investigator kickoff meeting january 2009. protocol review, part 1 robert silbergleit, md

45
Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009 The R apid AnticonvulsantM edications P riorto ArrivalTrial

Upload: debra-bradford

Post on 30-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Investigator Kickoff MeetingJanuary 2009

The Rapid Anticonvulsant Medications Prior to Arrival Trial

Page 2: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Protocol Review, Part 1

Robert Silbergleit, MD

The Rapid Anticonvulsant Medications Prior to Arrival Trial

Page 3: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Overview

• More background• Trial Synopsis• Chronological scaffolding

Who does what where when?

• Fill in more details

• Cases and questions in the afternoon

Page 4: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

In a nutshell

• Treat (only) patients who are convulsing• Primary outcome determination “Was patient

convulsing then, based on what you know now?”• Enter all your data right away• Visit (feed) your medics often• Never touch the orange end of the autoinjector

Page 5: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Background – the problem

• SE is common 120,000-200,000 cases/yr• SE is dangerous 22% mortality at 30 days• PHTSE trial proved EMS treatment effective• Ideal agent and route remain unknown• Convulsions can make IV placement challenging• Lorazepam has stocking / cost concerns• Midazolam is promising and is being adopted • Safety and efficacy in SE is untested

Page 6: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Background - Importance

• Controversy• Serendipity• Trail blazing

Page 7: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD
Page 8: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Background - Importance

• Controversy• Serendipity• Trail blazing

Page 9: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Background - Importance

• Controversy• Serendipity• Trail blazing

Page 10: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Synopsis - Hypotheses

Primary• IM midazolam is no less effective as IV

lorazepam at stopping convulsions prior to ED arrival

Secondary• Convulsions stop more rapidly with treatment

with IM midazolam versus IV lorazepam• There is no difference in safety between the two

treatments

Page 11: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Autoinjectormidazolam

Autoinjectorplacebo

IV syringelorazepam

IV syringeplacebo

IM Route

IV Route

IM Active Treatment

IV Active Treatment

Randomized to: or

Synopsis - double-dummy designAll subjects get active treatment by either IM or IV route

Page 12: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Synopsis - Dose

Infants and ChildrenEstimated < 13 kgAre NOT enrolled

Page 13: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Synopsis - Dose

Children (13-39 kg)purple dose tier

Lorazepam 2 mg or Midazolam 5 mg

Page 14: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Synopsis - Dose

Lorazepam 4 mg or Midazolam 10 mg

Page 15: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Synopsis - Dose

Lorazepam 4 mg or Midazolam 10 mg

Page 16: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Synopsis - primary outcome

• Proportion of subjects with termination of clinically evident seizure determined at arrival in the Emergency Department (ED) after a single dose of study medication.

• Non-inferiority analysis designed to detect greater than 10% absolute difference in proportion with termination at ED arrival.

Page 17: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Synopsis - secondary outcomes

• Rapidity of seizure termination• Frequency of subsequent tracheal intubation• Frequency and duration of ICU and hospital stay

Page 18: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Synopsis - enrollment

• 800 subjects over 36 months• 16 subjects per hub per year• If each hub recruits using 14 ambulances the

rate is 0.10 subjects/ambulance*month

• By comparison the PHTSE trial enrolled just over 0.20 subjects/ambulance*month and did not enroll children

Page 19: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Scaffoldingwho does what when?

• Getting regulatory ready• Getting real world ready• At the scene• In the ED• In the hospital• Subject end of study• Out and back again• Ongoing responsibilities

Page 20: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Getting regulatory ready

• EFIC and IRB approvals• EMS approvals• Investigator/coordinator HSP training• FDA 1572’s

You also have to STAY regulatory ready

Page 21: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Getting real-world ready

• EMS training• Study team activation• Study team response

• Site initiation• Getting boxes• Getting drug

Page 22: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

At the scene

Page 23: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

At the scene - inclusion criteria

• Continuous or repeated convulsive seizure activity for > 5 minutes

• Patient is still convulsing at time of treatment

• Estimated weight > 13 kg

• Subject to be taken to participating hospital

Page 24: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

At the scene - exclusion criteria

• Major trauma precipitating seizure• Hypoglycemia• Known allergy to midazolam or lorazepam• Cardiac arrest or heart rate <40 beats/minute• Medical alert tag with “RAMPART declined”• Prior treatment of this seizure in another study • Known pregnancy• Prisoner

Page 25: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

At the scene - sequence

• Medic arrives on scene and evaluates patient• Ask bystanders duration of seizure and trauma• Look for medical alert information • Check glucose and vital signs• For small children, check estimated weight• Confirm that box display reads “ready”

Continued….

Page 26: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

At the scene - sequence (cont.)

• If criteria are met, study box is opened• Medic states that entry criteria are met• Open the bag, select dose bundle• Give IM medication and verbalize • Start IV, give IV med, and verbalize• Dispose of sharps• Monitor vital sings and transport

Continued….

Page 27: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

At the scene - sequence (cont.)

• Verbalize immediately if convulsions stop• At 10 minute after treatment, provide “rescue”

meds per local protocol if still seizing en route, verbalize that a rescue med was given

• At ED arrival, verbalize whether patient is still convulsing or not at that time

• All without ever touching the orange end of the autoinjector

Page 28: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

In the ED

Page 29: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

In the ED – primary outcome

• Study team determines by asking the attending physician caring for the subject

• Question is “based on everything you know now, was patient still seizing on ED arrival?”

• Attending evaluation did not necessarily need to occur right at ED arrival to make determination

• Study team needs to ask the attending this question with 5 hours of subjects arrival in ED

Page 30: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

In the ED - sequence

• Study team activated on ED arrival of subject• Arrive within 4 hours• Ensure study box is collected• Obtain box number• Obtain primary outcome determination• Obtain other treatment information• Fill out ED CRF (Form 00, 01, and 02)

Continued….

Page 31: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

In the ED – sequence (cont.)

• Attempt notification and consent• Fill out notification log (Form 04)

• Any SAE or AE up to this point?• Fill out SAE/AE CRF (Form 05)

• Account for the remaining bundle• Log destruction / disposition in WebDCU

Page 32: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

In the hospital

Page 33: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

In the hospital - sequence

• Re-assess subject after 24 hours• Complete 24 hour CRF (Form 06)

• Serious adverse events (whenever you find out)• Adverse events (only first 24 hours)• If needed, fill out SAE/AE CRF (Form 05)

• Notification / consent? (every 24 hours till done) • If needed, fill out notification log (Form 04)

Page 34: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Subject end of study

Page 35: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Subject end of study

• ED discharge without admission• Hospital discharge within 30 days• Hospital stay reaches 30 days• Death• Withholds or withdraws consent• Lost to follow up

Page 36: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Subject end of study - sequence

• Review chart• Complete EOS CRF (Form 07)

• Any new SAE?• Any prior AE/SAE unresolved?• If needed, fill out SAE/AE CRF (Form 05)

Page 37: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Out and back again

Page 38: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Out and back again

• Study boxes cycle every 60 days• Getting more drug (routinely and urgently)• Logging drugs in• Resetting the box• Matching boxes and drug bundles

Page 39: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Ongoing responsibilities

Page 40: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Ongoing responsibilities

• Screen failure logs• Visit (and feed) your medics• EMS and ED retraining• Continue public disclosure• IRB reporting and renewals• Milestones and money• Monitoring

Page 41: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Public disclosure

• Advertising• Press releases• Public service announcements• Health system media• Advocacy group dissemination• Web internet presence

Page 42: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

Emergency24-Hour Investigator

contact

1-866-706-72671-866-706-RAMP

Page 43: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD
Page 44: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

So remember…

• Treat (only) patients who are convulsing• Primary outcome determination “Was patient

convulsing then, based on what you know now?”• Enter all your data right away• Visit (feed) your medics often• Never touch the orange end of the autoinjector

Page 45: Investigator Kickoff Meeting January 2009. Protocol Review, Part 1 Robert Silbergleit, MD

rampart.umich.edu