intro_m&m

32
The Research Proposal Researchable question itself Why it's important (i.e., the rationale and significance of your research) Propositions that are known or assumed to be true (i.e., axioms and assumptions) Propositions that will be tested (i.e., hypotheses or postulates) Goals and specific objectives of your research activities Methods you will use to test hypotheses and achieve objectives Expected results and scope of inference Describes the:

Upload: anthony-federico

Post on 06-Sep-2015

18 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Introduction to Research Methods

TRANSCRIPT

  • The Research Proposal

    Researchable question itself

    Why it's important (i.e., the rationale and significance of your research)

    Propositions that are known or assumed to be true (i.e., axiomsand assumptions)

    Propositions that will be tested (i.e., hypotheses or postulates)

    Goals and specific objectives of your research activities

    Methods you will use to test hypotheses and achieve objectives

    Expected results and scope of inference

    Describes the:

  • Define the researchable question

    Develop hypotheses, predictions, and objectives

    Develop materials and methods, including replication

    Gather data

    Analyze the data (contingency plans if things go wrong?)

    Draw conclusions (accept, modify, reject the hypothesis)

    Steps in the scientific method

  • HypothesesGeneral definitions

    A new idea A statement to be tested - an 'educated guess' that needs more

    study to be confirmed or disproved

    A proposition that explains some phenomenon

    Scientific hypothesis - The researchable question restated as a declarative sentence that is assumed to be true for testing purposes

    Stated as what you believe to be true not what you want to disprove (i.e., not a statistical 'null' hypothesis)

    Must be testable (e.g., generate predictions) The most valuable hypotheses are simple, consistent with what is

    already known, and have broad applicability

  • The materials and methods must describe the:

    Proposed experiments or investigations Materials and techniques that you will use, including their feasibility Statistical techniques and other methods used to analyze the data

    Your expected results and interpretations must describe the:

    Results that will lead you to conclude that the hypotheses are proved or disproved

    Scope of inference (i.e., to what extent are the results applicable to other locations, times, or situations?)

    Pitfalls that may be encountered Limitations to the proposed methods

    Methods and expected results

  • Think it through!

  • Typical formatsEach hypothesis or objective often has its own set of methods

    OBJECTIVES My objectives are to:Objective 1Objective 2

    MATERIALS AND METHODSObjective 1

    Hypotheses - RationaleExperimental designMeasurementsData analysisExpected results

    Objective 2Hypotheses - RationaleExperimental designMeasurementsData analysisExpected results

    Pitfalls and limitations (summary)

    HYPOTHESES I hypothesize that:Hypothesis 1Hypothesis 2

    MATERIALS AND METHODSHypothesis 1

    Objectives - RationaleExperimental designMeasurementsData analysisExpected results

    Hypothesis 2Objectives - RationaleExperimental designMeasurementsData analysisExpected results

    Pitfalls and limitations (summary)

  • The materials and methods must describe the:

    Proposed experiments or investigations Materials and techniques that you will use, including their feasibility Statistical techniques and other methods used to analyze the data

    Connection between methods and conclusions must be clear -

    why are you doing these things?

    ApproachThe strategy connecting hypotheses to conclusionsObservational, experimental, modeling?

    DesignRandomization, replication, etcHow do you know replication is sufficient?

    Measurements - Response variablesSurvey, lab, field?Have you done these before?Are you collaborating with someone who has?

    Statistical approaches

  • Expected results and interpretationsThe results you expect to see if your hypotheses are true (i.e., the predictions that flow from your hypotheses)

    What will conclude if you do not see your expected results (i.e., if your predictions are not observed)?

  • Prediction

    Hypothesis

    Researchable question

    Observations (axioms)

    TestFalse True

    deduction

    Accept hypoth. (induction)

    Reject hypoth. (deduction)

    Expected results

    Materials and methods

    Expected results and interpretations must describe the:

    Results that will lead you to conclude that the hypotheses are proved or disproved

  • The conditions to which the conclusions from the research will apply:

    Scope of inference

    Scientific Scope of inference Biological Geographical Temporal

    Statistical Scope of InferenceClo

    sely

    lin

    ked

    Important to consider when you design your research

    How broadly do you want to apply your results?

  • Pitfalls and limitations

    Pitfalls

    Demonstrates a realistic knowledge of your materials and methods Which procedures are risky? What can go wrong? How will you keep things from going wrong? What will you do if things go wrong - backup plans? What are the consequences if things go wrong?

    Limitations

    Scope of inference limitations Describe constraints - i.e., resource, time constraints

  • Evaluation Are the materials and methods adequate to test the

    hypotheses and achieve the objectives?

    Is the scope of inference defined, realistic, and adequate?

    Are issues of representation, replication, and randomization appropriate to the proposal and if so, are they addressed?

    Is it clear how conclusions will be drawn?

    Is the proposed study doable and repeatable?

    Are the pitfalls and limitations understood?

    Are the experiments novel or creative?

  • Design the study

    Carry out the study

    Analyze the data

    Define the question

    Draw conclusions

    Analyze the data

    Define the question

    Draw conclusions

  • Does the foliar boron concentration of seedlings differ among the nursery grown Douglas-fir seedlings in western Oregon that receive one of 4 different fertilizer regimes, the standard fertilizer with 0 lb/ac of boron, 1 lb/ac of boron, 2 lb/ac of boron, and 4 lb/ac of boron?

    The Question of Interest defines responses to measure population to which inference is made groups to compare

  • Relating the Question of Interest to the Conclusions in the planning stages

    What outcomes are possible?- Multiple or one?

    What are the explanations for the outcomes?- a priori decide what you will conclude from potential outcomes

    Does an outcome lead to more than one explanation?

    - Not satisfying if an outcome corroborates many explanations

  • Before we accept the existence of an

    effect, the effect must be observable

    in replicates that represent the range

    of variation* over which inference is to

    be made.

    -Hurlbert (1983)

    Replication

    *The scope of inference!

  • Replication

    is the repetition of independent applications of a treatment or

    protocol

  • Experimental Unit - smallest piece of material that receives an independent application of the treatment, a replicate

    Sampling Unit - smallest piece of material on which a measurement is made, a sub-sample.

    Pine

    Doug-FirPine

    Doug-Fir

  • What gets replicated?

    Boron Fertilizer applied to sections of nursery beds.

    How is the fertilizer applied!What gets an independent application?

    a bed?

    or a section of a bed?

    or a or a seedling?

  • Effect of Herbicide on Apple weight

    Two Orchards, tractor-sprayed herbicide. Assign each set of two rows to either herbicide or water

    treatment. In each orchard mix up one tank of herbicide and one tank

    of distilled water and apply each to assigned rows of trees.

    Herb waterHerb

  • Effect of fire severity on re-growth of herbaceous cover

    Severe

    Low

    Low

    Medium

  • Pine

    Doug-Fir

    Pine

    Doug-Fir

    Pine

    Doug-Fir

    Compare tree regeneration rate after fires in Douglas-fir and Pine Stands.

  • Confound: To confuseTo mingle so that the elements cannot be distinguished

    Confounding is the state in which 2 or more phenomena occur together in such a way that the study cannot separate the effects of one from the other.

    Detecting Differences AccuratelyAvoid Confounding

  • Confounding: an example

    Interest in whether bats forage more along streams then within forest stands.

    In August, sample nighttime foraging activity of bats along streams in the coastal range.

    In October, sample nighttime foraging activity of bats in forest stands in McDonald Dunn Forest (near Corvallis).

    (Note that in the literature it says that nighttime foraging activity of bats increases with increasing nighttime temperature)

  • Confounding: an example In August, sample nighttime foraging activity of

    bats along streams in the coastal range.

    In October, sample nighttime foraging activity of bats in forest stands in McDonald Dunn Forest (near Corvallis)

    To what should you attribute a difference in foraging activity?

    Forest type Nighttime temperature Other seasonal effects (e.g. day length, seasonally

    available food, day or night light levels)

  • Randomization

    What we do:

    Randomly select pieces of material to sample.randomly select

    Randomly assign a piece of material to a protocol.randomly assign

    Order items or protocols randomly.randomly order

    Physically place items randomly.randomly placed

  • Randomization is somewhat analogous to insurance, in that it is a precaution against disturbances that may or may not occur, and that may or may not be serious if they do occur.

    Cochran and Cox 1957

    Randomization ensures that a particular treatment will not be consistently favored or handicapped in successive replications by some extraneous sources of variation, known or unknown. Steele and Torrie 1997

    The function of randomization is to ensure that we have a valid or unbiased estimate of experimental error and of treatment means and the differences among the means.

    Steele and Torrie 1997

    Why do we randomize?

  • Randomization

    What do we mean by randomization?

    Mixed up the order? Cant repeat a selection or an assignment? See no pattern in a selection or an assignment? Cant explain how we did a selection or

    assignment?

  • Randomization

    Each replicate unit has a known chance of being assigned to a treatment.

    Or

    Each sample has a known chance of being sampled

    The process is definable and repeatable.Randomization ensures that the effects we estimate are reasonably believed to be true for the whole set were interested in, not just for the subset.

  • Randomly selecting a unit to sample or measure can insure no systematic difference between units intended to be replicates

  • Inferences Observational studies can only report associations

    between responses and groups Because you dont know and cant be sure that

    something unknown is responsible for the difference you see between your groups

    Controlled designed experiments allow you to draw cause and effect conclusions Because in theory, all other effects known to affect

    the response have been controlled

    Note: natural resource studies are commonly a mix of observational and design studies. It is not easy to have an natural resource study that can make cause and effect conclusions!