investigators: kevin ahlgrim, asa, phd, illinois state university

35
Modeling of Economic Series Research Sponsored by the Casualty Actuarial Society and the Society of Actuaries Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University Steve D’Arcy, FCAS, PhD, University of Illinois Rick Gorvett, FCAS, ARM, FRM, PhD, University of Illinois

Upload: ramya

Post on 04-Jan-2016

41 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Modeling of Economic Series Research Sponsored by the Casualty Actuarial Society and the Society of Actuaries. Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University Steve D’Arcy, FCAS, PhD, University of Illinois Rick Gorvett, FCAS, ARM, FRM, PhD, University of Illinois. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Modeling of Economic Series

Research Sponsored by theCasualty Actuarial Society and the

Society of Actuaries

Investigators:Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Steve D’Arcy, FCAS, PhD, University of IllinoisRick Gorvett, FCAS, ARM, FRM, PhD, University of Illinois

Page 2: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Outline of Presentation• Motivation for Financial Scenario Generator

Project

• Short description of included economic variables

• An overview of the model

• Applications of the model

• Comparison of this model with another actuarial return generating model

• Conclusions

Page 3: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

ERM Frameworks:“Traditional” Risk Management Process

1. Identify loss exposure

2. Measure impact potential

3. Evaluate alternative methods of control

4. Implement best alternative

5. Monitor outcomes

Page 4: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

COSO ERM Framework

Page 5: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

ERM Frameworks:“Traditional” Risk Management Process1. Identify loss exposure

2. Measure impact potential

3. Evaluate alternative methods of control– Based on “risk appetite” of organization

4. Implement best alternative

5. Monitor outcomes

Page 6: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Overview of Project• CAS/SOA Request for Proposals on “Modeling of

Economic Series Coordinated with Interest Rate Scenarios”– A key aspect of dynamic financial analysis– Also important for regulatory, rating agency, and internal

management tests – e.g., cash flow testing

• Goal: to provide actuaries with a model for projecting economic and financial indices, with realistic interdependencies among the variables.– Provides a foundation for future efforts

Page 7: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Scope of Project• Literature review

– From finance, economics, and actuarial science

• Financial scenario model– Generate scenarios over a 50-year time horizon

• Document and facilitate use of model– Report includes sections on data & approach, results of

simulations, user’s guide– Posted on CAS & SOA websites– Writing of papers for journal publication

Page 8: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Economic Series Modeled

• Inflation

• Real interest rates

• Nominal interest rates

• Equity returns– Large stocks– Small stocks

• Equity dividend yields

• Real estate returns

• Unemployment

Page 9: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Prior Work• Wilkie, 1986 and 1995

– Used internationally

• Hibbert, Mowbray, and Turnbull, 2001– Modern financial tool

• CAS/SOA project (a.k.a. the Financial Scenario Generator) applies Wilkie/HMT to U.S.

Page 10: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Relationship between Modeled Economic Series

Inflation Real Interest Rates

Real EstateUnemployment Nominal Interest

Lg. Stock Returns Sm. Stock ReturnsStock Dividends

Page 11: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Inflation (q)

• Modeled as an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process– One-factor, mean-reverting

dqt = q (q – qt) dt + dBq

• Speed of reversion: q = 0.40

• Mean reversion level: q = 4.8%

• Volatility: q = 0.04

Page 12: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Explanation of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process

• Deterministic component

If inflation is below 4.8%, it reverts back toward 4.8% over the next year

Speed of reversion dependent on • Random component

A shock is applied to the inflation rate that is a random distribution with a std. dev. of 4%

• The new inflation rate is last period’s inflation rate changed by the combined effects of the deterministic and the random components.

Page 13: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Real Interest Rates (r)• Problems with one-factor interest rate models

• Two-factor Vasicek term structure model

• Short-term rate (r) and long-term mean (l) are both stochastic variables

drt = r (lt – rt) dt + r dBr

dlt = l (l – lt) dt + l dBl

Page 14: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Nominal Interest Rates

• Combines inflation and real interest rates

i = {(1+q) x (1+r)} - 1

where i = nominal interest rate

q = inflation

r = real interest rate

Page 15: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Histogram of 10 Year Nominal Interest Rates

Model Values and Actual Data (04/53-01/06)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.00

0

0.00

5

0.01

5

0.02

5

0.03

5

0.04

5

0.05

5

0.06

5

0.07

5

0.08

5

0.09

5

0.10

5

0.11

5

0.12

5

0.13

5

0.14

5

0.15

5

0.16

5

0.17

5

0.18

5

CAS-SOA Model

Actual Data

Page 16: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Equity Returns• Empirical “fat tails” issue regarding equity

returns distribution• Thus, modeled using a “regime switching

model”1. High return, low volatility regime

2. Low return, high volatility regime

• Model equity returns as an excess return (xt) over the nominal interest rate

st = qt + rt + xt

Page 17: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Histogram of Large Stock Return

Model Values and Actual Data (1872-2006)

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

-0.7

5

-0.6

5

-0.5

5-0

.45

-0.3

5

-0.2

5

-0.1

5

-0.0

50.

05

0.15

0.25

0.35

0.45

0.55

0.65

0.75

0.85

0.95

1.05

1.15

1.25

1.35

1.45

1.55

1.65

1.75

1.85

CAS-SOA Model

Actual Data

Page 18: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Histogram of Small Stock Return

Model Values and Actual Data (1926-2004)

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

-0.7

5

-0.6

5

-0.5

5-0

.45

-0.3

5

-0.2

5

-0.1

5

-0.0

5

0.05

0.15

0.25

0.35

0.45

0.55

0.65

0.75

0.85

0.95

1.05

1.15

1.25

1.35

1.45

1.55

1.65

1.75

1.85

CAS-SOA Model

Actual Data

Page 19: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Other Series

• Equity dividend yields (y) and real estate– Mean-reverting processes

• Unemployment (u)– Phillip’s curve: inverse relationship between u

and q

dut = u (u – ut) dt + u dqt + u ut

Page 20: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Model Description

• Excel spreadsheet

• Simulation package - @RISK add-in

• 50 years of projections

• Users can select different parameters and track any variable

Page 21: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Parameter Selection

• Selecting parameters can be based on:1. Matching historical distributions or 2. Replicating current market prices (calibration)

• Of course, different parameters may yield different results

• Model is meant to represent range of outcomes deemed “possible” for the insurer

– Default parameters are chosen from history (as long as possible)

Page 22: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Applications of the Financial Scenario Generator

• Financial engine behind many types of analysis• Insurers can project operations under a variety of

economic conditions– Dynamic financial analysis

– Demonstrate solvency to regulators / rating agencies

– Propose enterprise risk management solutions

Page 23: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

CAS/SOA vs. AAA

• AAA models provides guidance for Risk-Based Capital (RBC) requirements for variable products with guarantees

• Focus is on– Interest rate risk– Equity risk

• 10,000 Pre-packaged scenarios available• Model and scenarios are available at:http://www.actuary.org/life/phase2.asp

Page 24: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Funnel of Doubt Graphs3 Month Nominal Interest Rates (U. S. Treasury Bills)

AAA RBC C-3 Scenarios

0

0.03

0.06

0.09

0.12

0.15

0.18

0.21

0 1m 2m 3m 4m 5m 6m 7m 8m 9m 10m11m 1y 2y 3y 4y 5y 6y 7y 8y 9y 10y 15y 20y

99th 75th 50th 25th 1st

CAS-SOA Economic Model

0

0.03

0.06

0.09

0.12

0.15

0.18

0.21

0 1m 2m 3m 4m 5m 6m 7m 8m 9m 10m 11m 1y 2y 3y 4y 5y 6y 7y 8y 9y 10y 15y 20y

99th 75th 50th 25th 1st

Page 25: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Histogram of 3 Month Nominal Interest RatesModel Values and Actual Data (01/34-01/06)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0

0.00

5

0.01

5

0.02

5

0.03

5

0.04

5

0.05

5

0.06

5

0.07

5

0.08

5

0.09

5

0.10

5

0.11

5

0.12

5

0.13

5

0.14

5

0.15

5

0.16

5

0.17

5

0.18

5

0.19

5

CAS-SOA Model

AAA Scenarios

Actual Data

Page 26: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Funnel of Doubt Graphs 10 Year Nominal Interest Rates (U. S. Treasury Bonds)

CAS-SOA Economic Model

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0 1m 2m 3m 4m 5m 6m 7m 8m 9m 10m11m 1y 2y 3y 4y 5y 6y 7y 8y 9y 10y 15y 20y

99th 75th 50th 25th 1st

AAA RBC C-3 Scenarios

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0 1m 2m 3m 4m 5m 6m 7m 8m 9m 10m11m 1y 2y 3y 4y 5y 6y 7y 8y 9y 10y 15y 20y

99th 75th 50th 25th 1st

Page 27: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Histogram of 10 Year Nominal Interest RatesModel Values and Actual Data (04/53-01/06)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.50.

000

0.00

5

0.01

5

0.02

5

0.03

5

0.04

5

0.05

5

0.06

5

0.07

5

0.08

5

0.09

5

0.10

5

0.11

5

0.12

5

0.13

5

0.14

5

0.15

5

0.16

5

0.17

5

0.18

5

CAS-SOA Model

AAA Scenarios

Actual Data

Page 28: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Histogram of Large Stock ReturnModel Values and Actual Data (1872-2006)

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

-0.7

5-0

.65

-0.5

5-0

.45

-0.3

5-0

.25

-0.1

5-0

.05

0.05

0.15

0.25

0.35

0.45

0.55

0.65

0.75

0.85

0.95

1.05

1.15

1.25

1.35

1.45

1.55

1.65

1.75

1.85

CAS-SOA Model

AAA Scenarios

Actual Data

Page 29: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Histogram of Small Stock ReturnModel Values and Actual Data (1926-2004)

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

-0.7

5

-0.6

5

-0.5

5-0

.45

-0.3

5

-0.2

5

-0.1

5

-0.0

50.

05

0.15

0.25

0.35

0.45

0.55

0.65

0.75

0.85

0.95

1.05

1.15

1.25

1.35

1.45

1.55

1.65

1.75

1.85

CAS-SOA Model

AAA Scenarios

Actual Data

Page 30: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Quantification of Model Fit

• Kolmogorov-Smirnov test Tries to determine if two datasets differ

significantlyUses the maximum vertical difference between percentile plots of the data as statistic D

• Chi-square test Take the squared difference between observed

frequency (O) and the expected frequency (E), and then divided by the expected frequency

E

EO 22

Page 31: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

3 Month Nominal Interest RatesK-S Test Comparison Percentile Plot

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15

X

Per

cen

tile Actual

AAA C-3

CAS-SOADCAS-SOA

DAAA C-3

Page 32: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Comparison of Two Data SetsCAS-SOA Model AAA C-3 Model

3m NIR 10y NIR Large SR Small SR 3m NIR 10y NIR Large SR Small SR1 0.1626 0.3138 0.0525 0.1306 1 0.2733 0.5265 0.0943 0.19872 0.1748 0.3152 0.0587 0.1280 2 0.2935 0.5375 0.0796 0.19433 0.2010 0.3276 0.0822 0.1430 3 0.3109 0.5575 0.0992 0.20304 0.1750 0.3186 0.0917 0.1550 4 0.2992 0.5395 0.1062 0.20505 0.1670 0.3316 0.0678 0.1290 5 0.2882 0.5325 0.0992 0.18276 0.1780 0.3267 0.0772 0.1610 6 0.2892 0.5285 0.0902 0.19007 0.1880 0.3240 0.0632 0.1590 7 0.2916 0.5340 0.1102 0.20738 0.1710 0.3246 0.0678 0.1220 8 0.2622 0.5110 0.0942 0.21339 0.1950 0.3252 0.0636 0.1323 9 0.2972 0.5385 0.1026 0.2093

10 0.1683 0.3059 0.0656 0.1431 10 0.2932 0.5212 0.0930 0.1954Average 0.1781 0.3213 0.0690 0.1403 Average 0.2899 0.5327 0.0969 0.1999

Page 33: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Chi-Square Test

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1000000

3m NIR 10y NIR Large SR Small SR

CAS-SOA

AAA C-3

Page 34: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

Summary of Differences• Kolmogorov-Smirnov test Statistic D of CAS-SOA model is smaller than that of AAA C-3

model

• Chi-square test For nominal interest rate, the Chi-square value of CAS-SOA

model is smaller than that of AAA C-3 model

For small stock returns, both models are rejected at significant level of 0.025 while accepted at level of 0.1

For large stock returns, both models are rejected at significant level of 0.05 while accepted at level of 0.1

Page 35: Investigators: Kevin Ahlgrim, ASA, PhD, Illinois State University

How to Obtain ModelsCAS-SOA model is posted on the following sites:• http://casact.org/research/econ/• http://www.soa.org/ccm/content/areas-of-practic

e/finance/mod-econ-series-coor-int-rate-scen/Or contact us at: [email protected]

[email protected]@uiuc.edu

• AAA model is posted at:http://www.actuary.org/life/phase2.asp