International labour OrganizationInternational labour Organization

Obstacles in implementing DWCPs and enhancingObstacles in implementing DWCPs and enhancingLabour Inspection in the Middle East Countries Labour Inspection in the Middle East Countries

covered by the Norwegian projectcovered by the Norwegian project

ByByDr. Amin Al-WreidatDr. Amin Al-Wreidat

Enhancing Labour Inspection EffectivenessEnhancing Labour Inspection EffectivenessLAB/ADMINLAB/ADMIN

Enhancing Labour Inspection Effectiveness

A technical cooperation project, under the Norway-ILO co-operation agreement 2008-2009, covering 6 countries in the Europe and Central Asia region and 4 Middle east Arab countries, to assist them in their efforts to strengthen and modernise their labour inspection systems

Middle East countries covered by the project

1- Lebanon2-Yemen3- Syria4- Oman

Project’s objectives

Contribution to the long-term socio-economic development of participating countries by improving compliance with labour legislation and promoting social justice and decent Work, which will lead to improving Working conditions, strengthening social dialogue, and thus enhancing productivity and employment prospects.

Project’s outcomes

1. Labour inspectorates are strengthened and modernized, moving towards more prevention-oriented organizations,

2. Labour inspectorates, employers’ and workers’ organisations and other institutional partners are in a better position to engage in programmes to promote compliance with legislation.

Implementation

Labour Inspection Audits

Highlighting areas strength and weakness

National action plans agreed on and implemented

Follow-up

Legal framework

(1) The laws are dispersed into many decisions, regulations, decrees and instructions that are either unclear, difficult to have access to or may not be distinguished whether cancelled or still in effect.

(4) Sanctions are too weak to prevent violations.

(2) Coverage excludes some categories, such as domestic workers, Public servants and workers in agriculture.

Findings

(3) Some laws are not clear concerning the authorities and. powers of labour inspectors.

Human Resources

(1) The numbers of inspectors are not sufficient. Very few inspectors are required to cover the large numbers of existing enterprises.

(3) Labour inspectors are under trained and poorly qualified.

(4) Low salaries and inspectors are not motivated.

Findings

(2) No clear policy for recruiting or selecting labour inspectors.

Indicator Oman Yemen Lebanon Syria

Labour inspectors/1000 enterprises

(Enterprises / one labour inspector)

1.52

(7500)

0.185

(5400)

0.35

(2800)

0.1

(9500)

OSH inspectors/1000 enterprises

(Enterprises / one OSH inspector)

0.086

(11500)

0.06

(16500)

0.11

(9000)

0.089

(11000)

Numbers of Labour Inspectors

Logistic support

(2) Inspectors have no access to computers or internet.

(1) Basic requirements, such as transports, are not provided. Expenses incurred by inspectors are not reimbursed.

(3) No equipment for monitoring workplace hazards.

(4) No PPE when inspecting hazardous workplaces.

(5) Secretarial services are not provided.

Findings

Visits and plans

(3) inspection is totally reactive and mostly based on labour complaints.

(1) Inspection visits are not planned or prepared for. They are mostly decided on the spot, on the same day.

(4) Inspectors use consize and misleading checklists.

Findings

(2) Inspection visits are not followed up.

Occupational Safety and Health

(1) No clear OSH policies or strategies.

Findings

(3) Very low coverage of enterprises and workers by OSH services .

(4) Occupational injuries and diseases are under reported and not properly investigated.

(2) Very small numbers of OSH inspectors and specialists

Partners and other institutions

(1) Social partners are not adequately involved or consulted.

(2) No proper cooperation or coordination among concerned institutions.

(3) Functions and reponsibilities of different instiutions overlap.

Findings

Other findings

(2) No proper documentation of activities.

(1) Unnecessary long bureaucratic procedures that waste both time and resources.

(3) No data base or registry of existing enterprises.

(4) Resources are not effeciently used.

Findings

Expectations from concerned governments

(2) The provision of minimum financial, human and material resources to follow up on the recommendations made

(1) sufficient political commitment to modernize labour inspection

(3) A sustained will for implementation and follow-up

??alwreidat@ilo.orgalwreidat@ilo.org

� شـــــكرًا