international ski federation members of the alpine youth ... · 1 international ski federation...
TRANSCRIPT
11 October 2019
32nd Meeting of the FIS Alpine Sub-Committee for Youth & Children’s Questions Experts Group) Dear Ski Friends: Thank you very much for your valuable contribution to our meeting in Zurich (SUI). Please find enclosed minutes of the meeting of the Alpine Youth and Children´s Sub-Committee (Experts Group). You are kindly asked to send any remarks to these minutes to the FIS Office in Oberhofen within two weeks. May I take this opportunity to wish you a successful winter to those members from the Northern Hemisphere and a pleasant summer to those from the southern Hemisphere.
INTERNATIONAL SKI FEDERATION
Ken Read Chair (sent by e-mail)
To the: - Members of the Alpine Youth & Children s Sub-Committee - Chairman of the Children’s Race Organisers Committee - Representative of SRS For information to: - Gian Franco Kasper, FIS President - Sarah Lewis, FIS Secretary General - Bernhard Russi, Chairman Alpine Committee - Jeff Weinman, Chairman Classifications Sub-Committee - Michael Huber, Chairman Rules Sub-Committee FIS Staff - Janez Fleré, Alpine Technical and Administrative Coordinator - Peter Gerdol, Continental Cup Coordinator - Jordi Pujol, Continental Cup Coordinator - Andrew Cholinski, Coordinator Bring Children to the Snow
INTERNATIONAL SKI FEDERATION
Blochstrasse 2
3653 Oberhofen/Thunersee
Switzerland
Tel +41 33 244 61 61
Fax +41 33 244 61 71
1
INTERNATIONAL SKI FEDERATION Sub-committee for Alpine Youth & Children’s´ Questions Invitation Meeting Sub-Committee for Youth & Children’s´ Questions (Experts Group) Thursday, 3
rd October 2019, 13:00 – 16:30, Meeting Room: “Panorama C”
AGENDA 1. Welcome, opening of the meeting and Roll Call of Members present 2. Approval of the Agenda 3. Report of the Chair
3.1. Introduce Jordi Pujol, Continental/EC Coordinator 4. Review of the previous meetings and minutes
4.1. 31st Meeting, Alpine Youth & Children's Sub-Committee Cavtat-Dubrovnik (CRO)
5. Reports from Special Groups 5.1. Equipment/SRS
Report from SRS: Rudi Huber 5.2. FIS Children’s Race Organisers Committee:
Report from Children’s Race Organisers Committee Calendars – any changes will be circulated at meeting, or in minutes
5.3. FIS Medical Committee (Dr. Jenny Shute) 5.4. SnowSafe Policy (Dr. Jenny Shute/Andrew Cholinski)
Update
6. Special Presentation: 6.1. ARG: - Present a project introducing the parallel to U16 athletes speed training and
racing. (Martin Begino) 6.2. Future Presentations: Spring/2020: SVK will present a project with speed and parallel.
7. Proposals/Discussion:
7.1. Age of FIS participation (Chip Knight) – discussion to review any future change to the age of FIS participation.
7.2. Tabled from spring: SWE Proposal U14 and U16 competitors included for FIS Registration.
8. FIS Alpine Junior World Ski Championships (Wim Roussel)
8.1. 2020 – Narvik (NOR) – March 4-14, 2020 – Presentation by Organising Committee 8.2. 2021 – Bansko (BUL) – update 8.3. 2022 – Panorama (CAN) – update 8.4. 2023 – Hinterstoder (AUT) – update 8.5. Update on future candidates
9. Other Youth Competitions
9.1. 2020 Youth Olympic Winter Games – Lausanne (SUI)
10. FIS Update/Promotion and Development (Andrew Cholinski) 10.1. FIS Youth Seminar 10.2. FIS Snow Day (January 20, 2019) 10.3. FIS Snowkidz
11. Varia/New Business/Questions 12. Next Meetings/Gathering:
12.1. Informal Gathering: Narvik (NOR) – meeting announced on-site 12.2. FIS Congress: Royal Cliff (THA) – 24 to 30 May 2020
2
INTERNATIONAL SKI FEDERATION Sub-committee for Alpine Youth & Children’s´ Questions 32
nd Meeting Sub-Committee for Youth & Children’s´ Questions (Experts Group)
Thursday, 3rd
October 2019, 13:00 – 16:30, Meeting Room: “Panorama C” ATTENDANCE
Chair: Ken Read (CAN) Vice Chair: Gert Ehn (AUT) Experts Group: Bostjan Anderlic (SLO); Martin Begino (ARG); Olle Danielsson (SWE); Andreas Ertl (GER); Hans Flatscher (SUI); Kiyotaka Kato (JPN); Olga Krizova-Charvatova (CZE); Andrea Bell Pedersen (NOR); Jenny Shute (GBR; Medical Liaison)
Committee members in attendance: Radovan Cagala (SVK); Jelena Dojcinovic (BIH); Dinars Dorss (LAT); Sophia Gritsi (GRE); Jaana Karhila-Rasanen (FIN); Rajko Kosic (MNE); Roberto Lorenzi (ITA); Henrik Oksholm (DEN); Jacques Pastor (MON); Fiona Stevens (NZL); Carles Visa (AND); Ivan Vucinic (CRO) Replacements: GALINIER Jean-Louis, for Pierre Bornat, (FRA); GAJEWSKI Wojciech, for Jan Winkiel (POL); PIROLA Stefano for Rainer Grob (CHI);
FIS: Wim Rossel, Wim; Jordi Pujol; Andrew Cholinski
SRS: Rudi Huber YOG Lausanne 2020: Simone Righenzi Narvik 2020: Erik Plener; Toni Franz; Linda Bogholm Kolloen; John Christian Eriksson Children’s Race Organisers: Hans-Peter Carlson (SWE) Guests: Marina Angelo SUI; Suresh Azmal IND; Milan Bosic SRB; Lorenzo Conci ITA; Marek Didek SVK; Jana Gantnerova SVK; Christian Greber AUT; Anne-Chantal Pigelet-Grevy FRA; Petra Kronberger AUT; Karin Sundberg SWE; Anders Sundqvist SWE; Tommi Viivret FIN; Matjaz Vrecl SLO; Hlebayna Walter AUT; Stefan Havnelid NOR MINUTES
1. Welcome, opening of the meeting and Roll Call of Members present (Chair) Chairman Ken Read welcomed members and guests to the meeting, and the Secretary took the Roll Call of Members present.
2. Approval of the Agenda The agenda was approved as circulated.
3. Report of the Chair (Ken Read) 3.1. Introduce Jordi Pujol, Continental & EC Women Coordinator (Wim Rossel now working with
Men’s Europa Cup) 3.2. Report of the Chair: The Chair focused on the crisis that is developing in the speed events, in
particular downhill, with declining participation and competence despite nearly 10 years of revisions to technical specifications to make the speed events more accessible and available. Urgent steps are required to continue to address needed technical or rule changes, to ensure the skills of speed are included in course design and NSA’s train coaches to properly guide and manage competitors in the speed events.
Action at the FIS, ENL and U16 levels is needed. The full statement of the Chair is attached to the minutes as Annex 1.
4. Review of Previous Meetings and Minutes
3
4.1. Meeting of the 31st Alpine Youth & Sub-Committee in Cavtat-Dubrovnik (CRO) – the minutes were approved.
5. Reports from Special Groups
5.1. Equipment/SRS: Report from SRS: Rudi Huber – Head of Ski Race suppliers – no update, but happy to answer questions.
5.2. FIS Children’s Race Organisers Group: 35th Meeting in Ricky CZE September 2019. Chair
Hans-Peter Carlson presented some statistics. Last season, 24 nations hosted events; 70 nations competed. A commercial rights project has commenced. Calendars – any changes will be circulated along with the minutes. Challenging calendar issues had been addressed. New member was welcomed to the group – Japan Cup/Nastar. New Honorary member had been appointed - former Secretary Marisa Ruatti. The group was overall not in favour of age range reversal.
5.3. FIS Medical Committee (Dr. Jenny Shute): requested any feedback or statistics for injuries in
case of age range reversal; will be discussed at Medical Committee meeting tomorrow. A reminder to take concussion seriously, especially as recovery is known to take longer in youth and children
5.4. Snow Safe Policy (Dr. Jenny Shute/Andrew Cholinski): An update to the Snow Safe Policy had
been presented at the Youth Seminar. A reminder that all NSAs are expected to have policies and procedures in place by end 2019. This will remain on the agenda at each meeting. The Children’s Alpine competitions will adopt a statement and policy, as will World Junior Championship organisers.
The Chair advised the Sub-Committee that reporting on Snow Safe will now be a standing Agenda item.
6. Best Practices / Knowledge Exchange: 6.1. ARG: - Martin Begino presented a project introducing parallel to U16 athletes, also covering
speed training and racing. 6.2. Future Presentations: Spring/2020: SVK will present a project with speed and parallel.
7. Proposals/Discussion 7.1. Age of FIS participation (Chip Knight): discussion to review any future change to the age of
FIS participation. No proposals to date. 1997 YoB were first group to be held back. Shortly afterwards, the restriction of the number of technical starts in first year FIS was removed. Original goals - Promote LTAD, reduce injuries, keep costs down as athletes will in general be closer to home. In USA, there has been a decline in FIS registrations, and less density of FIS competitions in remote areas; reduction in race field sizes; reduced speed participation. Also noted retention of U16 athletes, but loss of U18/older athletes (probably because of educational challenges which are specific to USA at this age). CAN – increased FIS membership over and above prior to 2012, for various reasons, though with 40% drop in regions that are geographically more remote. FRA, USA, FIN, AUT, SUI, SLO – worse fit with education; ISL, GBR, CRO, IRE, better fit. Number of FIS racers in JPN has dropped, though number of races has increased. Last time voted, roughly 50/50. A gender split (age range reduction for women, men to stay the same) would be ideal, but is impractical. Must look for solutions. For example, could last year childrens try a limited number of FIS events? Top end Juniors (U21) will definitely not change. Appeal for injury figures from any nations that are available. JS will also chase through FIS Medical Committee. Other changes in FIS may be responsible for decrease in numbers. Snow preparation, VD, equipment changes – multifactorial.
7.2. Tabled from spring: SWE Proposal U14 and U16 competitors included for FIS Registration.
FIS prefers to not take a decision.
4
7.3 Art. 1001.1.4. Entry League Races (ENL) – a proposal to reduce the lowest permissible VD for ENL SG competitions from 350m to 300. This had been tabled to the Spring meeting by Rules Committee, no additional comments here.
8. FIS Alpine Junior World Ski Championships (Jordi Pujol)
8.1. – 2020 Narvik (NOR): 4-14 March, 2020: Presentation by Organising Committee - 3 nearby airports. 6 hotels, all very close. Lunch near slopes. Hotels allocated by date of registration. The Grand Hotel is also the location of race office. Contacts and all information available at www.narvik2020.no
8.2. – 2021 Bansko (BUL): 1-11 March 2021. Venue confirmed. Inspection next week.
8.3. – 2022 Panorama (CAN): 1-12 March, 2022; No report. Venue inspection in spring/20.
8.4. – 2023 Hinterstoder (AUT): No report.
8.5. – Future candidates: Interest indicated from Sakhalin (RUS); if NSA’s wish to propose a candidate, contact the FIS Office and Jordi Pujol.
9. Other Youth Competitions
9.1. 2020 Youth Olympic Winter Games – Lausanne (SUI): Simone Righenzi presented the 2020 plan to use existing venues; travel times will be long (70km to Les Diablerets); all stay in Lausanne athletes’ village. 8km of corridors/ramps. This is necessary to fully experience the games. Sport promotion is important – “Lausanne en Jeu”, 2-week festival at every competition site. Two waves of athletes for the first time. Not much time or appropriate snow conditions for training. The races will be held on the refurbished former WC slope in Les Diablerets. This is only slope with artificial snow, hence limited training opportunities. VAP system, so NSAs can bring own car/vans, need permit – can also book additional accredited staff into local hotels.
10. FIS Update/Promotion and Development (Andrew Cholinski):
New initiative ‘Project Play’ in Lebanon, in conjunction with Right to Play. FIS Snow Day (January 19, 2020) – 82 events, 30 countries already registered. FIS Snowkidz – FIS safety animations freely available. Snowkidz awards 2020 - evolution criteria added; communications efforts rewarded; new judge this time. Top 8 announced online, top 3 in THA. Eco-friendly materials distributed free of charge. Essential to produce report. The Chair thanked all the FIS staff for their great work with these various FIS promotion activities and for the promotion of Snowsports
11. Various / New Business: None
12. Next Meetings/Gathering: 12.1. Informal Gathering: Narvik (NOR) meeting announced on-site 12.2. FIS Congress: Royal Cliff (THA) 17
to 23
May 2020
The Chair proposed thanks to Jenny Shute for the minutes, and best wishes to all race organisers for a successful winter season in the Northern Hemisphere.
The Chairman closed the meeting at 17:30.
5
Attachments
Report of the Chair – Autumn/2019
2019-20 FIS Children’s Race Organisers calendar (attached – separate file)
2020-21 FIS Children’s Race Organisers calendar (attached – separate file)
FIS Age Change Report (Chip Knight-USA) (attached – separate file)
Report of the Chair - Zurich
Welcome to the 32nd
meeting of the subcommittee: Experts Group – all members of the subcommittee are welcome to attend and participate, as is our practice.
As we move into the northern Hemisphere winter season, I felt it is my responsibility as your Chair to bring to your attention what I am prepared to call “a crisis”. I’ m speaking of our speed events – downhill and super G – but more specifically downhill. Our Sub-Committee has been hosting information sharing and giving profile to speed projects and initiatives for several years now. The alpine committee has been supportive of rule changes to ease vertical drop as well as encouraging events such as the alpine combined, 2-run downhills and ENL downhills – all to promote participation. But the result, after nearly 10 years, is not positive. At the 2019 Junior World Ski Championships, there were only 30 athletes at the start in the women’s DH. Roughly half the field – 15 – were competitive, the rest capable but learning. I have been on the mountain at COC speed events with fields of less than 20 competitors. I am hearing from the members of this subcommittee, the challenges to run speed events for very small fields – resorts are not willing to invest for so few. Quite frankly – and to be completely honest – if we care about the future of downhill, we need to declare we have a crisis and start – today – with a new approach, a new way of encouraging our competitors. I think we need to acknowledge the cost to set up and maintain speed tracks is enormous, so we need to collectively decide which venues we support and how we assist these or organisers. We need to figure out ways to make speed cost effective for individuals and for teams. We need to collectively agree to train our coaches – especially younger coaches – of the importance of speed and methods to introduce these events. And we need to always ensure our speed venues are safe, are challenging but in a way that matches the skill set of the competitors. As a speed competitor in my time, it is painful to see how thin our fields have become and how speed has become irrelevant to far too many coaches. They see it as time consuming and costly – and unnecessary to progress an athlete forward. Yet, on the other hand, I hear many competitors who participate in well run training sessions or racing at U14, U16 and FIS – who get all excited after a run, after a race. The kids still love speed. We need to work hard together to ensure we can tap into this enthusiasm. We know in our subcommittee, that we are the future of our sport. That what happens with competitors in Children’s and Youth events, will eventually emerge at the World Cup and World Championship level. So it is our responsibility to voice our concerns – loudly – boldly – and honestly – to ensure our sport continues to have a healthy base.
DRAFT CALENDAR 2022/2023
Vratna Interkriterium Vratna (SVK) 23-25 January Ricky v Orl. Horàch Skiinterkriterium FIS (CZE) 27-28 January Ordino Arcalis Trofeu Borrufa (AND) 30 Jan. – 2 February
Stari vrh Pokal Loka (SLO) 11-12 February Zagreb Zagreb Children Fis (CRO) 14-15 February Mokra Gora Fis Children Cup (SRB) 18-19 February Bjelasnica Children for Peace in World (BIH) 21-23 February Naeba Goldwin Japan Cup/ NASTAR RACE 10-12 March
Abetone (PT) Pinocchio sugli Sci (ITA) 30 Mar. – 1 April Val d’Isere La Scara (FRA) TBD Whistler Whistler Cup (CAN) TBD Tärnaby Ingemartrofen (SWE) TBD
Folgaria ALPECIMBRA FIS Children Cup (ITA) TBD
FIS ALPINE SKI RACING AND THE CHANGE OF AGE
Nigel Loring, September 2019
Page | 2
FIS ALPINE SKI RACING AND THE CHANGE OF AGE
Nigel Loring, September 2019
For nearly one hundred years, the International Ski Federation known as FIS has enjoyed a
tremendous rise in popularity. Since it was formed in 1924 during the first Winter Olympic Games
in Chamonix, France, it is remarkable that the organisation, based in Oberhofen, Switzerland and
manages 6 Olympic Winter sports has been so successful for so long. Coming up on its centennial
in just 5 years, FIS is currently comprised of a 132-member National Ski Associations
representing more than 30’000 licensed and active athletes. It is not surprising that with 12’300
registered alpine skiers and 40 percent of the entire FIS competitive membership, that Alpine’s
status and relative health is of significant interest to the future of the organisation and all
concerned.
By 2010, FIS Alpine ski racing was in its peak with participation numbering over 16’000 athletes
competing at various levels in countries around the world. After a successful Vancouver Winter
Olympic and all-time high competitor number for many nations and their respective FIS race
circuits, a major decision was taken to change the age of entry to this stable and robust population
of alpine ski racers.
The idea had been floated around for a few short years. Various FIS committees and national
associations supported the move. Not all but the notion gained notable popularity in the name of
growth and maturity, skill acquisition, injury prevention, school requirements and so on. A
formalized proposal emerged that as of the 2012/13 season the minimum eligible age of
registration would be raised from 15 to 16. In what many had thought to be a very progressive
move, the motion was ultimately passed by the FIS council. At the time, it was believed this would
likely be a good thing for the reasons mentioned above but also as a means of mitigating the
costs of participation in a sport which is generally considered a privilege of affluent alpine nations.
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
2 0 0 4 2 0 0 5 2 0 0 6 2 0 0 7 2 0 0 8 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 2 0 1 7 2 0 1 8 2 0 1 9
World FIS Alpine Compet i tor Populat ion
Women Men
Page | 3
In the 2012/13 season, with 15-year-old’s no longer eligible to register, the world’s alpine ski
racing population decreased 20 percent for men and 25 percent for women. Shocking as this may
sound, the global reduction of active FIS alpine racers since 2012, roughly 3’700, is likely not that
big a concern as presumably most of those were 15-year-olds and still racing within their own
nation’s or region’s development circuit. In fact, evidence supports that as dramatic the FIS age
change was to the overall alpine competitive population, the resiliency of the alpine world keeps
churning along in a remarkably stable and predictable manner.
The most immediate effect was felt by those two ages, 15 and 16. Competitors born in 1996, who
registered at the age of 15 for 2011/12 season where again at the age 16, the only eligible first
year of birth to compete in the 2012/13 season. Without any new FIS competitors for a whole
season it felt like every competition was a do over or repeat of the previous season. For those
born in 1997, the experience was similar where they repeated K2 (now U16) for a third year. The
season seemed like everything was frozen in time and for those specific birth years, it was.
Beyond the effect to the overall FIS Alpine population and those birth years that spent an extra
year in the same category, what has not been widely examined are the ramifications of the age
change on how the sport has reacted globally since that time. Individuals registered by their
respective national ski associations each season appear on the FIS Alpine point list, which is now
published digitally 13 times a year. Regardless of a competitors relative standing or rank in the
various alpine disciplines (qualitative), the nation, year of birth, gender and year over year rate of
return (retention), the final FIS list each season can be considered as a quantitative approach to
illustrating what affect this move has had and offers some insight as to the relative long-term
success of the sport.
In 2019, 68 percent of women and 65 percent of men alpine competitors came from just 9 nations.
It is not surprising what nations make up that list but what may not be as widely known is the
relative numbers each of those nations have put on the slopes every year for the past decade. A
seven-year average of pre and post age change shows that since 2012-13 women’s FIS
registrations have fallen 23 percent and men’s overall decline, almost identical at a 24 percent.
ITA USA JPN CAN FRA SWE SUI AUT NOR
2012 Totals 2774 2112 1527 612 1099 726 492 521 569
2019 Totals 1918 1443 1346 787 750 538 502 460 421
Net Change -856 -669 -181 175 -349 -188 10 -61 -148
-1500
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
FIS Alpine Registrations: 2012 versus 2019
Page | 4
Even without the annual influx of 15-year-olds, today, Italy is still by far the largest alpine nation
in terms of the numbers with 1’800 – 1’900 FIS licenses issued to Italian men and women every
season on a consistent basis since 2013. USA is second with just over 1’400 but to some a
surprise, Japan has the world’s 3rd largest FIS population, just 100 or so shy of the American
average.
France, who had for long been the 4th most prolific alpine nation moved to 5th largest overall, was
surpassed by Canada in 2017. France and the USA saw the most significant decline in
participation rates at -32% but almost every nation is down -12-32% today from their peak in 2012.
Conversely, Canada has had a surge in FIS activity and is up 29 percent by adding over 175 to
their national FIS ranks in just 7 years. Up until the age change, Canada had the same general
number of competitors as the central Europeans and Scandinavians, around the 500-600 range.
Switzerland is the only other nation other than Canada to show overall growth at 2 percent since
2012.
European alpine power nations have surprisingly very modest numbers, fielding annually between
420 (Norway) and 540 (Sweden) of combined male and female populations. In central Europe,
the numbers are very similar with Austria at 460 and Switzerland at just a nose above 500.
However, the age change had a much larger impact on total numbers in Scandinavia and France
than was felt in those nations in the heart of the Alps.
Yet Canada’s net growth barley offsets the net loss of Japanese racers and is less than 10 percent
of Italy’s annual line up. The fact Canada is the only nation experiencing significant growth in this
sector where all others have simply reset their expectancy rates of a normal annual participation,
begs the obvious question.
It appears that Canada has bolstered its FIS registrations by an increase popularity of entry league
FIS (ENL) in-province racing as well as FIS University circuits (UNI). This effect has been almost
entirely felt in the East of the country where availability of FIS competitions specific to those
categories has flourished in recent years.
Understanding the considerable investment of resources it takes to become a world class
competitor, it is not surprising that National Ski Associations look carefully at their FIS Alpine
population tracking and adjust for specific obstacles or opportunities they face in their region.
Canada’s numbers aside, it would be tempting to discount the global decline as merely a shift of
where the international counting point starts, at 16 instead of 15. But for the very reasons the
change was initiated in the first place, some nations are now evaluating its effects on the long-
term interest of their competitive populations and the viability of the competitive circuits that
support them.
Regardless of the age change, retention rates could be an indicator of which nations are better
than others in engaging and offering compelling reasons for competitors to continue racing or that
the racers themselves are more committed and have the necessary resources to persevere longer
than their peers in other nations. Either way, developing FIS Alpine World Cup ski racers takes a
long time, and few have done so before becoming senior which is another way to say, adult. This
is important to consider that in reaching their performance potential, a competitor, having
committed the years of training and experience is likely at age of 21, fully grown physically,
cognitively and socially.
Page | 5
Obviously not everyone who is still competing as an adult is a world cup ski racer. Many senior
racers may have kept their FIS registration active so they can compete part time when their
educational or work commitment allows or aligns. They still enjoy the level of competition and
preparedness that racing FIS Alpine requires. Their participation also helps younger racers with
crucial opportunities for strong competition and a chance to improve their FIS ranking and profile.
To know more, the idea of retention needed to be measured. As strong as nation’s first year
numbers are, year over year, that number will decline. This rate of change can be expressed as
percentage of the original population that will return each year thereafter. In this way, it is possible
to compare nations side by side regardless of how big or small their initial first year population
was. Over time a pattern emerges and an image of how FIS alpine competitors from different
nations and different year of births will track, return the following year, or not. To illustrate the
trend, North America (Canada and USA), a central European country (Switzerland) and a
Scandinavian country (Norway) were selected for comparison.
These four nations’ 10-year return rates for women and men through U18, U21 to Senior age
classes show a broader view of career expectancy, or at least a likely number of those who start
FIS Alpine racing, will stay competitive for how long and from which nation. On average, the
United States has the highest rates of second year returnees, but it is Switzerland, who over the
long term has the best track record of retaining their skiers through to senior. Canada seems to
lose competitors at a quicker rate despite its increase number in recent years, they fall behind the
other nations.
Another way to look at it would be for every 10 sixteen-year-olds who start racing FIS, 9 American,
Norwegian and Swiss would likely return the following season but only 8 Canadians. By fourth
year FIS, 5 women from Switzerland and Norway, 4 from the USA and 3 Canadians are on
average still competing. A similar story with the men but the Swiss would likely have 6 men,
Norway and USA 5, and again Canada just 3 of their original line up still racing.
75%46% 30% 25% 21%
85%
66%52% 40% 30%
86%
66%
49%37%
22%
88%
69%
40%
28%
25%
R E T U R N F O R 2 N D Y E A R ( U 1 8 )
R E T U R N F O R 3 R D Y E A R ( U 2 1 )
R E T U R N F O R 4 T H Y E A R ( U 2 1 )
R E T U R N F O R 5 T H Y E A R ( U 2 1 )
R E T U R N F O R 6 T H Y E A R ( S R )
Women Racing FIS Alpine Past Year 110 Year Average
CAN Women AVG SUI Women AVG NOR Women AVG USA Women AVG
Page | 6
Year over year, these are big declines however, considering the factors involved in continuing to
find success in racing against more mature and ever skilled competitors it is not that surprising.
Anecdotally these “costs” add up and be it money, education, health / injury, insurance, social or
economic obstacles, there can be no doubt FIS Alpine at its higher levels has its challenges.
The change of age eligibility clearly brought about a reduction in overall worldwide participation
however different nations responded quite differently in the 2012-13 ski racing season and
thereafter. As with many long-term development sports, new participants are mostly of youth age.
Alpine ski racing is no different and every year, the FIS point lists adds a new year of birth (YOB)
to its ranks. In all but 2 unique cases, the number of first year competitors (15 for those born in
1996 or earlier and 16 for those born in 1997 or later) will be the largest group.
Looking closer at comparable nations ten-year track record provides a clearer view of what was
happening before and what has happened since the age change. The differences between
women’s and men’s numbers follow a similar pattern with most nation’s FIS populations
responding in very similar but predictable manner with only slight fluctuations year to year
thereafter.
With an individual choosing to register in FIS, regardless if they are 15 or 16, their respective rate
of entry seems to fluctuate more in some nations than others. The below graph shows annual
variation of the same four nations and how total first year competitor registrations were only
slightly affected for those born in 1997 and later in Switzerland, as a Norwegian woman or an
American Women. Norwegian men declined somewhat however the largest reduction is found in
American men. Canadian registration rates have improved since the age change perhaps in large
part due to the FIS category options available that were mentioned earlier.
78%49% 31% 24% 20%
87%
71%
49%36% 27%
87%
74%
60%47%
33%
92%
71%
47%
31%
25%
R E T U R N F O R 2 N D Y E A R ( U 1 8 )
R E T U R N F O R 3 R D Y E A R ( U 2 1 )
R E T U R N F O R 4 T H Y E A R ( U 2 1 )
R E T U R N F O R 5 T H Y E A R ( U 2 1 )
R E T U R N F O R 6 T H Y E A R ( S R )
Men Racing FIS Alpine Past Year 110 Year Average
CAN Men AVG NOR Men AVG SUI Men AVG USA Men AVG
Page | 7
Perhaps there may be a correlation between 1st year registration rates and the age change but
there are many other factors that affect overall populations and will vary by nation. In some cases,
influences may be policy related as some adopted eligibility requirements in order to be
considered for international racing opportunities their point profile had to meet a specified
threshold. This made a lot of sense as the cost and time requirements of race travel is
considerable, an issue related to retention many nations debate continuously.
Over time, return rates may depend more on the availability of local programs and an appropriate
circuit as mentioned in the case of Canada. May be access to special camps or select teams that
provide a pathway for future success. Economics for Switzerland and Austria as their costs and
travel distances to and from training and competition are relatively small. Education commitments
weigh heavy on all student athletes. Most Europeans complete high school a year or two ahead
of their North American peers. Finally, it can be just luck as some year of births have a larger
overall number than others of would be ski racers.
It would be extremely difficult to quantify all those influencing factors however to better understand
the longer-term effect, compare the average return rates by birth year, both pre and post age
change. The first four years mark the sharpest rate of decline in returning competitors for all
nations. After 2012, all nations experienced a noticeable shift in return rates. Some very
positively, others not.
The below graphs track both women and men by their birth year with the average return rates for
the 5 years prior to the age change (1992-1996) with a dashed line. The 5 years since (1997-
2001) is represented with a solid line.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
1st Year FIS Alpine Registrations by YOB
US Men 1st Year US Women 1st Year CAN Men 1st Year CAN Women 1st Year
NOR Men 1st year NOR Women 1st year SUI Men 1st year SUI Women 1st Year
Page | 8
Today, a women’s average chance of returning for a second-year racing FIS is almost identical
in Norway, Switzerland and the United States at roughly 90%. Those gains over the previous
period remain consistent tracking 10% (or 1 net person) higher through third and fourth years of
FIS for both Switzerland and Norway. USA is relatively unchanged through 3rd year but drops in
the 4th. Canada however is seeing fewer women return for thirds year FIS at 40% but remains
comparatively consistent with its previous fourth year returns at 28%.
SUI 1992-1996
SUI 1997-2001
NOR 1992-1996
NOR 1997-2001
USA 1992-1996
USA 1997-2001
CAN 1992-1996
CAN 1997-2001
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
W Return 2nd Year W Return 3rd Year W Return 4th Year
Women FIS Alpine Return Rates Pre VS Post Age Change
SUI 1992-1996 SUI 1997-2001 NOR 1992-1996 NOR 1997-2001
USA 1992-1996 USA 1997-2001 CAN 1992-1996 CAN 1997-2001
SUI 1992-1996
SUI 1997-2001
NOR 1992-1996
NOR 1997-2001
USA 1992-1996
USA 1997-2001
CAN 1992-1996
CAN 1997-2001
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
M Return 2nd Year M Return 3rd Year M Return 4th Year
Men FIS Alpine Return RatesPre VS Post Age Change
SUI 1992-1996 SUI 1997-2001 NOR 1992-1996 NOR 1997-2001
USA 1992-1996 USA 1997-2001 CAN 1992-1996 CAN 1997-2001
Page | 9
Men's comparative data is consistent with what the women experience in percentage of retained
competitors through the age change. As with the women, more Swiss, Norwegian an American
men stay in competitive FIS Alpine racing longer starting at 16 than prior to the age change when
they started at age 15. Canada again shows a greater decline in third year but by fourth, those
variations match more closely to the pre age change return rates.
Each nations tracking has taken a slightly different course. Shown in the chart below, the net
effect since the age change on return rates gives a good indicator of which nations appear to
have benefited most from the change.
Women in Norway and Switzerland clearly had a favorable bounce. The Norwegian men, who
since 2012 experienced a 36 percent drop in first year registrations also have had double digit
improvement to their rates. Only minorly affected, the Swiss men’s annual net rate of return
appreciated a modest 3 percent.
Both Canadian and American women’s second year rates are completely neutral pre versus post
age change. Returning for a third year competing FIS proved a bigger challenge for those women
who were now age 18 when previously they’d have been in third year at age 17. By fourth year,
the difference was less so but still in negative territory. American men were equally unaffected
and Canadian men only slightly so for those who returned for a second year of FIS. Third- and
fourth-year declines for both nations and genders have greatly accelerated since 2012.
Time will tell, but indicators are that for some parts of the FIS Alpine world, retention rates have
shifted significantly since the age change. Even though there are far fewer competitors overall,
those who register at age 16 in Norway and Switzerland nowadays are more likely to stay in
competition a little longer than those who previously started at the age of 15.
USA, 0%USA, -13%
USA, -7% USA, 0% USA, -9%USA, -6%CAN, 0%
CAN, -9%
CAN, -3%
CAN, -3%
CAN, -16%
CAN, -6%
SUI, 16% SUI, 14%SUI, 12%
SUI, 3% SUI, 3% SUI, 3%
NOR, 13%NOR, 21%
NOR, 13%
NOR, 14% NOR, 15% NOR, 13%
W Return 2nd Year(17)
W Return 3rd Year(18)
W Return 4th Year(19)
M Return 2nd Year(17)
M Return 3rd Year(18)
M Return 4th Year(19)
+/-
Net Effect of Age Change on FIS Alpine Return Rates ofWomen (left), Men (right)
USA CAN SUI NOR
Page | 10
This could be an example of how nations with smaller populations punch above their weight when
it comes to competitors reaching maturity or adulthood. Closing the gap in total numbers
competing over the long term between nations may explain in part, some nations consistent
dominance in the sport. There are also many other advantages central European alpine nations
have over North America such as broader and closer access to training, competition, and other
foundational resources.
For Canada and the USA, a complete opposite effect has occurred since the age change. Perhaps
the re-alignment of third-year FIS registration corresponding with the end of high school in both
countries might explain why the U18 age category has remained largely unaffected. But for post
grads or even grade 12 students, the decision to continue competing FIS Alpine or pursue other
opportunities in life is a difficult one.
Not surprisingly, both the USA and Canada had hoped to revisit the matter at the 2019 FIS Spring
meetings in Dubrovnik, Croatia. Although the matter was discussed, no consensus was formed.
Any consideration for a reversal of the age change would require a specific proposal and further
study.
In the grand scheme of things, how much does the concept of retention really matter? For
perspective, if 25% of the 198 USA women and 25% of 199 USA men that started racing last
year, roughly 50 women and 50 men should still be competing at the FIS level when they turn 21
during or before the 2023/24 season. In contrast, Switzerland’s average retention rate of 30% for
48 women and 33% for 52 men should expect 14 women and 17 men to be competing as a senior.
Canada, with an average sixth-year return rate of 21% for those 150 women and 20% for the 153
men who registered in the 2018/19 season, means on average, 32 women and 31 Canadian
senior men will still be active in 2023.
Regardless of retention rates, North America’s sheer size of population advantage, over all
individual European nations (except Italy) means more Canadian and American racers will be
competing in FIS at older ages.
The value of examining retention rates and how policy can affect competitive populations is
something every nation strives to get a handle on. The perceived cost for continued participation
versus the potential for reward reaches its limit at some point for every competitor, in every sport.
Many nations have had to adjust to new economic realities since 2012, not the least of which is
funding opportunities to support fewer available competitors.
In terms of success, the age change has had mixed result. Some nations saw return rates improve
but population decline, others experienced the reverse. Undeniably, the change of age has
greatly reduced number of internationally licenced competitors on the slopes each winter. As
such, nations have had to adapt to smaller field sizes meaning the economic equations of hosting
successful events or sustainable circuits has become that much harder to balance.
Good news is that globally, FIS Alpine continues to attract new competitors every season at highly
predictable rates. Nation by nation that may be a slightly different story as other internal factors
may also be exerting influences on new registrations and rates of retention. Even at three quarters
its previous size, the future looks strong and healthy for FIS Alpine ski racing through its centennial
year and beyond.
FIS ALPINE SKI RACING AND THE CHANGE OF AGE
Nigel Loring, September 2019, Data source: https://www.fis-ski.com/DB/alpine-skiing/fis-points-lists.html