internal injuries · a clinical decision rule for identifying children with thoracic injuries after...
TRANSCRIPT
Internal Injuries
DR TRUSHA BRYS
VFPMS
SEMINAR 2019
INTERNAL ORGAN INJURYBasic principles
• Solid organs may lacerate and bleed
• Hollow organs may rupture and leak Stomach, intestines, bladder, ureters + gall bladder
• Bone fragments may penetrate & damage deeper tissues
• Vessels in mesentery may tear resulting in large volume haemorrhage and organ ischaemia
• Veins are more vulnerable to physical trauma than artery
• Higher pressures are required to compress arteries than veins
• Probably under-recognised / under-detected
• Can be fatal
• Overlying skin may appear uninjured
• Strangulation (neck trauma)
• Intra-thoracic injury
• Intra-abdominal trauma
A BRIEF OVERVIEW
STRANGULATION
DEFINITION: is the external compression of the neck that can cause
consequences that may be fatal as a result of compression of and injury
to the vital structures of the neck such as airways, blood vessels and
nerves.
Strangulation
In adults/adolescents – seen in context of sexual
assault and intimate partner violence
In children – probably under-recognised
Beware if history of LOC or memory gaps after
assault
Might need 24 close observation because neck
structures swell and airways can be suddenly
compromised!
Treat any symptoms and signs of neck trauma
VERY seriously
www.strangulationtraininginstitute.com
NB: Absence of neck skin injury
does NOT exclude damage to
underlying neck structures
RCPA FCFM Strangulation Guideline
• Presenting signs and symptoms vary depending on mechanism.
• There is inadequate experience or data to recommend an evidence-based
approach to imaging in strangulation or near-hanging victims.
• Imaging should be ordered based on clinical suspicion.
• Plain radiographs.
• Fiber optic laryngoscopy.
• CT - sensitive for bony, cartilaginous, and soft tissue injuries, subcutaneous
emphysema, oedema, and haemorrhage.
• MRI -deep soft tissue injury and oedema.
• CT Angiography - blunt vascular injury - sensitivity up to 100% (for clinically
significant injuries).
• Carotid Doppler ultrasound.
• Cardiac and vascular injuries
• Pulmonary trauma
• Pharyngeal and oesophageal trauma
• Chylothorax
INTRA-THORACIC INJURY
CHILD PROTECTION EVIDENCE - SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON VISCERAL INJURIES. RCPCH November 2018
A clinical decision rule for identifying children with thoracic injuries after blunt torso trauma. Holmes JF, Sokolove PE, Brant WE, Kuppermann N Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39(5):492
Predictors of thoracic injury in children sustaining blunt torso trauma include
• low systolic blood pressure,
• elevated respiratory rate,
• abnormal results on thoracic examination, abnormal chest auscultation findings,
• femur fracture,
• and a GCS score of less than 15
• CXR
• Chest CT***
• Chest MRI (“whole body” MRI infants?)
• FAST (US)
• Think ABDO trauma
Intra-thoracic trauma – basic tests
• FBE
• Clotting
• O2 Saturation
• Blood gas
• Troponin
Bilateral pleural effusions
Pericardial effusion
Infant also had
• Liver laceration
• Small amount of free fluid sub-
diaphragm
• Large distended gall bladder
INTRA-ABDOMINAL TRAUMAInjuries associated with NAT to anterior abdomen
Forces transmitted through anterior abdo wall – +/- external sign
• Haematoma anterior abdominal wall
• Splenic rupture and hhge
• Liver laceration and hhge
• Rupture 1st part of duodenum• Free air beneath diaphragm (erect and supine x-rays)
• Pancreatic compression, rupture, pancreatitis • Late – pancreatic pseudocyst
• Tear of bowel mesentery and hhge• Ileus (bowel)
• Rupture bladder, ureters
illustration of traumatic abdominal injuries
- liver laceration, duodenal injury
(?compression against the vertebral
column), and pancreatic injury
Injuries associated with NAT to posterior abdomen
Forces transmitted through posterior abdo wall – +/- external sign of injury (more rigid than anterior torso)
• Haematoma flank / torso
• Renal trauma, capsule rupture and hhge
• Vertebral body and spinous processes
• Spinal cord
• Sacrum and pelvis
• THINK - Compression – pancreatic, mesentery and bowel trauma
Intra-abdo trauma –reference++
• Every organ can be injured
• Intrathoracic injury in < 5 yo
• NAT = younger than accidental abdo trauma
• Duodenal injury NAT (3rd and 4th part)
• Liver and pancreas common in NAT
• Abdo bruising absent in ~80%
Visceral injury – systematic review
Intra-abdominal trauma
Liver laceration
with intra-
abdominal
haemorrhage
Attributed to NAI
Upper abdominal organs may be damaged by
• direct blow to the epigastrium with deformation of the abdominal wall,
• Eg punch or kick
• avulsion of the blood supply by rapid deceleration,
• Eg a fall from height , thrown
• puncture by a fractured rib,
• crushing against the vertebral column
Splenic trauma
Duodenal Haematoma
• Duodenal haematoma from blow to abdomen (Medscape)
• May cause bowel obstruction
Pseudocyst
Pancreatic Trauma
Epigastric abdo pain + raised enzymes
Pancreatitis in children 23% caused by trauma
(25% unknown cause)
URINALYSIS
• So easy to do
• So often forgotten!
Renal contusion and sub-capsular haemorrhage
• FAST
-ve result reassuring
• Abdo CT + contrast
• Abdo x-ray
• MRI (“whole body” infants)
• Lavage / laparoscopy
Intra-abdo trauma tests
• FBE (Serial Hb, retics)
• Clotting
• LFT (might repeat)
• U&E
• Lipase, amylase
• URINALYSIS
1.Identify injuries
2.Look for patterns
3.What are the circumstances ?
4.What investigations to assist with assessments ?
5. Should I be concerned about possible internal injuries?
VFPMS GUIDELINES - visceral injury including abdominal injury
Useful references and articles
◦ The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health’s review (UK, 2018) Child Protection Evidence on
Visceral Injury evaluates the literature on visceral injuries and provides data on the following questions:
What are the features of visceral injuries occurring as a consequence of physical abuse? What is the
value of non-radiological investigation in detecting abusive abdominal injury?
◦ Trout AT et al.’s article (2010) Abdominal and pelvic CT in cases of suspected abuse: can clinical and
laboratory findings guide its use? discusses pre-test probabilities of CT Scan in the context of suspected
physical abuse
◦ Maguire SA et al.’s article (2013) A systematic review of abusive visceral injuries in childhood – Their
range and recognition presents the data on visceral injuries in the context of physical abuse and calls for
clinical vigilance.
◦ Lane WG et al.’s article (2009) Screening for Occult Abdominal Trauma in Children with Suspected
Physical Abuse presents a strong argument in favour of screening for abdominal injury in abused
children
THANK YOU