international centre for theoretical physics
TRANSCRIPT
REFERENCEIC/72/32
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FORTHEORETICAL PHYSICS
PROPERTIES OF REAL PHOTON
AKD PHOTO-INDUCED PSEUDOSCALAR MESON
INCLUSIVE REACTION
N. Murai
INTERNATIONALATOMIC ENERGY
AGENCY
UNITED NATIONSEDUCATIONAL.
SCIENTIFICAND CULTURALORGANIZATION 1972 MIRAMARE-TRIESTE
IC/72/32
International Atomic Energy Agency
and
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS
PROPERTIES OF REAL PHOTON
AND PHOTO-INDUCED PSEUDOSCALAR MESON INCLUSIVE REACTION *
N. Murai
International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy.
MIRAMARE - TRIESTE
May 1972
To "be submitted for publication.
41I
ABSTRACT
The inclusive reaction, y + p •* c + (anything) (c = ir~ , K~) is dis-
cussed in association with the properties of the real photon. Assuming the
fixed-pole behaviour of the partial amplitude for y + (a vector meson) -*
(a meson) + c at high energies in the framework of a multiperipheral model,
the contribution to the structure function, integrated over the transverse
momentum of c , is shown to "be appreciably large, in addition to the one
coming from the diagram which has "been expected to contribute mainly in the
framework of this model. From the viewpoint of experiments we expect from
our simple calculations that the structure function at the point of the small
longitudinal momentum of c in the centre-of-mass system decreases to a con-
stant like s » if the fixed-pole behaviour exists. In the case of TT~
the absolute value of the contribution is too small to tell us anything definixe
about the properties of the real photon because even the main term, connected
to the multiplicity, is smaller than the experimental value, as recently pre-
dicted. There is a possibility of obtaining, information on the real photon
from the photo-induced kaon inclusive reaction. This proposal Is related to
the validity of the multiperipheral model for the kaon reaction.
-1-
I. INTRODUCTION
Several years ago, Gribov, Ioffe and Fomeranchuk raised the question of
the order of longitudinal distances which are important in the processes of
scattering at high energies . Ioffe subsequently showed, from some features
of experimental results in deep inelastic e-p scattering, that the large longi-
tudinal distances play an important role in the processes with small photon2)
mass . Many predictions have been made concerning the electromagnetic inter-
actions of hadrons by using the vector meson dominance model (VMD) whichattributes the same properties to the real photon as to hadrons. However, the
3)validity of VMD has recently been questionedh)
The experimental data on multibody photoproduction and the inclusive
reaction y + p -+• (a pseudoscalar meson) + (anything) have gradually9)accumulated. These data, especially on the y fragmentation region of
the photo-induced inclusive reaction, would provide us with information on the
properties of the real photon. The results obtained from their analysis
are the following:
a) When interpreted in a Regge-pole framework , the t-dependence
of the structure function of the inclusive reaction leads to a trajec-
tory associated with the y -*• TT~ vertex,with a(o) w 0.0 and a slope
of«1 GeV"2 at E =9-3 GeV. T'
if" production cross-section is
y-2 7)
ofttl GeV at E = 9.3 GeV. The corresponding expression of the
°dk3 R
where s = , (P X + p 2 )2 , s" = ^ + p 2 - k )
2 , t = (P 1 - k)
a{t) is the exchanged Regge trajectory which is coupled to the photonTOT i
with a residue G(t) and <J_. (s ,t) is the total cross-section forn
the reggeon-proton process.
b) Risk et al. compared inclusive photoproduction data in the
energy range E = 9.0 - l8.0 GeV wift a multi-Regge model with the usual
slope a' = 1 GeV"2 of the trajectory aft) in |t|< 0.6 . They
obtained a good agreement with the experimental data.
12)
c) Satz et al. applied the dual resonance model for diffractive
dissociation to two-pion and KK photoproduction and obtained a good
agreement with the experiments.
-2-
—" Ir• t —"t-IT— -j mtUl i r i i ilhin " ....... ... „. , ... .^i*-..,, . „ : , J
The consensus of these authors is that the real photon behaves like a
hadron. However, the following remarks on these results may be noted:
a) Unfortunately, the data can be available only at E = 9-3 GeV
because of the A peak in the region of the Y fragmentation. In
determining a(t) by experimental distribution, Cs'/s) ~ is
fitted for finite t-intervals. The contribution of the residue G(t)
is not clear.
b) The Y fragmentation region near the kinematic boundary is a
little underestimated in the longitudinal momentum distributions, though
their fits are globally in good agreement with experimental data..
c) The p meson strongly dominates the final two-pion spectrum and
we cannot obtain clear information on the properties of the y-~n vertex
at high energies. Further studies" would be necessary to Qive a de-
finite answer.
This article is devoted to the photo-induced reaction Y + P "*" c + (any-
thing) , where c = 7T or K . As a test, ve shall examine the graph
shown in Fig.2 within the framework of the multiperipheral model. A fixed
pole' ot(t) = 0 is assumed to dominate the amplitude for y + V -+• d + c at
high energies *), where V is a vector meson and d is another meson produced.
This fixed-pole behaviour describes the properties of the real photon, as we
shall remark below in A) and B). In practice, we shall calculate the struc-. CM
ture function at the point of small **) longitudinal momentum k|( of the
particle c in the centre-of-mass system. In the high-energy limit the
dominant structure function integrated over the transverse momentum is a con-
stant. This ter
the multiplicity.
stant. This term has been expected to give the scaling law * as well as
The graph shown in Fig.2 gives an additive term which decreases like s
because a(0) » 0 . The fixed-pole behaviour leads to the appreciably large
coefficient of s in the structure function. We can distinguish the term
*) In the low-energy region the production of resonances would dominate the
amplitude.
**->The elastic p° (yp -«-.TrVp , M + _ < 1.0 GeV) are small at kJM =• 0 in
YP -• IT + (anything).7' It is not necessary to take account of the effect
from the reaction.
from the main constant term by the energy dependence of the structure function.
The ratio of the fixed-pole term to the main term is recognized over the usual
statistical error (about 10j0 in our simple calculations.
Before proceeding with our calculations we note the following:
A) In pseudoscalar meson photoproduction on the nucleon the differential
cross-sections can be explained effectively with a fixed pole whose intercept
is a(0) = 0 and slope a' =s 0 up to the region |tj 2, 1 (GeV/c) .*) ' Can
we find this fixed-pole behaviour only in the pseudoscalar meson photoproduction on
the nucleon? Some insight into this question can be obtained from the dual15)
hadrodynamics with the electromagnetic interactions . If charge distri-
bution is pointlike in the internal space (i.e. the "name" space of vertices
in the so-called fish-net diagrams , the amplitude of photoproduction on
the meson has Begge behaviour at high energies. If charge distribution is
uniform, a fixed-pole behaviour is shown. We thus see that the properties of
the real photon strongly depend on charge distribution in the fish-net diagrams
exemplifying hadronic matter.
B) VMD seems to be a powerful tool in analyses of forward scattering and
total cross-sections. However, it has turned out that a systematic dis-
crepancy is found in Compton scattering of a proton between the predictions of
VMD and large-angle differential cross-sections . VMD usually underestimates
the experimental data there.**)
In this article we also assume VMD for total cross-sections.***^ -
*) This problem has been subjected to much phenomenological work over the past
decade. Here we limit ourselves to showing reviews (Ref.lU).
**)Brodsky and others have suggested,from the viewpoint of the parton
model, that the discrepancy is associated only with the two-photon processes.
But in this article we consider a test on a one-photon process.
***)Brodsky and others have also suggested that in the forward Compton scat-
tering of a proton there is a discrepancy between the prediction of VMD
and experimental data and that the discrepancy should be connected with
nuclear y absorption cross-section. However, we assume it in our
approximat ion.
II. THE MODEL
First we consider the case c = TT" for simplicity of description. Tiie
results for c = .K** can be obtained by modifying the kinematics and changing
the Regge trajectories exchanged.
Within the framework of the multiperipheral model, the diagram in
Fig.3a contributes to the production cross-section in the region x s* 0 where
x - 2kn /Ss t and k(| is the longitudinal momentum of IT in the
centre-of-mass system. In fact, many successful predictions have recently
been made in the measured secondary spectra in hadronic inclusive reactions,
assuming the same type of diagram as shown, in Fig.3a in the central region#^17^ T ft)
x z 0 . 'Here we use the generalized discontinuity theorem and assume
that the contributions of "anything" can be replaced by total cross-sections.
Then the TT production cross-section is given as
, V 8M a - f r &k Sl kpkq W ^C° dk3" (27r)3s J ^ ? £tl - y
2)2(t2 - n2/
where M , y and m are the masses of the proton, the pion and the p2
meson, respectively, s = (p - q)
the coupling constant of "mrp , and
2 2 2meson, respectively, s = (p - q) , t^ = q , t ~ (k + q) , f is
Wpa = j d\e i < 1 X <P2iJP(x) Ja(0)|p2>
with J (x) the source of the p meson. We have employed approximations
of s » y and s » M , and have assumed that the p meson is coupled
to the conserved current.
Under the assumption of the small cross-section of the longitudinal p
meson off the proton, we have
pa ^2_ TOT*D CT M apP
*) To cite all references is beyond this short article. See, for example,
Ref.17.
-5-
with
TC = •• ^ <(p. 2<1 J
1 -
where B 2 = (p2 - k - q) . Following Ref.19, we make a simple reggeization
for the p meson by the replacement
K2~ctp
e x P [ A2 V
mp (2.1)
with a (t )= J + a , s » (p? - k) and where A is a positive constant.
We do not reggeize the IT meson and consider the off-mass shell correction
After some manipulations, following Refs.19 and 20, in the approximation
of high energies *), we obtain
~ - TOT TOT 2 -P*
F?(0,s) = dkfJVCM ,2,dkl( d k
Yff PP _TT (2.2)
where k^ is the transverse momentum, kfi is the energy of TT in the centre-
of-mass system, I is an integer introduced to take care of analogous dia-
grams, and
X {(.
with
and
C - 1 + — ^ - (1 - An z)1-2
.00 _t
|-dt .
•) In integration over the five-body phase space we have put s » W , y
in the centre-of-mass system.
-6-
We obtain J™ = 0.0U3 with the choice of f2/l*TT = 2 , and A. * A = 1a 1 2
from the experimental observations of the k^ distribution.
Now we are in a position to estimate the contribution of the diagram
Fig.3b. First we regard the reggeon a like the ̂ meson and obtain
ovtp, + q) - m,)JL Q
ef )d TT f d%
TT)3 S ' T^r(Sir)- (tn - , 2 ) 2 (t9 - m 2 ) 2
where mfl is the mass of the particle d , and e is the polarization four-
vector of the photon.
Averaging over the polarization of the photon, we reggeize the ir
meson by the following replacement:
ef(2q
2,- V
5lll 2 0 t ( t l ) r. ,. .2exp[A1(t1- u
2)] , (2.3)
to pwhere a(t) « a (t - u ) , i, • (p, - k) and srt is a constant used in
1 1 0the conventional Regge pole model. We have normalized the Regge-pole residue
2near t̂. = y after considering the contributions of natural parity exchange(see Appendix).
Our reggeization may be too simple to discuss.the phase of the production
amplitudes from the recent observations of the inclusive reaction for polarized7)
photons up to E = 9*3 GeV. In the Regge-pole framework, phases from the
signature terms of Regge poles would play an important role in the discus-22)
sions . However, we now concentrate only on the fixed-pole behaviour.
Therefore, we assume our simple reggeization which would give effectively the
differential cross-section of YP "*" dir" at high energies.
In order to perform our calculation analytically, we do not reggeize the
p meson and assume the following replacement:
m2
£-2-2-* B — exp[A2(t2 -m2)] . (2.U)
In this replacement our requirement is that the right-hand side of (2.M should
be almost equal to that of (2.1) at t« w 0 . Our final result for ratios
does not change if these factors are of the same order.
Thus we obtain the following contribution from Fig.3b to F (x,s),1 ~* rtassuming a = 0 :
2 2 fTT0T m2 j"
fc ' " S ^ ^ 2 - m2l -̂ , (2.5)p S
where L has the same significance as I , and
The result is not sensitive to the mass m ; therefore, our high-energy
approximation is consistent in the centre-of-mass system. A numerical cal-
culation gives J. = 0.1*0 . The factor s~ in (2,5) comes from the zero
intercept a(0) = -a y S o of the effective trajectory.
III. RESULTS
We do not include the reaction from two-body on each mass shell to
stable one-body on the mass shell in the total cross-section. We have re-
placed the contribution of (anything) by ' the total cross-section for two
particles on the mass shell. Then the contribution of the diagram in Fig.3b
leads to an additional term to that of Fig.3a,which is expected to be the
principal one at high energies. We can distinguish the two terms from their
energy dependence. First we examine their ratios,
The ratip of F (0,B) to F (0,s) follows from (2.2) and (2.5):u a
F (0 s) ll I 2 . P Jr = . — .
a a i M a,
TOTIf we assume the factorization for the residues of the pomeron, a is. , TOT TOT TOT / TOT ™ Vgiven by o = a _ a /a . Then we have
rU * 1.3
putting I • I. . The ratio r is 0.68 even at E y = 9-3 GeV.ft D m
-8-
The integrals in J^ and J' contain 2a' logCl + f a /s |) + A and
2a log( l + |S / s Q | ) + i^ tbefore putting a * 0 ) , respectively. We can see
that J is large if 2ot log(l + li^/s j) can "be a A, at high energies;
and so on. When a a 0 this situation can be realized. But it is not
the case with j" "because of a » 1 (for a S o , J^/J77 = 1.? GeV2). Thisa p t p b a
provides a mathematical explanation of the large value J,/J w 10 GeV , thatoa
is, the integral values of J and J depend sensitively on the slope of theEL D
trajectories.
As for the photo-induced kaon inclusive reaction, we consider graphs
similar to Fig.3a and Fig.3b obtained by replacing the p meson by the K*
meson. Making some numerical adjustments in the preceding calculations we
obtain
K _ 7.2i> _
s
and rK = 0.U2 at E = 9.3 GeV.
From studies of our simple model, we thus have the following conjecture.
Within the framework of the multiperipheral model, the contribution from Fig.3b
gives the appreciably large term, though decreasing like s , in addition
to that of Fig.3a expected^dominant at k(, = 0 , if the fixed pole a(t) = 0
dominates the amplitude for y + V -*• d + c . From the viewpoint of experi-CM —1
nents we expect that the structure function at k,, = 0 decreases like s
to a constant as s increases. If the fixed pole does not exist, we cannot
find such a feature. The slope of our effective trajectory a{t ) in
Y + V -*• d + c might be related to the charge distribution of hadronic matter
as remarked at A) in Sec.I.Our next step is to examine the absolute values of F(0,s) . If the
multiperipheral mechanism works well in the central region x a 0 , to re-23)
produce it the multiplicity <^n~y must be given by
with
TOTAs we have remarked already, from VMD the total cross-section a is given
TOT P P TOTby O* = (f /e ) a p . Thus we have a small multiplicity c^ = 0.019
with I = 1+ , while the experimental value is c" = O.UU ± O.k . Thea 10) TT
multiplicity predicted is very small . This difficulty of the multi-
peripheral model prevents us from making a definite statement on the proper-
ties of the real photon from available experimental data for TT~—Q-
The ratio of the production cross-section of K to fr (K/ff ratio) is
small compared with our knowledge of the total cross-sections and the low-_ _ 3 3
energy phenomena. The K /u ratios of k_ d Of/dk near the point x = 0at E = 18 GeV ; are 0.09 at k = 0.5 GeV/c , 0.07 at k = 1.0 GeV/cand 0.08 at k =1.6 GeV/c. If we put the K /IT ratio equal to 0.1 for any
2k)1value of k, * the coefficient c in the multiplicity for the kaon is
-v 0.0U . *
Unfortunately, we have less experimental information on the kaon
than on the pion. It is plausible to assume that the multiplied factor for
J in F (0,s) is of the same order as in the case of the pion, since this& £L
factor includes only the total cross-sections and the coupling constants.Then we have cv ..^ ^ 0.01 predicted in our model. Thus we plausibly assumeK.,M-rthat the multiplicity of the kaon is roughly equal to that predicted with the
multiperipheral model. In fact, we have also found that the kaon multiplicity19)is roughly consistent with the multiperipheral model in hadronic processes
As for the pion, we might have a speculative picture; the soft-pion
emission may exist only for the pion and the mechanism gives a sufficient19)
number of pions . If the multiperipheral mechanism works well in the photo-
induced kaon reaction, as argued above, we can obtain information on the real
photon from the reaction by examining the energy dependence of the structure
function at x = 0 . Unfortunately, at present we have experimental data
for the kaon reaction at high energies only at E = l8 GeV . •
IV. FINAL REMARKS
In conclusion we may make the following remarks:
a) Near the kinematic boundary of the y fragmentation, the contribution
from Fig.3b to the production cross-section is naturally finite with thei- *)reggeized p-meson because of the high increase of |s ] . This contribution
does not correspond to the small slope of a(t ) ; actually it corresponds
to the graph shown in Fig.U. In this region we must take into account the
dominant production of vector mesons.
b) A large value of YP distribution at large k x and small k,, is- T)favourable to the fixed-pole behaviour. Experimental data for IT do not
show such a feature.
*) This result is the same with the elementary p meson.
-10-
c) Two-particle correlation in the photo-induced reaction would be larger
than in purely hadronlc processes on the assumption of uniform charge dis-
tribution in hadronic matter, (See A} in Sec.I.) In the Regge-pole frame-
work, the uniform charge distribution would be connected to the fixed-pole
behaviour.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author is grateful to Professor Abdus Salam, Professor P. Budini,
the International Atomic Energy Agency and UNESCO for hospitality at the
International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste. He would like to
thank Professor L. Bertocchi and Dr. M. Rafique for valuable comments, a
critical reading of the manuscript and scientific information. The early
stage of this work was stimulated "by discussions with Mr. Tateaki Sasaki at
the University of Tokyo.
-11-
• APPENDIX
In this appendix we note the kinematics for the reaction YP "*" 7I"ir in
order to clarify assumptions in the reggeization in the graph shovn in Fig.3b.
We have assumed that the longitudinal spin component of the p meson
off the nucleon is very small. • Therefore, with the reaction yy •*• Tnt our
kinematics is almost the same. The t-channel parity-conserving helicity25)
amplitudes free from all kinematical singularities are the following :
01;01 0 -l;01
(t - y2) ({t - (m - y)2}{t - (m + y)2}}1
ft t01;01 | 0 -l;1 + z, 1 -
P P
The differential cross-section in the s channel in terms of the
helicity amplitude s is given "by
dadft
1 + z.
8TT2 (B - m2Q]
+ ( t - y 2 ) 2 ( t - (mp - y ) 2 ) ( t - (mp
+ - g - I - t) [{t - (mp - u.)2Ht - (mp
where
2 s t - t(m2 2u2).-
Z* (u2 - t ) ({ t - (mp - u) 2 Ht - (mp + y)
In the conventional coupling schemes at t - 0 we require that F.
and F should be proportional to t . Then the differential cross-section2 22 2y2
at t = 0 decreases more rapidly than that in the region of st » m y
s increases (z •*• 1 as t ••• 0)t •
as
We see a dip in the forward cross-
section at high energies.
In order to elimin
require the following relation as another choice:
In order to eliminate the apparent pole in f0 1. 0 1
a t t we can
-12-
The above relation implies that the, differential cross-section receives the
contributions of both unnatural and natural parity exchanged at t • 0 .
We have assumed in Sec,II that the total contribution from unnatural and natural
parity exchange gives effectively the fixed-pole behaviour to the differential
cross-section, as we see in the pseudoscalar meson photoproduction on the
nucleon.
The left-hand side of (2.3) summed over polarization of the photon and
averaged over the direction of q. is (ef) |t-|/{3(t - u ) } at high
energies. After considering the contribution of natural parity exchange (we
neglect the effects from the mass of the p meson), we have normalized the2
squared Regge-pole amplitude near the point of t = y , because the contri-
bution of unnatural parity exchange dominates there. Then we again normalize2 —2
it at t. = 0 in order to get rid of the pole behaviour (t - y ) and to
include this factor in the Eegge residue. Another factor 1/2 comes from
averaging over the polarization of the photon.
-13-
, REFERENCES
1) V,N. Grifcov, B.L. loffe and I.Ya. Pomeranchuk, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 2_,
5U9 (1966).
2) B.L. loffe, Phys. Letters 30B, 123 (19^9).
3) S.J. Brodsky, F.E. Close and J.F. Gunion, Stanford University, preprint
SIiAC-PUB-1012, Jan. 19T2.
h) M. Davier, I. Derado, D. Drickey, D. Fries, R. Mozley, A. Odian, F. Villa
and D. Yount, Phys. Rev. D^, 790 (1970);
R. Schiffer, H.H.J. Schnackers, V. Valdmanis, U. Idschok, K. Miiller,
P. Benz, R. Riebensahm, V. Schulz, F. Storim, G. Ullrich, G. Knies,
0. Braun, J. Stiewe, H. Finger, C. Kiesling, P. Schlamp and J. Weigl,
Hucl. Phys. B38, 628 (1972).
5) W.P. Svanson, M. Davier, I. Derado, D.C. Fries, F.F. Liu, R.F. Mozley,
A.C. Odian, J. Park, F. Villa and D.E. Yount, Phys. Rev. Letters 27_,
1U72 (1971).
6) W.P. Swanson, W. Ko, R.L. Lander, C. Risk, R.R. Ross and D.B. Smith,
Stanford University, preprint*SLAC-PUB-979, Oct. 1971.
7) K.C. Moffeit, J. Ballam, G.B. Chadwick, M. Della-Negra, R. Gearhart,
J.J. Murray, P. Seyboth, C.K. Sinclair, 1.0. Skillicorn, H. Spitzer,
G. Wolf, H.H. Bingham, W.B. Fretter, W.J. Podolsky, M.S. Rabin,
A.H. Rosenfeld, R. Windmolders, G.P. Yost and R.H. Milburn, Stanford
University, preprint SLAC-PUB-IOOU and Lawrence Berkeley Lab., preprint
LBL-572, Dec.1971.
8) B. Wiik, Stanford University, preprint SLAC-FUB-992, Dec. 1971.
9) J. Benecke, T.T. Chou, C.N. Yang and E. Yen, Phys. Rev. l88_, 2159 (1969).
10) L. Caneschi and A. Pignotti,' Phys. Rev. Letters 22_, 1219 (1969).
11) C. Risk, W. P. Swanson and J.H. Friedman, Lawrence Berkeley Lat>., pre-
print LBL-556.
12) H. Satz and K. Schilling, Lettere al Nuovo Cimento 3_, 723 (1970);
Nuovo Cimento 67., 511 (1970).
13) R.P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. Letters 23., 1U15 (1969); HiRh-Energy Collision
(Gordon & Breach, New York 1969).
lk) B. Richter, in Proceedings of the 1967 International Symposium on Electron
and Photon Interactions at High Energies at SLAC;
-lU-
i41
H. Harari, in Proceedings of• the Uth International Symposium on Electron
and Photon Interactions at High Energies at Daresbury,
15) Y. Nambu, Fhys. Rev. Vk_, 1193 (1971);
J.T. Manassah and S. Matsuda, Fhys. Rev, I)4_, 882 (1971);
A. Hacinliyan and A. Maheshvari, ICTP, Trieste, preprint IC/72/ll* and
private communication.
16) C.S. Hsue, B. Sakita and M.A. Virasoro, Phys. Rev. D2_, 2857 (1970);
B. Sakita and M.A. Virasoro, Phys. Rev. Letters 2k_, Ilk6 (1970).
17) C. Risk and J.H. Friedman, Phys. Rev. Letters 2J_, 353 (1971).
18) A.H. Mueller, Phys. Rev. D2_, 2963 (1970);
H.P. Stapp, Phys. Rev. D3_, 3177 (l97l);
Chan Hong-Mo, C.S. Hsue, 0. Auigg and J-M. Wang, Phys. Rev. Letters
26, 672 (1971).
19) J. Arafune and H. Sugavara, Tokyo University, Irist. for Nuclear Study,
Report INS-175, Sept. 1971.
20) Chan Hong-Mo, K. Kajantie and G. Ranft, Wuovo Cimento 1+9_A> 157 (1967).
21) P.J. Biggs, D.W, Bfaben, R.W. ciifft, E. Gabathuler, P. Kitching and
R.E. Rand, Phys. Rev. Letters 2j*_, 1197 (1970);
H.H. Bingham, W.B. Fretter, K.C. Moffeit, W.J. Podolsky, M.S. Ra>in,
J. Ballam, G.B. Chadwick, R. Gearhart, Z.G.T. Guiragossian, M. Menke,
J.J. Murray, P. Seyboth, A. Shapira, C.K. Sinclair, 1.0. Skillicorn
and G. Wolf, Phys. Rev. Letters 2jt_, 955 (1970).
22) N. Murai, N. Nakazawa, N, Sakai, H. Okamura and Y. Shimizu, Progr.
Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) hS, 808 (1971).t
23) N.F. Bali, L.S. Brown, R.D. Peccei and A. Pignotti, Phys. Rev. Letters
25., 557 (1970).
2*0 J.V. Allaby, F. Binon, A.N. Diddens, P. Duteil, A. KLovning, R. Meunier,
J.P. Peigneux, E.J. Sacharidis, K. Schlupmann, M. Spighel, J.P. Stroot,
A.M. Thorndike and A.M. Wetherell, CERN 70-12 (1970).
25) Y. Kara, Phys. Rev. 136., B5O7 (196^);
L.L. Wang, Phys. Rev. lU2, BII87 (1966);
R. Brower and J.W. Dash, Phys. Rev. 175^ » 201^ (1968).
-15-
G(t)
Pi ^
Fig.l
Fiff. 2
-it,-
g.4f mm-
Fig. 3a
k , A v
q. -fc-q
/\
Fig. 3b
-17-
Fig. 4
Fig.l
Fie.2
Fig. 3
Fig.U
FIGURE CAPTIONS
Dominant diagram expected to contribute to IT production near the
kinematic boundary for beam associated IT" .
Diagram including a partial amplitude dominated by a fixed pole.
a) Dominant diagram expected to contribute to ir~ production near
the central region kn'ft* 0 in the multiperipheral framework.
b) Diagram vith a fixed-pole behaviour of the amplitude for
"YP + (a meson) + ir" . .
Diagram of Fig.3b near the kinematic boundary for beam associated IT"
- I S - 1 7 MAG 1972
»