intrinsic water use efficiency at the pollination stage as a parameter for
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/16/2019 Intrinsic Water Use Efficiency at the Pollination Stage as a Parameter For
1/6
PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM 106: 184–189. 1999 Copyright © Physiologia Plantarum 1999 ISSN 0031-9317 Printed in Ireland — all rights resered
Intrinsic water use efficiency at the pollination stage as a parameter for
drought tolerance selection in Phaseolus ulgaris
C. Pimentela,*, D. Laffrayb and P. Louguetb
aDepto. de Fitotecnia, I .A., Uni . Fed . Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Itaguaı́ , 23851-970 , RJ , Brazil bLab. de Physiologie Végétale, Faculté des Sciences , Uni . Paris-Val de Marne, A. du Gén. de Gaulle, F -94 010 , Créteil -Cedex, France
*Corresponding author, e-mail : [email protected]
Received 25 November 1998; revised 22 February 1999
or 39 DAS. The cultivar SC-90298823 had greater stomatalGenotype differences in gas exchange during ontogeny and
conductance at 39 DAS and a higher photosynthetic level thanwater stress responses at the vegetative and pollination stages
the other lines. Stomata of Ouro negro remained partiallywere evaluated in four lines of Phaseolus ulgaris L. In the
open during the water stress at the pollination stage (39 DAS)cultivar Carioca, net photosynthetic rate (A) and stomatal
and supported a positive net photosynthetic rate (A). Differ-conductance ( g s) were lower at the vegetative stage (20 daysafter sowing [DAS]) and maximum at the pollination stage (39 ences were also found between lines in intrinsic water use
efficiency (IWUE) at 39 DAS, but not at 20 DAS. TheDAS), followed by a decrease at the flowering stage (46 DAS)
and a dramatic fall at the grain-filling stage (60 DAS). possibility of using IWUE at the pollination stage is discussed,
in view of its use as one of the parameters for a droughtAmong the lines studied, the stomata of A320 closed faster
than those of the other lines when water stress occurred at 20 tolerance breeding program in bean lines.
Introduction
Water availability is one of the most important constraints
for plant productivity, mostly affecting the growth of leaves
and roots, stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and dry
matter accumulation (Blum 1997). Water stress tolerance is
considered a multigenic characteristic, and beans (Phaseolus
ulgaris L.) have two main mechanisms for adapting to
water stress: stomatal control (Laffray and Louguet 1990)
and root development (Kuruvadi and Aguilera 1990).
Past research on adaptation of common beans has
demonstrated that differences in yield under water stress
were primarily due to variation in the root habit (Norman et
al. 1995) and White et al. (1990) pointed out the correlation
between gas exchange and root density in the water deficit
responses of beans. Stomatal conductance control in a pho-
tosynthetically efficient genotype can cause a decrease in leaf
transpiration, maintaining growth and yield (Ehleringer
1990).Beans have a lower photosynthetic rate than grasses
because of a low CO2 mesophyll conductance from sub-
stomatal cavities through the cell wall, membranes and
liquid to fixation sites (von Caemmerer and Evans 1991).
Leaf anatomy and chloroplast distribution probably play a
role in this process (Nobel 1991). Roupsard et al. (1996)
showed that stomatal closure is probably the main factor
reducing CO2 concentration in the chloroplast during
drought in oak, a C3 species with a low photosynthetic rate.
However, Jones (1998) argued that the stomata play a
relatively small role (20%) in total photosynthetic limitation,
but they may play a major role in determining the difference
in assimilation rate within plants.
The production of beans can be decreased by more than
50% when water stress occurs during the pollination or
flowering stages (Norman et al. 1995), and there are differ-
ences in the effect of gas exchange on production and
adaptation among bean cultivars evaluated at the pollina-
tion stage (Bascur et al. 1985). Early stages of reproduction
are more susceptible to losses from a limited water supply
than any other stage of development in reproductive crops(Kramer and Boyer 1995). At those times, there was a
positive correlation between net CO2 exchange and final
yield. Although the requirement for photosynthate by flow-
ers, at this critical stage, is relatively low, a threshold level of
Abbreiations – A, net photosynthetic rate; DAS, days after sowing; g s, stomatal conductance; IWUE, intrinsic water use efficiency.
Physiol. Plant. 106, 1999184
-
8/16/2019 Intrinsic Water Use Efficiency at the Pollination Stage as a Parameter For
2/6
carbon accumulation is required to stimulate fertilization
(Wardlaw 1990).
In order to evaluate gas exchange adaptation, Osmond et
al. (1980), Cornic et al. (1983), and Jones (1985) proposed to
select drought-tolerant plants, mostly among C3 plants, by
analyzing the intrinsic water use efficiency (IWUE), i.e., the
rate of photosynthesis obtained for any given stomatal
conductance (A/ g s).
The present study was carried out to evaluate A and g s at
the vegetative, pollination, flowering and grain-filling stages
and to analyze the IWUE at the vegetative and pollination
stages under water stress. The trial was conducted on linesthat showed good performance in the field, with a lesser
effect of root growth on gas exchange. Differences in root
development were lower in plants growing in pots because
the root system developed in the same volume of soil. Ismail
et al. (1994) demonstrated, with cowpea plants growing in
three pot sizes, that the differences in the carbon isotope
discrimination and water use efficiency among cultivars were
correlated with the concentration of ABA in the xylem sap,
but not with pot size. Our objective was to evaluate the use
of the IWUE at the pollination stage as one of the parame-
ters for a breeding program to improve water stress
tolerance.
Materials and methods
Four bean lines were grown under controlled conditions of
14 h of light with a photon flux density of 360 mol m−2
s−1 and maximum and minimum temperatures of 28 and
22°C, in 5-l pots containing a 50/50 peat/vermiculite mix-
ture. They were permanently irrigated using a controlled
system and once a week received a diluted commercial
nutrient solution containing 21.5 g l−1 N-NO3−, 63.0 g l−1
K, 17.5 g l−1 P, 9.4 g l−1 S, 8.5 g l−1 Mg, 6.0 g l−1 Ca and
micronutrients.
The selected lines were SC-90298823 (a new line for high
temperature zones developed by CNPAF-EMBRAPA), Car-ioca (the cultivar most commonly cultivated in Brazil), Ouro
negro (a new black seeded cultivar) and A320 (a line that
maintains high leaf water potential under drought condi-
tions; Pimentel et al. 1991). In a first experiment, the line
Carioca was used to compare the gas exchange at different
stages, and in a second experiment, water stress effects were
studied in all four lines. In the field and in these experi-
ments, the lines have the same growth habit, intermediate
between type II and III (type II is an upright indeterminate
habit, with an erect stem without a guide, and type III is a
bush indeterminate habit, with a prostate stem and variable
ability to climb; Grahan and Ranalli 1997), maturity at 75
days after sowing (DAS), and practically the same shoot
weight and leaf area.
In the first experiment, the line Carioca was sown at
different moments to have plants at different stages. Data
for the ontogenic study were collected on plants at 20 DAS
(vegetative stage), at 39 DAS (pollination stage), at 46 DAS
(flowering stage) and at 60 DAS (grain-filling stage). The
pots were arranged in a completely randomized design (1
genotype×4 age groups), with three replicates. The mea-
surements were made on different leaves sampled on three
different plants. At all of these stages, gas exchange was
measured on the medium leaflet of the oldest and first
trifoliolate leaf and on the third and fifth trifoliolate leaves,
using an infrared gas analyzer in an open circuit (ADC
model 225-MK3; ADC, UK). The first and oldest leaf was
mature, but was not considered to be parasitic for the rest of
the plant (Wardlaw 1990). The third leaf was the youngest
fully expanded leaf with maximum photosynthate export.
The fifth leaf was at 50% of expansion and beginning to
export photoassimilates (Foyer and Galtier 1996). The
whole leaflet attached to the plant was placed in a tempera-ture-controlled chamber with forced ventilation to obtain a
high boundary layer conductance. The chamber, fitted with
a heat-reflecting glass, was illuminated with a photon flux
density of 780 mol m−2 s−1, and the ambient air in the
chamber was at 25°C, with a vapor pressure deficit (VPD) of
0.010 mol mol−1. The air temperature was maintained by a
water jacket circuit in an aluminium-walled chamber under-
surface, and the VPD was controlled by bubbling air first
through water at a temperature well above the required dew
point and then through water at the dew point temperature
for this VPD, before entering the chamber (Long and Häll-
gren 1993).
The second experiment was conducted to evaluate water
stress and rehydration effects on the four lines at two
growth stages. Therefore, a drying treatment was applied by
withholding water at 20 and 39 DAS and then rehydrating
for 2 days when the pre-dawn leaf water potential ( l) was
near −1.5 MPa. The four lines were sown together and the
measurements were made first on plants at the youngest age
(20 DAS) and later on others plants at the second age (39
DAS). The pots were also laid out in a completely random-
ized design (4 lines×2 age groups, at 20 and 39 DAS), with
three replicates on different leaves at the same position on
three different plants. The tension in the xylem was mea-
sured with a Scholander pressure chamber in a central leaf
on the same plant in which gas exchange measurements
were made. These measurements were assumed to measurethe l. For beans, a l of −1.5 MPa is the minimum for
full recovery (Boyer 1978) and was achieved in 5 days
during the vegetative stage and 3 days during the pollination
stage. Gas exchange measurements were performed on the
middle leaflet of the youngest fully expanded leaf, which had
a maximum photoassimilate export.
Net photosynthetic rate (A) and stomatal conductance
( g s) were calculated according to von Caemmerer and Far-
quhar (1981). The IWUE was derived by a second-order
polynomial relation between A and g s and calculated by
dividing A by g s (Osmond et al. 1980). The values of
transpiration (E ) were not shown because they were propor-
tional to g s. Both were calculated from the difference be-
tween air humidity at the entrance and exit of the chamber.
The maximum value of E was around 2.5 mol m−2 s−1 at
20 DAS for all lines. At 39 DAS, E was 3.2 mol m−2 s−1
in SC-90298823 and around 2.0 mol m−2 s−1 for the other
lines.
The data were subjected to analysis of variance
(ANOVA), and means were compared and segregated using
the Tukey test.
Physiol. Plant. 106, 1999 185
-
8/16/2019 Intrinsic Water Use Efficiency at the Pollination Stage as a Parameter For
3/6
Results
During the ontogeny of Carioca, A was lower at the vegeta-
tive stage, maximum at the pollination stage and decreased
at the flowering stage and, more dramatically, during grain
filling (Table 1). The measured values of A agree with those
presented by von Caemmerer and Evans (1991). These
variations in A were not related to equivalent changes in g s,
which were in the same range at the vegetative and pollina-
tion stages. Nevertheless, the g s values were greater than at
the flowering and grain-filling stages. Maximum gas ex-
change was observed at the vegetative stage in the fifth leaf and at the pollination stage in the third leaf. At the flower-
ing and grain-filling stages, no significant differences were
detected between the third and fifth leaves.
Under water deficit at the vegetative and pollination stages,
the l of line A320 was significantly higher (Fig. 1) than the
values for the other lines. Before water stress, SC-9029883 had
a significantly higher A than the other lines, both at 20 DAS
(Fig. 2a) and 39 DAS (Fig. 2b). The g s was not significantly
different from A320 and Carioca at 20 DAS (Fig. 3a), but was
significantly higher than in the other lines at 39 DAS (Fig. 3b).
The cultivar Carioca showed the lowest A before water stress
at20 DAS.At 39 DAS, the lowest A was found in Ouro negro.
The imposition of water stress caused a decrease in A and
g s for all lines, with a reduced l at the two stages. How-ever, both A and g s of line A320 reached zero at a higher lat 20 DAS (Fig. 2a, Fig. 3a) and 39 DAS (Fig. 2b, Fig. 3b)
compared to the other lines. The rapid stomatal closure of
A320 was the cause of its higher l during the water stress
compared to the other lines (Fig. 1).
The SC-9029883 and Carioca lines showed the same
behavior with respect to A, g s and l at 20 and 39 DAS.
However, the cultivar Ouro negro, in which A and g sreached zero at the same l value as the other lines at 20
DAS, maintained a positive A and displayed only a slight
decrease of g s at 39 DAS.
Fig. 1. Leaf water potential ( l) on the youngest most developedleaf of the four lines SC-9029883 (), Carioca (), Ouro negro() and A320 (), during water stress and rehydration, at 20 DAS(a) and at 39 DAS (b). (a) LSD5%=0.12 MPa. (b) LSD5%=0.09MPa.
The relation between A and g s was best fitted with a
second-order polynomial, and the slope described the IWUE
in the vegetative (20 DAS) and pollination (39 DAS) stages(Fig. 4). Differences appeared among lines at the pollina-
tion, but not at the vegetative stage. At 20 DAS, A320,
Carioca and Ouro negro showed the greatest A, with a
higher g s, while SC-9029883 showed the highest A value
among lines, with a lower g s. At 39 DAS, SC-9029883 had
the highest A, but also the highest g s. A320 and Carioca
showed the best IWUE at the pollination stage, having a
high A with low g s (Fig. 4b) and, consequently, E .
The values of IWUE during water stress were the same
for all lines at 20 DAS (Table 2), except on the fourth day
of water stress, when Ouro negro showed the highest value.
However, for plants at pollination stage (39 DAS), there
were significant differences among lines, and the highestIWUE values during water stress were obtained for Carioca
and Ouro negro (Table 2).
Discussion
Carbohydrate accumulation during the pollination stage,
when the plants show their maximum A, will be of primary
Table 1. Photosynthetic rate (A) and stomatal conductance ( g s) of the genotype Carioca, at 20 (vegetative stage), 39 (pollinationstage), 46 (flowering stage) and 60 (grain-filling stage) days aftersowing (DAS), in the first oldest leaf (1) and in the third (3) andfifth trifoliolate leaves (5). In the columns, values followed bydifferent letters are significant by difference at 5% (for leaf) at eachdevelopmental stage.
Stage Leaf A (mol m−2 s−1) g s (mol m−2 s−1)
Vegetative 1 0.041a0.18a(20 DAS)
0.066ab3 4.44b5 0.131b6.59c
Pollination 1 5.27a 0.019a(39 DAS)
3 13.29c 0.150c
5 11.99b 0.095bFlowering 0.030a1 1.13a
(46 DAS)3 5.65b 0.070b
0.056b5.01b5
Grain filling 0.019a1 0.59a(60 DAS)
0.050b2.57b32.96b5 0.049b
Physiol. Plant. 106, 1999186
-
8/16/2019 Intrinsic Water Use Efficiency at the Pollination Stage as a Parameter For
4/6
importance for the next stages in the growth of pods and
seeds (Table 1). If a climatic constraint occurs at this
stage, bean production will be affected dramatically (Bas-
cur et al. 1985). Because most (90%) of the pods that
reach maturity were formed from early flowers, the reduc-
tion of photosynthesis induced by drought at this stage
will cause the abscission of these flowers and thus a lower
productivity (Norman et al. 1995).
When a water deficit was applied, the gas exchange
reached zero faster in plants at 39 DAS (3 days) than in
plants at 20 DAS (5 days), despite the same l values
(Fig. 1). This was caused by the greater total leaf area at39 DAS compared to 20 DAS.
Under water stress, line A320 closed stomata more and
maintained l higher than the other lines in the two
stages at 20 and 39 DAS (Fig. 3), as also shown by
Pimentel et al. (1991). This is a desirable drought avoid-
ance mechanism in beans (Subbarao et al. 1995), but the
reduction of A caused by stomatal closure probably made
the plant use its own reserves. If the water deficit was not
prolonged, there would be little yield loss.
There can be non-uniform stomatal closure under water
stress, called patchiness, which causes variations of A and
CO2 concentration in the chloroplasts, but Cheeseman
(1991) showed that stomatal patchiness cannot account for
changes in the relation between A and intercellular CO2
Fig. 3. Stomatal conductance ( g s) and leaf water potential ( l)relations on the youngest fully expanded leaf of the four linesSC-9029883 (), Carioca (), Ouro negro () and A320 (),during water stress at 20 DAS (a) and at 39 DAS (b). (a) LSD5%=0.04 mol m−2 s−1. (b) LSD5%=0.1 mol m
−2 s−1.
Fig. 2. Photosynthetic rate (A) and leaf water potential 1 relationson the youngest fully expanded leaf of the four lines, SC-9029883(), Carioca (), Ouro negro () and A320 (), during waterstress at 20 DAS (a) and at 39 DAS (b). (a) LSD5%=1.2 mol m
−2
s−1. (b) LSD5%=2.5 mol m−2 s−1.
concentration. One factor reducing CO2 availability in the
chloroplast during drought might be stomatal closure
(Roupsard et al. 1996), but loss of photosynthetic bio-
chemical activity also seems to be involved (Lauer and
Boyer 1992). In our study, besides a rapid stomatal clo-
sure (Fig. 3) and a consequent reduction in water loss,
line A320 showed a lower stomatal limitation of A, as
pointed out by Jones (1998), than SC-90298883 and Ouro
negro under water deficit at the pollination stage (Fig.
4b).
Line SC-9029883 can be selected for cropping with irriga-
tion, where it can keep a high g s and A, in order to obtain
the highest yield. The response of Carioca, with values of A
close to those of SC-9029883 when well hydrated and show-
ing a high IWUE curve slope (Fig. 4b) and calculated values
(Table 2), explained the wide adaptation of this cultivar
planted in contrasting environments. Line A320 showed the
same IWUE slope as Carioca, but its stomata closed earlier.
Ouro negro, in which the stomata remained slightly open
under water stress at the pollination stage, causing a de-
crease in l (Fig. 1b), might present a better protoplasmic
tolerance than the other lines. However, more studies are
needed to confirm the response of A320 and Ouro negro in
Physiol. Plant. 106, 1999 187
-
8/16/2019 Intrinsic Water Use Efficiency at the Pollination Stage as a Parameter For
5/6
the field for their use in a drought tolerance breeding
program.
Drought tolerance is a multigenic mechanism, and char-
acterization of a drought-tolerant ideotype has not yet
been achieved. Therefore, numerous constitutive traits
must be considered for adaptation to drought (Blum
1997). The most used trait for breeding for drought toler-
ance in beans has been root growth, but several other
physiological, morphological and phenological characteris-
tics are required for desiccation tolerance. The IWUE at
the pollination stage could be one of the shoot parameters
to be used by plant breeders. Nevertheless, stomatal con-trol is not independent of root activity, and genotypes
with increased root growth under drought could maintain
large stomatal conductance, decreasing the IWUE (White
et al. 1990). Thus, this parameter should be evaluated in
the field together with other traits for drought adaptation
to confirm our results.
Table 2. Intrinsic water use efficiency (IWUE), in mol CO2 mol−1
H2O, of the four lines during 5 days of water stress at 20 days aftersowing (DAS) and during 3 days of water stress at 39 DAS. In thelines, values followed by different letters are significant by differ-ence at 5% (for genotype) at each day of water stress.
A320Days SC-9029883 Carioca Ouro negro
At 20 DAS45a1 55a 39a 37a39a51a45a2 67a
92a3 43a71a 47a113bc 195c 0a4 90ab
0a5 0a0a 0a
At 39 DAS1 60a 77b43a 142b
83c 77c 15a2 41b0a3 74b0a0a
References
Bascur G, Oliva MA, Laing D (1985) Termometria infraroja enselection de genotipos de Frijol (Phaseolus ulgaris L.), re-sistentes a sequia. I Bases fisiológicas; II. Crecimento y produc-tividad. Turrialba 35: 3–13
Blum A (1997) Crop responses to drought and the interpretation of adaptation. In: Belhassen I (ed.) Drought Tolerance in HigherPlants: Genetical, Physiological, and Molecular Biological Anal-ysis. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, pp 57 –70. ISBN 0-
7923-4123-6Boyer JS (1978) Water deficits and photosynthesis. In: KozloviskiTT (ed.) Water Deficits and Plant Growth IV. Academic Press,New York, pp 154–191. ISBN 0-12-424154-9
Cheeseman JM (1991) PATCHY: Simulating and visualizing theeffects of stomatal patchiness on photosynthetic CO2 exchangestudies. Plant Cell Environ 14: 593–599
Cornic G, Prioul JL, Louason G (1983) Stomatal and non-stomatalcontribution in the decline in leaf CO2 uptake during rapidwater stress. Physiol Plant 58: 295–301
Ehleringer JR (1990) Correlations between carbon isotope discrimi-nation and leaf conductance to water vapor in common beans.Plant Physiol 93: 1422–1425
Foyer CH, Galtier N (1996) Source-Sink interaction and communi-cation in leaves. In: Zamski E, Schaffer AA (eds) Photoassimi-late Distribution in Plants and Crops. Source-SinkRelationships. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 311–340.ISBN 0-8247-9440-0
Grahan PH, Ranalli P (1997) Common bean (Phaseolus ulgarisL.). Field Crops Res 53: 131–146
Ismail AM, Hall AE, Bray EA (1994) Drought and pot size effectson transpiration efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination of a cowpea accessions and hybrids. Aust J Plant Physiol 21:23–35
Kramer PJ, Boyer JS (1995) Water Relations of Plants and Soils.Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 377–404. ISBN 0-12-425060-2
Jones HG (1985) Partitioning stomatal and non stomatal limitationto photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 8: 95–104
Jones HG (1998) Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpira-tion. J Exp Bot 49: 387–398
Kuruvadi S, Aguilera DM (1990) Patrones del Sistema Radicular enFrijol Común (Phaseolus ulgaris L.). Turrialba 40: 491–498
Laffray D, Louguet P (1990) Stomatal responses and droughtresistance. Bull Soc Bot Fr, 137, Actual Bot 1: 47–60
Lauer MJ, Boyer JS (1992) Internal CO2 measured directly in
leaves. Abscisic and low leaf water potential cause opposingeffects. Plant Physiol 98: 1310–1316Long SP, Hällgren J-E (1993) Measurements of CO2 assimilation by
plants in the field and the laboratory. In: Hall DO, ScurlockJMO, Bolhàr-Nordenkampf HR, Leegood RC, Long SP (eds)Photosynthesis and Production in a Changing Environment. AField and Laboratory Manual. Chapman & Hall, London, pp129–167. ISBN 0-412-42900-4
Nobel PS (1991) Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiol-ogy. Academic Press, New York, pp 245–296. ISBN 0-12-520021-8
Fig. 4. Intrinsic water use efficiency (IWUE), i.e., the relationbetween the photosynthetic rate (A) and stomatal conductance ( g s)on the youngest fully expanded leaf of the four lines, during waterstress at 20 DAS (a) and at 39 DAS (b). (a) SC-9029883 (),0.59+77.56x−122.89x2, r2=0.71; Carioca (), −0.19+100.92x−253.45x2, r2=0.87; Ouro negro (), 0.30+96.66x−263.59x2, r2=0.85; A320 (), −0.32+91.75−192.17x2,r2=0.97. (b) SC-9029883, −0.22+54.25x−34.99x2, r2=0.99;Carioca, −0.44+151.54x−416.05x2, r2=0.89; Ouro negro,0.90+99.86x−353.29x2, r 2=0.99; A320, 0.13+88.10x+75.79x2,r2=0.99.
Physiol. Plant. 106, 1999188
-
8/16/2019 Intrinsic Water Use Efficiency at the Pollination Stage as a Parameter For
6/6
Norman MJT, Pearson CJ, Searle PGE (1995) The Ecology of Tropical Food Crops. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,pp 208–224. ISBN 0-521-42264-7
Osmond CB, Winter K, Powles SB (1980) Adaptive significance of carbon dioxide cycling during photosynthesis in water-stressedplants. In: Turner NC, Kramer PJ (eds) Adaptation of Plants toWater and High Temperature Stress. John Wiley & Sons, NewYork, pp 139–154. ISBN 0-471-05372-4
Pimentel C, Jacob Neto J, Goi SR, Pessanha GG (1991) Efeito doestresse hı́drico em cultivares de Phaseolus ulgaris L., emsimbiose com o Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar phaseoli . Tur-rialba 40: 521–526
Roupsard O, Gross P, Dreyer E (1996) Limitation of photosyn-thetic activity by CO2 availability in the chloroplast of oak
leaves from different species and during drought. Ann Sci For53: 243–254
Subbarao GV, Johansen AC, Slinkard RC, Rao N, Saxena NP,Chauhan YS (1995) Strategies for improving drought resistancein grain legumes. Crit Rev Plant Sci 14: 469–529
von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD (1981) Some relationships be-tween the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchangeof leaves. Planta 153: 676–687
von Caemmerer S, Evans JR (1991) Determination of the averagepartial pressure of CO2 in chloroplasts from leaves of several C3plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 18: 287–305
Wardlaw IF (1990) The control of carbon partioning in plants. NewPhytol 116: 341–381
White JW, Castillo JA, Ehleringer J (1990) Associations betweenproductivity, root growth and carbon isotope discrimination inPhaseolus ulgaris under water stress. Aust J Plant Physiol 17:189–198
Edited by I. Terashima
Physiol. Plant. 106, 1999 189