interim cg meeting copenhagen april 29, 2002 the electricity opportunity for integrating central...
TRANSCRIPT
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
The Electricity Opportunityfor
Integrating Central Asia into the World Economy
Role of Energy and Transport Infrastructure
A Conference Hosted byBrookings Institution and Carnegie Endowment for International
Peacein Association with
Asian Development Bankand Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation (CAREC)Raghuveer Sharma
The World BankWashington DC, October 23, 2007
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
Current Global ConditionsHigh Energy Prices
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
Global demand grows by more than half over the next quarter of a century, with coal use rising most in absolute
terms
Oil
Coal
Gas
BiomassNuclear
Other renewables
0
2 000
4 000
6 000
8 000
10 000
12 000
14 000
16 000
18 000
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Mto
e
Current Global Conditions:Growing Demand
Sou
rce:
IEA
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
Oil 21%
Electricity56%
Coal 3%Gas 19%
Just over half of all investment needs to 2030 are in developing countries, 18% in China alone
Cumulative Investment in Energy-Supply Infrastructure, 2005-2030 = $20.2 trillion (in $2005)
Power generation
54%
46%
OtherRefining
73%
18%9%
LNG chainTransmission and
distribution
56%
37%
7%
Mining
Shipping & ports11%
89%
$4.3 trillion$11.3
trillion
$3.9 trillion$0.6 trillion
Biofuels 1%
Exploration & development
Transmission & distribution
Exploration & development
Current Global Conditions:Huge Investment NeedsS
ou
rce:
IEA
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
Half of the projected increase in emissions comes from new power stations, mainly using coal & mainly located in China
& India
Increase of 14.3 Gt (55%)
0
10
20
30
40
50
1990 2004 2010 2015 2030
billio
n to
nnes
Coal Oil Gas
Current Global Conditions:Deepening climate change
concerns
Sou
rce:
IEA
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
Can the Central Asian Republics contribute to, and benefit from, the
global energy conditions?
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
Central Asian Republics possess significant energy resources
5,400
5
2
68
82
2,700
5
5
2,610
1,674
16,000
580
507
0
2,851
24,100
590
514
2,678
4,607
Kazakhstan
The KyrgyzRepublic
TajikistanTurkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Total Fossil Fuel MTOECoal MTOE
Gas MTOE
Crude Oil MTOE
Legend
27
163
317
2
15
Hydro Potential TWh/year
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
Regional Market Cost-Price GapsPrivate Investor (AES) View
$10 to $40 per MWh
$65 to $120 per MWh
$8 to $30 per MWh $30 to $75 per
MWh
$25 MWh to $350 MWh
$15 to $45 per MWh
$15 to $40 per MWh
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
Central Asian RepublicsPower Development and Trade Strategy
Loss Reduction &Rehab. Programs
Transmission Links:North-South Project
Power Trading Capacity: Sangtuda
Lev
el o
f R
isk
Low
High
Time Frame
Near-Term1- 5 yrs
Medium -Term3 - 10 yrs
Long -Term8 - 15 yrs
Domestic & RegionalCapacity Balance:
Bishkek II & Talimardjan I
Export MarketNegotiation
South TransmissionLinks Development
Export Capacity PPP:Rogun & Talimardjan II
Russia
Afghanistan
Pakistan
IranChina?
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
Specific Generation projects for exports developed-Sangtuda 1 with
Russian funds
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
North South Transmission Line in Taj
Varzob HPP
Vanj HPP
Perepadnaya HPPShujand HPP
Pamir HPP
Khorog HPP
Namangut HPP
Ak-Su HPP
Regar
Aigul Tash
Financed by China
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
Tajikistan Afghanistan 220 kV Transmission Line
Project•Tajikistan:Tajikistan:
construction of construction of 220kV double-circuit 220kV double-circuit transmission from transmission from Sangtuda HPP to Sangtuda HPP to Sherhan BandarSherhan Bandar
•Afghanistan:Afghanistan:Sherkhan Bandar to Sherkhan Bandar to Phul-e-KhumriPhul-e-Khumri
•ADB/IsDB/OPEC fund financing
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
CASA 1000 Transmission Project
to transfer 1000 MW to Pakistan
Tajikistan 166 22%Nurek to Sangtuda 1 60Sangtuda I to Shekhanbandar 106
Afghanistan 544 70%Shekhanbandar to Pul-e-Khumri 154Pul-e-Khumri to Kabul 220Kabul to Jalalabad 90Jalalabad to AFG border 80
Pakistan 60 8%AFG border to Peshawar 60
770
Transmission Line Length (km)
Feasibility Studies Phase 1 done•Resource Assessment in CA•Demand Assessment in SA•Techno-economics of trans. Line
•Institutional•Financial•Risk Mitigation•Legal Framework
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
•Tajikistan launched development of coal resources•Quality of coal reserves is high – average 7000 kcal/kg•Developing these resources crucial for meeting:
•domestic winter demand; •year round power demand in export markets
Fan Yagnob Mine
•Held an Investor Roundtable in May 2007 in which private investors, IFIs and bilateral donors participated•Decisions reached:
•Integrated development of Mine and power plant•Fan Yagnob mine would be the first one to be developed•1500 MW targeted (1000 MW for exports rest for domestic market)•Will be developed as a Public private partnership•Tajik Government will bear all initial development costs
•USTDA willing to help with funding feasibility study
New Thermal Generation New Thermal Generation Capacity Being plannedCapacity Being planned
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
Roghun Hydroelectric ProjectRoghun Hydroelectric Project
• 3600 MW storage hydro upstream of Nurek HPP in Tajikistan
• Circa 30% constructed during Soviet times
– Government is looking to complete it w/ international investors and financiers
– In 2004 a deal was reached with RusAl, did not work
– Currently negotiating a new agreement with Russian Government
– Government keen on World Bank involvement in structuring and financing this project
– World Bank agreed to finance feasibility study compliant with Bank Group guidelines
• Which includes assessment of environmental, social and importantly riparian issues
– Economic viability depends on exporting majority of production
– Pakistan keen to import
– Another interesting large project option for PPP
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
PeshawarKabul
Facilities Under Construction
500 kV OHL South-North Financing: China Exim bank
Sangtuda 1 HPP Financing: Russia
Sangtuda 2 HPP Financing: Iran
220 kV OHL SS Sarban – Tajik/Afghan border
Financing: ADB/IsDB
Existing Facilities
Toktogul HPP Existing Surplus
Nurek HPP Existing Surplus
Perspective Facilities
220/500 kV Uzbek by pass SS Datka (Kyrgyz) – SS
Hojent (Tajik)
Cascade of Zarafshan HPPs (Yavan and Oburdon HPP) Annual generation 1680
GWh
Rogun HPP Annual generation 13000 GWh
Coal TPP Annual generation 3900-6400 GWh
500 kV OHL “CASA 1000” Nurek HPP – Kabul -
Peshawar
Pakistan
Afghanistan
Kyrgyzstan
Tajikistan
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
India
China
CASAREM is a set of projects and institutional framework for enabling this
trade
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
• Projects are justifiable based on exports– Which bring its own set of political and security risks
• Project sizes are huge compared to size of economy– While export orientation should address this to some
extent, sustained domestic reforms are needed• These are underway, but at different pace in each country
• Private sector is needed, and there is interest– But limited interest– Many of them are majority foreign state owned
• Russia, Iran, China, India
• Governance Issues– These are real, but Government has shown willingness to
address them
• World Bank Group with other IFI partners, bilateral donors and private sector can address these risks
There Are Significant RisksThere Are Significant Risks
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
Partnerships of Partnerships
Inter-Ministerial Council
Multi-Country Working Group
Afghanistan Kyrgyz Rep. Pakistan Tajikistan
Inte
rnati
on
al Fi
nan
cial In
stit
uti
on
s
Inte
rest
ed
Pri
vate
In
vest
ors
Bilateral Donors/Institutions
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
Regional Cooperation is Imperative
• Necessity for Regional Cooperation– Existing dependencies – land locked nature,
complementary resource– New Opportunities
• Forms of Regional Cooperation– Market relationships; transit relationships; Investment
relationships; riparian relationships; littoral relationships; Knowledge sharing
• Benefits of Regional Cooperation– Significant boost to economic growth– New Opportunities; Transit revenues– Least cost development – sharing hydro resources
• Pre-conditions for Successful Regional Cooperation– Win-win for participants; no excessive dependence on one
another; diversify dependencies; commercial orientation• IFIs and bilateral donors can facilitate, and finance
INTERIMCG MEETING
CopenhagenApril 29, 2002
Thank You Very Much