introduction “ two modes ” model method of the calculation for the transient response
DESCRIPTION
Measurement & Calculation of the Lorentz Detuning for the transient response of the resonant cavity. Introduction “ Two modes ” model Method of the calculation for the transient response Case of Flat-top Comparison between experiment and calculation Next Measurement Plan Summary. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 11
Measurement & Calculation of the Lorentz Measurement & Calculation of the Lorentz DetuningDetuning
for the transient response of the resonant for the transient response of the resonant cavitycavity
Measurement & Calculation of the Lorentz Measurement & Calculation of the Lorentz DetuningDetuning
for the transient response of the resonant for the transient response of the resonant cavitycavity
Introduction “Two modes” model Method of the calculation for the transient response Case of Flat-top Comparison between experiment and calculation Next Measurement Plan Summary
Y. Yamamoto, H. Hatori, H. Hayano, E. Kako, S. Noguchi, M. Sato, T. Shishido, K. Watanabe(KEK), H. Hara, K. Sennyu(MHI)
04/21/2304/21/23 TESLA Technology Collaboration MeetingTESLA Technology Collaboration Meeting 22
Improvement in the KEK TESLA-like Cavities
Stiffness of Cavity Fixing Support 80 kN/mm 13 kN/mmLorentz Detuning -480 Hz -1050 Hz (31.5 MV/m)
TTF Cavity
Thick Titanium Baseplate,Thick Nb Beam Tube & Thick Nb End-cell
KEK TESLA-like Cavity
Cell Taper13 deg. → 10 deg.
Beam Tube78 → 84
Input Port40 →
KEK TESLA-like Cavity TTF CavityFz
Fr
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 33
IntroductionIntroductionIntroductionIntroductionThe shape of the resonant cavity is generally deformed by the Lorentz force.
The frequency of the cavity is changed according to the square of the field strength.
The cavity is detuned, and the field may not be constant during the flat-top of the pulse.
It is necessary to compensate or lower the detuning by the Lorentz force.
The methods to do it are following…(1) Using Piezo(2) Setting the initial offset of the frequency to the cavity(3) Increasing the mechanical strength of the cavity
STF base-line cavity is mechanically stronger than TESLA’s one!
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 44
Fast mode
Slow mode
Mechanical Oscillation (Two Modes Model)Mechanical Oscillation (Two Modes Model)
Time1.5 msec.
Oscillation Amplitude (Xk)
Eacc
Stationary Amplitude
Offset Compensation
Piezo Compensation
Very roughly speaking, the fast mode is mainly contributed to the Lorentz Detuning before 500μsec and the slow mode after 500 μsec.
The behavior of the filling is considered not to be different between on resonance and the slight detuning.
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 55
Two Modes ModelTwo Modes ModelTwo Modes ModelTwo Modes ModelIn this model, the Lorentz detuning is generated by two modes.One is the “fast mode” and the other is “slow”.
fast mode(linear)
slow mode(sine)
500μsec5msec(=200Hz)
300Hz90HzIn the simulation
From the mechanical calculation
slow mode fast mode
Actually, so many modes exist in 9-cell cavity!But, these modes are mainly effective.
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 66
U(t)V(t)ωV(t)dt
d
Q
ω)
Q
Qj(1V(t)
dt
d 2o
L
o
o
L2
2
)tan
(exp)(exp)~~
(~~
tT
jT
tVVVV
FFdod
Cavity Voltage EquationCavity Voltage Equation
Equi-angular Spiral
If the factor in each term is constant in time, this equation can be solved analytically.But, if not so…
From J.
Slater
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 77
Voltage SolutionVoltage SolutionVoltage SolutionVoltage Solution
11,
1,
11
1,1,
expcos~
tanexpexp1~
tanexpexp~
tanexpexp~~~~
nnng
Fn
Fng
Fn
Fn
Fn
Fngnngn
jV
T
tj
T
tV
T
tj
T
tV
T
tj
T
tVVVV
1μsec
Generally normalized by 1
Within the very short period (Δt), the following equation is filled and solved analytically.
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 88
Used numerical valuesfilling time : Tf = 2QL/ω0
f0 = 1300.25MHzQL = 1.15x106 (from horizontal test for STF B.L. #3
cavity)Δt = 1μsec (sufficiently short)Δf = sine + linear (t<500μsec)
→ sine (t>500μsec)
Expressions and values for the Expressions and values for the calculationcalculationExpressions and values for the Expressions and values for the calculationcalculation
11,
1,
11
1,1,
expcos~
tanexpexp1~
tanexpexp~
tanexpexp~~~~
nnng
Fn
Fng
Fn
Fn
Fn
Fngnngn
jV
T
tj
T
tV
T
tj
T
tV
T
tj
T
tVVVV
tanΨ=-2QLΔf/f0
Used expressions
After 500µsec, the fast mode disappears, because the damping is very fast.
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 99
Example of Flat-top Example of Flat-top calculationcalculationExample of Flat-top Example of Flat-top calculationcalculation
Input data (frequency)
Input data (degree)
Output data (VC)
Output data (ΨCavity)
tanΨ=-2QLΔf/f0
fast mode + slow mode
slow mode (sine)
After 500µsec, the fast mode disappears.
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 1010
Case of Flat-top (offset Case of Flat-top (offset +160Hz)+160Hz)Case of Flat-top (offset Case of Flat-top (offset +160Hz)+160Hz)
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 1111
One pulse during High-Power Test (+160Hz One pulse during High-Power Test (+160Hz Offset)Offset)One pulse during High-Power Test (+160Hz One pulse during High-Power Test (+160Hz Offset)Offset)
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 1212
Comparison between experiment and calculation Comparison between experiment and calculation ①①Comparison between experiment and calculation Comparison between experiment and calculation ①①
No offset +160Hz offset
Before 500µsec, the response speed of the phase detector is probably significant.After that, it is consistent between the experiment and the calculation.
“Two modes model” is valid!
500µsec 500µsec
1500µsec
Preliminary
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 1313
+300Hz offset -160Hz offset
Comparison between experiment and calculation Comparison between experiment and calculation ②②Comparison between experiment and calculation Comparison between experiment and calculation ②②
“Two modes model” is valid!
500µsec500µsec
Preliminary
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 1414
For the real operation (with Piezo), For the real operation (with Piezo), the calculation is modified for a few the calculation is modified for a few
parameters.parameters.
For the real operation (with Piezo), For the real operation (with Piezo), the calculation is modified for a few the calculation is modified for a few
parameters.parameters.
Eacc = 18.5 → 35MV/mQL = 1.15x106 → 3x106
Sorry! There is not the experimental data around 35MV/m.The result around 30MV/m will be obtained in STF-Phase 1.0 on June or July.
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 1515
Example of Piezo Compensation (#1)Example of Piezo Compensation (#1)Example of Piezo Compensation (#1)Example of Piezo Compensation (#1)
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 1616
Criteria of Piezo parameters (#1)Criteria of Piezo parameters (#1)Criteria of Piezo parameters (#1)Criteria of Piezo parameters (#1)
300Hz/μm for Δfcavity
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 1717
Example of Piezo Compensation (#2)Example of Piezo Compensation (#2)Example of Piezo Compensation (#2)Example of Piezo Compensation (#2)
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 1818
Criteria of Piezo parameters (#2)Criteria of Piezo parameters (#2)Criteria of Piezo parameters (#2)Criteria of Piezo parameters (#2)
300Hz/μm for Δfcavity
Next Measurement PlanNext Measurement PlanNext Measurement PlanNext Measurement Plan Comparing between Two types of Piezo actuator
High voltage type– 2μm/1000V@2K
Low voltage type– 2μm/150V@2K
Measurement of the Lorentz detuning around 30MV/mSTF #2 B.L. cavity achieved 29.4MV/m in the V.T.
Measurement of the detuning angle during the RF decayThis was already demonstrated in the horizontal test of LL cavity.
Checking the response of the phase detector
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 1919
300Hz/μm for Δfcavity
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 2020
Suggestion to the compensation Suggestion to the compensation method for the Lorentz Detuningmethod for the Lorentz DetuningSuggestion to the compensation Suggestion to the compensation method for the Lorentz Detuningmethod for the Lorentz Detuning
Put the initial offset for the cavity frequencyDuring the filling time, the cavity frequency is gradually decreased by
the Lorentz detuning.
Work piezo with the small oscillationAvoid to break out the Piezo by the large oscillationLonger lifetime of Piezo
Increase the mechanical strength of the cavity It is difficult to deform the cavity.
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 2121
SummarySummarySummarySummary “Two modes model” is valid for the transient response of
the cavity in the horizontal test at STF Phase-0.5.
It is effective to increase the mechanical strength ofthe cavity for the reduction of the Lorentz detuning.
It is similarly effective to set the initial offset tothe cavity frequency around the high field.
In STF Phase-1.0, we will compare betweenthe experimental data around 30MV/m and the simulation.
We will re-examine “two modes model” for more optimization.
Backup SlidesBackup SlidesBackup SlidesBackup Slides
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 2222
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 2323
k
kkk
k
k
kk
kk
kk
m
Fx
td
xd
Qtd
xd
FFtsxtsx
2
2
2
;,,
Mechanical Detuning Equation
It is expected that there are two modes from the calculation of the mechanical oscillation.One is the fast mode and the other is slow.
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 2424
Two Dominant Mechanical ModesTwo Dominant Mechanical Modes
~ +
~ 2500Hz
~200Hz
Need Stiff Cavity
Need Stiff Jacket-Tuner
2-nd order mode(Fast mode)
Fundamental mode(Slow mode)
F
F
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 2525
Case of Flat-top ① (no Case of Flat-top ① (no offset)offset)Case of Flat-top ① (no Case of Flat-top ① (no offset)offset)
Phaser diagram
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 2626
Case of Flat-top ③ (offset Case of Flat-top ③ (offset +300Hz)+300Hz)Case of Flat-top ③ (offset Case of Flat-top ③ (offset +300Hz)+300Hz)
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 2727
Case of Flat-top ④ (offset -Case of Flat-top ④ (offset -160Hz)160Hz)Case of Flat-top ④ (offset -Case of Flat-top ④ (offset -160Hz)160Hz)
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 2828
One pulse during High-Power Test (No One pulse during High-Power Test (No Offset)Offset)One pulse during High-Power Test (No One pulse during High-Power Test (No Offset)Offset)
This pulse is used for the comparison later.
5˚
18.5MV/m
Ψcavity
Pkly
Vcavity
PRef
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 2929
One pulse during High-Power Test (+300Hz One pulse during High-Power Test (+300Hz Offset)Offset)One pulse during High-Power Test (+300Hz One pulse during High-Power Test (+300Hz Offset)Offset)
SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 3030
One pulse during High-Power Test (-160Hz One pulse during High-Power Test (-160Hz Offset)Offset)One pulse during High-Power Test (-160Hz One pulse during High-Power Test (-160Hz Offset)Offset)