intrinsic water use efficiency at the pollination stage as a parameter for

Upload: gerydde

Post on 05-Jul-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/16/2019 Intrinsic Water Use Efficiency at the Pollination Stage as a Parameter For

    1/6

    PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM 106: 184–189. 1999   Copyright  ©   Physiologia Plantarum   1999 ISSN  0031-9317 Printed in Ireland  — all rights resered 

    Intrinsic water use efficiency at the pollination stage as a parameter for

    drought tolerance selection in  Phaseolus   ulgaris

    C. Pimentela,*, D. Laffrayb and P. Louguetb

    aDepto.  de Fitotecnia,   I .A.,   Uni .  Fed .  Rural do Rio de Janeiro,   Itaguaı́ ,   23851-970 ,  RJ ,  Brazil bLab.  de Physiologie Végétale,   Faculté des Sciences ,   Uni .  Paris-Val de Marne,  A.  du Gén.  de Gaulle,  F -94 010 ,  Créteil -Cedex,  France

    *Corresponding author,  e-mail :  [email protected]

    Received 25 November 1998; revised 22 February 1999

    or 39 DAS. The cultivar SC-90298823 had greater stomatalGenotype differences in gas exchange during ontogeny and

    conductance at 39 DAS and a higher photosynthetic level thanwater stress responses at the vegetative and pollination stages

    the other lines. Stomata of Ouro negro remained partiallywere evaluated in four lines of  Phaseolus   ulgaris   L. In the

    open during the water stress at the pollination stage (39 DAS)cultivar Carioca, net photosynthetic rate (A) and stomatal

    and supported a positive net photosynthetic rate (A). Differ-conductance ( g s) were lower at the vegetative stage (20 daysafter sowing [DAS]) and maximum at the pollination stage (39 ences were also found between lines in intrinsic water use

    efficiency (IWUE) at 39 DAS, but not at 20 DAS. TheDAS), followed by a decrease at the flowering stage (46 DAS)

    and a dramatic fall at the grain-filling stage (60 DAS). possibility of using IWUE at the pollination stage is discussed,

    in view of its use as one of the parameters for a droughtAmong the lines studied, the stomata of A320 closed faster

    than those of the other lines when water stress occurred at 20 tolerance breeding program in bean lines.

    Introduction

    Water availability is one of the most important constraints

    for plant productivity, mostly affecting the growth of leaves

    and roots, stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and dry

    matter accumulation (Blum 1997). Water stress tolerance is

    considered a multigenic characteristic, and beans (Phaseolus

    ulgaris   L.) have two main mechanisms for adapting to

    water stress: stomatal control (Laffray and Louguet 1990)

    and root development (Kuruvadi and Aguilera 1990).

    Past research on adaptation of common beans has

    demonstrated that differences in yield under water stress

    were primarily due to variation in the root habit (Norman et

    al. 1995) and White et al. (1990) pointed out the correlation

    between gas exchange and root density in the water deficit

    responses of beans. Stomatal conductance control in a pho-

    tosynthetically efficient genotype can cause a decrease in leaf 

    transpiration, maintaining growth and yield (Ehleringer

    1990).Beans have a lower photosynthetic rate than grasses

    because of a low CO2   mesophyll conductance from sub-

    stomatal cavities through the cell wall, membranes and

    liquid to fixation sites (von Caemmerer and Evans 1991).

    Leaf anatomy and chloroplast distribution probably play a

    role in this process (Nobel 1991). Roupsard et al. (1996)

    showed that stomatal closure is probably the main factor

    reducing CO2   concentration in the chloroplast during

    drought in oak, a C3   species with a low photosynthetic rate.

    However, Jones (1998) argued that the stomata play a

    relatively small role (20%) in total photosynthetic limitation,

    but they may play a major role in determining the difference

    in assimilation rate within plants.

    The production of beans can be decreased by more than

    50% when water stress occurs during the pollination or

    flowering stages (Norman et al. 1995), and there are differ-

    ences in the effect of gas exchange on production and

    adaptation among bean cultivars evaluated at the pollina-

    tion stage (Bascur et al. 1985). Early stages of reproduction

    are more susceptible to losses from a limited water supply

    than any other stage of development in reproductive crops(Kramer and Boyer 1995). At those times, there was a

    positive correlation between net CO2   exchange and final

    yield. Although the requirement for photosynthate by flow-

    ers, at this critical stage, is relatively low, a threshold level of 

    Abbreiations   –   A, net photosynthetic rate; DAS, days after sowing;  g s, stomatal conductance; IWUE, intrinsic water use efficiency.

    Physiol. Plant. 106, 1999184

  • 8/16/2019 Intrinsic Water Use Efficiency at the Pollination Stage as a Parameter For

    2/6

    carbon accumulation is required to stimulate fertilization

    (Wardlaw 1990).

    In order to evaluate gas exchange adaptation, Osmond et

    al. (1980), Cornic et al. (1983), and Jones (1985) proposed to

    select drought-tolerant plants, mostly among C3  plants, by

    analyzing the intrinsic water use efficiency (IWUE), i.e., the

    rate of photosynthesis obtained for any given stomatal

    conductance (A/ g s).

    The present study was carried out to evaluate  A  and  g s  at

    the vegetative, pollination, flowering and grain-filling stages

    and to analyze the IWUE at the vegetative and pollination

    stages under water stress. The trial was conducted on linesthat showed good performance in the field, with a lesser

    effect of root growth on gas exchange. Differences in root

    development were lower in plants growing in pots because

    the root system developed in the same volume of soil. Ismail

    et al. (1994) demonstrated, with cowpea plants growing in

    three pot sizes, that the differences in the carbon isotope

    discrimination and water use efficiency among cultivars were

    correlated with the concentration of ABA in the xylem sap,

    but not with pot size. Our objective was to evaluate the use

    of the IWUE at the pollination stage as one of the parame-

    ters for a breeding program to improve water stress

    tolerance.

    Materials and methods

    Four bean lines were grown under controlled conditions of 

    14 h of light with a photon flux density of 360   mol m−2

    s−1 and maximum and minimum temperatures of 28 and

    22°C, in 5-l pots containing a 50/50 peat/vermiculite mix-

    ture. They were permanently irrigated using a controlled

    system and once a week received a diluted commercial

    nutrient solution containing 21.5 g l−1 N-NO3−, 63.0 g l−1

    K, 17.5 g l−1 P, 9.4 g l−1 S, 8.5 g l−1 Mg, 6.0 g l−1 Ca and

    micronutrients.

    The selected lines were SC-90298823 (a new line for high

    temperature zones developed by CNPAF-EMBRAPA), Car-ioca (the cultivar most commonly cultivated in Brazil), Ouro

    negro (a new black seeded cultivar) and A320 (a line that

    maintains high leaf water potential under drought condi-

    tions; Pimentel et al. 1991). In a first experiment, the line

    Carioca was used to compare the gas exchange at different

    stages, and in a second experiment, water stress effects were

    studied in all four lines. In the field and in these experi-

    ments, the lines have the same growth habit, intermediate

    between type II and III (type II is an upright indeterminate

    habit, with an erect stem without a guide, and type III is a

    bush indeterminate habit, with a prostate stem and variable

    ability to climb; Grahan and Ranalli 1997), maturity at 75

    days after sowing (DAS), and practically the same shoot

    weight and leaf area.

    In the first experiment, the line Carioca was sown at

    different moments to have plants at different stages. Data

    for the ontogenic study were collected on plants at 20 DAS

    (vegetative stage), at 39 DAS (pollination stage), at 46 DAS

    (flowering stage) and at 60 DAS (grain-filling stage). The

    pots were arranged in a completely randomized design (1

    genotype×4 age groups), with three replicates. The mea-

    surements were made on different leaves sampled on three

    different plants. At all of these stages, gas exchange was

    measured on the medium leaflet of the oldest and first

    trifoliolate leaf and on the third and fifth trifoliolate leaves,

    using an infrared gas analyzer in an open circuit (ADC

    model 225-MK3; ADC, UK). The first and oldest leaf was

    mature, but was not considered to be parasitic for the rest of 

    the plant (Wardlaw 1990). The third leaf was the youngest

    fully expanded leaf with maximum photosynthate export.

    The fifth leaf was at 50% of expansion and beginning to

    export photoassimilates (Foyer and Galtier 1996). The

    whole leaflet attached to the plant was placed in a tempera-ture-controlled chamber with forced ventilation to obtain a

    high boundary layer conductance. The chamber, fitted with

    a heat-reflecting glass, was illuminated with a photon flux

    density of 780   mol m−2 s−1, and the ambient air in the

    chamber was at 25°C, with a vapor pressure deficit (VPD) of 

    0.010 mol mol−1. The air temperature was maintained by a

    water jacket circuit in an aluminium-walled chamber under-

    surface, and the VPD was controlled by bubbling air first

    through water at a temperature well above the required dew

    point and then through water at the dew point temperature

    for this VPD, before entering the chamber (Long and Häll-

    gren 1993).

    The second experiment was conducted to evaluate water

    stress and rehydration effects on the four lines at two

    growth stages. Therefore, a drying treatment was applied by

    withholding water at 20 and 39 DAS and then rehydrating

    for 2 days when the pre-dawn leaf water potential ( l) was

    near  −1.5 MPa. The four lines were sown together and the

    measurements were made first on plants at the youngest age

    (20 DAS) and later on others plants at the second age (39

    DAS). The pots were also laid out in a completely random-

    ized design (4 lines×2 age groups, at 20 and 39 DAS), with

    three replicates on different leaves at the same position on

    three different plants. The tension in the xylem was mea-

    sured with a Scholander pressure chamber in a central leaf 

    on the same plant in which gas exchange measurements

    were made. These measurements were assumed to measurethe   l. For beans, a   l   of  −1.5 MPa is the minimum for

    full recovery (Boyer 1978) and was achieved in 5 days

    during the vegetative stage and 3 days during the pollination

    stage. Gas exchange measurements were performed on the

    middle leaflet of the youngest fully expanded leaf, which had

    a maximum photoassimilate export.

    Net photosynthetic rate (A) and stomatal conductance

    ( g s) were calculated according to von Caemmerer and Far-

    quhar (1981). The IWUE was derived by a second-order

    polynomial relation between   A   and   g s   and calculated by

    dividing   A   by   g s   (Osmond et al. 1980). The values of 

    transpiration (E ) were not shown because they were propor-

    tional to   g s. Both were calculated from the difference be-

    tween air humidity at the entrance and exit of the chamber.

    The maximum value of  E   was around 2.5 mol m−2 s−1 at

    20 DAS for all lines. At 39 DAS,  E  was 3.2 mol m−2 s−1

    in SC-90298823 and around 2.0 mol m−2 s−1 for the other

    lines.

    The data were subjected to analysis of variance

    (ANOVA), and means were compared and segregated using

    the Tukey test.

    Physiol. Plant. 106, 1999   185

  • 8/16/2019 Intrinsic Water Use Efficiency at the Pollination Stage as a Parameter For

    3/6

    Results

    During the ontogeny of Carioca,  A  was lower at the vegeta-

    tive stage, maximum at the pollination stage and decreased

    at the flowering stage and, more dramatically, during grain

    filling (Table 1). The measured values of  A  agree with those

    presented by von Caemmerer and Evans (1991). These

    variations in  A  were not related to equivalent changes in  g s,

    which were in the same range at the vegetative and pollina-

    tion stages. Nevertheless, the  g s  values were greater than at

    the flowering and grain-filling stages. Maximum gas ex-

    change was observed at the vegetative stage in the fifth leaf and at the pollination stage in the third leaf. At the flower-

    ing and grain-filling stages, no significant differences were

    detected between the third and fifth leaves.

    Under water deficit at the vegetative and pollination stages,

    the  l  of line A320 was significantly higher (Fig. 1) than the

    values for the other lines. Before water stress, SC-9029883 had

    a significantly higher  A  than the other lines, both at 20 DAS

    (Fig. 2a) and 39 DAS (Fig. 2b). The  g s  was not significantly

    different from A320 and Carioca at 20 DAS (Fig. 3a), but was

    significantly higher than in the other lines at 39 DAS (Fig. 3b).

    The cultivar Carioca showed the lowest  A  before water stress

    at20 DAS.At 39 DAS, the lowest A was found in Ouro negro.

    The imposition of water stress caused a decrease in  A  and

     g s   for all lines, with a reduced   l   at the two stages. How-ever, both A  and  g s of line A320 reached zero at a higher  lat 20 DAS (Fig. 2a, Fig. 3a) and 39 DAS (Fig. 2b, Fig. 3b)

    compared to the other lines. The rapid stomatal closure of 

    A320 was the cause of its higher   l  during the water stress

    compared to the other lines (Fig. 1).

    The SC-9029883 and Carioca lines showed the same

    behavior with respect to   A,   g s   and    l   at 20 and 39 DAS.

    However, the cultivar Ouro negro, in which   A   and   g sreached zero at the same   l   value as the other lines at 20

    DAS, maintained a positive   A   and displayed only a slight

    decrease of  g s at 39 DAS.

    Fig. 1. Leaf water potential ( l) on the youngest most developedleaf of the four lines SC-9029883 (), Carioca (), Ouro negro() and A320 (), during water stress and rehydration, at 20 DAS(a) and at 39 DAS (b). (a)   LSD5%=0.12 MPa. (b)   LSD5%=0.09MPa.

    The relation between   A   and   g s   was best fitted with a

    second-order polynomial, and the slope described the IWUE

    in the vegetative (20 DAS) and pollination (39 DAS) stages(Fig. 4). Differences appeared among lines at the pollina-

    tion, but not at the vegetative stage. At 20 DAS, A320,

    Carioca and Ouro negro showed the greatest   A, with a

    higher   g s, while SC-9029883 showed the highest   A   value

    among lines, with a lower  g s. At 39 DAS, SC-9029883 had

    the highest   A, but also the highest   g s. A320 and Carioca

    showed the best IWUE at the pollination stage, having a

    high  A  with low   g s  (Fig. 4b) and, consequently,  E .

    The values of IWUE during water stress were the same

    for all lines at 20 DAS (Table 2), except on the fourth day

    of water stress, when Ouro negro showed the highest value.

    However, for plants at pollination stage (39 DAS), there

    were significant differences among lines, and the highestIWUE values during water stress were obtained for Carioca

    and Ouro negro (Table 2).

    Discussion

    Carbohydrate accumulation during the pollination stage,

    when the plants show their maximum  A, will be of primary

    Table 1. Photosynthetic rate (A) and stomatal conductance ( g s) of the genotype Carioca, at 20 (vegetative stage), 39 (pollinationstage), 46 (flowering stage) and 60 (grain-filling stage) days aftersowing (DAS), in the first oldest leaf (1) and in the third (3) andfifth trifoliolate leaves (5). In the columns, values followed bydifferent letters are significant by difference at 5% (for leaf) at eachdevelopmental stage.

    Stage Leaf     A   (mol m−2 s−1)   g s   (mol m−2 s−1)

    Vegetative 1 0.041a0.18a(20 DAS)

    0.066ab3 4.44b5 0.131b6.59c

    Pollination 1 5.27a 0.019a(39 DAS)

    3 13.29c 0.150c

    5 11.99b 0.095bFlowering 0.030a1 1.13a

    (46 DAS)3 5.65b 0.070b

    0.056b5.01b5

    Grain filling 0.019a1 0.59a(60 DAS)

    0.050b2.57b32.96b5 0.049b

    Physiol. Plant. 106, 1999186

  • 8/16/2019 Intrinsic Water Use Efficiency at the Pollination Stage as a Parameter For

    4/6

    importance for the next stages in the growth of pods and

    seeds (Table 1). If a climatic constraint occurs at this

    stage, bean production will be affected dramatically (Bas-

    cur et al. 1985). Because most (90%) of the pods that

    reach maturity were formed from early flowers, the reduc-

    tion of photosynthesis induced by drought at this stage

    will cause the abscission of these flowers and thus a lower

    productivity (Norman et al. 1995).

    When a water deficit was applied, the gas exchange

    reached zero faster in plants at 39 DAS (3 days) than in

    plants at 20 DAS (5 days), despite the same    l   values

    (Fig. 1). This was caused by the greater total leaf area at39 DAS compared to 20 DAS.

    Under water stress, line A320 closed stomata more and

    maintained    l   higher than the other lines in the two

    stages at 20 and 39 DAS (Fig. 3), as also shown by

    Pimentel et al. (1991). This is a desirable drought avoid-

    ance mechanism in beans (Subbarao et al. 1995), but the

    reduction of   A   caused by stomatal closure probably made

    the plant use its own reserves. If the water deficit was not

    prolonged, there would be little yield loss.

    There can be non-uniform stomatal closure under water

    stress, called patchiness, which causes variations of   A   and

    CO2   concentration in the chloroplasts, but Cheeseman

    (1991) showed that stomatal patchiness cannot account for

    changes in the relation between   A   and intercellular CO2

    Fig. 3. Stomatal conductance ( g s) and leaf water potential ( l)relations on the youngest fully expanded leaf of the four linesSC-9029883 (), Carioca (), Ouro negro () and A320 (),during water stress at 20 DAS (a) and at 39 DAS (b). (a)   LSD5%=0.04 mol m−2 s−1. (b)   LSD5%=0.1 mol m

    −2 s−1.

    Fig. 2. Photosynthetic rate (A) and leaf water potential  1 relationson the youngest fully expanded leaf of the four lines, SC-9029883(), Carioca (), Ouro negro () and A320 (), during waterstress at 20 DAS (a) and at 39 DAS (b). (a)   LSD5%=1.2  mol m

    −2

    s−1. (b)   LSD5%=2.5   mol m−2 s−1.

    concentration. One factor reducing CO2   availability in the

    chloroplast during drought might be stomatal closure

    (Roupsard et al. 1996), but loss of photosynthetic bio-

    chemical activity also seems to be involved (Lauer and

    Boyer 1992). In our study, besides a rapid stomatal clo-

    sure (Fig. 3) and a consequent reduction in water loss,

    line A320 showed a lower stomatal limitation of   A, as

    pointed out by Jones (1998), than SC-90298883 and Ouro

    negro under water deficit at the pollination stage (Fig.

    4b).

    Line SC-9029883 can be selected for cropping with irriga-

    tion, where it can keep a high  g s  and  A, in order to obtain

    the highest yield. The response of Carioca, with values of  A

    close to those of SC-9029883 when well hydrated and show-

    ing a high IWUE curve slope (Fig. 4b) and calculated values

    (Table 2), explained the wide adaptation of this cultivar

    planted in contrasting environments. Line A320 showed the

    same IWUE slope as Carioca, but its stomata closed earlier.

    Ouro negro, in which the stomata remained slightly open

    under water stress at the pollination stage, causing a de-

    crease in   l   (Fig. 1b), might present a better protoplasmic

    tolerance than the other lines. However, more studies are

    needed to confirm the response of A320 and Ouro negro in

    Physiol. Plant. 106, 1999   187

  • 8/16/2019 Intrinsic Water Use Efficiency at the Pollination Stage as a Parameter For

    5/6

    the field for their use in a drought tolerance breeding

    program.

    Drought tolerance is a multigenic mechanism, and char-

    acterization of a drought-tolerant ideotype has not yet

    been achieved. Therefore, numerous constitutive traits

    must be considered for adaptation to drought (Blum

    1997). The most used trait for breeding for drought toler-

    ance in beans has been root growth, but several other

    physiological, morphological and phenological characteris-

    tics are required for desiccation tolerance. The IWUE at

    the pollination stage could be one of the shoot parameters

    to be used by plant breeders. Nevertheless, stomatal con-trol is not independent of root activity, and genotypes

    with increased root growth under drought could maintain

    large stomatal conductance, decreasing the IWUE (White

    et al. 1990). Thus, this parameter should be evaluated in

    the field together with other traits for drought adaptation

    to confirm our results.

    Table 2. Intrinsic water use efficiency (IWUE), in  mol CO2 mol−1

    H2O, of the four lines during 5 days of water stress at 20 days aftersowing (DAS) and during 3 days of water stress at 39 DAS. In thelines, values followed by different letters are significant by differ-ence at 5% (for genotype) at each day of water stress.

    A320Days SC-9029883 Carioca Ouro negro

    At 20 DAS45a1 55a 39a 37a39a51a45a2 67a

    92a3 43a71a 47a113bc 195c 0a4 90ab

    0a5 0a0a 0a

    At 39 DAS1 60a 77b43a 142b

    83c 77c 15a2 41b0a3 74b0a0a

    References

    Bascur G, Oliva MA, Laing D (1985) Termometria infraroja enselection de genotipos de Frijol (Phaseolus   ulgaris   L.), re-sistentes a sequia. I Bases fisiológicas; II. Crecimento y produc-tividad. Turrialba 35: 3–13

    Blum A (1997) Crop responses to drought and the interpretation of adaptation. In: Belhassen I (ed.) Drought Tolerance in HigherPlants: Genetical, Physiological, and Molecular Biological Anal-ysis. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, pp 57 –70. ISBN 0-

    7923-4123-6Boyer JS (1978) Water deficits and photosynthesis. In: KozloviskiTT (ed.) Water Deficits and Plant Growth IV. Academic Press,New York, pp 154–191. ISBN 0-12-424154-9

    Cheeseman JM (1991) PATCHY: Simulating and visualizing theeffects of stomatal patchiness on photosynthetic CO2   exchangestudies. Plant Cell Environ 14: 593–599

    Cornic G, Prioul JL, Louason G (1983) Stomatal and non-stomatalcontribution in the decline in leaf CO2   uptake during rapidwater stress. Physiol Plant 58: 295–301

    Ehleringer JR (1990) Correlations between carbon isotope discrimi-nation and leaf conductance to water vapor in common beans.Plant Physiol 93: 1422–1425

    Foyer CH, Galtier N (1996) Source-Sink interaction and communi-cation in leaves. In: Zamski E, Schaffer AA (eds) Photoassimi-late Distribution in Plants and Crops. Source-SinkRelationships. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 311–340.ISBN 0-8247-9440-0

    Grahan PH, Ranalli P (1997) Common bean (Phaseolus   ulgarisL.). Field Crops Res 53: 131–146

    Ismail AM, Hall AE, Bray EA (1994) Drought and pot size effectson transpiration efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination of a cowpea accessions and hybrids. Aust J Plant Physiol 21:23–35

    Kramer PJ, Boyer JS (1995) Water Relations of Plants and Soils.Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 377–404. ISBN 0-12-425060-2

    Jones HG (1985) Partitioning stomatal and non stomatal limitationto photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 8: 95–104

    Jones HG (1998) Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpira-tion. J Exp Bot 49: 387–398

    Kuruvadi S, Aguilera DM (1990) Patrones del Sistema Radicular enFrijol Común (Phaseolus   ulgaris  L.). Turrialba 40: 491–498

    Laffray D, Louguet P (1990) Stomatal responses and droughtresistance. Bull Soc Bot Fr, 137, Actual Bot 1: 47–60

    Lauer MJ, Boyer JS (1992) Internal CO2   measured directly in

    leaves. Abscisic and low leaf water potential cause opposingeffects. Plant Physiol 98: 1310–1316Long SP, Hällgren J-E (1993) Measurements of CO2 assimilation by

    plants in the field and the laboratory. In: Hall DO, ScurlockJMO, Bolhàr-Nordenkampf HR, Leegood RC, Long SP (eds)Photosynthesis and Production in a Changing Environment. AField and Laboratory Manual. Chapman & Hall, London, pp129–167. ISBN 0-412-42900-4

    Nobel PS (1991) Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiol-ogy. Academic Press, New York, pp 245–296. ISBN 0-12-520021-8

    Fig. 4. Intrinsic water use efficiency (IWUE), i.e., the relationbetween the photosynthetic rate (A) and stomatal conductance ( g s)on the youngest fully expanded leaf of the four lines, during waterstress at 20 DAS (a) and at 39 DAS (b). (a) SC-9029883 (),0.59+77.56x−122.89x2,   r2=0.71; Carioca (),   −0.19+100.92x−253.45x2,   r2=0.87; Ouro negro (), 0.30+96.66x−263.59x2,   r2=0.85; A320 (),   −0.32+91.75−192.17x2,r2=0.97. (b) SC-9029883,   −0.22+54.25x−34.99x2,   r2=0.99;Carioca,   −0.44+151.54x−416.05x2,   r2=0.89; Ouro negro,0.90+99.86x−353.29x2,  r 2=0.99; A320, 0.13+88.10x+75.79x2,r2=0.99.

    Physiol. Plant. 106, 1999188

  • 8/16/2019 Intrinsic Water Use Efficiency at the Pollination Stage as a Parameter For

    6/6

    Norman MJT, Pearson CJ, Searle PGE (1995) The Ecology of Tropical Food Crops. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,pp 208–224. ISBN 0-521-42264-7

    Osmond CB, Winter K, Powles SB (1980) Adaptive significance of carbon dioxide cycling during photosynthesis in water-stressedplants. In: Turner NC, Kramer PJ (eds) Adaptation of Plants toWater and High Temperature Stress. John Wiley & Sons, NewYork, pp 139–154. ISBN 0-471-05372-4

    Pimentel C, Jacob Neto J, Goi SR, Pessanha GG (1991) Efeito doestresse hı́drico em cultivares de   Phaseolus   ulgaris   L., emsimbiose com o   Rhizobium leguminosarum   biovar   phaseoli . Tur-rialba 40: 521–526

    Roupsard O, Gross P, Dreyer E (1996) Limitation of photosyn-thetic activity by CO2   availability in the chloroplast of oak

    leaves from different species and during drought. Ann Sci For53: 243–254

    Subbarao GV, Johansen AC, Slinkard RC, Rao N, Saxena NP,Chauhan YS (1995) Strategies for improving drought resistancein grain legumes. Crit Rev Plant Sci 14: 469–529

    von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD (1981) Some relationships be-tween the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchangeof leaves. Planta 153: 676–687

    von Caemmerer S, Evans JR (1991) Determination of the averagepartial pressure of CO2  in chloroplasts from leaves of several C3plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 18: 287–305

    Wardlaw IF (1990) The control of carbon partioning in plants. NewPhytol 116: 341–381

    White JW, Castillo JA, Ehleringer J (1990) Associations betweenproductivity, root growth and carbon isotope discrimination inPhaseolus   ulgaris   under water stress. Aust J Plant Physiol 17:189–198

    Edited by I. Terashima

    Physiol. Plant. 106, 1999   189