investigating the effect of aggregation on prediction intervals in … · 2017. 12. 15. ·...

16
Investigating the effect of aggregation on prediction intervals in case of solar power, electricity consumption and net demand forecasting Dennis van der Meer, Joakim Widén, Joakim Munkhammar Email: [email protected] 2017-10-24

Upload: others

Post on 24-Oct-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Investigating the effect of aggregation on

    prediction intervals in case of solar

    power, electricity consumption and net

    demand forecasting

    Dennis van der Meer, Joakim Widén, Joakim Munkhammar Email: [email protected] 2017-10-24

  • Outline

    • Introduction

    • Motivation

    • Data & Method

    • Results

    • Conclusion

  • Introduction

    • The smoothing effect is well-studied for deterministic forecasting, but not yet for probabilistic forecasting.

    Widén et al., On the properties of aggregate clear-sky index distributions and an improved model for spatially correlated instantaneous solar irradiance, Solar Energy 2017, p. 566-580

  • Motivation

    Fonseca Jr et al., Regional forecasts and smoothing effect of photovoltaic power generation in Japan: An approach with principal component analysis, Renewable Energy 2014, p. 403-413

  • Data & Method • Public data (PV and electricity consumption) of 300 de-

    identified customers in the metropolitan area of Sydney

    • Randomly aggregate the de-identified consumers in steps of 30 customers from 1 to 240 (after data cleansing)

    • Probabilistic forecasting of PV power, electricity consumption and net demand using Gaussian Processes1 (GPs)

    • Net demand = electricity consumption – PV production

    1 Rasmussen & Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (2006)

  • Single customer

  • 210 customers

  • Performance metrics • Prediction interval (PI) coverage probability (PICP) • PI normalized average width (PINAW) • Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS)

    • PICP = 1𝑇𝑇∑ 𝜖𝜖𝑡𝑡𝑇𝑇𝑡𝑡=1 , where 𝜖𝜖𝑡𝑡 = �

    1 if 𝑦𝑦𝑡𝑡 ∈ 𝐿𝐿𝑡𝑡 ,𝑈𝑈𝑡𝑡0 if 𝑦𝑦𝑡𝑡 ∉ 𝐿𝐿𝑡𝑡 ,𝑈𝑈𝑡𝑡

    • PINAW = 1𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇∑ 𝑈𝑈𝑡𝑡 − 𝐿𝐿𝑡𝑡𝑇𝑇𝑡𝑡=1

    • CRPS 𝐹𝐹�𝑡𝑡,𝑦𝑦𝑡𝑡 = 𝔼𝔼𝐹𝐹�𝑡𝑡 𝑌𝑌 − 𝑦𝑦𝑡𝑡Abs. differences

    − 12𝔼𝔼𝐹𝐹�𝑡𝑡 𝑌𝑌 − 𝑌𝑌𝑌

    Spread

  • Outline

    • Introduction

    • Motivation

    • Data & Method

    • Results

    • Conclusion

  • Aggregating 1 to 240 customers

  • Aggregating 1 to 30 customers

  • Electricity consumption forecast

  • PV power production forecast

  • Net demand forecast

  • Conclusions • Disadvantage of this study: de-identified data so no

    geographical information

    • Most significant improvement occurs for the first 25 customers

    • CRPS remain constant while spread decreases absolute differences also decrease

    • Forecasting net demand offers computational advantages for similar accuracy

    • Future work will focus on removing anomalous behavior by bootstrapping

  • Thank you

    Investigating the effect of aggregation on prediction intervals in case of solar power, electricity consumption and net demand forecastingOutlineIntroductionMotivationData & MethodSingle customer210 customersPerformance metricsOutlineAggregating 1 to 240�customersAggregating 1 to 30�customersElectricity consumption forecastPV power production forecastNet demand forecastConclusionsThank you