internet and society: community 2009
DESCRIPTION
Lecture Slides for Internet and Society course at the University of Edinburgh on understanding the analysis of community and internet (amd mobile etc), using ideas from studies of CMC, social network studies, social capital etc https://www.wiki.ed.ac.uk/display/IandS/Internet+and+Society+HomeTRANSCRIPT
Community
Internet and Society 2008
So far
Technology and society - sociotechnical network
Information society and Network Society theories
How was the Internet created, how did cultures of creators count, innovation commons
Who uses the internet, social inclusion and the digital divide
What Next?
Outline
CMC – Computer Mediated Communication
Online communitiesVirtual worlds 1Identity onlineCommunitySome theoretical
ideas
• ICTs in everyday life• Local communities• Neworked individualism
• Technology of community
• Community identity• Virtual Worlds 2
Key Ideas
Computer Mediated Communication (CMC)
CommunityOnline IdentityNetwork approachesSocial CapitalVirtuality and virtual communityNetworked individualism
Communication and Society
Communication technology allows people to form and sustain social relationships, be they of co-operation or control.
Changing the manner and ease by which individuals and groups communicate alters the information flows and thus the social relations in a community.
Those changes will depend on the existing relations
Communication and Society
Communicative acts (a) unfold within concrete historical and socio-cultural contexts; (b) refer to the interaction of people who are situated within particular place in a complex configuration of relationships (eg. groups); (c) involve the exchange of information or messages the construction and interpretation of which occur within a shared context of symbolic meanings (eg. culture); and (d) create or ‘introduce’ new contexts or dimensions of discourse that help shape or alter the texture of social reality.
(Georgoudi and Rosnow, 1985),
Georgoudi and Rosnow, 1985, The Emergence of Contextualism, J. of Communication , 35, 7-88, quoted in Fulk et al. 1992, 9)
CMC: Computer mediated communication - historyPhone vs F2FEmail and BBS (Bulletin Board System)One2one -> many2many
Is CMC good for work?Reduced inhibitionsFlaming, PolarisationAnonymity
(Social) psychological theoriesHow does CMC influence interpersonal
relationships?
CMC 2The social presence model (1970s)
F2F idealSocial norms not apparent - CMC “CMC may represent a more intrinsically ‘social’ medium of communication then apparently ‘richer’ context of face to face interaction, and one that gives fuller rein to fundamentally social psychological factors” (Spears and Lea, 1992)
The cuelessness model CMC should be colder, more task oriented, less compromise -
not the caseReduced social cues
Open, uninhibited polarised, - ‘risky shift. De-individuation Depersonalisation/Attention Focus Shift Increased Equality Many faults
CMC 3SIDE model (Social Identity and DE-
individuation) Emphasis on “social identity” from informational cues
etcv. Individual identityOutcome depends on which is more importantSelf-attention - heightens relevant identity.Personal identity - polarization, taskGroup identity - consensus etc
What sort of social organisation emerges with CMC?
How much are these behaviours a function of particular technology?
IdentitySherry TurkleNew identity - no-one knows you are a dogNo ethnicity, age, gender, looks, disability etc
Avatars - graphical representationsFluid identifyMultiple identityA Place to Change ourselvesVirtual selfPeople go to explore themselves and work
though problems. Criticism: ignores reality of life
Internet: Community or Consumption
<20% of internet users ‘participatory users’80% shop onlineIs the Internet a social space?What does it mean to say ‘community online’, or
‘online communities’?Can the internet actually support a community?Discussion
What is community? What are benefits of community?
Communities, Organisations and SocietyA place where “people create for themselves shared meanings, symbols, rituals, and cognitive schema which allow them to create and maintain meaningful interactions among themselves and in relation to the world beyond their small society” (Argyris and Schon 1978)
Heterogenous and dynamicFormal and informal relations and rules‘Moral’ and practical benefitsIndividual benefits; Social benefitsTensions - no chocolate box village!Need Mechanisms for support and maintenance of
community
Community ideas
E.g.TrustReciprocityRespectLoyaltyTruthfulnessCivility
Information, money, security etc
Online community onlineBBNs and The Well - ReingoldCommunities of interest and choice, not
geography (old academic networks)Support, reinforce minority ideas - like cities,
create critical mass for a subcultureIdeal communityBut
Often poor social identityAnonymity and fluid personal identity - flaming etcActive members and lurkersEasy to leave, easy to expel. Easy to start new
community
Community Online
Creating communities from nothingTechnical and social mechanisms to create ‘community’
FAQ, netiquette, moderators, mentors, technical controlsArchives, tracking use, control of posting
How to move from early homogenous user culture to mass use?
“Psuedo-communitiesThick and thin communitiesCommunity needs responsibility
Does this happen?
Virtual Worlds and Cyberspace
MUDs, MOORole playing gamesSingle multi user machines (Nerds)
Digital Cities - DDSActivitst Artists in Amsterdam
Cyberspace - “where the bank keeps your money” W. Gibson (Neuromancer )
Virtual Reality - a parallel ‘space’ - a re-creation and reinvention of laws of nature -> and norms of society
Community worries
50s - suburbs, end of community etcSocial Capital argumentHow and why we take part in ‘society’?How is society constituted?
First - Social Network approaches
Network Approaches
See society and social relations emerging from individual ties/bonds/connections.
Bottom-up analysis
Network approachesStrength of tiesPower in ties, status etcUse of tiesQuality of ties: e.g. trust.
Centrality/marginality of individualsEmbeddednessQuality of network: dense, sparse, cliques, closureBridging tiesStructural Holes
Network structure effect on contagion of ideas/innovations/information
Does not help much with norms and values
Network approaches
Close, dense, closed networksHigh trust, dependency, reputationStrong Norms, sanctionsUsed for strong moral, financial etc supportIsolating
Open networksFree Information exchangeWeak ties
Weak Ties Theory
Mark GranovetterSocial relations embedded in social
networkStrength of Weak Ties theoryStrong ties in work classWeak ties in middle classWeak ties give a access to important
economic information (jobs)
Bridging
Old: centrality in dense network source of power
New: Power comes from bridging between poorly connected networks (e.g.Burt)
Brokers of innovation and powerSource of innovation
Social CapitalColeman, Bourdieu, Putnam,( Burt)Value of social relations
How we use social tiesWhat are the emergent society features
Social capital can be accumulatedBourdieu :Personal benefits from rich networksThose without connections lose out
ColemanSocial norms as social capitalProvide supportDense interconnected networks
Social Capital 2
Putnam ‘Bowling alone’ Reduced participation in civil society
(Church, bowling clubs etc) Home-centred, electronic media Reduction in civic norms, reduced community trust etc Reduced political participation - > Week7/8 Individual relationships build to create is social capital of a
community. Bonding capital, bridging capital
Loosing Rich, thick communitySkeptical about InternetWhat might the Internet mean for Social Capital?
Individual, community
Internet in everyday life
Early fears that Internet use and virtual/online communities isolate people from ‘real communities’ - Kraut - Putnam
Early studies: Users Withdraw, become less social etc (distopian) Early adopters, short time users.
Explosion in commercial Internet Use of websites,mailing lists, ecommerce (Amazon
recommendations etc) ebay, easyjet, Tesco online Never have to leave the home
Community Online Projects
Inspiration from early BBSsPolitical concernReinvigorate communities->digital divideGive computers to everyone in a placeTrain in skills, support civic organisationsSee what happens
Nothing much at firstEngaged people more engaged
->politic/social movements
Discussion of papers
Wellman et al findingsWhat we use community for?
How is community constituted today?
Networked individualism
Actually greater participation in community
Social TechnologiesCreated by users to satisfy own
community/communication needsSuccessful configurations diffuse rapidlyWide choice of tools to support particular types of
sociality and community. But not deterministic!
Email (lists)Bulletin board (yahoo groups etc)Discussion list (polarisation) open, moderated,
closed.Chat, IM, Virtual PresenceWebpage - present self (complete control) (podcast)
Social Technologies
Web log (Blog)- controlled interactivityBlogrolls; Political, personal, technicalGenerally for small ‘audience’
Social Networking sitesWikis - collective writingOpen source development
Many ‘real’ and ‘virtual’ communities use many of these.
New communities both real and virtualFuture: We must allow communities to
appropriate and innovate technology
Virtual Community Identity?
Virtual communitiesDevelopment of community awareness/identityInvestment in maintenance of communitySocial action outside?Rich community?Online communities
NationalismReligionPedophilesTerrorism?Network society Support networks
New Virtual Worlds:Merge PC games and MOO/MUD ,graphical(MMORPG) Everquest, World of Warcraft,
tribes, explorationSecond Life Habbo Hotel- colonization, static,
building, Exploring or building? Your choice.CommercialAffective, play, creativeDesigners set the ground rules, users create the
society
Virtual Society?
Beyond community? 7 million people Virtual societies (courts, government?)
Virtual economiesLinks to ‘real world’ - economy, personal
life, murder.
Conclusions and QuestionsIntegral part of social lifeNetworked IndividualismNew communities?Social capital in online environments?Towards real virtual communitiesPuralisim or fragmentation;virtual class.
Virtual organisations - new work organisationFuture: social movements, political movementsEngaged and non-engaged
Network methodsNodes and ConnectionMap networkMetrics for relationships
‘strength of relationsPower directionUse of relationshipFlow of ideas and information
Network qualitiesDensityCentrality of nodesMarginality Integration - Bridging
Next time: MobilesReally personalTime and SpacePublic-PrivateBlog entry on what mobile means to youLook at, maybe edit wiki on “Phones and Fags”Add questions to Wiki - we will discuss in classVirtual Society articlePresentation : blog entries, wiki questionsPresentation: Ling et al…Presentation: Smart Mobs
Read also Wajcman report, any of the booksMore class discussion