introduction to gi - nyu tandon school of engineeringfaculty.poly.edu/~brao/global09ses1.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Introduction to GI
Q1: WHAT is a global firm?
Q2: WHY do firms go global?
Q3: HOW can firms pursue a global strategy?
Q4: WHAT is the role of technology in GI?
Q5: WHAT are some forms of organizingglobal corporations?
TODAY’SGLOBAL
NewCompetitors
Rise of GlobalStandards
DisintegratingBorders
The Internet &Information GLOBAL
ECONOMYInformationTechnology
Privatization
Growing Tradeand Investment
GlobalProducts/
Customers/Employees
Why do companies go global?
To reduce costs (labor, taxes, tariffs, etc.)
To improve the supply chain
To provide better goods and services
Tangible
To provide better goods and services
To attract and access new markets
To learn how to improve operations
To attract and retain global talentIntangible
Typical evolution towards a global strategy
Firm IntroducesInnovation in
11
Product DemandDevelops and
Firm ExportsProducts
22
Foreign33
Why do companies go global?
Innovation inDomesticMarket
11Foreign
CompetitionBegins Production
33
Firm BeginsProduction Abroad
44Production BecomesStandardized and is
Relocated to Low CostCountries
55
Some examples..
Boeing - flourishes because both its sales andproduction are world-wide
Benetton - moves inventory to stores around the worldfaster than its competitors
Sony - purchases components from suppliers inThailand, Malaysia, etc.
General Motors - simultaneously building four similarplants in Argentina, Poland, China, and Thailand sothat they can learn from each other and drive downcost while increasing quality
Sample Boeing Suppliers (777)
Firm Country PartsAlenia Italy Wing flaps
AeroSpaceTechnologies
Australia Rudder
CASA Spain Ailerons
Fuji Japan Landing geardoors, wing section
Fuji Japan Landing gear
GEC Avionics United Kingdom Flight computers
Korean Air Korea Flap supports
MenascoAerospaceCanada Landing gears
Short Brothers Ireland Landing gear doors
SingaporeAerospace
Singapore Landing gear doors
Branded PCs - 2002Breakdown of Components and Sources of Origin
Brand: USA
Main Box: Ireland
Chips on Cards: USA, Korea,Taiwan, Philippines
Battery: Philippines
CD ROM Drive: China (Japanese
Keyboard: Mexico
Mouse: Mexico
Child's Mouse: Taiwan
Loudspeakers: Malaysia
Microphone: Mexico
Inkjet Printer: SpainCD ROM Drive: China (JapaneseParts)
CD-R (consumables) Germany
Hard Disk Drive: Singapore
3.5" Floppy Disk Drive:Philippines
Modem Card: Netherlands
Graphics Card: China
Specialist Video Card: USA
Monitor: UK
Zip Drive: Malaysia
Scanner: Taiwan
Webcam: China
Power Supplies: Taiwan, China,Malaysia, Mexico
Manuals: Scotland, Ireland, Wales,Germany
Environmental Certification: Sweden
Source: Peter Swann, 2002
Operations Decisions
Global Product Design Issues
Global Supply Chain Management
Global Process Design and Technology
Global Facility Location and Co-ordination Global Facility Location and Co-ordination
Location Decisions
Country-related issues
Product-related issues
Government policy/political risk
Organizational issues
Materials Management Decisions
Flow of materials
Transportation options and speed
Inventory levels
Packaging
Storage
Types of Global Operations
International business - engages in cross-bordertransactions
Multinational Corporation - has extensive involvementin international business, owning or controllingfacilities in more than one countryfacilities in more than one country
Global company - integrates operations from differentcountries, and views world as a single marketplace
Transnational company - seeks to combine thebenefits of global-scale efficiencies with the benefits oflocal responsiveness
Types of Global Strategies
International Strategy: uses exports and licenses topenetrate the global area
Multi-domestic Strategy: uses decentralized authoritywith substantial autonomy at each business
Global Strategy: Uses a high degree of centralization, Global Strategy: Uses a high degree of centralization,with headquarters coordinating to seek standardizationand learning between plants
Transnational Strategy: Exploits economies of scaleand learning, as well as pressure for responsiveness,by recognizing that core competencies resideeverywhere in the organization
Four International OperationsStrategies
Global Strategy
Standardized product
Economies of scale
Cross-cultural learning
Transnational Strategy
Move material, people,ideas, across nationalboundaries
Cross-cultural learning
High
Co
stR
edu
ctio
ns
ToyotaCanon
ABBShishedo
International Strategy
Import.export orlicense existingproduct
Multi-domestic strategy
Use existing domesticmodel globally
Franchise, joint ventures,subsidiaries
Low HighLocal Responsiveness
Low
Co
stR
edu
ctio
ns Canon
CaterpillarOtis Elevator
ShishedoNestléMcKinsey
KraftPfizerU.S. SteelHarley Davidson
UnileverHeinzMcDonalds
Home Replication (or International) Strategy
In this approach, a firm utilizes the corecompetency or firm-specific advantage itdeveloped at home as its main competitive
Global Innovation StrategiesThe cost-responsiveness tradeoff
developed at home as its main competitiveweapon in the foreign markets that it enters.
It takes what it does exceptionally well in itshome market and attempts to duplicate it inforeign markets.
Examples: Kraft, Pfizer, US Steel, Harley Davidson
Multi-Domestic StrategyA multi-domestic corporation views itself as acollection of relatively independent operatingsubsidiaries, each of which focuses on aspecific domestic market.
Global Innovation StrategiesThe cost-responsiveness tradeoff
specific domestic market.Each of these subsidiaries is free tocustomize its products, its marketingcampaigns, and its operations techniques tobest meet the needs of its local customers.
Examples: Unilever, Heinz, McDonalds
Global StrategyA global corporation views the world as asingle marketplace and has as its primarygoal the creation of standardized goods and
Global Innovation StrategiesThe cost-responsiveness tradeoff
goal the creation of standardized goods andservices that will address the needs ofcustomers worldwide. The global strategy isalmost the exact opposite of themultidomestic strategy.
Examples: Toyota, Caterpillar, Canon, Otis Elevator
Transnational Strategy
The transnational corporation attempts tocombine the benefits of global scaleefficiencies, such as those pursued by a
Global Innovation StrategiesThe cost-responsiveness tradeoff
efficiencies, such as those pursued by aglobal corporation, with the benefits andadvantages of local responsiveness, which isthe goal of a multidomestic corporation.
Examples: ABB, Shiseido, Nestle, McKinsey
How MultinationalCorporations Differ
Company HomeCountry
% SalesOutsideHomeCountry
% AssetsOutsideHomeCountry
% ForeignWorkforce
Colgate- USA 65 47 NA
Citicorp USA 34 46 NA
Colgate-Palmolive
USA 65 47 NA
DowChemical
USA 54 45 NA
Gillette USA 68 66 NA
Honda Japan 63 36 NA
IBM USA 59 55 51
How MultinationalCorporations Differ
WorkforceCompany Home
Country% SalesOutsideHomeCountry
% AssetsOutsideHomeCountry
% Foreign
ICI Britain 78 50 NA
Nestlé Switzerland 98 95 97
Philips Netherlands 94 85 82
Siemens Germany 51 NA 38
Electronics
The BOP Market
What is the BOP concept? Why does itmatter?
Why do MNCs ignore BOP opportunities?
Are there new ways of looking at the BOP Are there new ways of looking at the BOPmarket a) to deliver value, and b) as a sourceof innovations?
Examples and prospects
THE BOTTOM OF THE PYRAMIDFour Billion People!
>$20,000 75-100
Purchasing powerparity (in dollars)
Population
(in millions)
Tier 1
Source: Prahalad, C.K., 2004. The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid, Wharton School Publishing
$1,500-20,000
$1,500
1,500-1,750
4,000
Tiers 2-3
Tier 4
Tier 5<$1,500
The Bottom of the PyramidCustomer Profiles
There are 3-4 billion people with per-capitaequivalent purchasing power (PPP) less thatUS$2,000 per year
The numbers could swell to 6-8 billion over the next25 years25 years
Most live in rural villages or urban slums and shantytowns—urbanization representing opportunity
Education levels are low or no-existent (especiallyamong women)
Markets are hard to reach, disorganized, and verylocal in nature
MNC MyopiaUnderestimating BOP Markets
The first wave of multinationals’ entries to emergingmarkets missed the real potential “Corporate Imperialism” (Prahalad & Lieberthal, 2002)
Focus on the high-end, “Western-like” consumers
Many misperceptions about the state of the economies andmarket attractiveness
Strategies pursued were not adjusted to emerging marketneeds
Assumed that emerging markets were on the samedevelopment trajectory as developed countries
MNC MyopiaDominant Logic of MNCs as it relates to BOP
The poor are not our target customers.They cannot afford our products andservices.
With our cost structure, we cannot serveBOP markets.
The poor do not have use for productssold in developed countries.
We are committed to form overfunctionality.
Assumption Implication
Only developed countries appreciate andpay for technological innovations.
The BOP does not need technologysolutions and is not a source ofinnovations.
The BOP market is not critical for the long-term growth and vitality of MNCs
BOP markets are at best an attractivedistraction.
Intellectual excitement is in the developedmarkets. It is very hard to recruitmanagers for BOP markets.
We cannot assign our best people to workon market development in BOP markets.
Source: Prahalad, C.K., 2004. The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid, Wharton School Publishing
MNC MyopiaUnderestimating Emerging Markets
Most common misperceptions regardingemerging markets are: Potential resides in the high-end market segments
Poor are so concerned with fulfilling the basic Poor are so concerned with fulfilling the basicneeds that they’re unable to buy any ‘luxury’items, e.g., TVs or phones
Poor are unable to use advanced technologies,e.g., wireless communications
Multinational’s operations in emerging marketsmeans exploitation of the already poor
The Bottom of the PyramidCustomer Profiles
In Dharavi, one of the poorest slums of Bombay: 85% of residents have a TV
50% of residents have a pressure cooker
21% of residents have a telephone
Almost all residents pay a premium for water and electricity
… but most cannot afford a house
Even the poorest families in Bangladesh: devote 7 percent of household income to communications
services (like GrameenPhone)
The Bottom of the PyramidBeing Poor can be Expensive
Item Dharavi(The poorest slum inAsia)
Warden Road(Decent 2BR apartmentcosts around $750K)
PovertyPremium
Credit
(Annual Interest)
600-1000% 12-18% 53.0
Municipal gradewater (per cubicmeter)
$1.12 $0.03 37.0
Phone call (perminute)
$0.04-$0.05 $0.025 1.8
Diarrheamedication
$20.00 $2 10
Rice (perkilogram)
$0.28 $0.24 1.2
Source: Prahalad, C.K., 2004. The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid, Wharton School Publishing
The Bottom of the PyramidBeing Poor can be Expensive
Item Dharavi(The poorest slum inAsia)
Warden Road(Decent 2BR apartmentcosts around $750K)
PovertyPremium
Credit 600-1000% 12-18% 53.0
(Annual Interest)
Municipal gradewater (per cubicmeter)
$1.12 $0.03 37.0
Phone call (perminute)
$0.04-$0.05 $0.025 1.8
Diarrheamedication
$20.00 $2 10
Rice (per kilogram) $0.28 $0.24 1.2
Q. Are these validmarket opportunities?
MNC MyopiaEmerging Markets Realities
Traditional product life-cycle models predict slowdiffusion for a new product. However, in emergingmarkets: Customers can be surprisingly sophisticated
The lack of installed old infrastructure enables adoption ofstate-of-the-art technology directly, enabling leapfrogging
BOP customers are very brand conscious and aspire forthe best
Virtuous cycle takes over once initial resistance isovercome
The Enabling Environment MattersNeed to improve these in BOP markets
Private Sector Growth
Levelplayingfield
Access tofinancing
Accessto skillsand
Pillars of entrepreneurship(Too often missing)
Domestic macro environment
field andknowledge
Physical and social Infrastructure
Global macro environment
Rule of Law
(Too often missing)
Pillars of private sector(Not yet ready)
“The aspiring poor present a prodigiousopportunity for the world’s wealthiest
companies. But it requires a radical newapproach to business strategy”approach to business strategy”
C.K. Prahalad and Stuart Hart“The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid”Strategy+Business, January 2002
Early Lessons Existing mental models prevent success
BOP is not a homogeneous market Understand real needs of end-users and customers Systemic understanding may redefine industry
categories
Need both technology optimization and innovation Product features include durability, ruggedness, Product features include durability, ruggedness,
consistency Disruptive innovation is not bad if it works
Requires business model innovation Small scale, distributed, fragmented distribution Co-development, local partners, new brands Capital efficiency, employment intensiveness
Avoid dependence upon centralized institutions National governments Technological infrastructure
Source: Prof. Stuart Hart, UNC Chapel Hill
Differences in Business ModelsDeveloped markets versus BOP markets
“Developed” MarketBusiness Model Rapid innovation
Obsolecence
“BOP” MarketBusiness Model Durability
Consistency Fine segmentation
High margins
Labor efficiency
Mass media
Top down
Consistency
Coarse segmentation
High volume
Capital efficiency
Direct selling
Bottom up
Source: Prof. Stuart Hart, UNC Chapel Hill
Low Cost Eyeglasses2001
URL: http://www.lowcosteyeglasses.net
WINNERS - Harvard Business School Social Enterprise Business Plan Contest
Low Cost Eyeglasses2001
Low Cost Eyeglasses is a social enterprise for theone billion people in the developing world who needeyeglasses yet currently do not have them.
Unlike existing eyeglasses that are difficult topurchase and very expensive, we are designing
URL: http://www.lowcosteyeglasses.net
purchase and very expensive, we are designingeyeglass systems that make eyeglassesinexpensive and easy to purchase.
We believe low cost and availability can beachieved through product designs that eliminatecomplexity and channel designs that rely on localoutlets such as micro-entrepreneurs.
Gyaana2003
Gyaana’s vision is to eliminate functionalilliteracy in India
Gyaana believes that:•By providing funds
URL: http://www.gyaana.org
WINNERS - Harvard Business School Social Enterprise Business Plan Contest
•By providing funds•By making education economically relevant•By fostering community commitment to education
Families will further invest in their children’s education,thereby fostering a virtuous cycle of empowerment,opportunity, and poverty alleviation.
Other Resources
University of MichiganServing the Bottom of the Pyramidhttp://www.bus.umich.edu/BottomOfThePyramid/xMAP2003.htm
Social Enterprise @HBS Social Enterprise @HBShttp://www.hbs.edu/socialenterprise/bplan/entrants.html
Business for Social Responsibilitywww.bsr.org
World Bank – Documents and Projectshttp://www-wds.worldbank.org/
Grameen BankGroup Discussion Questions
•What were the success factors behindGrameen Bank’s performance inGrameen Bank’s performance inBangladesh?
•What are the key incentives for participantsin Grameen’s microlending system? Whatare the checks and balances (i.e. controls)?
•Suggest two new areas where Grameencould expand to using a similar businessmodel.
Grameen Bank: Banking for thepoor Started out providing “tiny loans” (microcredit) to the
poorest of the poor in rural Bangladesh (1976);officially converted as an independent bank (1983).
96% of its borrowers (3.36 million) are women.
93% of equity owned by borrowers, remaining 7%owned by the government.owned by the government.
No collateral required against micro-loans.
Loan recovery rate of 98.69%.
Approximately 1200+ branches, servicing 45,000villages, with a staff of 12,000.
Total disbursed: $4.27 billion (197 billion Taka).
Founded by Muhammad Yunus in Jobra,Bangladesh. Yunus became guarantor of loans topoor ($300, 10,000 Taka).
The 16 decisions: We shall follow and advance the four principles of Grameen Bank
--- Discipline, Unity, Courage and Hard work – in all walks of ourlives.
Prosperity we shall bring to our families.
We shall not live in dilapidated houses. We shall repair our housesand work towards constructing new houses at the earliest.
We shall grow vegetables all the year round. We shall eat plenty of We shall grow vegetables all the year round. We shall eat plenty ofthem and sell the surplus.
During the plantation seasons, we shall plant as many seedlingsas possible.
We shall plan to keep our families small. We shall minimize ourexpenditures. We shall look after our health.
We shall educate our children and ensure that they can earn topay for their education.
We shall always keep our children and the environment clean.
The Grameen NetworkThe Grameen Bank Family has grown to over twodozen organizations.
The major groups are:
Grameen Trust
Grameen Fund
Grameen Communications
Grameen Phone Ltd.
Grameen Software Ltd.
Grameen IT Park
Grameen Shakti/Energy
Grameen Shikkha/Education
Grameen Telecom
Grameen Knitwear Ltd.
Grameen Cybernet Ltd.
Grameen Byabosa Bikash(Business Promotion )
Grameen InformationHighways Ltd.
Grameen Star Education Ltd.
Grameen Bitek Ltd.
Grameen Uddog (Enterprise)
Gonoshasthaya GrameenTextile Mills Ltd.