introduction to field informatics chapter 9 outreach ... · (bse:bovine spongiform...
TRANSCRIPT
Outreach Communication
Reiko Hishiyama
Introduction to Field Informatics Chapter 9
1/25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
Contents
• Approach
• Participatory method for outreach communication– Background
– Methodology
– Designing the experimental environment
– Examples
• Outreach as a role of experimentation in building the future
2/25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
What does the word “Field” bring to your mind?
Many people associate “Field” with the natural environment, or the outdoors as one of the academic research environment.
We will stand back and contemplate the big pictureand try to expand the concept of “Field” !
Start looking at society including the natural environment in the wider context…
3 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
Do you get a real sense of global warming?
We still don’t know how such extraordinary weather relates to global warming… however, the weather become similar to tropical weather…
This squall is similar to those experienced in the tropics !!
4 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
Resources, water, energy
Air pollution
Climate change
Ecosystem, biodiversity
Urban problem
Economic disparity, poverty
Infection, health and safetyIndustrial structure/ technique
Health care
Human rights and fundamental freedoms, discrimination
Law/ Ethics
Education/ training
Regional/local issues
Employment opportunities
Privacy
Waste products
Natural disaster
problems in environment / social or economic / human or life systems--- The issues are complex and require pluralistic or multifactorial analysis ---
The effects are just starting to be visible, but … what is actually changing…
The threat to the planet’s biodiversity is real …
H1N1 flu virus spreads rapidly throughout the world…. …
5 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
Scientific technology approach
Approach by applying the normative function or
ethics or rules
Requirement of the different types of approachto address these issues…
• We have made all kind of efforts to deal with the situation.Many of the efforts are made via the scientific approach or the normative approach.
• These are helpful to find a solution to specific problems.
These issues are complex and require pluralistic or multifactorial analysis.
6 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
Case study: Mad cow disease (BSE:Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy)
• BSE is a fatal neurodegenerative disease in cattle. The first cow to fall ill with BSE occurred in 1984 in Britain.
• After a long incubation period, about 4 years, progresses to death over 2 weeks – 6 months.
• Its cause is yet to be identified.The infectious agent in BSE is believed to be a specific type of misfolded protein called a prion.
• The meat and bone meal causes the infectious agent to spread?
• The origin of the disease itself remains unknown. It is believed by most scientists that the disease may be transmitted to human beings who eat the brain or spinal cord of infected meats.
Suspect the meal as the cause of BSE(as route of transmission)
7 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
→Ban the sale of meat-and-bone meal
Blanket testing?
Anything safe except specified-risk material??
“Unable to recognize whether all of the cows are safe or not…”→Government defers all decisions to local public administration.
Case study : Mad cow disease (BSE:Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy)The case of communication gaps
between specialists who assess the scientific risks and citizens who recognize the risks.
We cannot attempt to determine the extent of the impact…Whether the young cows are safe or not is uncertain…
Under the age of 20 months
8 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
Pay attention to consumers’ safesupply of ecologically friendly products
What should we do to achieve someone's understanding of the issues ?
Scientific risk assessmentIncreasing the participation of
diverse stakeholder in these issues
raise awareness of risk
reflect the difference of values
structural understanding of the issues
involved with the problem-solving
Clarification of health riskObtaining of Informed consent(what services will be provided and how they will be conducted. )
Social / ethical decision-making(genetically-modified products, construction of a nuclear power plant…)
Specialists
Citizens
9 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
How they were recognized or thinking about social systems
Cultural or social group consciousness / Social dilemma
Impact of the image- building that determines the cognitive element
Cognitive bias(a person’s tendency to make error in judgment based on cognitive factors)
Sharing the structural elucidation of the difference in interpretation
Media’s impact
Social values /Personal values
Management method for the social communication10 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
Outreach for science communication
11 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
Spatial scale(Local / Global)
Time scale(irreversibility, non-selectivity)
Interaction(casual relationship,
interrelationship)
Structural features of the problems that should be dealt with by an outreach communication
Adaptive problem solving(Technology, system, rule or standard)
Single value judgment that specialists focus on → Various endpoints
from concentration to wide diversification (cross-boundary)from short-term to long-term (accumulation for a long period)
From direction to indirection (multi-disciplinary character)
12 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
”Hand on the pointer” for Gaming Simulation as an anecdotal experiment for outreach
Pseudo Field (Experimental Field)
Field
Theory ・Hypothesis
Difficulty in controlling the experimentDifficulty in collecting the objective dataDifficulty in conducting the repeatability test
This type of simulation places more emphasis on “process” and less on the “result”.
AnalysisCollect data under controlled experimental conditions
It enables us to conduct a repeatability test
When we need to duplicated test in other labs, it can be tested and details verified.
Combines theory with
practice.
13 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
Relationships between “fields” and “experiments in the laboratory”( Embedding experimental object as the drivers or as a trigger in the simulation )
LaboratoryField
・Providing the expertise, criteria・Having to take a preventable risks・Sharing the scientific forecast with the participant・Figure out the local knowledge, turns feedback to the future works
Pseudo Field(Experimental Space)
・Flaming effect・Risk assessment・Social dilemma・Element of uncertainty・Difficulty of the validation・Various local knowledge・Changing in the condition
14 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
Designing the outreach communication methods
15 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
The framework of the outreach communication
Communication space where the participants stay and share the theme
Transmitting the structure of the problems, interaction (social dynamisms)
Several scenarios that can be considered a variety of alternatives
Communication frameworks that can produce new knowledge under the general view.
Interactive communication models
Communication space
Central theme of the communication
CooperationCompetition
Inducing interaction (promote discussion, offer alternative proposals, explain the gaming rules… )
16 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
Design process of the communication tool
Real world
Conceptual models
Tool design
Design a scenario or
computational model
Develop and embed messages
Inducing interaction (promote discussion, offer alternative proposals, explain the gaming rules… )
Facilitator
17 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
Case study:”Eco-Experiment”Global carbon cycle and global warming game
(CBSC: Computer Based Science Communication)
18 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
Science café
(lecture by a specialist)
Discussion between the
specialists and participants
Share the scenarioprevious knowledge
Participatory gaming
Pseudo International conference
“Eco Experiment”-Let’s save the earth from global warming• Outreach activities on the Internet
• Integrate the participatory gaming and the science cafe
• Easy to understand and citizen-friendly
Participatory gaming
Pseudo International conference
Participatory gaming
(Cooperativecommunication process)
Cool Down(Debriefing and discussion)
Advi
ce fr
om s
peci
alis
t
Tim
e pa
ssag
e
Traditional communication process
Integration of the participatory gaming and traditional science cafe
Providing the minimum knowledge for participation
Share the experience, produce the controversial topics and communication
Interaction to deepen exchange
19 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
Progress of the participatory gaming
20 /25
Asking the question
Pass out Scenario
Gaming(Online)
Discussion(Offline)
Debriefing(Recommendation
from the professional or class teacher)
Orientation(Sharing the
precondition and rules as a briefing)
Advice from the professional
Science cafe
Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
Implicational message and communication design
Greenhouse effect gas level
Country A : environmental administrator
Implicational messageThe structural features of the problems-Problems move the progress from local to global.-We need to analyze a dependent relationship between micro – macro environmental structures from the view of the political policy and its response.The scientific features of the problems-There are only three types of energies on the Earth; energy from fossil fuel, natural gas (methane), biomass. -Greenhouse effect of the methane is more than 20 times that of CO2.-Economic activities have an (negative) impact on the global carbon cycle-climate feedback.
R1→R2→R3・・・
Country B : environmental administrator
Country C : environmental administrator21 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
Global warming on the pseudo Earth on the Internet-changing in the characteristics of the environment over time-
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Inde
x
Round
Change graph of global environmentgreenhouse gas levels
CO2 levels
CH4 levelsEstablish goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions for each participating country Regarding
economic goals
Discussion leads to a real effective change of the simulation…
Conference
Conference
“Tetrahedral Eco-dice” associate the simulated society with real society.
22 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
Outreach communication - a comprehensive, panoramic view of the outreach
communication as a future challenge-
23 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
Outreach communication using participatory method as field studies
Action research on FieldExperiment in Laboratory
Focus on the phenomena
Theory
Analysis
Stay on the Field
Finding the problems
Collecting data , Modeling,
Experiment
Problem-solving and feedback to
the field
Contribute to Field( to encourage the people )
Study the Field(to research and verify the theory)
Experiment on the pseudo Field
The researcher want to know the field itself. The researcher want to contribute to the field.24 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.
Outreach Communication as Future Works• Potential as a studying method
Study on the overall structure of the multiple problems, mechanisms of the interaction, verification of the social theory - contribution to the theory
• The possibilities as a communication tool –as a role of the future narration• Generating the virtual simulation space and real world• Cooperation and collaboration between professional and citizens • It helps to find cross-referenced tips…
– It sheds light on the importance of issues surrounding their daily life.– Provides the opportunities and steps to handle these problems easily.– Promotes the finding of the new knowledge, facilitates the problem-solving, it
acts as a catalyst in order to speed up the innovation.
25 /25Copyright (C) 2010 Field Informatics Research Group. Kyoto University. All Rights Reserved.