interventions in the elderly - tri city cardiology · interventions in the elderly. satya reddy...
TRANSCRIPT
People greater than 65 years of age will increase from 12% of population in 2000 to 20% of population in 2030People greater than 85 years of age will increase from 9.3 million in 2000 to 19.5 million in 2030Average life expectancy in US was 77.3 years in 2002 and risingWe take care of these elderly patients every dayWe are in Mesa !!
Acute coronary syndromes
ST elevation myocardial infarction
Peripheral arterial disease
Structural heart disease
Figure 1. Representation of the subgroup ≥75 years of age as a proportion of the total trial and community populations described in the present
statement.
Alexander K P et al. Circulation. 2007;115:2549-2569
Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights
Figure 2. Proportion of age subgroups with cardiac risk factors and comorbidity from the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative.
Alexander K P et al. Circulation. 2007;115:2549-2569
Copyright © American Heart Association Inc All rights
Figure 4. Admission signs, symptoms, and initial diagnosis according to age groups from NRMI (Chest Pain, Cardiac Dx) and CRUSADE (Signs of CHF).
Alexander K P et al. Circulation. 2007;115:2549-2569
Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights
Figure 5. In-hospital and 30-day death rates according to age groups in trial (VIGOUR) and community (GRACE) populations.
Alexander K P et al. Circulation. 2007;115:2549-2569
Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights
Figure 7. Benefit of invasive care in older patients in reducing the risk of death or MI combined from the TACTICS-TIMI 18 trial.117.
Alexander K P et al. Circulation. 2007;115:2549-2569
Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved
Patient Presentation - ACS
91 yo gentleman presents with progressive class III – IV angina Able to walk 1-2 blocks 2 months prior to presentationCardiac risk factors◦ Hypertension◦ HyperlipidemiaSick sinus syndrome◦ s/p PPMRheumatoid arthritis
Stress studyIschemia of anterior/anterolateral walls and apexEF 45%
EchocardiogramEF 40-45%No significant valvular disease
Medical therapyAtenolol 25, Lisinopril 2.5, Imdur30ASA 81, Simvastatin 10
Admitted to the hospital with worsening angina and dyspnea at rest
New onset CHF
PTCA – 3mm balloon at 8 atm
Impella 2.5CO 2.2 L/min at P8
7 Fr EBU 3.5 guide
Runthrough wire in LAD
BMW wire in LCX
Figure 1. Representation of elderly (≥75 years of age) trial versus community populations.
Alexander K P et al. Circulation. 2007;115:2570-2589
Copyright © American Heart Association Inc All rights
Figure 2. Presentation of STEMI and age (NRMI 2–4).
Alexander K P et al. Circulation. 2007;115:2570-2589
Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights
Figure 3. Reperfusion therapy for STEMI (NRMI 2–4).
Alexander K P et al. Circulation. 2007;115:2570-2589
Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All
Figure 4. Death and stroke after fibrinolysis in GUSTO-I, categorized by age.
Alexander K P et al. Circulation. 2007;115:2570-2589
Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved
STEMIFigure 5. Fibrinolytic therapy and age (excluding patients presenting beyond 12 hours, with normal ECGs, with only T-wave inversion or ST depression).
Alexander K P et al. Circulation. 2007;115:2570-2589
Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights
STEMIFibrinolytic vs. PCI (PCAT data)
Alexander K P et al. Circulation. 2007;115:2570-2589
Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights d
Shock trial◦ Small subset, n=56◦ No benefit from revascularizationShock registry◦ 277 patients > 75 years◦ Benefit with early revascularization
81 year old femaleRisk factors◦ Hypertension◦ Hyperlipidemia◦ Severe COPD – FEV-1 0.7 L◦ Current smokerPresentation◦ 3 hours of chest pain◦ Inferior ST elevation by EKG
Patient developed COPD exacerbation Intubated on hospital day 3Ventilator associated pneumoniaAtrial fibrillationGI BleedCVATracheostomyPassed away from multi-organ failure after 40 days from presentation
Developed to treat patients ◦ High surgical risk (Partner Cohort-A)◦ In-operable (Partner Cohort-B)◦ Technically difficult
Porcelain AortaRadiationSternal infectionPatent LIMA underneath sternum
Frailty - Risk Assessment in ElderlySyndrome of multisystem impairment associated with aging that results in decreased physiologic reserve and increased vulnerability to stressors.
Increasing ageFried J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3)figure modified from Taffert GE: Physiology of aging. 2003.
Objective Frailty Assessment -Physical Frailty in CHS
Self Report Objective Measures• Unintentional
weight loss• Subjective
exhaustion• Low physical
activity
• Slow walking speed• Low grip strength
Fried 2001, Guralnik 2000,Studenski 2011, Afilalo, 2010.
Frailty increases risk for• Death• New disability• Major complications after
cardiac surgery• Resource utilization
Frailty in the general population
Fried, LP. J Geront Med Sci 2001, 56A, 3, M146
3‐year Outcomes (%)Frailty Status at Baseline (n)
Died First Hospitalization
First Fall Worsening ADL Disability
Worsening Mobility Disability
Not Frail (2469) 3 33 15 8 23Intermediate (2480) 7 43 19 20 40
Frail (368) 7% 18 59 28 39 51
p‐value <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
Frailty Score in Transcatheter Valve
Score range 0-12 12 = most frail 0 = least frail
J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5(9):974
Frailty Domain Measure Frailty ScoreSlowness 15 foot walk gait speed (m/s) Quartiles (0-3)
Weakness Grip strength (kg) Gender based quartiles (0-3)
Wasting and malnutrition
Serum albumin (g/dl) Quartiles (0-3)
Inactivity Katz ADLs (dress, bath, transfer, feed, toilet, continence)
Any dependence=3, Independence=0
Frailty: Increased mortality after TAVR
Frailty ≠ Futility 78% of frail subjects alive at 1 year
J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5(9):974
94 year old femalePresents with Class III CHFSTS 11.2%Normal coronariesNormal LV functionPADBalloon Aortic Valvuloplasty 1 year agoFrailty score◦ After valvuloplasty – 3◦ Current presentation - 7
Vmax 3.7m/sec after BAV now back to 4.18m/sec ; mean gradient 45 mm HG Area-0.8cm 2
Heavily calcified valve
• Procedural success is lower in elderly pts (≥ 80 years) than inyounger groups (70-80 years and < 70 years): 74.2% vs. 78% vs. 81.4%, respectively; P < 0.001)
In multivariate analysis, advanced age predicts increasedvascular access complications
• However, very old age is not associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality, MI, stroke, or reintervention
•
7,769 pts from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of MichiganCardiovascular Consortium PVI registry.
Plaisance BR, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv.2011;4:694-701.
Safety of Contemporary Percutaneous Peripheral ArterialInterventions in the Elderly
Implications: Contemporary peripheral vascular intervention canbe performed in elderly patients with low rates of periproceduralcomplications.
85 year old practicing attorney presents with chest pain and right foot pain and noted to have troponin 2.4◦ DM◦ HTN◦ Hyperlipidemia◦ CAD s/p CABG in 2000◦ CRI with creatinine in 1.8 to 2.0 rangeInitial medical management◦ NTG, iv heparin◦ ASA, beta blocker, statin
Physical Exam◦ Clear lungs, S4, 1/6 SEM, R carotid bruit◦ Left toe ulcer and non-palpable pulses in left footChest discomfort improved with medical therapyABI◦ Right – 0.72; Left 0.4Carotid ultrasound◦ Right > 80% stenosis; Left < 50% stenosisEcho◦ EF 55-60%, Aortic sclerosis
Cardiac◦ No angina◦ Stress study in 2011 – No ischemia, EF 60%Lower extremity◦ No claudication (ABI in 2013: R–0.9, L-0.8) ◦ R toe – partial amputation; healed well◦ No further ischemic sequalaeCarotid◦ Widely patent stent in 2013Renal◦ Creatinine – 2.2
Patients > 75 years :Are usually not enrolled in clinical trialsPresent with atypical symptomsHave more co-morbiditiesHave more risks associated with interventionsHave the greatest benefit