intertek studies p16 2225 2530 aircleaners
DESCRIPTION
http://temp.iqair.com/pdf/Intertek-Studies-P16-2225-2530-AirCleaners.pdfTRANSCRIPT
Report No. 3098477-002a Page 1 of 4July 31, 2006
Graph 1: Resistance of Clean Device vs. Airflow
Airflow Rate, cfm
Res
ista
nce
, Pa
Res
ista
nce
, in
. Wat
er
Airflow Rate in % of Test Airflow Rate
50%100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.400
0.350
0.300
0.250
0.200
0.150
0.100
0.050
0.000
700 1050 1400 1750
75% 100% 125%
Table 1: Resistance of Clean Device vs. Airflow
Airflow Rate in % of TestAirflow Rate
Air Velocity
1.251.872.503.12
246.0369.0492.0615.0
0.330.500.660.83
700105014001750
19386194
0.0760.1510.2460.379
Airflow Rate Resistancem/s fpm cfm Pam3/s in H2O
50%75%
100%125%
Report No. 3098477-002a Page 2 of 4July 31, 2006
Report No. 3098477-002a Page 3 of 4July 31, 2006
Graph 2: PSE After Incremental Dust Loading
Initial
1st Loading
2nd Loading
3rd Loading
4th Loading
5th Loading
Geometric Mean Particle Size, mm
Par
ticl
e S
ize
Rem
ova
l Eff
icie
ncy
, %100.0
99.0
98.0
97.0
96.0
95.0
94.00.35 0.47 0.62 0.84 1.14 1.44 1.88 2.57 3.46 4.69 6.20 8.37
Range Number
Size Range, µm
Geometric Mean Particle Size, µm
Initial
1st Loading
2nd Loading
3rd Loading
4th Loading
5th Loading
Composite Minimum
1
0.30-0.40
0.35
96.3
96.7
97.7
96.6
96.7
96.2
96.2
97.6
97.6
98.0
97.4
97.0
96.6
96.6
98.3
98.1
98.1
97.5
97.2
97.0
97.0
98.7
98.5
98.3
97.8
97.3
97.2
97.2
98.9
98.8
98.4
97.9
97.6
97.4
97.4
99.1
98.9
98.4
98.2
97.9
97.5
97.5
99.2
99.1
98.7
98.4
97.9
97.8
97.8
99.3
99.1
98.8
98.5
98.0
98.2
98.0
99.4
99.3
98.9
98.5
98.4
98.3
98.3
99.3
99.4
99.0
98.8
98.4
98.8
98.4
99.5
99.5
98.7
99.4
98.6
98.7
98.6
99.5
99.9
98.8
99.0
99.1
98.6
98.6
0.47 0.62 0.84 1.14 1.44 1.88 2.57 3.46 4.69 6.20 8.37
0.40-0.55
0.55-0.70
0.70-1.00
1.00-1.30
1.30-1.60
1.60-2.20
2.20-3.00
3.00-4.00
4.00-5.50
5.50-7.00
7.00-10.00
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Table 2: Particle Size Efficiency
Graph 3: Composite Minimum Efficiency Curve
Geometric Mean Particle Size, mm
Par
ticl
e S
ize
Rem
ova
l Eff
icie
ncy
, %
100.0
99.0
98.0
97.0
96.0
95.0
94.0
0.35 0.47 0.62 0.84 1.14 1.44 1.88 2.57 3.46 4.69 6.20 8.37
Composite Min
Report No. 3098477-002a Page 4 of 4July 31, 2006
Report No. 3098477-001a Page 1 of 4July 31, 2006
Report No. 3098477-001a Page 2 of 4July 31, 2006
Graph 1: Resistance of Clean Device vs. Airflow
Airflow Rate, cfm
Res
ista
nce
, Pa
Res
ista
nce
, in
. Wat
er
Airflow Rate in % of Test Airflow Rate
50%80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.300
0.250
0.200
0.150
0.100
0.050
0.000
1000 1500 2000 2500
75% 100% 125%
Table 1: Resistance of Clean Device vs. Airflow
Airflow Rate in % of TestAirflow Rate
Air Velocity
1.251.872.503.12
246.0369.0492.0615.0
0.470.710.941.18
1000150020002500
18335478
0.0730.1340.2150.313
Airflow Rate Resistancem/s fpm cfm Pam3/s in H2O
50%75%
100%125%
Report No. 3098477-001a Page 3 of 4July 31, 2006
Graph 2: PSE After Incremental Dust Loading
Initial
1st Loading
2nd Loading
3rd Loading
4th Loading
5th Loading
Geometric Mean Particle Size, mm
Par
ticl
e S
ize
Rem
ova
l Eff
icie
ncy
, %100.0
99.0
98.0
97.0
96.0
95.0
94.0
93.0
92.00.35 0.47 0.62 0.84 1.14 1.44 1.88 2.57 3.46 4.69 6.20 8.37
Range Number
Size Range, µm
Geometric Mean Particle Size, µm
Initial
1st Loading
2nd Loading
3rd Loading
4th Loading
5th Loading
Composite Minimum
1
0.30-0.40
0.35
95.0
94.9
96.8
96.8
96.3
95.2
94.9
96.5
96.2
97.4
97.1
96.5
95.9
95.9
97.3
97.0
97.7
97.2
96.6
96.3
96.3
97.9
97.6
97.9
97.5
97.1
96.6
96.6
98.3
98.1
98.2
97.8
97.4
96.8
96.8
98.5
98.4
98.3
97.8
97.5
97.2
97.2
98.7
98.7
98.4
98.2
97.7
97.5
97.5
98.8
98.9
98.5
98.4
97.8
97.7
97.7
98.8
99.0
98.9
98.7
98.5
98.0
98.0
98.8
99.1
99.1
99.0
98.7
98.5
98.5
99.0
99.0
99.1
98.8
99.4
98.1
98.1
99.7
99.5
99.5
98.8
98.7
99.9
98.7
0.47 0.62 0.84 1.14 1.44 1.88 2.57 3.46 4.69 6.20 8.37
0.40-0.55
0.55-0.70
0.70-1.00
1.00-1.30
1.30-1.60
1.60-2.20
2.20-3.00
3.00-4.00
4.00-5.50
5.50-7.00
7.00-10.00
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Table 2: Particle Size Efficiency
Graph 3: Composite Minimum Efficiency Curve
Geometric Mean Particle Size, mm
Par
ticl
e S
ize
Rem
ova
l Eff
icie
ncy
, %
100.0
99.0
98.0
97.0
96.0
94.0
95.0
93.0
92.00.35 0.47 0.62 0.84 1.14 1.44 1.88 2.57 3.46 4.69 6.20 8.37
Composite Min.
Report No. 3098477-001a Page 4 of 4July 31, 2006