introduction objective methodology to determine whether there are any differences or similarities in...

1
Introduction Introduction Objective Objective Methodology Methodology To determine whether there are any differences or similarities in the ranking of the e-commerce websites as a result of consumer preferences in these countries. The purpose is to evaluate the global trends in cyberspace and the impact of a culture on cyber consumer preferences. This research compares the top ranking lists of e-commerce Websites from nine countries with diverse cultural background and different stages of national development. The countries included and the top 5 websites in each country are: Consumer Preferences in Cyberspace Growth potential? Growth potential? To market their products and/or services globally, transnational corporations are often faced with the question of to what extent they need to tailor their marketing message and their commodities to local culture and regional norms. The challenge is whether to globalize or to localize. This study attempts to examine this dichotomy from a macro angle by observing international e-commerce websites. How big is the online How big is the online population? population? US India China Mexico Germany France Pakistan Japan Indonesi a yahoo.com yahoo.com baidu.com google.com.m x google.de google.fr yahoo.com yahoo.co.j p yahoo.com google.com google.co .in qq.com live.com ebay.de skyrock.c om google.com .pk google.co. jp friendster .com myspace.co m orkut.com sina.com. cn msn.com google.com msn.com orkut.com fc2.com google.co. id youtube.co m google.co m sohu.com youtube.com yahoo.com yahoo.com msn.com mixi.jp google.com facebook.c om rediff.co m 163.com yahoo.com youtube.co m live.com google.com youtube.co m blogger.co m Metrics used to measure Metrics used to measure similarities/ differences similarities/ differences 1. Membership Commonality Matrix How many sites in two particular country lists are common ? us mx in pk de fr id jp cn us 1 .39 .33 .35 .27 .22 .31 .16 .08 mx 1 .26 .29 .27 .25 .29 .16 .08 in 1 .46 .20 .19 .26 .12 .10 pk 1 .22 .20 .34 .13 .09 de 1 .19 .22 .12 .08 fr 1 .18 .13 .08 id 1 .12 .08 jp 1 .08 cn 1 Membership commonality graph Membership commonality graph Stee p rise Maximum similar ity Approach fixed value 1. Initial rise of commonality to maximum, till n=15 • Dominated by Web giants-uniformity 2. Decrease in correlation as n increases • Starts to show diversity 3. Converge to groups of value when n is large Regional culture/norms come into play •Small difference between USA & Mexico list •Similar small difference between India and Pakistan, and Pakistan and Indonesia list •Largest difference with Japan & China The remaining ones all in between. A Global Trend: common feature of A Global Trend: common feature of all curves all curves • The commonality between country specific website ranking is very high in first 15 ranks, demonstrating a global trend. • There is a overall trend that the top 15 websites preferred by consumers in all countries are global websites • As n increase, the proportion of global websites decreases and regional websites increases. • The culture of a country has a significant impact on the consumer preferences for websites, and the content of the website • Similar culture countries depict similar consumers preferences for website. Based on the findings of our existing study, we would believe that there would be large differences in the design, as well as content, of websites in countries with different cultures. Therefore, to identify the impact of culture on website design, we plan to study country-specific websites of a particular transnational corporation. We expect to find differences in the websites in high-context cultures like Mexico and Arab countries, and those in the low context cultures like Germany or Scandinavian countries. Google? Yahoo? MSN? Orkut? Ebay? USA? China? Mexico? France? India? ? Globalize? Localize? Or GLOCALIZE? Conclusion Conclusion Trends identified Trends identified Scope for further Scope for further research research Piyush Gupta ([email protected]) MBA student. The presenter is a Graduate Assistant with MBA Piyush Gupta ([email protected]) MBA student. The presenter is a Graduate Assistant with MBA Department, College of Business. Department, College of Business. Mentor: Dr. Bruce Lo, Department of Information Technology, College of Business. Mentor: Dr. Bruce Lo, Department of Information Technology, College of Business. 2. Rank correlation of common sub- lists To what extent the ranks of 2 common sub- lists are similar? Kandall’s Tau (Spearman’s Rho) 3. Degree of discordance in rank order To what degree do 2 sub-lists disagree with each other? A new metric was introduced

Upload: horace-sullivan

Post on 02-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Introduction Objective Methodology To determine whether there are any differences or similarities in the ranking of the e-commerce websites as a result

IntroductionIntroduction

ObjectiveObjective

MethodologyMethodology

To determine whether there are any differences or similarities in the ranking of the e-commerce websites as a result of consumer preferences in these countries. The purpose is to evaluate the global trends in cyberspace and the impact of a culture on cyber consumer preferences.

This research compares the top ranking lists of e-commerce Websites from nine countries with diverse cultural background and different stages of national development. The countries included and the top 5 websites in each country are:

Consumer Preferences in Cyberspace Consumer Preferences in Cyberspace

Growth potential?Growth potential?

To market their products and/or services globally, transnational corporations are often faced with the question of to what extent they need to tailor their marketing message and their commodities to local culture and regional norms.

The challenge is whether to globalize or to localize. This study attempts to examine this dichotomy from a macro angle by observing international e-commerce websites. 

How big is the online population?How big is the online population?

US India China Mexico Germany France Pakistan Japan Indonesia yahoo.com yahoo.com baidu.com google.com.mx google.de google.fr yahoo.com yahoo.co.jp yahoo.comgoogle.com google.co.in qq.com live.com ebay.de skyrock.com google.com.pk google.co.jp friendster.commyspace.com orkut.com sina.com.cn msn.com google.com msn.com orkut.com fc2.com google.co.idyoutube.com google.com sohu.com youtube.com yahoo.com yahoo.com msn.com mixi.jp google.comfacebook.com rediff.com 163.com yahoo.com youtube.com live.com google.com youtube.com blogger.com

Metrics used to measure similarities/ Metrics used to measure similarities/ differencesdifferences

1. Membership Commonality MatrixHow many sites in two particular country lists are common ?

 us mx in pk de fr id jp cn

us 1 .39 .33 .35 .27 .22 .31 .16 .08

mx 1 .26 .29 .27 .25 .29 .16 .08

in 1 .46 .20 .19 .26 .12 .10

pk 1 .22 .20 .34 .13 .09

de 1 .19 .22 .12 .08

fr 1 .18 .13 .08

id 1 .12 .08

jp 1 .08

cn 1

Membership commonality graphMembership commonality graph

Steep rise

Maximum similarity

Approach fixed value

1. Initial rise of commonality to maximum, till n=15• Dominated by Web giants-uniformity

2. Decrease in correlation as n increases• Starts to show diversity

3. Converge to groups of value when n is large• Regional culture/norms come into play

•Small difference between USA & Mexico list

•Similar small difference between India and Pakistan, and Pakistan and Indonesia list

•Largest difference with Japan & China

•The remaining ones all in between.

A Global Trend: common feature of all curvesA Global Trend: common feature of all curves

• The commonality between country specific website ranking is very high in first 15 ranks, demonstrating a global trend.

• There is a overall trend that the top 15 websites preferred by consumers in all countries are global websites

• As n increase, the proportion of global websites decreases and regional websites increases.

• The culture of a country has a significant impact on the consumer preferences for websites, and the content of the website

• Similar culture countries depict similar consumers preferences for website.

Based on the findings of our existing study, we would believe that there would be large differences in the design, as well as content, of websites in countries with different cultures.

Therefore, to identify the impact of culture on website design, we plan to study country-specific websites of a particular transnational corporation. We expect to find differences in the websites in high-context cultures like Mexico and Arab countries, and those in the low context cultures like Germany or Scandinavian countries.

Google? Yahoo? MSN? Orkut? Ebay?

USA? China? Mexico? France? India?

? Globalize?Localize?

Or GLOCALIZE?

ConclusionConclusion

Trends identifiedTrends identified

Scope for further researchScope for further research

Piyush Gupta ([email protected]) MBA student. The presenter is a Graduate Assistant with MBA Department, College of Business. Piyush Gupta ([email protected]) MBA student. The presenter is a Graduate Assistant with MBA Department, College of Business.

Mentor: Dr. Bruce Lo, Department of Information Technology, College of Business.Mentor: Dr. Bruce Lo, Department of Information Technology, College of Business.

2. Rank correlation of common sub-listsTo what extent the ranks of 2 common sub-lists are similar?

• Kandall’s Tau (Spearman’s Rho)

3. Degree of discordance in rank orderTo what degree do 2 sub-lists disagree with each other?

• A new metric was introduced