introduction to magnetic fusion and the sparc project fusion overview... · •result of this...

46
Libby Tolman IAP @ PSFC January 15 th , 2019 Acknowledgments: Jerry Hughes, Catherine Fiore, Jeff Freidberg, Martin Greenwald, Zach Hartwig, Alberto Loarte, Bob Mumgaard, Geoff Olynyk, Brian LaBombard, Dennis Whyte Introduction to magnetic fusion and the SPARC project

Upload: others

Post on 30-Apr-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Libby TolmanIAP @ PSFCJanuary 15th, 2019Acknowledgments: Jerry Hughes, Catherine Fiore, Jeff Freidberg, Martin Greenwald, Zach Hartwig, Alberto Loarte, Bob Mumgaard, Geoff Olynyk, Brian LaBombard, Dennis Whyte

Introduction to magnetic fusion and the SPARC project

2

• What is fusion?

• Advantages of fusion as an energy source

• How we get fusion on earth

• Progress of the tokamak to date

• The SPARC project

• Profiles of students at PSFC involved in fusion development

Please raise your hand at any point with questions!

Outline of talk

3

What is fusion?

4

• Fusion happens when isotopes lighter than iron combine to form heavier nuclei, with less final mass

• The extra mass is released as energy

2mcE =

Fusion is a basic physical process that produces energy

5

Fusion is the energy source of the sun

• The sun is powered by the fusion of hydrogen

• Over its 4.5 billion year lifetime thus far, the Sun has lost approximately the mass of Saturn through this process

6

Advantages of fusion as an energy source

7

Global warming, economic development present energy challenges

Smog in New Delhi, India (source: Vox)

8

As an energy source on earth, fusion would have advantages

• No emissions

• Nearly inexhaustible fuel supply (deuterium and lithium, which is used to breed tritium)

• High power density land use

• On when needed

• Can be sited anywhere

• No chain reaction = no possibility of meltdown

• No long-lived nuclear waste for deep storage (lower level activation of components)

• Low proliferation risk

9

How we get fusion on earth

10

Fusion is hard because nuclei tend to repel

• Like charges repel (Coulomb force)

• Throw them at each other and they tend to scatter

• To obtain fusion, nuclei must be confined over numerous scattering times

• High temperature is necessary for significant fusion probability

confinement mechanism

(107 K)

11

At high temperatures necessary for fusion, materials become plasma

• When energy is added to matter, phase changes can occur à new physical properties

• When sufficient heat energy is added to matter, bound electrons strip from the nuclei

• Plasma = “soup” of negatively charged electrons and positively charged nuclei

Add heat

Solid / liquid / gas Plasma

Neutron

Proton

e–e–

e–

e–

12

The sun confines and heats its plasma fuel through gravity

Pressure from

gravity

Proton-proton fusion

13

Fusion bombs use x-rays from fission primary to compress fusion fuel

14

Magnetic fusion energy uses magnetic fields to confine plasma

15

Tokamaks confine plasma by wrapping field lines in a donut shape

16

A twist is necessary to confine plasma in toroidal geometry

• Field is weaker on the outside

• Plasma wants to expand

• Hole gets bigger

• Need to wrap the field lines around the plasma like on a barber pole

• Can do this by passing a current around the plasma

17

Tokamak power plant uses fusion reaction to provide power

D+T plasma: makes

neutrons and alpha particles

magnet

blanket: breeds tritium, captures energy

heat exchanger

turbine generator

18

Plasma conditions determine tokamak energy production

Plasma density Plasma temperature Energy confinement

n × T × τE“fusion triple product”

19

!"#E is related to relationship between rion and device size

Wall

Plasma

Low B

High B

$%&'Plasma temperature, set by fusion cross-section

Magnetic field, set by device magnets

Make many of these fit inside the device

$%&'~"�*

• Basic understanding of triple product can be obtained by considering how many times the ion gyroradius fits inside device

• More gyroradii in device = better energy confinement, higher temperature, better able to hold plasma

• Higher magnetic field and larger device size are both good for triple product

20

Rigorous analysis says:

!"#+ ∼ ./01⋆3

45.7*7How good your tokamak is at

producing energy

Devicesize

Plasma physicsDevice magnetic

field strength

21

Progress of the tokamak to date

2222

• The ratio of fusion power producedto plasma heating power suppliedis defined as capital Q:

• Q=1 à BreakevenQ=∞ à Ignition (no external heating)

• Q increases as triple product increases

8 = :;<=>?@:ABCD>@E

Progress has been made towards net energy with tokamaks

23

Roughly 170 tokamaks have been built worldwideAlcator C-Mod, Cambridge, MA, USA

DIII-D, San Diego, CA, USA

ASDEX Upgrade, Garching, Germany

EAST (HT-7), Hefei, Anhui, China

Joint European Torus (JET), Oxfordshire, UK

JT-60SA, Naka, Japan

KSTAR, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

SST-1, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

Tore Supra, Cadarache, France

24

• C-Mod is a compact device with some pretty hefty parameters

• Operated until 2016

• Magnetic field at the plasma center up to 8 T (>100,000 x Earth’s surface magnetic field)

• Plasma densities span the range expected for reactors

• Volume averaged plasma pressure of 2 atmospheres (world record)

Alcator C-Mod

Next door is a tokamak—tour follows lunch

25

Q for next-generation tokamak designs depends on size, field

!"#+ ∼ ./01⋆3

45.7*7

26

Historically, magnetic field technology has limited accessible space

!"#+ ∼ ./01⋆3

45.7*7Inaccessible magnetic fields with traditional

superconductors

27

ITER, a tokamak under construction with Q∼10, is a large device

Human

2820

Cadarache

• Joint effort among China, EU, India, Japan, Korea, Russia, US

• Political origin: 1985 Geneva summit

• ITER agreement reached in 2006

• Construction began in 2010 in France

• Construction cost > €10B

• First plasma: 2025

• D-T operations: 2035

ITER aims to demonstrate scientific, technological feasibility of fusion

29

The SPARC project

30

Recent developments enable smaller and faster fusion development

• Large size and resulting slow development has traditionally been a major drawback of fusion

• Recent technological developments present faster, smaller pathways

• High temperature, high field superconductors (HTS) have been developed

• HTS tapes have recently become an industrially produced product

31

HTS expands accessible parameter space

!"#+ ∼ ./01⋆3

45.7*7Now accessible!

32

ARC study (2015) outlined the size reductions allowed by HTS

• Design study led by MIT students

• Conceptual design of demonstration fusion pilot power plant that obtains ITER-level performance in much smaller size

ITER

Torus Radius [m] 6.2Magnet Technology LTS

Magnetic Field Strength [T]

5.3

Pfusion [MW] 500Pelectric [MW] 0

ARCTorus Radius [m] 3.2

Magnet Technology HTSMagnetic Field

Strength [T]9.2

Pfusion [MW] 500Pelectric [MW] 200

33

Intermediate steps needed to reach ARC

• ARC requires too big of an investment and is too big of a step in technology, plasma physics to build immediately

• After ARC design study, MIT PSFC leadership started discussing the most important elements of ARC to develop and demonstrate and how they could be packaged in an achievable project

• Desire to attract private capital as funding

• Result of this deliberation is the SPARC project (soonest [or smallest] possible ARC)

34

SPARC

~ 12 T, 100 MW, Q=2-5

In spring, PSFC started the SPARC project as first step towards a reactor

35

SPARC funded with novel private financing strategy

• MIT PSFC remains an independent research establishment

• Providing scientific R&D to the joint project

• Bringing the best of both worlds together: the scientific underpinnings from tokamak research and the speed, capital, and drive of the private sector

• CFS is a private company

• Investor-backed with the aim of commercializing the high-field path

• Investors are in it for the long haul with capital to see it through

36

Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS) announced in March 2018

37

SPARC has attracted significant investment capital

• CFS has attracted significant capital from a range of investors

• Leading investor is Italian oil company ENI ($50 million)

• Other investors include billionaire-led Breakthrough Energy Ventures and The Engine

38

First step of SPARC is magnet development: ongoing presently

39

Profiles of students at PSFC involved in fusion development

40

PSFC attracts devoted scientists, engineers, and technical staff

41

• Received A.B. (2015) in Physics from Princeton

• Loves challenging physics problems

• Explored many areas of physics in undergrad (black holes etc.), but was drawn to the practical applications of plasma physics and fusion

• At MIT, focuses on plasma instabilities relevant to the confinement of energetic fusion products in high magnetic field tokamaks

• Computational and analytical work, in close collaboration with experimentalists

Libby Tolman, Ph.D. student in Physics (Me)

42

Erica Salazar, Ph.D. student in Nuclear Science and Engineering

Erica, the only female engineer in the General Atomics magnet development program and the leader of her team

• Received B.S. (2010) and M.S. (2012) in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford

• Deeply passionate about technological challenges

• Worked for 5 years at General Atomics manufacturing magnets for ITER

• Wanted to move more into research and heard about the SPARC project

• Came to PSFC as a PhD student to work on SPARC magnet development

43

Lucio Milanese, Ph.D. student in Nuclear Science and Engineering

• Grew up in Italy, and learned basics of fusion at a young age

• Was fascinated by Fusion Power Plant in SimCity 4

• While interviewing to get into undergrad at Imperial College, plasma physics professor asked him how to confine a plasma

• Realized fusion research was actually happening!

• At PSFC, uses analytical and computational methods to study how different types of turbulence interact to determine how heat is confined in a plasma

44

Leigh Ann Kesler, Postdoc

• Grew up in Illinois on a corn and soybean farm

• Learned about fusion through writing assignment in high school

• For undergrad, studied Nuclear, Plasma, and Radiological Engineering and worked in a lab that focused on plasma-material interactions

• Came to MIT for PhD in Nuclear Science and Engineering

• Currently uses experiments to study the effects of neutron damage on HTS

45

• Fusion is a fundamental energy source that powers the sun

• Fusion has many attractive features as an energy source on earth

• One device for obtaining fusion is the tokamak

• The tokamak has made significant progress to date, but has not yet achieved break even

• The SPARC project aims to accelerate fusion development using high temperature superconductors

• PSFC’s path to fusion has attracted a diverse and passionate set of scientists and engineers

Summary

46

Recommended resources for additional learning

• More info about what we discussed today and discussion of alternative fusion concepts: IAP 2017 talk “MIT’s Pathway to Fusion Energy” : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0KuAx1COEk

• C-Mod tour at 1:00 pm

• Future IAP events:

Jan. 16th, 10 am, here: “Design your own fusion plant with Excel”

Jan. 18th, 11 am, here: “Inertial confinement fusion and high energy density physics at the NIF, OMEGA, and Z” (tour follows)

Jan. 22nd, 1 pm, 34-101: “The MIT Fusion Landscape”

Jan. 23rd, 11 am, here: “Overview of the Divertor Tokamak Test Facility project”

Jan. 26-27th, starting at 10 am, here: “Hack for Fusion: A Machine Learning Hackathon at MIT’s Plasma Science and Fusion Center”