introduction to wearables
DESCRIPTION
An Introduction to Wearable Computers given on Thursday December 11th 2014 by Mark Billinghurst. Presented to people from CitiGroup and so case studies were from the financial sector.TRANSCRIPT
Introduction to Wearables
Mark Billinghurst HIT Lab NZ
December 2014
Room Desk Lap Hand Head
Wearable Computing ▪ Computer on the body that is: ▪ Always on ▪ Always accessible ▪ Always connected
▪ Other attributes ▪ Augmenting user actions ▪ Aware of user and surroundings
The Ideal Wearable ▪ Persists and Provides Constant Access: Designed
for everyday and continuous user over a lifetime. ▪ Senses and Models Context: Observes and
models the users and environment. ▪ Augments and Mediates: Information support for
the user in both the physical and virtual realities. ▪ Interacts Seamlessly: Adapts its input and output
modalities to those most appropriate at the time.
Starner, T. E. (1999). Wearable computing and contextual awareness (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
Wearable Attributes
▪ fafds
History
History of Wearables ▪ 1960-90: Early Exploration ▪ Custom build devices
▪ 1990 - 2000: Academic, Military Research ▪ MIT, CMU, Georgia Tech, EPFL, etc ▪ 1997: ISWC conference starts
▪ 1995 – 2005+: First Commercial Uses ▪ Niche industry applications, Military
▪ 2010 - : Second Wave of Wearables ▪ Consumer applications, Head Worn
The Gamblers
▪ Timing device for roulette prediction ▪ Card counting hardware (toe input)
Ed Thorp (1961)
Thorp, E. O. (1998, October). The invention of the first wearable computer. In Wearable Computers, 1998. Second International Symposium on (pp. 4-8). IEEE.
Belt computer
Shoe Input
Glasses Display
Keith Taft (1972)
The Hackers (1980’s - )
! MIT Media Lab – Wearable Computing (1993)
http://www.media.mit.edu/wearables/
Enabling Technologies (1989+) ▪ Private Eye Display (Reflection Tech.) ▪ 720 x 280 dipslay ▪ Red LED ▪ Vibrating mirror
▪ Twiddler (Handykey) ▪ Chording keypad ▪ Mouse emulation
MIT Tin Lizzy (1993) ▪ General Purpose Wearable ▪ Doug Platt, Thad Starner ▪ 150 MHz Pentium CPU ▪ 32-64 Mb RAM, 6 Gb HDD ▪ VGA display ▪ Cellular modem
http://www.media.mit.edu/wearables/lizzy/lizzy/index.html
Prototype Applications ▪ Remembrance Agent ▪ Rhodes (97)
▪ Augmented Reality ▪ Feiner (97), Thomas (98)
▪ Remote Collaboration ▪ Garner (97), Kraut (96)
▪ Maintenance/Factory ▪ Caudell (92), Thompson (97)
Mobile AR: Touring Machine (1997)
▪ University of Columbia ▪ Feiner, MacIntyre, Höllerer, Webster
▪ Combines ▪ See through head mounted display ▪ GPS tracking ▪ Orientation sensor ▪ Backpack PC (custom) ▪ Tablet input
Feiner, S., MacIntyre, B., Höllerer, T., & Webster, A. (1997). A touring machine: Prototyping 3D mobile augmented reality systems for exploring the urban environment. Personal Technologies, 1(4), 208-217.
MARS View ▪ Virtual tags overlaid on the real world ▪ “Information in place”
PCI 3D Graphics Board
Hard Drive
Serial Ports
CPU
PC104 Sound Card
PC104 PCMCIA
GPS Antenna
RTK correction Antenna
HMD Controller
Tracker Controller
DC to DC Converter
Battery
Wearable Computer
GPS RTK correction
Radio
Example self-built working solution with PCI-based 3D graphics
Columbia Touring Machine
Mobile AR - Hardware
Early Commercial Systems ▪ Xybernaut (1996 - 2007) ▪ Belt worn, HMD, 200 MHz
▪ ViA (1996 – 2001) ▪ Belt worn, Audio Interface ▪ 700 MHz Crusoe
▪ Symbol (1998 – 2006) ▪ Wrist worn computer ▪ Finger scanner
Symbol WWC 1000 (1998 - )
! Wrist worn wearable + finger barcode scanner ! $3500 USD, current price $1000 ! Over 30K sold in first 2 years, still selling (>100k units?) ! First widely deployed wearable computer
Reasons For Success ! Well defined large market niche
! Stock pickers with holster scanners
! Significant usability/ergonomics effort ! Over 40,000 hours user testing
! Provided significant performance improvement ! Met user needs, solved existing problems
! Addressed social factors ! Company with substantial R+D resources
Stein, R., Ferrero, S., Hetfield, M., Quinn, A., & Krichever, M. (1998, October). Development of a commercially successful wearable data collection system. In Wearable Computers, 1998. Digest of Papers. Second International Symposium on (pp. 18-24). IEEE.
Second Gen. Commercial Systems ! Recon (2010 - )
! Head worn displays for sports ! Ski goggle display ! Investment from Intel (2013)
! Google (2011 - ) ! Google Glass ! Consumer focus
Recon MOD/MOD live (2010 - ) ! http://www.reconinstruments.com ! Ski goggle wearable
! Niche market focus ! Show speed, maps, phone calls etc ! $199/$299 accessory ! GPS location, orientation, sensor output ! Android platform/SDK
! Sales: > 50K units sold
Use Case ! While skiing
show: ! maps, ! speed, ! altitude ! phone calls ! text messages
Google Glass (2011 - )
Other HWCs ▪ Vuzix M-100 ▪ $999, professional
▪ Recon Jet ▪ $600, more sensors, sports
▪ Opinvent ▪ 500 Euro, multi-view mode
▪ Motorola Golden-i ▪ Rugged, remote assistance
dsfh
Summary ! First wearable companies
! Targeting niche markets ! Expensive/poorly designed solutions ! Mostly low sales (< 10,000)
! Current generation ! First general consumer wearable (Glass, others) ! Bigger niche markets (skiing, sports) – > 50K+ sales ! Lower costs/better design
Market Analysis
Gartner - Hype Cycle
! 5-10 years to widespread commercial acceptance
5 – 10 years to widespread commercialization
Projected Market - 1
Total Number Wearable Devices
Wide Difference in Market Size
Key Companies
Summary ! Wearables reach mass market over 5-10 years ! Analysts disagree on projected sales
! Maybe 20 million devices shipped/year by 2018 ! Up to $11 Billion market size by 2018
! Wearable computers small cf to other technology ! Smart glass around 10% of all wearable sales ! All wearable devices < 10% of smart phone sales
Experience Design
“The product is no longer the basis of value. The experience is.”
Venkat Ramaswamy The Future of Competition.
Using the N-gage
SideTalking
! www.sidetalkin.com
Experience Design is All About You
! Users should be involved throughout the Design Process
! Consider all the needs of the user
Glass User Experience ! Truly Wearable Computing
! Less than 46 ounces
! Hands-free Information Access ! Voice interaction, Ego-vision camera
! Intuitive User Interface ! Touch, Gesture, Speech, Head Motion
! Access to all Google Services ! Map, Search, Location, Messaging, Email, etc
Living Heads Up vs. Heads Down
Lost in Screen Space
PHYSICAL
Physical Elements ! Interface design ! Input techniques ! Interaction metaphors ! Wearability/Ergonomics
Design For Device
! Simple, relevant information ! Complement existing devices
Typical Usage Times
Consider Your User ! Wearable User
! Probably Mobile ! One/no hand interaction ! Short application use ! Need to be able to multitask ! Use in outdoor or indoor environment ! Want to enhance interaction with real world
It's like a rear view mirror
Don't overload the user. S2ck to the absolutely essen2al, avoid long
interac2ons. Be explicit.
Micro Interac3ons
The posi2on of the display and limited input ability makes longer interac2ons less comfortable.
Using it shouldn’t take longer than taking out your phone.
Micro-Interactions
▪ On mobiles people split attention between display and real world
Time Looking at Screen
Oulasvirta, A. (2005). The fragmentation of attention in mobile interaction, and what to do with it. interactions, 12(6), 16-18.
Design for MicroInteractions ▪ Design interaction less than a few seconds
! Tiny bursts of interaction ! One task per interaction ! One input per interaction
▪ Benefits ! Use limited input ! Minimize interruptions ! Reduce attention fragmentation
Do one thing at a time
Make it Glanceable
! Seek to rigorously reduce information density. ! Design for recognition, not reading.
Bad Good
Reduce the number of info chunks
Reducing the total # of information chunks will increase the glanceability of your design.
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
5 (6)
Single Interactions Faster than 4 s
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
5 (6)
Eye Movements: ~ 2 secs
Eye Movements: ~ 0.9 sec
Test the glanceability of your design ✓
Don’t Get in the Way
! Enhance, not replace, real world interaction
Keep it Relevant
! Information at the right time and place
✓ Test your design indoors + outdoors
Interface Guidelines ▪ Don’t design a mobile app ! Design for emotion ▪ Make it glanceable ! Do one thing at a time ! Reduce number of information chunks ▪ Design for indoor and outdoor use
Physical Input ! Interaction on the go
! Must support mobile input
! Fatigue ! “Gorrilla” Arm from free-hand input
! Comfort ! People want to do small gestures by waist
! Socially Acceptable ! Do I look silly doing this?
Twiddler Input
▪ Chording or multi-tap input ▪ Possible to achieve 40 - 60 wpm after 30+ hours ▪ Chording input about 50% faster than multi-tap ▪ cf 20 wpm on T9, or 60+ wpm for QWERTY
Lyons, K., Starner, T., Plaisted, D., Fusia, J., Lyons, A., Drew, A., & Looney, E. W. (2004, April). Twiddler typing: One-handed chording text entry for mobile phones. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 671-678). ACM.
Virtual Keyboards
▪ In air text input ▪ Virtual QWERTY keyboard up to 20 wpm ▪ Word Gesture up to 28 wpm
▪ Handwriting around 20-30 wpm
A. Markussen, et. al. Vulture: A Mid-Air Word-Gesture Keyboard (CHI 2014)
Unobtrusive Input Devices
▪ GestureWrist ▪ Capacitive sensing ▪ Change signal depending on hand shape
Rekimoto, J. (2001). Gesturewrist and gesturepad: Unobtrusive wearable interaction devices. In Wearable Computers, 2001. Proceedings. Fifth International Symposium on (pp. 21-27). IEEE.
GesturePad
Skinput
Using EMG to detect muscle activity
Tan, D., Morris, D., & Saponas, T. S. (2010). Interfaces on the go. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, 16(4), 30-34.
Types of Head Mounted Displays
Occluded See-thru
Multiplexed
See-through Thin Displays
▪ Waveguide techniques for thin see-through displays ▪ Wider FOV, AR applications, Social acceptability
Opinvent Ora
Lumus
Where to put Wearables?
▪ Places for unobtrusive wearable technology
Gemperle, F., Kasabach, C., Stivoric, J., Bauer, M., & Martin, R. (1998, October). Design for wearability. In Wearable Computers, 1998. Digest of Papers. Second International Symposium on (pp. 116-122). IEEE.
Where to Place Trackpad?
▪ User study 25 people different postures ▪ Front of thigh most preferred, torso/upper arm worst
Thomas, Bruce, et al. "Determination of placement of a body-attached mouse as a pointing input device for wearable computers.” ISWC 1999. IEEE Computer Society, 1999.
Where do users want Wearables?
29% on clothing 28% on wrist 12% on Glasses
SOCIAL/CULTURAL
TAT Augmented ID
How is the User Perceived?
The Glasshole Effect
Social Interaction
! For mobiles, location and audience have a significant impact on the type of gestures people will be willing to perform.
Professional vs. Everyday Use
! Everyday acceptance ! Only 12% US adults said they would use AR glasses ! 20% handheld AR users experienced social issues ! 40% neutral/uncomfortable with public gestures
! Professional Use ! 85% Doctors said they would use AR glass in job ! < 25% neutral/uncomfortable with work gestures
COGNITIVE
Cognitive Load and Interfaces
A Typical Work Day
Which is the most cognitively demanding?
Cognitive Interference ▪ Structural interference ▪ Two or more tasks compete for limited
resources of a peripheral system - eg two cognitive processes needing vision
▪ Capacity interference ▪ Total available central processing overwhelmed
by multiple concurrent tasks - eg trying to add and count at same time
Resource Competition Framework
▪ Mobility tasks compete for cognitive resources with other tasks ▪ the most important given higher priority
▪ RCF is a method for analyzing this, based on: ▪ task analysis ▪ modelling cognitive resources ▪ a resource approach to attention
Oulasvirta, A., Tamminen, S., Roto, V., & Kuorelahti, J. (2005, April). Interaction in 4-second bursts: the fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 919-928). ACM.
Cognitive Resources & Limitations
Application of RCF
Busy street > Escalator > Café > Laboratory. But if you made Wayfinding, Path Planning, Estimating
Time to Target, Collision Avoidance easier?
Handling Interruptions
▪ Gradually increase engagement ▪ Reduce attention load
Receiving SMS on Glass
“Bing”
Tap Swipe
Glass
Show Message Start Reply User
Look Up
Say Reply
Nomadic Radio (2000)
▪ Spatial audio wearable interface Sawhney, N., & Schmandt, C. (2000). Nomadic radio: speech and audio interaction for contextual messaging in nomadic environments. ACM transactions on Computer-Human interaction (TOCHI), 7(3), 353-383.
Spatial Audio Metaphor
Messages arranged depending on time of day
Notification Interruptions
▪ Dynamic scaling of incoming message based on interruptibility of the user ▪ Busy = silence ▪ Availble = preview
Use Cases
Ideal Applications ! Use cases that require:
! Hands-free interaction ! Mobile information access ! Constant access to information ! Supporting activity in real world ! Low likelihood of social issues ! Enhanced view of reality
Wearable Use Cases
Smart Watch Consumer Insights/Primary Uses
Personal assistance Health & Fitness Personal safety
Communication Smart home access Near Field Communication
(NFC)
Social ac3on First-‐person journalist Tim Pool broadcasts an in2mate view of Istanbul protests. 'I want to show you what it's like to be there as best I can, even if that ends with me running full-‐speed into a cafe and rubbing lemons all over my face a<er being tear-‐gassed'
CityViewAR
! Using AR to visualize Christchurch city buildings ! 3D models of buildings, 2D images, text, panoramas ! AR View, Map view, List view ! Available on Android market
CityViewAR on Glass
! AR overlay of virtual buildings in Christchurch
Financial Services Applications ! Which Financial Services task could benefit from
using wearables? ! always on, connected, accessible
! Match task requirements to wearable attributes ! Hands-busy, constant information access, user
monitoring, mobile, etc
! Key question: can this task be done on a mobile phone instead of wearable?
Financial Applications ! Possible types of Financial Services experiences
! Customer Service ! Consumer Banking ! Finance Trading ! Remote Collaboration
CUSTOMER SERVICE
Customer Service ! Wearables provide
! Constant access to information ! Mobile access – move agent from behind counter ! Improved face to face customer experience
- Customer face recognition - Eye to eye contact
Example: Virgin Atlantic
! Virgin Atlantic trialing Glass for customer check in ! Features
! Agent greets customer curb-side, start check-in process ! Provide customer details, personalized service ! Document verification – camera scanning of boarding pass
! Advantages ! Focus attention on customer ! Moves agent to customer
- Earlier engagement
! Reduces technology barrier between agent and customer
- Hide behind computer/desk
! Provides personalized service - Name, flight details, weather, diet,
translation services, etc
“The trial was a huge success with positive feedback from both our staff and customers on the usage of wearable technology” ! Key findings
! Only Google Glass permitted the agent to maintain eye contact showing they were engaged and interesting in helping.
! Some passengers were taken aback initially by Glass wearing concierges, but, on the whole, passengers responded well.
! Technical challenges to overcome - Short battery life, camera resolution, wifi issues
CONSUMER BANKING
Consumer Banking ! Use Glass to provide mobile finance services
! Bank locator ! In-store payments ! Currency conversion ! Receipt capture (using camera) ! Account balance checking ! Etc
! Some banks porting their mobile apps to Glass
Example: Westpac ! Ported mobile finance app Cash Tank to Glass ! Features
! Check balance ! Transfer funds ! Find nearest ATM/bank branch ! Get alerts and notifications
! Trialed in NZ and Australia
Demo Video
! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qX25cE7Bww
Other Examples ! CaixaBank ! Well Fargo ! Discover ! Saudi Investment Bank ATM finder ! FISERV Mobile payments on Glass ! TMG See2Pay small-dollar payments on Glass
! http://blog.dwolla.com/dwolla-now-available-on-google-glass/
See2pay Demo
! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-3UKp0a4nU
CiaxaBank Glass Application
Branch finder (AR), currency converter, contact details
FINANCE TRADING
Finance Trading ! Currently most finance trading is confined to
fixed desks/location ! Wearables could allow managers to maintain
awareness while away from trading floor ! Provides constant access to markets ! Alerts where ever they are ! Constant monitoring of individual funds ! Etc.
Deskbound to Mobile
COLLABORATION
Google Glass
▪ Wearable computer – Ego-Vision view ▪ camera + processing + display + connectivity
Example – Vipaar Telemedicine
! Vipaar + UAB - http://www.vipaar.com ! Endoscopic view streamed remotely ! Remote expert adds hands – viewed in Glass
VIPAAR Demo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTOoBwfqBe0
GoToAssist ! http://www.gotoassist.com/ ! Remote collaboration platform
! Screen sharing ! File transfer ! Chat, Annotation
! SeeIt platform supports Glass
SeeIt Glass Demo
! http://www.citrix.com/tv/#videos/10065
Research Problems
Challenges for the Future (2001) ▪ Privacy ▪ Power use ▪ Networking ▪ Collaboration ▪ Heat dissipation ▪ Interface design ▪ Intellectual tools ▪ Augmented Reality systems
Starner, T. (2001). The challenges of wearable computing: Part 1. IEEE Micro,21(4), 44-52. Starner, T. (2001). The challenges of wearable computing: Part 2. IEEE Micro,21(4), 54-67.
Gesture Interaction With Glass ▪ 3 Gear Systems ▪ Hand tracking
▪ Hand data sent to glass ▪ Wifi networking ▪ Hand joint position ▪ AR application rendering ▪ Vuforia tracking
Performance
▪ Full 3d hand model input ▪ 10 - 15 fps tracking, 1 cm fingertip resolution
● Meta Gesture Interaction
▪ Depth sensor + Stereo see-through ▪ https://www.spaceglasses.com/
Current Collaboration
▪ First person remote conferencing/hangouts ▪ Limitations
- Single POV, no spatial cues, no annotations, etc
Sharing Space: Social Panoramas
▪ Capture and share social spaces in real time ▪ Enable remote people to feel like they’re with you
Context Sensing ▪ Using context to manage information ▪ progressive information display as user shows
interest
▪ Context from ▪ Speech ▪ Gaze ▪ Real world
▪ Wearable AR Display
Ajanki, A., Billinghurst, M., Gamper, H., Järvenpää, T., Kandemir, M., Kaski, S., ... & Tossavainen, T. (2011). An augmented reality interface to contextual information. Virtual reality, 15(2-3), 161-173.
Gaze Interaction
AR View
More Information Over Time
Conclusions
Conclusions ! Wearable computing represents a fourth
generation of computing devices ! Google Glass is the first consumer wearable
! Lightweight, usable, etc
! A range of wearables will appear in 2014 ! Ecosystem of devices
! Significant research opportunities exist ! User interaction, displays, social impact