introductiongodae-data/symposium/gov-posters/s3.2-17-wen.pdf · assessment of surface heat fluxes...

1
Assessment of Surface Heat Fluxes in the NCEP CFSR at the KEO buoy site Caihong Wen 1 , Meghan F.Cronin 2 , Yan Xue 1 and Arun Kumar 1 1 Climate prediction Center,NCEP/NWS/NOAA, 2 Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, NOAA [email protected] Introduction: Western boundary currents are regions of intense air-sea interactions, where the ocean loses heat and moisture to the atmosphere. In the North Pacific, air-sea interactions near the Kuroshio Extension can affect weather and climate locally and remotely, and thus are critical to the global climate system. The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) represents a new reanalysis effort with first guess from a high-resolution coupled system, offering potential prospects to capture surface heat fluxes well. The Kuroshio Extension Observatory (KEO) buoy was not assimilated into the CFSR, thus providing independent data for validating CFSR surface heat flux and historical NCEP reanalysis data sets. The objectives of this study are to: (1) compare surface heat fluxes from CFSR, NCEP/NCAR(R1), NCEP/DOE(R2) with KEO observations; and (2) investigate causes for improvement /degradation of CFSR compared to R1, R2, including biases due to the bulk algorithm. Snapshot of Latent Heat Flux and Wind speed at 26-Dec-2008 KEO location Shaded: Surface Wind speed (m/s) Contours: Latent heat flux (W/m 2 ) CFSR has higher resolution than R1 and R2 Observations: Reanalysis data : KEO moored buoy: hourly data at 144.6ºE, 32.4º N from 2004-2010 CFSR : hourly data with T382 Gaussian NCEP/NCAR (R1) : 6-hourly data with T62 Gaussian NCEP/DOE(R2): 6-hourly data with T62 Gaussian Causes for Biases in Heat Fluxes Surface Heat Flux Comparisons CFSR-KEO R1-KEO R2-KEO KEO net heat flux USWR: Upward shortwave radiation DSWR: Downward shortwave radiation LWR: Net longwave radiation LHF: Latent heat flux SHF: Sensible heat flux THF: Net surface heat flux Temporal variations of LHF, SHF and THF are highly consistent between the CFSR and KEO. THF in the CFSR is over- estimated by about 25 Wm -2 . This bias is primarily caused by the LHF bias, while the RMS are mainly attributed to SWR and LHF errors. Bias and root mean square (RMS) errors are substantially reduced in the CFSR compared with R1 and R2. Positive value means a heat transfer from the ocean to the atmosphere Winter CFSR and R2 TCC is significantly larger than R1 TCC, contributing to the large difference in DSWR bias. Total Cloud Content Albedo R1 albedo is much larger than CFSR and R2, leading to a large bias in R1 USWR and net SWR. Shortwave Radiation Flux (SWR) Two possible causes for difference between the KEO and reanalysis heat fluxes are examined: (1) use of different flux algorithms. To test this, heat fluxes are calculated with CFSR state variables using the same bulk algorithm as used by KEO (COARE 3.0 bulk algorithm); (2) differences in meteorological variables between the KEO buoy and reanalysis data sets. Turbulent Heat Flux CFSR R1 R2 · LHF from reanalysis · LHF from reanalysis using COARE 3.0 bulk algorithm CFSR LHF is closer to KEO, especially for LHF > 200 Wm -2 R1 and R2 have larger biases due to algorithm Daily time series of specific humidity (Q2m) and wind speed (WS) Q2m and WS were well captured in CFSR CFSR R1 R2 CFSR R1 R2 Differences in both the algorithm and meteorological variables lead to RMS differences between reanalysis and KEO latent heat flux. Improvements to the algorithm, and to WS and Q2m contributed to the better performance of CFSR to R1 and R2 References: Kubota, M., N. Iwabe, M. Cronin, and H. Tomita, 2008: Surface heat fluxes from the NCEP/NCAR and NCEP/DOE reanalyses at the Kuroshio Extension Observatory buoy site. J. Geophys. Res, 113, C02009. Fairall, C. W., E. F. Bradley, J. E. Hare, A. A. Grachev, J. B. Edson, 2003: Bulk Parameterization of Air–Sea Fluxes: Updates and Verification for the COARE Algorithm. J. Climate, 16, 571–591. LHF: Latent heat flux LHF-Q2m: LHF from KEO, but with reanalysis Q2m LHFC: Latent heat flux using COARE bulk algorithm LHF-WS: LHF from KEO, but with reanalysis WS LHF (COARE bulk)

Upload: others

Post on 28-Dec-2019

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Introductiongodae-data/Symposium/GOV-posters/S3.2-17-Wen.pdf · Assessment of Surface Heat Fluxes in the NCEP CFSR at the KEO buoy site Caihong Wen1 , Meghan F.Cronin2 , Yan Xue1

Assessment of Surface Heat Fluxes in the NCEP CFSR at the KEO buoy site Caihong Wen1 , Meghan F.Cronin2 , Yan Xue1 and Arun Kumar1

1 Climate prediction Center,NCEP/NWS/NOAA, 2 Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, NOAA [email protected]

Introduction: Western boundary currents are regions of intense air-sea interactions, where the ocean loses heat and moisture to the atmosphere. In the North Pacific, air-sea interactions near the Kuroshio Extension can affect weather and climate locally and remotely, and thus are critical to the global climate system. The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) represents a new reanalysis effort with first guess from a high-resolution coupled system, offering potential prospects to capture surface heat fluxes well. The Kuroshio Extension Observatory (KEO) buoy was not assimilated into the CFSR, thus providing independent data for validating CFSR surface heat flux and historical NCEP reanalysis data sets. The objectives of this study are to: (1) compare surface heat fluxes from CFSR, NCEP/NCAR(R1), NCEP/DOE(R2) with KEO observations; and (2) investigate causes for improvement /degradation of CFSR compared to R1, R2, including biases due to the bulk algorithm.

Snapshot of Latent Heat Flux and Wind speed at 26-Dec-2008

KEO location Shaded: Surface Wind speed (m/s) Contours: Latent heat flux (W/m2 )

CFSR has higher resolution than R1 and R2

Observations: Reanalysis data : KEO moored buoy: hourly data at 144.6ºE, 32.4º N from 2004-2010 CFSR : hourly data with T382 Gaussian NCEP/NCAR (R1) : 6-hourly data with T62 Gaussian NCEP/DOE(R2): 6-hourly data with T62 Gaussian

Causes for Biases in Heat Fluxes

Surface Heat Flux Comparisons

CFSR-KEO R1-KEO R2-KEO

KEO net heat flux

USWR: Upward shortwave radiation DSWR: Downward shortwave radiation LWR: Net longwave radiation LHF: Latent heat flux SHF: Sensible heat flux THF: Net surface heat flux

Temporal variations of LHF, SHF and THF are highly consistent between the CFSR and KEO. THF in the CFSR is over-estimated by about 25 Wm-2. This bias is primarily caused by the LHF bias, while the RMS are mainly attributed to SWR and LHF errors. Bias and root mean square (RMS) errors are substantially reduced in the CFSR compared with R1 and R2.

Positive value means a heat transfer from the ocean to the atmosphere

Winter CFSR and R2 TCC is significantly larger than R1 TCC, contributing to the large difference in DSWR bias.

Total Cloud Content

Albedo

R1 albedo is much larger than CFSR and R2, leading to a large bias in R1 USWR and net SWR.

Shortwave Radiation Flux (SWR) Two possible causes for difference between the KEO and reanalysis heat fluxes are examined: (1) use of different flux algorithms. To test this, heat fluxes are calculated with CFSR state

variables using the same bulk algorithm as used by KEO (COARE 3.0 bulk algorithm); (2) differences in meteorological variables between the KEO buoy and reanalysis data sets.

Turbulent Heat Flux

CFSR R1 R2

· LHF from reanalysis · LHF from reanalysis using COARE 3.0 bulk algorithm

CFSR LHF is closer to KEO, especially for LHF > 200 Wm-2

R1 and R2 have larger biases due to algorithm

Daily time series of specific humidity (Q2m) and wind speed (WS)

Q2m and WS were well captured in CFSR

CFSR R1 R2

CFSR R1 R2

Differences in both the algorithm and meteorological variables lead to RMS differences between reanalysis and KEO latent heat flux. Improvements to the algorithm, and to WS and Q2m contributed to the better performance of CFSR to R1 and R2

References: Kubota, M., N. Iwabe, M. Cronin, and H. Tomita, 2008: Surface heat fluxes from the NCEP/NCAR and NCEP/DOE reanalyses at the Kuroshio Extension Observatory buoy site. J. Geophys. Res, 113, C02009. Fairall, C. W., E. F. Bradley, J. E. Hare, A. A. Grachev, J. B. Edson, 2003: Bulk Parameterization of Air–Sea Fluxes: Updates and Verification for the COARE Algorithm. J. Climate, 16, 571–591.

LHF: Latent heat flux LHF-Q2m: LHF from KEO, but with reanalysis Q2m LHFC: Latent heat flux using COARE bulk algorithm LHF-WS: LHF from KEO, but with reanalysis WS

LHF

(CO

ARE

bulk

)