intermec’s picolink wpan
DESCRIPTION
Intermec’s PicoLink WPAN. MAC Overview. PEN*KEY 6500 Picking Application Scan Item000123456 Description:Tide Liq., 50oz. Scan Location:BAY 31 Enter Quantity:40 Take to Location:Dock 5A. Keyboard. Keypad. Help. Exit. Initial Targeted Applications for PicoLink . - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
Intermec’s PicoLink WPAN
MAC Overview
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
Initial Targeted Applications for PicoLink
• Cable replacement (point to point)– Barcode scanner to portable/mobile
computer
– Printer to portable/mobile computer
• Personal area connectivity (peer to peer)
– hand held computer to numerous peripheral devices including scanners, printers, wide area network radios, etc.
SCAN EntEnt
1 2 3
0
7 8 9
4 5 6
F1 F2 F3 F4
F9 F10 F11 F12
F5 F6 F7 F8
33
PEN*KEY 6500Picking Application
Scan Item 000123456Description: Tide Liq., 50oz.Scan Location: BAY 31Enter Quantity: 40
Take to Location: Dock 5A
Keyboard Keypad Help Exit
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
High Rate WPANsExisting WPANs
Newly Targeted Applications
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
WPAN Solution Requirements•Very low cost
•Low power consumption
•Small size
•Minimal attach/detach times
•Interference immunity
•Ease of use
•Standardized interfaces
•Unlicensed, international usability
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
PicoLink Concept
•Complementary to WLAN/IEEE 802.11 devices–some of the WLAN’s areas of performance have been sacrificed for cost/size/current drain
–reduced range, roaming is not optimum
•Lower complexity than WLAN devices–reduced RF specifications
–reduced MAC/PHY complexity
–this MAC has similarities to the 802.11 IBSS/adhoc
•Features which do not add recurring costs–peer to peer with up to 10 nodes per PAN
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
Picolink Configurations
PersonalAreaNetwork
InfrastructuredNetwork
Access Point
PowerShip terminalAstra Printer
DADS Terminal
EST
PowerPad
Ethernet
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
Picolink Configurations
PersonalAreaNetwork
PowerShip terminalAstra Printer
DADS Terminal
EST
PowerPad
• Personal Area Network (PAN; Peer-to-Peer)– Multiple Networks co-habitate (20 or more have been tested, but
this attribute is dependent upon the PHY)
– Up to 10 devices in a single PAN
– Dynamic PAN and device IDs with network initiation
– Network maintained devices coming and going
– Temporary devices and NETWORKS also supported
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
Picolink Configurations
Limited InfrastructuredNetworkAccess Point
Ethernet
• Limited Infrastructured Network– Main device (access point) typically has power at all times (for
fast access)
– Support for up to 10 devices
– Ethernet access points with higher layer protocol
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • Transparent to Upper Layer Protocols
• Ease of Use– Unique 48 bit address– Simple network join/un-join procedure– Device registration
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • Delivered Data Throughput
– For the proposed aggregate rate of 44 Mbps a throughput of 28 Mbps is anticipated but depends upon the PHY (e.g. reducing Rx-Tx to 10µS increases throughput to 34 Mbps with 2048 byte frames)
• Fast Response – Average response time for small packets is
under 5 mS for current 1 Mbps system, projected to be less at higher data rate
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • Data Transfer Types
– Asynchronous• short response times• CSMA/CA; collision sense/collision avoidance
(very much like 802.11)
– Isochronous (we propose a timebounded service to provide a level of QoS although CSMA presents bandwidth limitation for Isochronous operation
– Mixed traffic load management
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • Topology
– Minimum number of active connections• Up to 10 nodes per network
– Ad hoc network• Fully supported• Temporal ad-hoc networks are also supported
– Access to portal• Any node on the network can provide a portal to
another network• Multiple portals are possible
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • Reliability
– Master redundancy• Any node on the network can assume the
master(coordinator) role either by request from the master or by disappearance of the master
– Loss of connection• The proposed system does provide a method
for detection and recovering from the loss of a link
• System has options allowing it to conserve current drain by allowing periodic searches for link re-establishment rather than continuous searches
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • Power Management Types
– Sleeping• Multiple time increments for sleeping are
selectable, e.g. 1,2…beacon periods
– Wakeup• Schedule service intervals allow the MAC to
adapt to various PHY wakeup times
– Polling• Beacons are scheduled and allow the nodes to
wakeup listen for any pending messages and then go back to sleep if there are no messages
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • Power Consumption of MAC controller
– Transmit: 20 mA– Receive: 30 mA– Sleep: .3 mA– Other Power Consumption Features
• programmable search duty cycle during loss of connect
• Slave to slave links require less energy in a Peer to Peer topology than a Master/Slave topology
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • Security
– Authentication. Propose a modified Safer algorithm be used, as in Bluetooth
– Privacy. Propose the use of the Bluetooth algorithm
• Quality of Service– Will be a function of environment
congestion
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
MAC Protocol Criteria • Cost/Complexity
– Baseband controller– functionality described for the HR MAC is
estimated to be much less than 6,000 gates additional to the 802.15.1 MAC (10,000 gates w/o reuse).
– Code size– under 32 Kbytes in addition to the 802.15.1
MAC
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
CRITERIA REF. Comparison Values- Same +
Transparent to UpperLayer Protocols(TCP/IP)
3.1 FALSE TRUE N/A
Unique 48-bit Address 3.2.1 Not Qualified(required by802)
Essential N/A
Simple NetworkJoin/UnJoin Proceduresfor RF enabled devices
3.2.3 Extendedprocedure forjoining network
802.15.1 style join asspecified in sections8.10.6, 9.3.23 and11.6.5.5
Enhanced self-configuration ofnetwork
Device Registration 3.2.3 Requires manualconfiguration
802.15.1 styleregistration asspecified in sections8.10.7 and 11.6.5.1-4.
Auto registration basedon profile
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
CRITERIA REF. Comparison Values- Same +
Minimum delivered datathroughput
3.3.2 20 Mbps minusMAC overhead
20 Mbps > 20 Mbps
High end delivered datathroughput (Mbps)
3.3.3 20 – 39 Mbps 40 Mbps > 40 Mbps
Data Transfer Types 3.4 Asynchronousonly
Asynchronous orIsochronous
Mixed Mode(Asynchronous &Isochronoussimultaneously)
Topology 3.5.1 Point-to-Multipoint only
Point-to-Multipoint &Point-to-Point (with noPeer-to-Peer)
Point-to-Multipoint,Point-to-Point &Peer-to-Peer
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
CRITERIA REF. Comparison Values- Same +
Max. # of activeconnections
3.5.2 < 7 7 > 7
Ad-Hoc Network 3.5.3 FALSE TRUE EnhancedAccess to a Portal 3.5.4 FALSE TRUE N/AMaster Redundancy 3.6.2 FALSE TRUE EnhancedLoss of Connection 3.6.3 FALSE TRUE N/APower ManagementTypes
3.7 Does not supportpower savingsmodes
Supports 802.15.1power savings modesas specified in sections8.10.8.2-4 and11.6.6.1-5
Enhanced powersavings modes
Pat Kinney, Intermec Technologies
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/205r1
Submission
CRITERIA REF. Comparison Values- Same +
Power Consumption ofMAC controller (thepeak power of the MACcombined with anappropriate PHY)
3.8 > 1.5 watts Between .5 watt and1.5 watts
< .5 watt
Authentication 3.9.1 Noauthentication
802.15.1 styleauthentication asspecified in sections8.14.4 and 9.3.2
Enhancedauthentication at MAClayer
Privacy 3.9.2 No encryption Encryption as specifiedin 802.15.1 section8.14.3 and 9.3.6
Enhanced privacy atMAC layer
Quality of Service 3.9.2 No provisionsfor QoS
Equivalent to QoSspecified in 802.15.1section 9.3.20 , 10.6.3and 11.6.6.6
Streams,priority,Controlled latency/jitterbounds, Connectionagreements, Dynamicbandwidth allocation,Selectiveretransmission,Dynamic channelselection