investment evaluation grou p@ @ikn vd mv yif bh z2 ugk gn ......jul 03, 2019  · this report is...

34
PAGE 1 OF 34 Investment Evaluation Prepared on 07/03/2019. Investment Data as of 05/31/2019. Prepared For: Riverview Realty Prepared By: M.D.C. Advisors 3 Penn Center W #400 Pittsburgh, 15276 United States This report has been created by your financial consultant under a license agreement with Fi360, Inc. Your financial consultant and Fi360 are not affiliated. This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of investments. Your financial consultant is solely responsible for any advice or recommendations provided. In some cases, this portfolio may be an investment option that is available (or proposed to be made available) in a defined contribution plan. To the extent that this report is used by the financial consultant with respect to any defined contribution plan, any such use, advice, or recommendation is solely the responsibility of such financial consultant, including advice or recommendations as to the suitability of any investment options for the defined contribution plan. Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of a fund before investing. Prospectuses containing this and other information about the underlying funds included in a portfolio are available by contacting your financial consultant. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing to make sure that the fund is appropriate for your goals and risk tolerance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. © 2000-2019, Fi360. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinions generated by Fi360 do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for informational purposes. Some data in this report was obtained from third parties. Although Fi360 obtains data from sources it deems to be reliable, it does not independently verify the data, and does not warrant or represent that the data is timely, complete, or accurate.

Upload: others

Post on 21-Mar-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

PAGE 1 OF 34

group@@@IkNvdmVyIFBhZ2UgKGNvbnRpbnVlZCki@@@

Investment EvaluationPrepared on 07/03/2019. Investment Data as of 05/31/2019.

Prepared For:

Riverview Realty

Prepared By: M.D.C. Advisors 3 Penn Center W #400 Pittsburgh, 15276 United States

This report has been created by your financial consultant under a license agreement with Fi360, Inc. Your financial consultant and Fi360 are notaffiliated. This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of investments. Your financial consultant issolely responsible for any advice or recommendations provided. In some cases, this portfolio may be an investment option that is available (orproposed to be made available) in a defined contribution plan. To the extent that this report is used by the financial consultant with respect to anydefined contribution plan, any such use, advice, or recommendation is solely the responsibility of such financial consultant, including advice orrecommendations as to the suitability of any investment options for the defined contribution plan.

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges,and expenses of a fund before investing. Prospectuses containing this and other information about the underlying funds included in a portfolio areavailable by contacting your financial consultant. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing to make sure that the fund is appropriate foryour goals and risk tolerance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

© 2000-2019, Fi360. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinions generated by Fi360 do not constitute professional investment advice and areprovided solely for informational purposes. Some data in this report was obtained from third parties. Although Fi360 obtains data from sources itdeems to be reliable, it does not independently verify the data, and does not warrant or represent that the data is timely, complete, or accurate.

Page 2: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORE® BREAKDOWN

PAGE 2 OF 34

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red).

* For separately managed accounts, r-squared in the top 75% of it’s peer group is used as a replacement criterion for Exp Ratio.

U.S. EQUITY

INVESTMENT NAME TICKERSCORE (PEERS)

SCORE CRITERIAROLLING AVERAGES

(PEERS)

IN MT NA CO SS ER A3 S3 R1 R3 R5 1 YR 3 YR 5 YR 10 YR

T. Rowe Price New America Growth PRWAX 0 (1,338) 3

(1,299)

22

(1,183)

19

(1,028)

15

(686)

Vanguard Equity-Income Adm VEIRX 0 (1,192) 0

(1,130)

3

(999)

5

(867)

5

(578)

Federated Mid-Cap Index Svc FMDCX 17 (414) 4

(386)

4

(324)

6

(279)

11

(179)

American Beacon Mid-Cap Value Inv AMPAX 47 (387) 65

(373)

38

(315)

30

(273)

20

(171)

AB Small Cap Growth C QUACX 47 (659) 42

(633)

61

(542)

63

(483)

48

(341)

Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth C NSNCX 19 (659) 26

(633)

63

(542)

70

(483)-

DFA US Targeted Value R1 DFTVX 56 (418) 20

(402)

22

(359)

17

(322)-

MFS New Discovery Value R1 NDVRX 24 (418) 24

(402)

35

(359)

36

(322)-

group@@@IjxzcGFuIGNsYXNzPVwibm8tdGV4dC10cmFuc2Zvcm1cIj5GaTM2MDwvc3Bhbj4gRmlkdWNpYXJ5IFNjb3JlPHNwYW4gY2xhc3M9XCJzdXBcIj4mcmVnOzwvc3Bhbj4gQnJlYWtkb3duIg==@@@

Score Criterion

IN. Inception Date. Must have at least a 3 year track historyMT. Manager Tenure. Must have at least a 2 year track history. (Most senior manager's tenure)NA. Net Assets. Must have >= 75 million under management. (Total across all share classes)CO. Composition. Must have >= 80% allocation to primary asset (Not applied to all peer groups)SS. Style. Must have current style box match the peer group. (Not applied to all peer groups)ER. Prospectus Net Exp Ratio. * Must place in the top 75% of its peer group.A3. Alpha - Broad Market (3 YR). Must place in the top 50% of its peer group.S3. Sharpe (3 YR). Must place in the top 50% of its peer group.R1. Return (1 YR). Must place in the top 50% of its peer group.R3. Return (3 YR). Must place in the top 50% of its peer group.R5. Return (5 YR). Must place in the top 50% of its peer group.

Summary Legend

Investment meets the criterion

Investment does not meet the criterion

- Investment data is not available

NA Investment is not screened on thecriterion

Page 3: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORE® BREAKDOWN

PAGE 3 OF 34

INTERNATIONAL EQUITY

INVESTMENT NAME TICKERSCORE (PEERS)

SCORE CRITERIAROLLING AVERAGES

(PEERS)

IN MT NA CO SS ER A3 S3 R1 R3 R5 1 YR 3 YR 5 YR 10 YR

Invesco Oppenheimer Developing MarketsY ODVYX 0

(784) NA 0

(725)

18

(509)

14

(370)

7

(147)

Ivy International Core Equity R IYITX 85 (685) 72

(620)

53

(524)

41

(445)-

American Funds Europacific Growth A AEPGX 15 (457) 24

(415)

12

(354)

16

(301)

18

(184)

SECTOR EQUITY

INVESTMENT NAME TICKERSCORE (PEERS)

SCORE CRITERIAROLLING AVERAGES

(PEERS)

IN MT NA CO SS ER A3 S3 R1 R3 R5 1 YR 3 YR 5 YR 10 YR

Wells Fargo Precious Metals Inst EKWYX 0 (74) NA NA 28

(70)

31

(62)

19

(58)

12

(40)

DFA Global Real Estate Securities Port DFGEX 0 (214) NA NA 6

(202)

12

(171)

9

(139)-

Vanguard Health Care Inv VGHCX 64 (141) NA NA 40

(134)

32

(126)

27

(111)

28

(88)

LDERX LDERX - - - - NA NA - - - - - - - - - -

ALLOCATION

INVESTMENT NAME TICKERSCORE (PEERS)

SCORE CRITERIAROLLING AVERAGES

(PEERS)

IN MT NA CO SS ER A3 S3 R1 R3 R5 1 YR 3 YR 5 YR 10 YR

American Funds American Balanced A ABALX 0 (738) NA NA 0

(686)

1

(641)

1

(535)

5

(370)

TAXABLE BOND

INVESTMENT NAME TICKERSCORE (PEERS)

SCORE CRITERIAROLLING AVERAGES

(PEERS)

IN MT NA CO SS ER A3 S3 R1 R3 R5 1 YR 3 YR 5 YR 10 YR

Fidelity® New Markets Income FNMIX 26 (288) NA NA 20

(240)

10

(171)

6

(100)

5

(38)

Metropolitan West Total Return Bd Plan MWTSX 25 (602) 19

(561)

17

(494)

12

(437)-

PIMCO Total Return Instl PTTRX 25 (602) 27

(561)

33

(494)

46

(437)

37

(274)

Vanguard Short-Term Investment-GradeAdm VFSUX 31

(528) NA 40

(502)

16

(430)

10

(359)

8

(217)

Page 4: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

AB SMALL CAP GROWTH C QUACX SMALL GROWTH MF

PAGE 4 OF 34

HISTORICAL Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORES AT QUARTER END

27 44 45 29 27 29 26 26 26 30 32 32 31 30 29 45 43 39 29 28 26 35 67 74 65 78 62 82 85 83 88 82 81 76 43 49 43 44 45 49

Q209

Q309

Q409

Q110

Q210

Q310

Q410

Q111

Q211

Q311

Q411

Q112

Q212

Q312

Q412

Q113

Q213

Q313

Q413

Q114

Q214

Q314

Q414

Q115

Q215

Q315

Q415

Q116

Q216

Q316

Q416

Q117

Q217

Q317

Q417

Q118

Q218

Q318

Q418

Q119

10 YR ROLLING AVG: 48 5 YR ROLLING AVG: 63 3 YR ROLLING AVG: 61 1 YR R. AVG: 42

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red). Any cellsshaded in yellow below accrued Fi360 Fiduciary Score shortfall points during that quarter.

FI360 SCORECRITERIA

2016 2017 2018 2019

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Peer Group SG SG SG SG SG SG SG SG SG SG SG SG

Mgr. Tenure 15.51 15.76 16.01 16.26 16.51 16.76 17.01 17.26 17.51 17.76 18.01 18.26

Net Assets 1.1B 1.1B 1.1B 1.2B 1.3B 1.4B 1.4B 1.5B 1.7B 1.9B 1.5B 1.9B

Composition Consistency

97% USEQ

96% USEQ

96% USEQ

96% USEQ

97% USEQ

95% USEQ

97% USEQ

97% USEQ

96% USEQ

96% USEQ

96% USEQ

95% USEQ

Style Consistency

SmallCap

Growth

SmallCap

Growth

SmallCap

Growth

SmallCap

Growth

SmallCap

Growth

SmallCap

Growth

SmallCap

Growth

Mid CapGrowth

Mid CapGrowth

Mid CapGrowth

Mid CapGrowth

Mid CapGrowth

group@@@IjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJmbGV4LWNvbnRhaW5lclwiPjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJvdmVyZmxvdy1lbGxpcHNpc1wiIHN0eWxlPVwibWF4LXdpZHRoOjQwMHB4O1wiPkFCIFNtYWxsIENhcCBHcm93dGggQzwvZGl2PjxkaXY+JmVtc3A7PC9kaXY+PGRpdiBjbGFzcz1cIm92ZXJmbG93LWVsbGlwc2lzIGZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0LW5vcm1hbFwiIHN0eWxlPVwibWF4LXdpZHRoOjkwcHg7XCI+UVVBQ1g8L2Rpdj48ZGl2PiZlbXNwOzwvZGl2PjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJmb250LXdlaWdodC1ub3JtYWxcIj5TbWFsbCBHcm93dGg8L2Rpdj48ZGl2PiZlbXNwOzwvZGl2PjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJmb250LXdlaWdodC1ub3JtYWxcIj5NRjwvZGl2PjwvZGl2PiI=@@@

100

75

50

25

0

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio Rank

86 86 90 90 91 91 88 89 89 89 89 89

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

68

4

69

0

70

4

71

0

73

3

72

4

73

9

73

0

74

1

73

6

70

3

69

7

Alpha Rank - Primary Benchmark (3yr)

20 23 15

32 36

55

80 88 87 86 84 81

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

63

4

64

0

65

7

67

5

69

7

69

0

71

1

70

1

71

3

70

4

67

0

66

9

Sharpe Ratio Rank (3yr)

23 22 12

30 37

51

79 85 84 81 79 78

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

63

4

64

0

65

7

67

5

69

7

69

0

71

1

70

1

71

3

70

4

67

0

66

9

22 17 9 9 11 10 10 23 17

68

76 85

Return Rank (1yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

67

9

68

5

69

6

70

6

72

9

71

7

72

9

71

9

73

3

72

9

69

5

69

2

17 16 11 16 11

26

67

78 85 86 81 78

Return Rank (3yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

63

4

64

0

65

7

67

5

69

7

69

0

71

1

70

1

71

3

70

4

67

0

66

9

21 24

47 28 39 28

64 68 68

81 79 76

Return Rank (5yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

61

6

62

0

62

2

62

8

65

0

65

3

66

7

65

7

66

5

66

2

63

6

64

2

Page 5: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

AMERICAN BEACON MID-CAP VALUE INV AMPAX MID-CAP VALUE MF

PAGE 5 OF 34

HISTORICAL Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORES AT QUARTER END

42 36 35 0 0 0 12 12 9 17 0 20 0 27 14 0 0 17 0 0 14 14 20 27 17 0 0 27 51 44 44 14 13 0 0 14 38 71 73 73

Q209

Q309

Q409

Q110

Q210

Q310

Q410

Q111

Q211

Q311

Q411

Q112

Q212

Q312

Q412

Q113

Q213

Q313

Q413

Q114

Q214

Q314

Q414

Q115

Q215

Q315

Q415

Q116

Q216

Q316

Q416

Q117

Q217

Q317

Q417

Q118

Q218

Q318

Q418

Q119

10 YR ROLLING AVG: 20 5 YR ROLLING AVG: 30 3 YR ROLLING AVG: 38 1 YR R. AVG: 65

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red). Any cellsshaded in yellow below accrued Fi360 Fiduciary Score shortfall points during that quarter.

FI360 SCORECRITERIA

2016 2017 2018 2019

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Peer Group MV MV MV MV MV MV MV MV MV MV MV MV

Mgr. Tenure 12.01 12.26 12.51 12.76 13.01 13.26 13.51 13.76 14.01 14.26 14.51 14.76

Net Assets 585.2M 556.2M 597.2M 622.4M 648.1M 659.6M 702.7M 813.6M 845.7M 826.7M 657.6M 571.5M

Composition Consistency

89% USEQ

90% USEQ

89% USEQ

88% USEQ

87% USEQ

88% USEQ

86% USEQ

86% USEQ

88% USEQ

91% USEQ

92% USEQ

91% USEQ

Style Consistency

Mid CapValue

Mid CapValue

Mid CapValue

Mid CapValue

Mid CapValue

Mid CapValue

Mid CapValue

Mid CapValue

Mid CapValue

Mid CapValue

Mid CapValue

Mid CapValue

group@@@IjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJmbGV4LWNvbnRhaW5lclwiPjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJvdmVyZmxvdy1lbGxpcHNpc1wiIHN0eWxlPVwibWF4LXdpZHRoOjQwMHB4O1wiPkFtZXJpY2FuIEJlYWNvbiBNaWQtQ2FwIFZhbHVlIEludjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+JmVtc3A7PC9kaXY+PGRpdiBjbGFzcz1cIm92ZXJmbG93LWVsbGlwc2lzIGZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0LW5vcm1hbFwiIHN0eWxlPVwibWF4LXdpZHRoOjkwcHg7XCI+QU1QQVg8L2Rpdj48ZGl2PiZlbXNwOzwvZGl2PjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJmb250LXdlaWdodC1ub3JtYWxcIj5NaWQtQ2FwIFZhbHVlPC9kaXY+PGRpdj4mZW1zcDs8L2Rpdj48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPVwiZm9udC13ZWlnaHQtbm9ybWFsXCI+TUY8L2Rpdj48L2Rpdj4i@@@

100

75

50

25

0

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio Rank

48 48

51 55 56 58 57 56 57 57 57 59

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

44

7

43

9

41

0

41

5

42

8

44

1

44

0

43

4

44

3

44

4

42

7

42

6

Alpha Rank - Primary Benchmark (3yr)

49 48

63 55 61 74

83 81 76 88 87 84

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

40

7

39

6

37

1

37

6

39

4

40

5

40

8

40

3

40

8

40

9

39

6

39

7

Sharpe Ratio Rank (3yr)

50 44 39 39 49

68 65

79 77 78 80 77

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

40

7

39

6

37

1

37

6

39

4

40

5

40

8

40

3

40

8

40

9

39

6

39

7

14 10 6 9

42

71 56 74

86 91 95 93

Return Rank (1yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

44

2

42

9

40

7

41

0

41

8

42

9

42

3

42

0

42

6

43

3

42

4

42

4

23

41 37 28 41

75 71 58 55 57

80 76

Return Rank (3yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

40

7

39

6

37

1

37

6

39

4

40

5

40

8

40

3

40

8

40

9

39

6

39

7

24 18

36 31 41 28 31 29 46

67 75 69

Return Rank (5yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

37

0

36

6

35

4

35

4

36

3

37

5

36

7

36

4

36

7

37

0

35

9

36

7

Page 6: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

AMERICAN FUNDS AMERICAN BALANCED A ABALX ALLOCATION--50% TO 70% EQUITY MF

PAGE 6 OF 34

HISTORICAL Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORES AT QUARTER END

28 60 31 30 15 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Q209

Q309

Q409

Q110

Q210

Q310

Q410

Q111

Q211

Q311

Q411

Q112

Q212

Q312

Q412

Q113

Q213

Q313

Q413

Q114

Q214

Q314

Q414

Q115

Q215

Q315

Q415

Q116

Q216

Q316

Q416

Q117

Q217

Q317

Q417

Q118

Q218

Q318

Q418

Q119

10 YR ROLLING AVG: 5 5 YR ROLLING AVG: 1 3 YR ROLLING AVG: 1 1 YR R. AVG: 0

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red). Any cellsshaded in yellow below accrued Fi360 Fiduciary Score shortfall points during that quarter.

FI360 SCORECRITERIA

2016 2017 2018 2019

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Peer Group MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA

Mgr. Tenure 19.51 19.76 20.01 20.26 20.51 20.76 21.01 21.26 21.51 21.76 22.01 22.26

Net Assets 94.2B 98B 101.2B 107.8B 113.2B 118.4B 124.9B 125.2B 129B 135.3B 127.4B 140B

Composition Consistency - - - - - - - - - - - -

Style Consistency - - - - - - - - - - - -

group@@@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@@@

100

75

50

25

0

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio Rank

8 8 8 9 10 11 11 10 11 11 11 12

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

84

8

84

5

84

0

86

0

85

7

85

6

86

6

82

3

80

8

80

5

79

2

78

5

Alpha Rank - Primary Benchmark (3yr)

5 5 7 5 4 5 4 4 4 6 6 8

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

78

0

78

1

77

9

79

7

79

8

79

5

79

2

75

2

74

0

77

1

75

6

74

3

Sharpe Ratio Rank (3yr)

7 7 8 5 5 4 3 3 4 3 5 6

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

78

0

78

1

77

9

79

7

79

8

79

5

79

2

75

2

74

0

77

1

75

6

74

3

4 9 24 19 19 9 22 8 17

28 28

56

Return Rank (1yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

81

0

83

5

83

1

85

5

85

2

85

1

84

4

80

0

78

5

78

3

78

5

76

8

4 4 7 5 4 4 4 4 4 9 7 13

Return Rank (3yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

78

1

78

2

78

0

79

8

79

9

79

5

79

2

75

2

74

0

77

1

75

6

74

3

3 4 5 5 5 4 4 5 6 6 6 7

Return Rank (5yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

69

3

70

3

70

2

72

1

77

1

77

3

77

2

73

0

71

4

71

4

70

3

69

0

Page 7: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

AMERICAN FUNDS EUROPACIFIC GROWTH A AEPGX FOREIGN LARGE GROWTH MF

PAGE 7 OF 34

HISTORICAL Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORES AT QUARTER END

0 0 22 20 0 0 13 0 13 12 18 17 19 19 19 33 46 55 17 21 21 16 23 20 23 26 29 32 27 15 0 0 0 0 18 0 28 46 18 15

Q209

Q309

Q409

Q110

Q210

Q310

Q410

Q111

Q211

Q311

Q411

Q112

Q212

Q312

Q412

Q113

Q213

Q313

Q413

Q114

Q214

Q314

Q414

Q115

Q215

Q315

Q415

Q116

Q216

Q316

Q416

Q117

Q217

Q317

Q417

Q118

Q218

Q318

Q418

Q119

10 YR ROLLING AVG: 18 5 YR ROLLING AVG: 16 3 YR ROLLING AVG: 12 1 YR R. AVG: 24

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red). Any cellsshaded in yellow below accrued Fi360 Fiduciary Score shortfall points during that quarter.

FI360 SCORECRITERIA

2016 2017 2018 2019

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Peer Group FG FG FG FG FG FG FG FG FG FG FG FG

Mgr. Tenure 24.52 24.77 25.02 25.27 25.52 25.77 26.02 26.27 26.52 26.77 27.02 27.27

Net Assets 120B 127.3B 120.7B 132.4B 143.5B 154.4B 162.5B 166.9B 163.9B 162.6B 138.7B 156.7B

Composition Consistency

85%INTL EQ

88%INTL EQ

91%INTL EQ

91%INTL EQ

85%INTL EQ

89%INTL EQ

90%INTL EQ

90%INTL EQ

91%INTL EQ

88%INTL EQ

90%INTL EQ

90%INTL EQ

Style Consistency

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

group@@@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@@@

100

75

50

25

0

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio Rank

13 13 17 17 20 21 22 24 19 20 22 23

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

34

8

34

7

39

5

42

8

43

5

42

7

42

6

43

2

44

2

44

7

46

0

46

7

Alpha Rank - Primary Benchmark (3yr)

43 30 34 32 31 43 44 45 42 37

52 59

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

31

4

31

3

33

9

35

8

35

9

37

1

37

4

38

4

39

1

39

5

41

5

42

8

Sharpe Ratio Rank (3yr)

23 25

38 31 29 32 28 35 48 38 30

51

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

31

4

31

3

33

9

35

8

35

9

37

1

37

4

38

4

39

1

39

5

41

5

42

8

25 18 19

26 43

67 53 55 60 57 61

80

Return Rank (1yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

32

7

32

6

37

2

41

5

42

3

41

5

42

1

42

8

44

0

44

1

45

7

46

0

41 28 31 30 30 43 43 42 50 38 35

51

Return Rank (3yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

31

4

31

3

33

9

35

8

35

9

37

1

37

4

38

4

39

1

39

5

41

5

42

8

40 37 33 35 38 35 27 35 41 44 42

59

Return Rank (5yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

28

8

28

7

31

3

33

8

34

2

35

6

35

7

36

3

37

3

37

9

38

7

39

0

Page 8: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

DFA GLOBAL REAL ESTATE SECURITIES PORT DFGEX GLOBAL REAL ESTATE MF

PAGE 8 OF 34

HISTORICAL Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORES AT QUARTER END

- - - - - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 7 26 15 14 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 28 26 25 17 0 0 17

Q209

Q309

Q409

Q110

Q210

Q310

Q410

Q111

Q211

Q311

Q411

Q112

Q212

Q312

Q412

Q113

Q213

Q313

Q413

Q114

Q214

Q314

Q414

Q115

Q215

Q315

Q415

Q116

Q216

Q316

Q416

Q117

Q217

Q317

Q417

Q118

Q218

Q318

Q418

Q119

10 YR ROLLING AVG: - 5 YR ROLLING AVG: 9 3 YR ROLLING AVG: 12 1 YR R. AVG: 6

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red). Any cellsshaded in yellow below accrued Fi360 Fiduciary Score shortfall points during that quarter.

FI360 SCORECRITERIA

2016 2017 2018 2019

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Peer Group GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR

Mgr. Tenure 6.34 6.59 6.84 7.09 7.34 7.59 7.84 8.09 8.34 8.59 8.84 9.09

Net Assets 5B 5.2B 5B 5.4B 5.9B 6.5B 7.1B 7B 7.5B 7.6B 7.1B 8.2B

Composition Consistency - - - - - - - - - - - -

Style Consistency - - - - - - - - - - - -

group@@@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@@@

100

75

50

25

0

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio Rank

3 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 4 4

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

25

3

25

1

25

3

25

3

24

4

24

6

24

3

24

3

24

5

24

0

23

0

23

0

Alpha Rank - Primary Benchmark (3yr)

1 1 2 2 3 3 10 7 7 19

29 29

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

20

9

20

5

21

0

21

0

20

9

21

4

22

2

22

3

22

0

22

5

21

4

21

4

Sharpe Ratio Rank (3yr)

1 2 3 7 10 16 17

34 48 26 27

53

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

20

9

20

5

21

0

21

0

20

9

21

4

22

2

22

3

22

0

22

5

21

4

21

4

1 4 7 14 4

33 38

69

89 81 84 93

Return Rank (1yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

23

4

24

3

24

8

24

8

23

9

24

5

24

2

23

8

23

6

23

1

22

1

22

5

2 1 2 2 6 9 12 25 25

31 47 48

Return Rank (3yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

20

9

20

5

21

0

21

0

20

9

21

4

22

2

22

3

22

0

22

5

21

4

21

4

2 3 11 9 24 14 8 23 14 6 3 5

Return Rank (5yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

18

5

18

1

18

9

18

9

18

7

18

6

18

6

19

1

20

4

19

9

18

8

18

8

Page 9: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

DFA US TARGETED VALUE R1 DFTVX SMALL VALUE MF

PAGE 9 OF 34

HISTORICAL Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORES AT QUARTER END

- - - - - - 0 0 11 54 34 62 40 30 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 11 13 17 13 15 16 15 19 19 21 23 9 22 24 13 9 35

Q209

Q309

Q409

Q110

Q210

Q310

Q410

Q111

Q211

Q311

Q411

Q112

Q212

Q312

Q412

Q113

Q213

Q313

Q413

Q114

Q214

Q314

Q414

Q115

Q215

Q315

Q415

Q116

Q216

Q316

Q416

Q117

Q217

Q317

Q417

Q118

Q218

Q318

Q418

Q119

10 YR ROLLING AVG: - 5 YR ROLLING AVG: 17 3 YR ROLLING AVG: 22 1 YR R. AVG: 20

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red). Any cellsshaded in yellow below accrued Fi360 Fiduciary Score shortfall points during that quarter.

FI360 SCORECRITERIA

2016 2017 2018 2019

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Peer Group SV SV SV SV SV SV SV SV SV SV SV SV

Mgr. Tenure 4.34 4.59 4.84 5.09 5.34 5.59 5.84 6.09 6.34 6.59 6.84 7.09

Net Assets 7.8B 8.3B 9.5B 9.6B 9.7B 10.3B 10.9B 10.7B 11.4B 11.6B 9.3B 10.7B

Composition Consistency

97% USEQ

97% USEQ

95% USEQ

96% USEQ

97% USEQ

97% USEQ

97% USEQ

97% USEQ

97% USEQ

97% USEQ

97% USEQ

97% USEQ

Style Consistency

SmallCap

Value

SmallCap

Value

SmallCap

Value

SmallCap

Value

SmallCap

Value

SmallCap

Value

SmallCap

Value

SmallCap

Value

SmallCap

Value

SmallCap

Value

SmallCap

Value

SmallCap

Value

group@@@IjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJmbGV4LWNvbnRhaW5lclwiPjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJvdmVyZmxvdy1lbGxpcHNpc1wiIHN0eWxlPVwibWF4LXdpZHRoOjQwMHB4O1wiPkRGQSBVUyBUYXJnZXRlZCBWYWx1ZSBSMTwvZGl2PjxkaXY+JmVtc3A7PC9kaXY+PGRpdiBjbGFzcz1cIm92ZXJmbG93LWVsbGlwc2lzIGZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0LW5vcm1hbFwiIHN0eWxlPVwibWF4LXdpZHRoOjkwcHg7XCI+REZUVlg8L2Rpdj48ZGl2PiZlbXNwOzwvZGl2PjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJmb250LXdlaWdodC1ub3JtYWxcIj5TbWFsbCBWYWx1ZTwvZGl2PjxkaXY+JmVtc3A7PC9kaXY+PGRpdiBjbGFzcz1cImZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0LW5vcm1hbFwiPk1GPC9kaXY+PC9kaXY+Ig==@@@

100

75

50

25

0

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio Rank

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 6

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

43

6

43

1

43

6

44

7

41

8

41

7

42

0

42

6

43

0

42

9

43

3

45

3

Alpha Rank - Primary Benchmark (3yr)

48

57 62 65 66 66 72 56 56 62 52 57

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

38

7

39

0

39

8

40

9

37

8

36

8

38

2

38

5

39

3

39

0

40

4

42

3

Sharpe Ratio Rank (3yr)

42 47 46 46 38 48

58 57 58 70 51 57

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

38

7

39

0

39

8

40

9

37

8

36

8

38

2

38

5

39

3

39

0

40

4

42

3

25

42 42 45 47 47 43 30

72 54 54 56

Return Rank (1yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

41

1

41

2

42

6

43

8

40

9

40

3

40

9

41

1

41

8

42

0

42

3

44

4

41 45 43 48 37 39 43

55 54 59 64 52

Return Rank (3yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

38

7

39

0

39

8

40

9

37

8

36

8

38

2

38

5

39

3

39

0

40

4

42

3

19 18 16 15

30 30 28 33 35 36 50

53

Return Rank (5yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

36

5

37

2

37

6

39

1

36

9

35

7

36

0

36

5

37

2

36

3

37

7

39

6

Page 10: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

FEDERATED MID-CAP INDEX SVC FMDCX MID-CAP BLEND MF

PAGE 10 OF 34

HISTORICAL Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORES AT QUARTER END

0 0 0 0 0 0 24 18 21 16 12 11 16 20 20 23 19 41 12 31 17 30 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 13

Q209

Q309

Q409

Q110

Q210

Q310

Q410

Q111

Q211

Q311

Q411

Q112

Q212

Q312

Q412

Q113

Q213

Q313

Q413

Q114

Q214

Q314

Q414

Q115

Q215

Q315

Q415

Q116

Q216

Q316

Q416

Q117

Q217

Q317

Q417

Q118

Q218

Q318

Q418

Q119

10 YR ROLLING AVG: 11 5 YR ROLLING AVG: 6 3 YR ROLLING AVG: 4 1 YR R. AVG: 4

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red). Any cellsshaded in yellow below accrued Fi360 Fiduciary Score shortfall points during that quarter.

FI360 SCORECRITERIA

2016 2017 2018 2019

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Peer Group MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB

Mgr. Tenure 4.00 4.25 4.50 4.75 5.00 5.25 5.50 5.75 6.00 6.25 6.50 6.75

Net Assets 867.8M 855.6M 899.4M 900.8M 839.5M 830.4M 780.5M 729.1M 725.4M 724.3M 541.9M 593.4M

Composition Consistency

100%US EQ

104%US EQ

99% USEQ

100%US EQ

99% USEQ

94% USEQ

95% USEQ

98% USEQ

100%US EQ

100%US EQ

100%US EQ

99% USEQ

Style Consistency

Mid CapBlend

Mid CapBlend

Mid CapBlend

Mid CapBlend

Mid CapBlend

Mid CapBlend

Mid CapBlend

Mid CapBlend

Mid CapBlend

Mid CapBlend

Mid CapBlend

Mid CapBlend

group@@@IjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJmbGV4LWNvbnRhaW5lclwiPjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJvdmVyZmxvdy1lbGxpcHNpc1wiIHN0eWxlPVwibWF4LXdpZHRoOjQwMHB4O1wiPkZlZGVyYXRlZCBNaWQtQ2FwIEluZGV4IFN2YzwvZGl2PjxkaXY+JmVtc3A7PC9kaXY+PGRpdiBjbGFzcz1cIm92ZXJmbG93LWVsbGlwc2lzIGZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0LW5vcm1hbFwiIHN0eWxlPVwibWF4LXdpZHRoOjkwcHg7XCI+Rk1EQ1g8L2Rpdj48ZGl2PiZlbXNwOzwvZGl2PjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJmb250LXdlaWdodC1ub3JtYWxcIj5NaWQtQ2FwIEJsZW5kPC9kaXY+PGRpdj4mZW1zcDs8L2Rpdj48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPVwiZm9udC13ZWlnaHQtbm9ybWFsXCI+TUY8L2Rpdj48L2Rpdj4i@@@

100

75

50

25

0

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio Rank

19 19 18 18 18 20 20 20 20 20 20 21

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

43

5

45

9

48

1

49

1

48

7

46

8

47

6

47

2

48

0

47

4

47

8

46

8

Alpha Rank - Primary Benchmark (3yr)

25 24 20 23 23 18 19 25 19 23

31 45

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

38

1

39

1

40

8

41

9

41

5

40

0

41

1

40

8

41

9

41

8

42

5

41

9

Sharpe Ratio Rank (3yr)

23 21 25 23 17 18 18

26 26 26 26 40

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

38

1

39

1

40

8

41

9

41

5

40

0

41

1

40

8

41

9

41

8

42

5

41

9

22 18 13 25

38 36 46 28 28 48

55 57

Return Rank (1yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

41

0

42

2

44

6

46

4

46

3

45

7

46

6

46

7

47

4

47

0

47

1

46

4

23 19 20 19 18 19 25 17 23

28 26 37

Return Rank (3yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

38

1

39

1

40

8

41

9

41

5

40

0

41

1

40

8

41

9

41

8

42

5

41

9

24 25 22 24 25

26 33 29 28 31 32 28

Return Rank (5yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

34

7

36

3

38

6

39

6

39

0

38

0

38

8

38

5

39

1

38

9

39

1

38

6

Page 11: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

FIDELITY® NEW MARKETS INCOME FNMIX EMERGING MARKETS BOND MF

PAGE 11 OF 34

HISTORICAL Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORES AT QUARTER END

0 0 0 0 0 9 12 30 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 13 26 19 22 17

Q209

Q309

Q409

Q110

Q210

Q310

Q410

Q111

Q211

Q311

Q411

Q112

Q212

Q312

Q412

Q113

Q213

Q313

Q413

Q114

Q214

Q314

Q414

Q115

Q215

Q315

Q415

Q116

Q216

Q316

Q416

Q117

Q217

Q317

Q417

Q118

Q218

Q318

Q418

Q119

10 YR ROLLING AVG: 5 5 YR ROLLING AVG: 6 3 YR ROLLING AVG: 10 1 YR R. AVG: 20

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red). Any cellsshaded in yellow below accrued Fi360 Fiduciary Score shortfall points during that quarter.

FI360 SCORECRITERIA

2016 2017 2018 2019

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Peer Group EB EB EB EB EB EB EB EB EB EB EB EB

Mgr. Tenure 21.05 21.30 21.55 21.80 22.05 22.30 22.55 22.80 23.05 23.30 23.55 23.80

Net Assets 4.5B 5B 4.8B 5.4B 5.9B 6.3B 6.4B 6.2B 5.6B 5.1B 8.6B 9.2B

Composition Consistency - - - - - - - - - - - -

Style Consistency - - - - - - - - - - - -

group@@@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@@@

100

75

50

25

0

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio Rank

24 25 25

26 26 27 28 29 26 29 31 33

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

29

4

30

0

31

2

30

8

32

3

31

8

32

0

31

0

30

8

31

4

32

4

31

7

Alpha Rank - Primary Benchmark (3yr)

11 9 9 10 18 9 7 11 12 25

41 35

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

21

2

22

2

25

0

25

1

25

2

26

2

26

2

25

0

24

6

25

3

26

0

26

0

Sharpe Ratio Rank (3yr)

17 22 20 19 23 25 20 22

26 40 46

51

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

21

2

22

2

25

0

25

1

25

2

26

2

26

2

25

0

24

6

25

3

26

0

26

0

11 17 8 9 18

37

54 66 64 63

76 88

Return Rank (1yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

27

7

27

8

28

9

29

1

31

3

30

8

31

1

30

0

29

6

30

2

31

4

30

9

10 8 4 4 12 6 6 10 11 25

37 32

Return Rank (3yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

21

2

22

2

25

0

25

1

25

2

26

2

26

2

25

0

24

6

25

3

26

0

26

0

5 8 6 4 7 9 9 7 7 9 16 16

Return Rank (5yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

13

4

14

0

15

1

15

1

16

2

15

8

16

4

17

0

18

6

20

1

22

1

21

9

Page 12: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

INVESCO OPPENHEIMER DEVELOPING MARKETS Y ODVYX DIVERSIFIED EMERGING MKTS MF

PAGE 12 OF 34

HISTORICAL Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORES AT QUARTER END

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 18 18 18 0 0 0 26 35 36 27 29 39 0 0 0 0 0

Q209

Q309

Q409

Q110

Q210

Q310

Q410

Q111

Q211

Q311

Q411

Q112

Q212

Q312

Q412

Q113

Q213

Q313

Q413

Q114

Q214

Q314

Q414

Q115

Q215

Q315

Q415

Q116

Q216

Q316

Q416

Q117

Q217

Q317

Q417

Q118

Q218

Q318

Q418

Q119

10 YR ROLLING AVG: 7 5 YR ROLLING AVG: 14 3 YR ROLLING AVG: 18 1 YR R. AVG: 0

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red). Any cellsshaded in yellow below accrued Fi360 Fiduciary Score shortfall points during that quarter.

FI360 SCORECRITERIA

2016 2017 2018 2019

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Peer Group EM EM EM EM EM EM EM EM EM EM EM EM

Mgr. Tenure 9.17 9.42 9.68 9.92 10.17 10.42 10.68 10.92 11.17 11.42 11.68 11.92

Net Assets 28.6B 30.2B 28.5B 31.6B 34.2B 37.3B 39.3B 40.7B 39.3B 38.3B 35.5B 40.7B

Composition Consistency

90%INTL EQ

89%INTL EQ

88%INTL EQ

92%INTL EQ

90%INTL EQ

88%INTL EQ

92%INTL EQ

92%INTL EQ

91%INTL EQ

91%INTL EQ

91%INTL EQ

90%INTL EQ

Style Consistency - - - - - - - - - - - -

group@@@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@@@

100

75

50

25

0

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio Rank

21 22 23 23 25

26 27 29 29 30 29 30

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

88

7

86

7

88

9

88

5

87

7

88

2

87

1

87

9

89

5

90

1

90

6

90

2

Alpha Rank - Primary Benchmark (3yr)

19 10 17

49 47 29

67 72 72 72 70 69

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

62

0

62

0

67

4

70

6

71

1

71

8

72

6

74

9

77

7

79

3

78

8

78

2

Sharpe Ratio Rank (3yr)

14 6 24 12

44 37

66 72 70 71 67 62

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

62

0

62

0

67

4

70

6

71

1

71

8

72

6

74

9

77

7

79

3

78

8

78

2

9 12 11 11

49 26 43 43 40

57 61 53

Return Rank (1yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

82

9

83

0

84

2

84

4

84

7

84

4

84

7

84

9

85

7

86

0

86

0

85

5

15 14 20

46 42 30

65 72 70 71 68 65

Return Rank (3yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

62

0

62

0

67

4

70

6

71

1

71

8

72

6

74

9

77

7

79

3

78

8

78

2

20 23 24

27 28 31 34 32 31 40 49 33

Return Rank (5yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

47

5

49

4

53

5

54

2

55

4

56

7

58

3

58

7

60

6

61

8

64

4

66

3

Page 13: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

IVY INTERNATIONAL CORE EQUITY R IYITX FOREIGN LARGE BLEND MF

PAGE 13 OF 34

HISTORICAL Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORES AT QUARTER END

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 39 21 23 17 21 21 16 15 19 19 22 34 36 38 32 23 23 23 55 63 79 66 54 72 81

Q209

Q309

Q409

Q110

Q210

Q310

Q410

Q111

Q211

Q311

Q411

Q112

Q212

Q312

Q412

Q113

Q213

Q313

Q413

Q114

Q214

Q314

Q414

Q115

Q215

Q315

Q415

Q116

Q216

Q316

Q416

Q117

Q217

Q317

Q417

Q118

Q218

Q318

Q418

Q119

10 YR ROLLING AVG: - 5 YR ROLLING AVG: 41 3 YR ROLLING AVG: 53 1 YR R. AVG: 72

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red). Any cellsshaded in yellow below accrued Fi360 Fiduciary Score shortfall points during that quarter.

FI360 SCORECRITERIA

2016 2017 2018 2019

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Peer Group FB FB FB FB FB FB FB FB FB FB FB FB

Mgr. Tenure 10.37 10.62 10.88 11.12 11.37 11.62 11.88 12.12 12.37 12.62 12.88 13.12

Net Assets 4.7B 4.7B 4.3B 4.7B 6B 6.4B 6.9B 7.2B 7.3B 6.9B 6B 5.9B

Composition Consistency

91%INTL EQ

88%INTL EQ

88%INTL EQ

87%INTL EQ

89%INTL EQ

91%INTL EQ

91%INTL EQ

93%INTL EQ

91%INTL EQ

93%INTL EQ

91%INTL EQ

90%INTL EQ

Style Consistency

LargeCap

Blend

LargeCap

Blend

LargeCap

Blend

LargeCap

Blend

LargeCap

Blend

LargeCap

Blend

LargeCap

Blend

LargeCap

Blend

LargeCap

Blend

LargeCap

Blend

LargeCap

Blend

LargeCap

Blend

group@@@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@@@

100

75

50

25

0

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio Rank

82 82 82 83 84 85 86 86 86 86 85 85

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

86

5

86

1

83

2

80

6

81

9

81

6

82

9

84

0

83

5

84

9

79

8

80

9

Alpha Rank - Primary Benchmark (3yr)

15 13 9 14

31

57 72 72

80 77 87 83

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

71

4

70

5

67

7

66

1

67

0

67

1

68

0

68

9

70

5

73

7

71

1

71

9

Sharpe Ratio Rank (3yr)

15 15 9 14

31

58 72 74 69

78 85 81

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

71

4

70

5

67

7

66

1

67

0

67

1

68

0

68

9

70

5

73

7

71

1

71

9

14 19

46

52 65 57

83 86 91 79 84 85

Return Rank (1yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

78

4

81

1

78

3

75

9

77

1

76

9

79

6

80

3

80

7

82

0

76

4

77

9

13 13 10 14

31

57 70 74 67

77 86 80

Return Rank (3yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

71

4

70

5

67

7

66

1

67

0

67

1

68

0

68

9

70

5

73

7

71

1

71

9

25 19 13 13 18 13 12 13 18

28 43

56

Return Rank (5yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

65

5

64

9

63

8

62

1

63

5

63

3

64

4

64

8

65

2

65

6

62

1

63

2

Page 14: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

METROPOLITAN WEST TOTAL RETURN BD PLAN MWTSX INTERMEDIATE CORE-PLUS BOND MF

PAGE 14 OF 34

HISTORICAL Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORES AT QUARTER END

- - - - - - - - - 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 12 12 12 14 13 10 14 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 13 12 12 17 21 22 20 21 10 0

Q209

Q309

Q409

Q110

Q210

Q310

Q410

Q111

Q211

Q311

Q411

Q112

Q212

Q312

Q412

Q113

Q213

Q313

Q413

Q114

Q214

Q314

Q414

Q115

Q215

Q315

Q415

Q116

Q216

Q316

Q416

Q117

Q217

Q317

Q417

Q118

Q218

Q318

Q418

Q119

10 YR ROLLING AVG: - 5 YR ROLLING AVG: 12 3 YR ROLLING AVG: 17 1 YR R. AVG: 19

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red). Any cellsshaded in yellow below accrued Fi360 Fiduciary Score shortfall points during that quarter.

FI360 SCORECRITERIA

2016 2017 2018 2019

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Peer Group CI CI CI CI CI CI CI CI CI CI CI CI

Mgr. Tenure 19.26 19.52 19.77 20.01 20.26 20.52 20.77 21.01 21.26 21.52 21.77 22.01

Net Assets 78.6B 80.9B 78.6B 78.6B 79.3B 80B 80.7B 78.2B 75.2B 72.9B 69.4B 72.1B

Composition Consistency

90% USBOND

88% USBOND

103%US

BOND

96% USBOND

93% USBOND

95% USBOND

98% USBOND

91% USBOND

97% USBOND

97% USBOND

95% USBOND

93% USBOND

Style Consistency

MedQualModDura

MedQualModDura

MedQualModDura

MedQualModDura

MedQualModDura

MedQualModDura

MedQualModDura

MedQualModDura

MedQualModDura

MedQualModDura

MedQualModDura

MedQualModDura

group@@@IjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJmbGV4LWNvbnRhaW5lclwiPjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJvdmVyZmxvdy1lbGxpcHNpc1wiIHN0eWxlPVwibWF4LXdpZHRoOjQwMHB4O1wiPk1ldHJvcG9saXRhbiBXZXN0IFRvdGFsIFJldHVybiBCZCBQbGFuPC9kaXY+PGRpdj4mZW1zcDs8L2Rpdj48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPVwib3ZlcmZsb3ctZWxsaXBzaXMgZm9udC13ZWlnaHQtbm9ybWFsXCIgc3R5bGU9XCJtYXgtd2lkdGg6OTBweDtcIj5NV1RTWDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+JmVtc3A7PC9kaXY+PGRpdiBjbGFzcz1cImZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0LW5vcm1hbFwiPkludGVybWVkaWF0ZSBDb3JlLVBsdXMgQm9uZDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+JmVtc3A7PC9kaXY+PGRpdiBjbGFzcz1cImZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0LW5vcm1hbFwiPk1GPC9kaXY+PC9kaXY+Ig==@@@

100

75

50

25

0

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio Rank

12 11 11 12 12 12 12 13 14 14 14 15

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

1,0

03

1,0

14

1,0

49

1,0

39

1,0

45

1,0

46

1,0

48

1,0

58

1,0

84

1,1

12

1,0

92

1,0

94

Alpha Rank - Primary Benchmark (3yr)

15

27 33 32 34 48 50 50

53 51 53 51

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

92

8

93

7

96

2

94

7

95

1

94

7

95

6

96

4

98

1

99

3

96

5

98

8

Sharpe Ratio Rank (3yr)

6 13 24 23 25

37 45 48 46 48 49

51

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

92

8

93

7

96

2

94

7

95

1

94

7

95

6

96

4

98

1

99

3

96

5

98

8

16 10

34 29

52 65 65 64 61 63 59 54

Return Rank (1yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

97

6

98

6

1,0

13

1,0

01

1,0

13

1,0

12

1,0

27

1,0

35

1,0

43

1,0

77

1,0

44

1,0

50

19

33 41 39 43 50 50

55 58 51 52 53

Return Rank (3yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

92

8

93

7

96

2

94

7

95

1

94

7

95

6

96

4

98

1

99

3

96

5

98

8

5 7 6 8 10 20 25

31 32 38 35 34

Return Rank (5yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

89

3

90

0

91

4

90

2

91

4

91

6

92

5

92

9

93

3

94

5

91

5

91

7

Page 15: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

MFS NEW DISCOVERY VALUE R1 NDVRX SMALL VALUE MF

PAGE 15 OF 34

HISTORICAL Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORES AT QUARTER END

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 40 43 38 36 51 26 24 46 21 22 61 50 55 51 47 27 24 26 19 21

Q209

Q309

Q409

Q110

Q210

Q310

Q410

Q111

Q211

Q311

Q411

Q112

Q212

Q312

Q412

Q113

Q213

Q313

Q413

Q114

Q214

Q314

Q414

Q115

Q215

Q315

Q415

Q116

Q216

Q316

Q416

Q117

Q217

Q317

Q417

Q118

Q218

Q318

Q418

Q119

10 YR ROLLING AVG: - 5 YR ROLLING AVG: 36 3 YR ROLLING AVG: 35 1 YR R. AVG: 24

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red). Any cellsshaded in yellow below accrued Fi360 Fiduciary Score shortfall points during that quarter.

FI360 SCORECRITERIA

2016 2017 2018 2019

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Peer Group SV SV SV SV SV SV SV SV SV SV SV SV

Mgr. Tenure 5.10 5.35 5.61 5.85 6.10 6.35 6.61 6.85 7.10 7.35 7.61 7.85

Net Assets 507.2M 562.4M 698.2M 898.1M 989.7M 1.1B 1.2B 1.3B 1.5B 1.7B 1.7B 2.4B

Composition Consistency

94% USEQ

94% USEQ

95% USEQ

94% USEQ

94% USEQ

94% USEQ

92% USEQ

91% USEQ

93% USEQ

89% USEQ

91% USEQ

92% USEQ

Style Consistency

SmallCap

Value

SmallCap

Value

SmallCap

Blend

SmallCap

Blend

SmallCap

Blend

SmallCap

Blend

SmallCap

Blend

SmallCap

Value

SmallCap

Value

SmallCap

Value

SmallCap

Value

SmallCap

Value

group@@@IjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJmbGV4LWNvbnRhaW5lclwiPjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJvdmVyZmxvdy1lbGxpcHNpc1wiIHN0eWxlPVwibWF4LXdpZHRoOjQwMHB4O1wiPk1GUyBOZXcgRGlzY292ZXJ5IFZhbHVlIFIxPC9kaXY+PGRpdj4mZW1zcDs8L2Rpdj48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPVwib3ZlcmZsb3ctZWxsaXBzaXMgZm9udC13ZWlnaHQtbm9ybWFsXCIgc3R5bGU9XCJtYXgtd2lkdGg6OTBweDtcIj5ORFZSWDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+JmVtc3A7PC9kaXY+PGRpdiBjbGFzcz1cImZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0LW5vcm1hbFwiPlNtYWxsIFZhbHVlPC9kaXY+PGRpdj4mZW1zcDs8L2Rpdj48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPVwiZm9udC13ZWlnaHQtbm9ybWFsXCI+TUY8L2Rpdj48L2Rpdj4i@@@

100

75

50

25

0

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio Rank

93 91 92 92 94 94 94 94 94 94 95 95

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

43

6

43

1

43

6

44

7

41

8

41

7

42

0

42

6

43

0

42

9

43

3

45

3

Alpha Rank - Primary Benchmark (3yr)

24 22 16 22 21 16 15 14

27 35 49 33

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

38

7

39

0

39

8

40

9

37

8

36

8

38

2

38

5

39

3

39

0

40

4

42

3

Sharpe Ratio Rank (3yr)

24 16 10 10 16 14 5 10 6

31 34 27

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

38

7

39

0

39

8

40

9

37

8

36

8

38

2

38

5

39

3

39

0

40

4

42

3

10 14 15 6

26 42 47 43 33

56 52 53

Return Rank (1yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

41

1

41

2

42

6

43

8

40

9

40

3

40

9

41

1

41

8

42

0

42

3

44

4

24 17 25 18 11 8

31 37 38 28 29

54

Return Rank (3yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

38

7

39

0

39

8

40

9

37

8

36

8

38

2

38

5

39

3

39

0

40

4

42

3

15 15 23 22 17 13

35 36 40 32 33 32

Return Rank (5yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

36

5

37

2

37

6

39

1

36

9

35

7

36

0

36

5

37

2

36

3

37

7

39

6

Page 16: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

NEUBERGER BERMAN SMALL CAP GROWTH C NSNCX SMALL GROWTH MF

PAGE 16 OF 34

HISTORICAL Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORES AT QUARTER END

- - - - - - 96 88 89 78 84 86 74 77 89 86 83 76 66 72 84 83 70 67 71 68 85 97 99 94 96 91 85 81 81 49 43 30 15 18

Q209

Q309

Q409

Q110

Q210

Q310

Q410

Q111

Q211

Q311

Q411

Q112

Q212

Q312

Q412

Q113

Q213

Q313

Q413

Q114

Q214

Q314

Q414

Q115

Q215

Q315

Q415

Q116

Q216

Q316

Q416

Q117

Q217

Q317

Q417

Q118

Q218

Q318

Q418

Q119

10 YR ROLLING AVG: - 5 YR ROLLING AVG: 70 3 YR ROLLING AVG: 63 1 YR R. AVG: 26

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red). Any cellsshaded in yellow below accrued Fi360 Fiduciary Score shortfall points during that quarter.

FI360 SCORECRITERIA

2016 2017 2018 2019

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Peer Group SG SG SG SG SG SG SG SG SG SG SG SG

Mgr. Tenure 0.61 0.87 1.12 1.36 1.61 1.87 2.12 2.36 2.61 2.87 3.12 3.36

Net Assets 62.5M 67.6M 64.7M 69.4M 72.7M 75.6M 78M 83.4M 92.3M 98.4M 81.1M 123.3M

Composition Consistency

97% USEQ

95% USEQ

94% USEQ

91% USEQ

90% USEQ

93% USEQ

92% USEQ

94% USEQ

94% USEQ

97% USEQ

88% USEQ

89% USEQ

Style Consistency

SmallCap

Growth

SmallCap

Growth

SmallCap

Growth

SmallCap

Growth

SmallCap

Growth

SmallCap

Growth

SmallCap

Growth

SmallCap

Growth

SmallCap

Growth

SmallCap

Growth

SmallCap

Growth

SmallCap

Growth

group@@@IjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJmbGV4LWNvbnRhaW5lclwiPjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJvdmVyZmxvdy1lbGxpcHNpc1wiIHN0eWxlPVwibWF4LXdpZHRoOjQwMHB4O1wiPk5ldWJlcmdlciBCZXJtYW4gU21hbGwgQ2FwIEdyb3d0aCBDPC9kaXY+PGRpdj4mZW1zcDs8L2Rpdj48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPVwib3ZlcmZsb3ctZWxsaXBzaXMgZm9udC13ZWlnaHQtbm9ybWFsXCIgc3R5bGU9XCJtYXgtd2lkdGg6OTBweDtcIj5OU05DWDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+JmVtc3A7PC9kaXY+PGRpdiBjbGFzcz1cImZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0LW5vcm1hbFwiPlNtYWxsIEdyb3d0aDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+JmVtc3A7PC9kaXY+PGRpdiBjbGFzcz1cImZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0LW5vcm1hbFwiPk1GPC9kaXY+PC9kaXY+Ig==@@@

100

75

50

25

0

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio Rank

89 89 89 89 90 90 91 92 92 92 92 93

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

68

4

69

0

70

4

71

0

73

3

72

4

73

9

73

0

74

1

73

6

70

3

69

7

Alpha Rank - Primary Benchmark (3yr)

9 5

44

70 75 67 71 52 53

77 82 80

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

63

4

64

0

65

7

67

5

69

7

69

0

71

1

70

1

71

3

70

4

67

0

66

9

Sharpe Ratio Rank (3yr)

12 4

74 70 66 66 72

80 81 77 79 85

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

63

4

64

0

65

7

67

5

69

7

69

0

71

1

70

1

71

3

70

4

67

0

66

9

15 17 22 17 16 20 7 4

41

90 87 86

Return Rank (1yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

67

9

68

5

69

6

70

6

72

9

71

7

72

9

71

9

73

3

72

9

69

5

69

2

14 6

45

73 63 68 53 53

80 83 76 80

Return Rank (3yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

63

4

64

0

65

7

67

5

69

7

69

0

71

1

70

1

71

3

70

4

67

0

66

9

12

39 39 46 31

62

89 88 88 76 80 79

Return Rank (5yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

61

6

62

0

62

2

62

8

65

0

65

3

66

7

65

7

66

5

66

2

63

6

64

2

Page 17: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

PIMCO TOTAL RETURN INSTL PTTRX INTERMEDIATE CORE-PLUS BOND MF

PAGE 17 OF 34

HISTORICAL Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORES AT QUARTER END

0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 14 52 65 23 40 42 44 45 45 26 54 50 63 65 47 73 72 78 59 69 77 57 55 32 16 19 21 22 23 34 22 37

Q209

Q309

Q409

Q110

Q210

Q310

Q410

Q111

Q211

Q311

Q411

Q112

Q212

Q312

Q412

Q113

Q213

Q313

Q413

Q114

Q214

Q314

Q414

Q115

Q215

Q315

Q415

Q116

Q216

Q316

Q416

Q117

Q217

Q317

Q417

Q118

Q218

Q318

Q418

Q119

10 YR ROLLING AVG: 37 5 YR ROLLING AVG: 46 3 YR ROLLING AVG: 33 1 YR R. AVG: 27

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red). Any cellsshaded in yellow below accrued Fi360 Fiduciary Score shortfall points during that quarter.

FI360 SCORECRITERIA

2016 2017 2018 2019

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Peer Group CI CI CI CI CI CI CI CI CI CI CI CI

Mgr. Tenure 1.76 2.01 2.27 2.51 2.76 3.01 3.27 3.51 3.76 4.01 4.27 4.51

Net Assets 86.1B 85.8B 78.5B 74.2B 73.8B 74.5B 73.6B 68.1B 70.9B 70B 66.6B 64B

Composition Consistency

94% USBOND

109%US

BOND

122%US

BOND

114%US

BOND

94% USBOND

144%US

BOND

129%US

BOND

171%US

BOND

94% USBOND

177%US

BOND

159%US

BOND

171%US

BOND

Style Consistency - - - - - - - - - - - -

group@@@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@@@

100

75

50

25

0

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio Rank

20 20 20 21 22 22 23 24 25

38 39 40

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

1,0

03

1,0

14

1,0

49

1,0

39

1,0

45

1,0

46

1,0

48

1,0

58

1,0

84

1,1

12

1,0

92

1,0

94

Alpha Rank - Primary Benchmark (3yr)

25 25

40 39 28 29 28 32 29

69

82 78

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

92

8

93

7

96

2

94

7

95

1

94

7

95

6

96

4

98

1

99

3

96

5

98

8

Sharpe Ratio Rank (3yr)

50 33 35 32 32 27 33 28

73 53

84 82

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

92

8

93

7

96

2

94

7

95

1

94

7

95

6

96

4

98

1

99

3

96

5

98

8

17 9 11 17

35 30 30 35

66 63 68 60

Return Rank (1yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

97

6

98

6

1,0

13

1,0

01

1,0

13

1,0

12

1,0

27

1,0

35

1,0

43

1,0

77

1,0

44

1,0

50

15 22 25

29 29 29 27 32 29

63 64 58

Return Rank (3yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

92

8

93

7

96

2

94

7

95

1

94

7

95

6

96

4

98

1

99

3

96

5

98

8

22

26 31 34 35 42 44 36 41 31 30

51

Return Rank (5yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

89

3

90

0

91

4

90

2

91

4

91

6

92

5

92

9

93

3

94

5

91

5

91

7

Page 18: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

T. ROWE PRICE NEW AMERICA GROWTH PRWAX LARGE GROWTH MF

PAGE 18 OF 34

HISTORICAL Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORES AT QUARTER END

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 19 22 17 0 31 32 31 28 19 19 38 19 0 0 0 0 35 48 49 25 27 27 29 0 0 0 0 0

Q209

Q309

Q409

Q110

Q210

Q310

Q410

Q111

Q211

Q311

Q411

Q112

Q212

Q312

Q412

Q113

Q213

Q313

Q413

Q114

Q214

Q314

Q414

Q115

Q215

Q315

Q415

Q116

Q216

Q316

Q416

Q117

Q217

Q317

Q417

Q118

Q218

Q318

Q418

Q119

10 YR ROLLING AVG: 15 5 YR ROLLING AVG: 19 3 YR ROLLING AVG: 22 1 YR R. AVG: 3

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red). Any cellsshaded in yellow below accrued Fi360 Fiduciary Score shortfall points during that quarter.

FI360 SCORECRITERIA

2016 2017 2018 2019

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Peer Group LG LG LG LG LG LG LG LG LG LG LG LG

Mgr. Tenure 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00

Net Assets 3.9B 3.8B 3.6B 3.7B 4B 4.2B 4.4B 4.7B 4.9B 5.2B 4.4B 5B

Composition Consistency

93% USEQ

92% USEQ

91% USEQ

93% USEQ

89% USEQ

86% USEQ

87% USEQ

92% USEQ

92% USEQ

93% USEQ

91% USEQ

95% USEQ

Style Consistency

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

LargeCap

Growth

group@@@IjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJmbGV4LWNvbnRhaW5lclwiPjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJvdmVyZmxvdy1lbGxpcHNpc1wiIHN0eWxlPVwibWF4LXdpZHRoOjQwMHB4O1wiPlQuIFJvd2UgUHJpY2UgTmV3IEFtZXJpY2EgR3Jvd3RoPC9kaXY+PGRpdj4mZW1zcDs8L2Rpdj48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPVwib3ZlcmZsb3ctZWxsaXBzaXMgZm9udC13ZWlnaHQtbm9ybWFsXCIgc3R5bGU9XCJtYXgtd2lkdGg6OTBweDtcIj5QUldBWDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+JmVtc3A7PC9kaXY+PGRpdiBjbGFzcz1cImZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0LW5vcm1hbFwiPkxhcmdlIEdyb3d0aDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+JmVtc3A7PC9kaXY+PGRpdiBjbGFzcz1cImZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0LW5vcm1hbFwiPk1GPC9kaXY+PC9kaXY+Ig==@@@

100

75

50

25

0

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio Rank

24 25 25

27 28 29 31 32 32 32 33 33

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

1,5

35

1,5

22

1,5

23

1,5

36

1,5

21

1,4

90

1,4

53

1,4

47

1,5

14

1,4

90

1,4

50

1,4

47

Alpha Rank - Primary Benchmark (3yr)

18 18 10

46 35 34 31 37 35 46

59 56

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

1,4

61

1,4

50

1,4

52

1,4

63

1,4

38

1,4

06

1,3

68

1,3

69

1,4

23

1,4

03

1,3

71

1,3

66

Sharpe Ratio Rank (3yr)

20 19 9

49 39 37 34 40 40 49

56 53

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

1,4

61

1,4

50

1,4

52

1,4

63

1,4

38

1,4

06

1,3

68

1,3

69

1,4

23

1,4

03

1,3

71

1,3

66

11 9 8 12 22 20

47 29 30 27 36

66

Return Rank (1yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

1,5

09

1,5

06

1,4

98

1,5

10

1,4

94

1,4

67

1,4

31

1,4

25

1,4

96

1,4

72

1,4

40

1,4

27

20 14 9 13 11 12 12 9 14 13

34 41

Return Rank (3yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

1,4

61

1,4

50

1,4

52

1,4

63

1,4

38

1,4

06

1,3

68

1,3

69

1,4

23

1,4

03

1,3

71

1,3

66

14 10 12 15 11 11 16 13 13

34 37 40

Return Rank (5yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

1,3

53

1,3

45

1,3

75

1,3

95

1,4

12

1,3

81

1,3

41

1,3

29

1,3

83

1,3

51

1,3

20

1,3

12

Page 19: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

VANGUARD EQUITY-INCOME ADM VEIRX LARGE VALUE MF

PAGE 19 OF 34

HISTORICAL Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORES AT QUARTER END

0 13 19 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 10 10 12 12 17 22 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Q209

Q309

Q409

Q110

Q210

Q310

Q410

Q111

Q211

Q311

Q411

Q112

Q212

Q312

Q412

Q113

Q213

Q313

Q413

Q114

Q214

Q314

Q414

Q115

Q215

Q315

Q415

Q116

Q216

Q316

Q416

Q117

Q217

Q317

Q417

Q118

Q218

Q318

Q418

Q119

10 YR ROLLING AVG: 5 5 YR ROLLING AVG: 5 3 YR ROLLING AVG: 3 1 YR R. AVG: 0

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red). Any cellsshaded in yellow below accrued Fi360 Fiduciary Score shortfall points during that quarter.

FI360 SCORECRITERIA

2016 2017 2018 2019

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Peer Group LV LV LV LV LV LV LV LV LV LV LV LV

Mgr. Tenure 12.51 12.76 13.01 13.26 13.51 13.76 14.01 14.26 14.51 14.76 15.01 15.26

Net Assets 22.2B 23.6B 25.4B 27.5B 28.2B 29.4B 31.3B 30.8B 31.5B 33.4B 30.1B 33.8B

Composition Consistency

87% USEQ

87% USEQ

85% USEQ

87% USEQ

86% USEQ

86% USEQ

87% USEQ

88% USEQ

86% USEQ

86% USEQ

87% USEQ

88% USEQ

Style Consistency

LargeCap

Value

LargeCap

Value

LargeCap

Value

LargeCap

Value

LargeCap

Value

LargeCap

Value

LargeCap

Value

LargeCap

Value

LargeCap

Value

LargeCap

Value

LargeCap

Value

LargeCap

Value

group@@@IjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJmbGV4LWNvbnRhaW5lclwiPjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJvdmVyZmxvdy1lbGxpcHNpc1wiIHN0eWxlPVwibWF4LXdpZHRoOjQwMHB4O1wiPlZhbmd1YXJkIEVxdWl0eS1JbmNvbWUgQWRtPC9kaXY+PGRpdj4mZW1zcDs8L2Rpdj48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPVwib3ZlcmZsb3ctZWxsaXBzaXMgZm9udC13ZWlnaHQtbm9ybWFsXCIgc3R5bGU9XCJtYXgtd2lkdGg6OTBweDtcIj5WRUlSWDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+JmVtc3A7PC9kaXY+PGRpdiBjbGFzcz1cImZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0LW5vcm1hbFwiPkxhcmdlIFZhbHVlPC9kaXY+PGRpdj4mZW1zcDs8L2Rpdj48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPVwiZm9udC13ZWlnaHQtbm9ybWFsXCI+TUY8L2Rpdj48L2Rpdj4i@@@

100

75

50

25

0

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio Rank

3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

1,3

34

1,3

28

1,3

32

1,3

37

1,3

50

1,3

69

1,3

62

1,3

46

1,3

27

1,3

15

1,2

77

1,2

61

Alpha Rank - Primary Benchmark (3yr)

10 9 11 10 12 9 7 6 9 15 13 13

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

1,1

84

1,1

91

1,2

02

1,2

10

1,2

23

1,2

35

1,2

24

1,2

14

1,2

14

1,2

14

1,1

96

1,1

90

Sharpe Ratio Rank (3yr)

9 8 8 7 8 6 5 4 6 10 11 11

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

1,1

84

1,1

91

1,2

02

1,2

10

1,2

23

1,2

35

1,2

24

1,2

14

1,2

14

1,2

14

1,1

96

1,1

90

9 13 21 19 20

45 49 34 35 48

68

76

Return Rank (1yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

1,2

85

1,2

96

1,3

02

1,3

03

1,3

08

1,3

28

1,3

23

1,3

12

1,3

04

1,2

95

1,2

67

1,2

52

8 10 11 8 10 7 5 6 8 22 13 20

Return Rank (3yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

1,1

84

1,1

91

1,2

02

1,2

10

1,2

23

1,2

35

1,2

24

1,2

14

1,2

14

1,2

14

1,1

96

1,1

90

4 19 16 21 16 16 16 16 8 7

37 26

Return Rank (5yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

1,1

01

1,1

04

1,1

07

1,1

08

1,1

27

1,1

45

1,1

45

1,1

39

1,1

31

1,1

18

1,1

03

1,0

97

Page 20: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

VANGUARD HEALTH CARE INV VGHCX HEALTH MF

PAGE 20 OF 34

HISTORICAL Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORES AT QUARTER END

28 29 18 38 17 20 23 0 36 31 0 38 45 57 32 15 23 31 49 30 37 44 25 16 38 0 0 0 0 23 25 16 29 27 35 34 47 36 0 63

Q209

Q309

Q409

Q110

Q210

Q310

Q410

Q111

Q211

Q311

Q411

Q112

Q212

Q312

Q412

Q113

Q213

Q313

Q413

Q114

Q214

Q314

Q414

Q115

Q215

Q315

Q415

Q116

Q216

Q316

Q416

Q117

Q217

Q317

Q417

Q118

Q218

Q318

Q418

Q119

10 YR ROLLING AVG: 28 5 YR ROLLING AVG: 27 3 YR ROLLING AVG: 32 1 YR R. AVG: 40

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red). Any cellsshaded in yellow below accrued Fi360 Fiduciary Score shortfall points during that quarter.

FI360 SCORECRITERIA

2016 2017 2018 2019

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Peer Group SH SH SH SH SH SH SH SH SH SH SH SH

Mgr. Tenure 8.09 8.35 8.60 8.84 9.09 9.35 9.60 9.84 10.09 10.35 10.60 10.84

Net Assets 48.6B 47.7B 42.8B 46B 48.3B 48.1B 47.2B 46B 45.3B 50.3B 43.9B 46.5B

Composition Consistency - - - - - - - - - - - -

Style Consistency - - - - - - - - - - - -

group@@@IjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJmbGV4LWNvbnRhaW5lclwiPjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJvdmVyZmxvdy1lbGxpcHNpc1wiIHN0eWxlPVwibWF4LXdpZHRoOjQwMHB4O1wiPlZhbmd1YXJkIEhlYWx0aCBDYXJlIEludjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+JmVtc3A7PC9kaXY+PGRpdiBjbGFzcz1cIm92ZXJmbG93LWVsbGlwc2lzIGZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0LW5vcm1hbFwiIHN0eWxlPVwibWF4LXdpZHRoOjkwcHg7XCI+VkdIQ1g8L2Rpdj48ZGl2PiZlbXNwOzwvZGl2PjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJmb250LXdlaWdodC1ub3JtYWxcIj5IZWFsdGg8L2Rpdj48ZGl2PiZlbXNwOzwvZGl2PjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9XCJmb250LXdlaWdodC1ub3JtYWxcIj5NRjwvZGl2PjwvZGl2PiI=@@@

100

75

50

25

0

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio Rank

10 9 10 10 10 10 11 12 12 11 12 12

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

14

6

14

9

14

8

14

9

15

1

14

7

14

6

14

8

15

0

14

6

14

9

15

1

Alpha Rank - Primary Benchmark (3yr)

19 9 20 24

31 42 35 37 45 50 43

78

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

13

1

13

1

13

1

13

2

13

4

13

2

13

5

13

5

13

4

13

5

13

8

14

0

Sharpe Ratio Rank (3yr)

3 4 8 9 12 25

29 35 47 48 47

67

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

13

1

13

1

13

1

13

2

13

4

13

2

13

5

13

5

13

4

13

5

13

8

14

0

11

41 41 46

72 64 70 57 71

79 78 92

Return Rank (1yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

13

6

13

7

13

7

14

2

14

7

14

7

14

6

14

6

14

5

14

1

14

3

14

6

20 8 16

27 32 42 38 40 50 50

59

81

Return Rank (3yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

13

1

13

1

13

1

13

2

13

4

13

2

13

5

13

5

13

4

13

5

13

8

14

0

30 45 42 50 49 39

58 55 55 53 61 53

Return Rank (5yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

12

3

12

5

12

6

12

7

12

9

12

7

13

0

13

0

12

9

12

9

13

2

13

3

Page 21: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

VANGUARD SHORT-TERM INVESTMENT-GRADE ADM VFSUX SHORT-TERM BOND MF

PAGE 21 OF 34

HISTORICAL Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORES AT QUARTER END

24 0 0 0 23 25 14 15 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 44 43 36

Q209

Q309

Q409

Q110

Q210

Q310

Q410

Q111

Q211

Q311

Q411

Q112

Q212

Q312

Q412

Q113

Q213

Q313

Q413

Q114

Q214

Q314

Q414

Q115

Q215

Q315

Q415

Q116

Q216

Q316

Q416

Q117

Q217

Q317

Q417

Q118

Q218

Q318

Q418

Q119

10 YR ROLLING AVG: 8 5 YR ROLLING AVG: 10 3 YR ROLLING AVG: 16 1 YR R. AVG: 40

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red). Any cellsshaded in yellow below accrued Fi360 Fiduciary Score shortfall points during that quarter.

FI360 SCORECRITERIA

2016 2017 2018 2019

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Peer Group CS CS CS CS CS CS CS CS CS CS CS CS

Mgr. Tenure 8.09 8.35 8.60 8.84 9.09 9.35 9.60 9.84 0.21 0.47 0.72 0.96

Net Assets 55.7B 57.9B 57.8B 59.6B 61.6B 63.2B 64B 62.2B 60.4B 59.5B 57.8B 59.2B

Composition Consistency - - - - - - - - - - - -

Style Consistency

MedQual Ltd

Dura

MedQual Ltd

Dura

MedQual Ltd

Dura

MedQual Ltd

Dura

MedQual Ltd

Dura

MedQual Ltd

Dura

MedQual Ltd

Dura

MedQual Ltd

Dura

MedQual Ltd

Dura

MedQual Ltd

Dura

MedQual Ltd

Dura

MedQual Ltd

Dura

group@@@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@@@

100

75

50

25

0

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio Rank

3 3 3 3 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 5

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

53

9

54

1

53

7

53

5

55

2

55

2

56

5

54

3

54

6

56

5

56

7

57

5

Alpha Rank - Primary Benchmark (3yr)

12 17 17 16 18 22 23 23 25

29 30 35

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

47

3

47

5

48

4

48

0

49

1

50

3

51

1

49

7

49

8

51

9

51

5

52

1

Sharpe Ratio Rank (3yr)

7 8 15 16 15 18 19 23 24

32 33 39

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

47

3

47

5

48

4

48

0

49

1

50

3

51

1

49

7

49

8

51

9

51

5

52

1

5 13 22 24 11

33 38 39 38

55 53 51

Return Rank (1yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

52

6

53

6

53

2

52

7

53

3

53

4

54

2

52

4

53

1

54

5

54

4

55

0

6 8 10 10 12 13 17 20 21 25

26 30

Return Rank (3yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

47

3

47

5

48

4

48

0

49

1

50

3

51

1

49

7

49

8

51

9

51

5

52

1

14 17 18 15 15 13 14 15 16 16 15 14

Return Rank (5yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

42

6

42

7

42

8

42

8

44

8

45

2

46

7

45

0

44

9

46

2

47

2

48

1

Page 22: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

WELLS FARGO PRECIOUS METALS INST EKWYX EQUITY PRECIOUS METALS MF

PAGE 22 OF 34

HISTORICAL Fi360 FIDUCIARY SCORES AT QUARTER END

0 0 20 0 0 0 17 18 25 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 14 39 51 55 26 23 39 30 41 15 0

Q209

Q309

Q409

Q110

Q210

Q310

Q410

Q111

Q211

Q311

Q411

Q112

Q212

Q312

Q412

Q113

Q213

Q313

Q413

Q114

Q214

Q314

Q414

Q115

Q215

Q315

Q415

Q116

Q216

Q316

Q416

Q117

Q217

Q317

Q417

Q118

Q218

Q318

Q418

Q119

10 YR ROLLING AVG: 12 5 YR ROLLING AVG: 19 3 YR ROLLING AVG: 31 1 YR R. AVG: 28

The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score® Average is a one-, three-, five-, or ten-year rolling average of an investment’s Fi360Fiduciary Score®. All Scores are color coded based on the quartile they fall in (1st - Green; 2nd - Light Green; 3rd - Yellow; 4th - Red). Any cellsshaded in yellow below accrued Fi360 Fiduciary Score shortfall points during that quarter.

FI360 SCORECRITERIA

2016 2017 2018 2019

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Peer Group SP SP SP SP SP SP SP SP SP SP SP SP

Mgr. Tenure 9.08 9.33 9.58 9.83 10.08 10.33 10.58 10.83 11.08 11.33 11.58 11.83

Net Assets 513.9M 490.2M 367.2M 396.1M 380.5M 379.6M 350.7M 302.7M 313.8M 251.7M 271.1M 281.7M

Composition Consistency - - - - - - - - - - - -

Style Consistency - - - - - - - - - - - -

group@@@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@@@

100

75

50

25

0

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio Rank

25 25 24 24 24 25

28 28 27 26 27 26

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

74

74

73

74

74

75

71

70

72

71

73

72

Alpha Rank - Primary Benchmark (3yr)

36 47 45 37

51 54 51 51 58 66 58 56

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

71

72

71

72

72

74

70

70

72

71

73

72

Sharpe Ratio Rank (3yr)

32 40 46 43

52 57 60 53 61 67 60 66

Q2 16

Q3 16

Q4 16

Q1 17

Q2 17

Q3 17

Q4 17

Q1 18

Q2 18

Q3 18

Q4 18

Q1 19

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

71

72

71

72

72

74

70

70

72

71

73

72

16 1

36 48 48 45

53 66 64

85 92 78

Return Rank (1yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

74

74

73

74

74

75

71

70

72

71

73

72

32 47 41

55 64 60 54 73 71 61 69 53

Return Rank (3yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

71

72

71

72

72

74

70

70

72

71

73

72

18

40 35 43 43 47 43 45 37

51 54 58

Return Rank (5yr)

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Pee

rs

25

50

75

67

67

66

70

70

71

68

67

69

69

71

70

Page 23: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES

PAGE 23 OF 34

INTRODUCTION

This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional investment advice. Some data in this report was obtained fromthird parties. Although Fi360 obtains data from sources it deems to be reliable, it does not independently verify the data, and does not warrant orrepresent that the data is timely, complete, or accurate.

Unless denoted otherwise with a CI superscript (Investment Name ), the investment data source is © 2019 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.The data contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar, Inc. and/or its content providers; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is notwarranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar, Inc. nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arisingfrom any use of this information. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Any investment denoted with the CI subscript was supplied byanother 3rd party such as the advisor, custodian, recordkeeper or other provider.

Mutual funds and Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are sold by prospectus. Please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expensescarefully before investing. The prospectus and, if available, the summary prospectus, which contains this and other information, can be obtainedby calling your financial advisor. Read the prospectus and, if available, the summary prospectus carefully before you invest.

Investing in mutual funds involves risk. The principal value and investment return will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may beworth more or less than the original cost. All investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. This does not apply, however, to theguaranteed portions of group annuity contracts that constitute guaranteed benefit policies as defined in ERISA 401(b)(2)(B).

Collective investment trusts (CITs) are available for investment primarily by eligible retirement plans and entities. Participation in CITs is generallygoverned by the terms of a Declaration of Trust and a Participation or Adoption Agreement, which is signed by the retirement plan’s fiduciary at thetime the plan invests in the CITs. In addition, various other documents may contain important information about the CITs including FundDescriptions, Statement of Characteristics or Investment Guidelines, and/or other fee or investment disclosure documents. All of these documentsmay contain important information about CIT fees, investment objectives, and risks and expenses of the underlying investments in the CITs andshould be read carefully before investing. To obtain a copy, you will need to contact the plan sponsor or trustee of the CIT.

CITs are not insured by FDIC or any other type of deposit insurance; are not deposits or other obligations of, and are not guaranteed by any firmor their affiliates; and involve investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested. CITs are not mutual funds and are exempt fromregistration and regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), and their units are not registered under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, or applicable securities laws of any state or other jurisdiction. Unit holders of the Funds are not entitled to the protections of the1940 Act. The decision to invest in CITs should be carefully considered. The CITs unit values will fluctuate and may be worth more or less whenredeemed, so unit holders may lose money. CITs are not sold by prospectus and are not available for investment by the public; Fund prices are notquoted in readily available market quotation services.

Separate Accounts are available through a group annuity contract. The contract and other fee/disclosure documents, such as fact sheets, maycontain important information about the separate account fees, investment objectives and risks and expenses of underlying investments in theseparate accounts and should be read carefully before investing. Certain investment options may not be available in all states or U.S.commonwealths. Some payments or transfers from the Separate Accounts may be deferred as described in the group annuity contracts providingaccess to the Separate Accounts or as required by applicable law. Such deferment will be based on factors that may include situations such as:unstable or disorderly financial markets or investment conditions which do not allow for orderly investment transactions.

This Statement of Additional Disclosures includes important information regarding the information provided in the report. If an investor does notunderstand any term or data presented herein, he/she should consult with his/her financial advisor.

FI360 FIDUCIARY SCORE®

Fi360 Fiduciary Score®. The Score is a peer percentile ranking of an investment against a set of quantitative due diligence criteria selected to reflectprudent fiduciary management. The Rolling Averages are a one-, three-, five- or ten-year equal-weighted average of an investment’s Fi360 FiduciaryScores during that corresponding time period. The Historical Fi360 Fiduciary Scores at Quarter End trend chart (if included) displays the Fi360Fiduciary Score for each calendar quarter-end during that year.

If an investment does not meet an individual due diligence criterion, points are tallied. Investments that satisfy all of the due diligence criteria receivean Fi360 Fiduciary Score of 0. Every other investment is given a Score of 1-100 based on their point total, and representing their percentile ranking

group@@@IlN0YXRlbWVudCBvZiBBZGRpdGlvbmFsIERpc2Nsb3N1cmVzIg==@@@

CI

Page 24: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES

PAGE 24 OF 34

within their peer group. The Fi360 Fiduciary Score represents a suggested course of action and is not intended, nor should it be used, as the solesource of information for reaching an investment decision. Visit www.fi360.com/fi360-Fiduciary-Score for the complete methodology document.

Criteria. The following criteria are included as part of the Score calculation.

PERFORMANCE

Total Return (No Load). Expressed in percentage terms, an investment’s total return is determined each month by taking the change in monthly netasset value, reinvesting all income and capital gains distributions during that month, and dividing by the starting NAV. Reinvestments are madeusing the actual reinvestment NAV, and daily payoffs are reinvested monthly. Total Return (No Load) is not adjusted for sales charges (such as front-end loads, deferred loads and redemption fees), but do reflect management, administrative, 12b-1 fees and other costs taken out of fund assets.Total returns for periods longer than one year are expressed in terms of compounded average annual returns (also known as geometric total returns).

Total Return (With Load). Expressed in percentage terms, an investment’s total return is determined each month by taking the change in monthlynet asset value, reinvesting all income and capital gains distributions during that month, and dividing by the starting NAV. Reinvestments are madeusing the actual reinvestment NAV, and daily payoffs are reinvested monthly. Total Return (With Load) is adjusted for front-end loads, deferredloads and redemption fees, but not taxes. For funds with front-end loads, the full amount of the load is deducted. For deferred loads and redemptionfees, the percentage charged often declines the longer the shares are held. Total returns for periods longer than one year are expressed in terms ofcompounded average annual returns (also known as geometric total returns).

Percentile Rank. The relative ranking of an investment within its peer group on a scale of 1-100 (1 being the best) for the data point and timeperiod being measured. Rankings are calculated against the corresponding Peer Group and Number of Peers as explained in the following paragraph.Performance ranks do not account for an investment’s sales charge (if applicable). Ranks will not be provided for periods less than one year.

Number of Peers. The number of investments in the same peer group which were used to calculate any percentile rank or Fi360 Fiduciary Score.Only investments which had the given data point being ranked are included in this number, so the number of peers can change for the sameinvestment by data point being ranked. For Mutual funds (MF) and Exchange Traded Funds (ETF), we combine both sets of investments together toform one peer group for ranking purposes. For Collective Investment Trusts (CIT), since many do not report timely, we utilize the pre-definedMF/ETF peer group and calculate the ranks as an overlay on that peer group. For Group Retirement Plan Annuities (GRPA), we combine this universewith all mutual funds and ETFs to form one peer group for ranking purposes. For Separately managed accounts (SMA) and Variable annuity subaccounts (VA), we use their respective universe of investments only.

Growth of 10k Chart. This chart shows an investment’s performance based on how $10,000 invested in the fund would have grown over time withdividends reinvested. The returns used in the graph are not load-adjusted. The growth of $10,000 begins at the investment’s inception, or the firstyear listed on the graph, whichever is appropriate. Located alongside the investment’s graph line are lines that represent the growth of $10,000 inthe investment’s Broad Index, Peer Group Index, and Best-fit Index Benchmarks, which are listed in the Benchmarks section. All lines are plotted on alogarithmic scale, so that identical percentage changes in the value of an investment have the same vertical distance on the graph. This provides amore accurate representation of performance than would a simple arithmetic graph.

Inception Date. The investment must have at least a 3 year track history1.

Manager Tenure. The investment manager must have at least a 2 year track history. (Most senior manager’s tenure)2.

Net Assets. The investment must have at least 75 million under management (Total across all share classes for funds/ETFs)3.

Composition. The investments allocation to its primary asset class should be greater than or equal to 80%. (Not applied to all peer groups)4.

Style. The investment's current style box5.

Prospectus Net Exp Ratio. The investment must place in the top 75% of its peer group6.

Alpha (3yr) - Primary Benchmark. The investment must place in the top 50% of its peer group7.

Sharpe (3yr). The investment must place in the top 50% of its peer group8.

Return (1yr). The investment must place in the top 50% of its peer group9.

Return (3yr). The investment must place in the top 50% of its peer group10.

Return (5yr). The investment must place in the top 50% of its peer group11.

Page 25: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES

PAGE 25 OF 34

Upside/Downside Capture Ratio. This ratio shows whether a given fund has outperformed—gained more or lost less than—a broad marketbenchmark during periods of market strength and weakness, and if so, by how much. Upside capture ratios for funds are calculated by taking thefund’s monthly return during months when the benchmark had a positive return and dividing it by the benchmark return during that same month.Downside capture ratios are calculated by taking the fund’s monthly return during the periods of negative benchmark performance and dividing it bythe benchmark return. Upside and downside capture ratios over three- and five-year periods are determined by calculating the geometric average forboth the fund and index returns during the up and down months, respectively, over each time period. An upside capture ratio over 100 indicates afund has generally outperformed the benchmark during periods of positive returns for the benchmark. Meanwhile, a downside capture ratio of lessthan 100 indicates that a fund has lost less than its benchmark in periods when the benchmark has been in the red. All stock funds’ upside anddownside capture ratios are calculated versus the S&P 500, whereas bond and international funds’ ratios are calculated relative to the BarclaysCapital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and MSCI EAFE Index, respectively.

Risk/Reward Chart. This chart helps to visually review the relative reward (measured by investment return) received by a fund for the risk or volatility(measured by standard deviation) of the fund over a three or five-year period. Relatively speaking, it is preferable for the diamond to fall in the upperleft quadrant of the graph.

Benchmarks. A benchmark gives an investor a point of reference for evaluating a fund’s performance by comparing benchmark returns to the fund’sreturns. This report may utilize one or many of these benchmarks:

Broad Index. The index used in the calculation of metrics such as Alpha, Beta, and R-Squared. The Broad Index provides a common comparison pointfor funds with similar investing styles across different peer groups.

Peer Group Index. The index assigned to the fund’s peer group, which is a group of funds with similar investment style. Each peer group has its ownindex which can be used as a common comparison point between funds.

Best-fit Index. The market index that shows the highest correlation with a fund over the most-recent 36 months, as measured by the highest R-Squared. In addition, the Best-fit Index can be used to compare the betas and alphas of similar funds that show the same Best-fit Index. The Best-fitIndex may not be the fund’s benchmark, nor does it necessarily contain the types of securities that may be held by the fund.

Indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly. Please reference the Index Descriptions section for more specific detail on each index thatis included in this report.

VOLATILITY METRICS

Standard Deviation. A statistical measure of the historical volatility. It depicts how widely the returns varied over a certain period of time. Investorsuse standard deviation to try to predict the range of returns that are most likely for a given time period. When an investment has a high standarddeviation, the predicted range of performance is wide, implying greater volatility. If the investment is the only holding in an investor’s portfolio, thenit is an appropriate measure of risk. If the returns follow a normal distribution, then approximately 68 percent of the time they will fall within onestandard deviation of the mean return for the investment and 95 percent of the time within two standard deviations.

Sharpe Ratio. A risk-adjusted measure developed by Nobel Laureate William Sharpe. The higher the Sharpe ratio, the better the investment’shistorical risk-adjusted performance. The Sharpe ratio is calculated for the past three or five-year period by dividing the investment’s annualizedexcess return by the standard deviation of an investment’s annualized excess return. Since this ratio uses standard deviation as its risk measure, it ismost appropriately applied when analyzing an investment that is an investor’s sole holding. The Sharpe ratio can be used to compare two fundsdirectly on how much risk an investment had to bear to earn excess return over the risk-free rate.

MPT STATISTICS

Alpha. A measure of the difference between an investment’s actual returns and its expected performance, given its level of risk as measured by beta.Alpha is often seen as a measure of the value added or subtracted by a manager. A positive alpha figure indicates the investment has performedbetter than its beta (or expected return) would predict. In contrast, a negative alpha indicates the investment underperformed, given the expectationsestablished by the investment’s beta.

Beta. A measure of an investment’s sensitivity to market movements. The beta of the market is 1.00 by definition. An investment with a betagreater than 1.00 is more volatile than the market, and an investment with a beta less than 1.00 is less volatile than the market.

Page 26: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES

PAGE 26 OF 34

R-Squared. This statistic reflects the percentage of an investment’s movements that can be explained by movements in its benchmark index,showing the degree of correlation between the investment and the benchmark. An R-squared of 100 indicates that all movements of an investmentcan be explained by movements in the index. Thus, index funds that invest only in S&P 500 stocks will have an R-squared very close to 100.Conversely, a low R-squared indicates that very few of the investment’s movements can be explained by movements in its benchmark index. An R-squared measure of 35, for example, means that only 35% of the investment’s movements can be explained by movements in the benchmark index.R-squared can be used to ascertain the significance of a particular beta. Generally, a higher R-squared will indicate a more reliable beta figure. If theR-squared is lower, then the beta is less relevant to the investment’s performance.

EXPENSES

Prospectus Net Expense Ratio. This value is from the investment’s most recent prospectus. The percentage of investment assets used to pay foroperating expenses and management fees, including 12b-1 fees, administrative fees, and all other asset-based costs incurred by the fund, exceptbrokerage costs. Fund expenses are reflected in the fund’s Net Asset Value. Sales charges are not included in the expense ratio. The expense ratio forfund of funds is the aggregate expense ratio defined as the sum of the wrap or sponsor fees plus the estimated weighted average of the underlyingfund fees. A higher expense ratio will "drag" on the overall performance of a fund compared to peers with a lower expense ratio.

Net Expense Ratio (Rank). The percentile rank for the Net Expense Ratio within the investment’s peer group. 1 being the best and 100 the worst.

Prospectus Gross Expense Ratio. This value is from the investment’s most recent prospectus. The total gross expenses (net expenses with waiveradded back in) divided by the fund’s average net assets. If it is not equal to the net expense ratio, the gross expense ratio portrays the fund’sexpenses had the manager not waived a portion, or all, of its fees. Thus, to some degree, it is an indication of fee contracts. Some fee waivers have anexpiration date; other waivers are in place indefinitely.

Audited Net Expense Ratio. The percentage of fund assets paid for operating expenses and management fees, including 12b-1 fees, administrativefees, and all other asset-based costs incurred by the fund, except brokerage costs. Fund expenses are reflected in the fund’s NAV. This expense ratiois pulled directly from the investment’s annual report. Sales charges are not included in the expense ratio. For fund of funds, the underlying fundexpense ratios are not included in the expense ratio.

Management Fee. Fee charged for the management of pooled investments such as collective investment funds, insurance/annuity products, mutualfunds and individually managed accounts.

12b-1 Fee. This value is usually taken from the fund’s prospectus but may have been edited by your financial advisor if the prospectus amount wasnot accurate for your given situation. This value is part of the Net Expense Ratio. It represents a maximum annual charge deducted from investmentassets to pay for distribution and marketing costs. This value can be rebated back to the client to offset other expenses.

Front Load. A one-time deduction from a purchase made into the fund. The amount is relative to the amount of the investment, so that largerinvestments incur smaller rates of charge. The sales charge serves as a commission for the broker who sold the fund. Potential fees and salescharges are an important factor to consider before making an investment. The load compensates the broker or financial planner for the service ofproviding professional investment advice.

Deferred Load. A one-time charge paid at the time of the sale of the fund. The amount is relative to the amount of the investment, so that largerinvestments incur smaller rates of charge. The sales charge serves as a commission for the broker who sold the fund. Potential fees and salescharges are an important factor to consider before making an investment. The load compensates the broker or financial planner for the service ofproviding professional investment advice.

Redemption fee. Amount charged when money is withdrawn from the fund. This fee does not go back to the investment company, but rather intothe fund itself and thus does not represent a net cost to shareholders. Also, unlike contingent deferred sales charges, redemption fees typicallyoperate only in short, specific time clauses, commonly 30, 180, or 365 days. However, some redemption fees exist for up to five years. Charges arenot imposed after the stated time has passed. These fees are typically imposed to discourage market timers, whose quick movements into and outof an investment can be disruptive. The charge is normally imposed on the ending share value, appreciated or depreciated from the original value.

Initial Minimum Investment. The smallest investment amount accepted for establishing a new investment in the fund. Funds often charge a lowerfee for larger initial investments and will have several share classes that provide an alternative initial investment.

Page 27: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES

PAGE 27 OF 34

Fee Waiver/Cap. This value is from the investment’s most recent prospectus. The elimination of all or part of a fund’s expense or the cap ormaximum fee charged by the portfolio manager. Some fee waivers and caps have an expiration date; others are in place indefinitely. Some fundsadopt this practice at various times to make their returns more competitive.

INVESTMENT STRATEGY & STYLE

Peer Group. Fi360 utilizes the Morningstar Category for peer group assignment. In an effort to distinguish funds by what they own, as well as bytheir prospectus objectives and styles, Morningstar developed the Morningstar Categories. While the prospectus objective identifies a fund’sinvestment goals based on the wording in the fund prospectus, the Morningstar Category identifies funds based on their actual investment styles asmeasured by their underlying portfolio holdings (portfolio and other statistics over the past three years). Peer groups are for comparison only, and donot represent any investable products. Please reference the Peer Group Descriptions section for more specific detail on each peer group that isincluded in this report.

Investment Strategy. A written summary of the Investment Objectives and Policy section found in every fund prospectus. It states the objective ofthe fund, and how the managers intend to invest to achieve this objective. It includes any limitations as to the fund’s investment policies, as well asany share class structure difference, previous names, merger, liquidation, and opening or closing information. This statement is from the fundprospectus.

Morningstar Equity Style Box™. Morningstar classifies funds as being large-cap, mid-cap, or small-cap based on the market capitalization of longstocks owned; and as value, blend, or growth based on the value-growth orientation of the stock holdings. The nine possible combinations of thesecharacteristics correspond to the nine squares of the Morningstar Style Box-size is displayed along the vertical axis and style is displayed along thehorizontal axis. The referenced data elements below are a weighted average of the long equity holdings in the portfolio.

Price/Earnings Ratio is a weighted average of the price/earnings ratios of the stocks in the underlying fund’s portfolio. The P/E ratio of a stock iscalculated by dividing the current price of the stock by its trailing 12-months’ earnings per share. In computing the average, portfolio holding isweighted by the percentage of equity assets it represents.

Price/Cash Flow Ratio is a weighted average of the price/cash-flow ratios of the stocks in a fund’s portfolio. Price/cash-flow shows the ability of abusiness to generate cash and acts as a gauge of liquidity and solvency.

Price/Book Ratio is a weighted average of the price/book ratios of all the stocks in the underlying fund’s portfolio. The P/B ratio of a company iscalculated by dividing the market price of its stock by the company’s per-share book value. Stocks with negative book values are excluded from thiscalculation.

Geometric Average Market Capitalization of a fund’s equity portfolio offers a measure of the size of the companies in which the mutual fund invests.

Morningstar Fixed Income Style Box™. Morningstar classifies bond funds in its style box based on their interest rate sensitivity as limited, moderateand extensive measured by the average effective duration of the fund’s holdings; and their credit quality as high, medium, or low based on letter (oralphanumeric) credit ratings of the long bonds owned by third party credit rating agencies. The nine possible combinations of these characteristicscorrespond to the nine squares of the Morningstar Style Box -- quality is displayed along the vertical axis and sensitivity to interest rate along thehorizontal axis.

Morningstar seeks credit rating information from fund companies on a periodic basis (e.g., quarterly). In compiling credit rating informationMorningstar accepts credit ratings reported by fund companies that have been issued by all Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations(NRSROs). For a list of all NRSROs, please visit http://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/ratingagency.htm. Additionally, Morningstar accepts foreigncredit ratings from widely recognized or registered rating agencies. If two rating organizations/agencies have rated a security, fund companies are toreport the lower rating; if three or more organizations/agencies have rated a security, fund companies are to report the median rating, and in caseswhere there are more than two organization/agency ratings and a median rating does not exist, fund companies are to use the lower of the twomiddle ratings. PLEASE NOTE: Morningstar, Inc. is not itself an NRSRO nor does it issue a credit rating on the fund. An NRSRO or rating agencyratings can change from time-to-time.

For credit quality, Morningstar combines the credit rating information provided by the fund companies with an average default rate calculation tocome up with a weighted-average credit quality. The weighted-average credit quality is currently a letter that roughly corresponds to the scale usedby a leading NRSRO. Bond funds are assigned a style box placement of "low", "medium", or "high" based on their average credit quality. Funds with a

Page 28: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES

PAGE 28 OF 34

low credit quality are those whose weighted-average credit quality is determined to be less than "BBB-"; medium are those less than "AA-", butgreater or equal to "BBB-"; and high are those with a weighted-average credit quality of "AA-" or higher. When classifying a bond portfolio,Morningstar first maps the NRSRO credit ratings of the underlying holdings to their respective default rates (as determined by Morningstar’sanalysis of actual historical default rates). Morningstar then averages these default rates to determine the average default rate for the entire bondfund. Finally, Morningstar maps this average default rate to its corresponding credit rating along a convex curve.

For interest-rate sensitivity, Morningstar obtains from fund companies the average effective duration. Generally, Morningstar classifies a fixed-income fund’s interest-rate sensitivity based on the effective duration of the Morningstar Core Bond Index (MCBI), which is currently three years. Theclassification of Limited will be assigned to those funds whose average effective duration is between 25% to 75% of MCBI’s average effectiveduration; funds whose average effective duration is between 75% to 125% of the MCBI will be classified as Moderate; and those that are at 125%or greater of the average effective duration of the MCBI will be classified as Extensive.

For municipal bond funds, Morningstar also obtains from fund companies the average effective duration. In these cases, static breakpoints areutilized. These breakpoints are as follows: (i) Limited: 4.5 years or less; (ii) Moderate: more than 4.5 years but less than 7 years; and (iii) Extensive:more than 7 years. In addition, for non-US taxable and non-US domiciled fixed income funds static duration breakpoints are used: (i) Limited: lessthan or equal to 3.5 years; (ii) Moderate: greater than 3.5 and less than equal to 6 years; (iii) Extensive: greater than 6 years.

The referenced data elements below are a weighted average of the long fixed income holdings in the portfolio.

Average Effective Duration is a weighted average of the duration of the underlying fixed income securities within the portfolio.

Average Effective Maturity is a weighted average of all the maturities of the bonds in a portfolio, computed by weighting each maturity date by themarket value of the security.

Average Weighted Price is generated from the fund’s portfolio by weighting the price of each bond by its relative size in the portfolio. This numberreveals if the fund favors bonds selling at prices above or below face value (premium or discount securities, respectively). A higher number indicates abias toward premiums. This statistic is expressed as a percentage of par (face) value.

Credit Quality Breakdowns are shown for corporate-bond holdings and depict the quality of bonds in the underlying portfolio. The report shows thepercentage of fixed-income securities that fall within each credit quality rating as assigned by an NRSRO. Bonds not rated by an NRSRO areincluded in the not rated (NR) category.

Turnover Ratio is a decent proxy for how frequently a manager trades his or her portfolio. The inverse of a fund’s turnover ratio is the average holdingperiod for a security in the fund. As turnover increases, a fund’s brokerage costs typically rise as well.

WEIGHTINGS & HOLDINGS

Sector Weightings. Calculated for all stock and bond funds based on the securities in the fund’s most recent portfolio. For stock funds, this statisticshows the percentage of the fund’s stock assets invested in each of the 12 major equity sectors. For taxable bond funds, this statistic shows thepercent of the fund’s cash and bond assets invested in each of the 14 fixed-income sectors. For municipal bond funds, this statistic shows thepercentage of the fund’s municipal assets invested in each of the 11 muni sectors.

Regional Weightings. This data set provides a broad breakdown of a fund’s geographical exposure for a region. Each region’s exposure is presentedas a percentage of non-cash equity assets held by the fund. Regional exposure information summarizes a portfolio’s exposure to geopolitical risk.

Page 29: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES: INDEX DESCRIPTIONS

PAGE 29 OF 34

Barclays.

This following indices are part of this family:

BBgBarc EM USD Aggregate TR USD. The index measures the performance of hard currency Emerging Markets debt, including fixed andfloating-rate US dollar-denominated debt issued from sovereign, quasi-sovereign, and corporate EM issuers. Country eligibility and classificationas Emerging Markets is rules-based and reviewed annually using World Bank income group and International Monetary Fund (IMF) countryclassifications.

BBgBarc US Govt/Credit 1-5 Yr TR USD. The index measures the performance of the non-securitized component of the U.S. AggregateIndex including treasuries, government-related issues and corporates with maturities of one to five years. It is a subset of the U.S. AggregateIndex.

BBgBarc US Universal TR USD. The index measures the performance of USD-denominated, taxable bonds that are rated either investmentgrade or high-yield. It represents the union of the U.S. Aggregate Index, U.S. Corporate High Yield Index, Investment Grade 144A Index,Eurodollar Index, U.S. Emerging Markets Index, and the non-ERISA eligible portion of the CMBS Index.

Morningstar.

This following indices are part of this family:

Morningstar Mod Tgt Risk TR USD. The Morningstar Target Risk Index family is designed to meet the needs of investors who would like tomaintain a target level of equity exposure through a portfolio diversified across equities, bonds and inflation-hedged instruments. TheMorningstar Moderate Target Risk Index seeks approximately 60% exposure to global equity markets.

MSCI. © 2019 MSCI. All Rights Reserved. Without prior written permission of MSCI, this information and any other MSCI intellectual property mayonly be used for your internal use, may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form and may not be used to create any financial instruments orproducts or any indices. This information is provided on an as is basis, and the user of this information assumes the entire risk of any use made ofthis information. Neither MSCI nor any third party involved in or related to the computing or compiling of the data makes any express or impliedwarranties, representations or guarantees concerning the MSCI index-related data, and in no event will MSCI or any third party have any liability forany direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) relating to any use of this information.

This following indices are part of this family:

MSCI ACWI Ex USA Growth NR USD. The index measures the performance of the growth large and mid cap segments of the particularregions, excluding USA equity securities, including developed and emerging market. It is free float-adjusted market-capitalization weighted.

MSCI ACWI Ex USA NR USD. The index measures the performance of the large and mid cap segments of the particular regions, excludingUSA equity securities, including developed and emerging market. It is free float-adjusted market-capitalization weighted.

MSCI EM NR USD. The index measures the performance of the large and mid cap segments of emerging market equity securities. It is freefloat-adjusted market-capitalization weighted.

MSCI World/Metals & Mining NR USD. The index measures the performance of the large and mid cap metals and mining (industry) segmentsof world equity securities. It is constructed using GICS-Global Industry Classification Standard. The index is free float-adjusted market-capitalization weighted.

Russell. Russell Investment Group is the source and owner of the trademarks, service marks and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes. Russell®is a trademark of Russell Investment Group.

This following indices are part of this family:

Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. The index measures the performance of the large-cap growth segment of the US equity securities. It includesthe Russell 1000 index companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. It is market-capitalization weighted.Russell Investment Group is the source and owner of the trademarks, service marks and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes. Russell® is atrademark of Russell Investment Group.

group@@@IlN0YXRlbWVudCBvZiBBZGRpdGlvbmFsIERpc2Nsb3N1cmVzOiBJbmRleCBEZXNjcmlwdGlvbnMi@@@

Page 30: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES: INDEX DESCRIPTIONS

PAGE 30 OF 34

Russell 1000 Value TR USD. The index measures the performance of the large-cap value segment of the US equity securities. It includes theRussell 1000 index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower expected growth values. It is market-capitalization weighted. RussellInvestment Group is the source and owner of the trademarks, service marks and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes. Russell® is atrademark of Russell Investment Group.

Russell 2000 Growth TR USD. The index measures the performance of small-cap growth segment of the US equity universe. It includesthose Russell 2000 companies with higher price-to-value ratios and higher forecasted growth values. It is market-capitalization weighted.Russell Investment Group is the source and owner of the trademarks, service marks and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes. Russell® is atrademark of Russell Investment Group.

Russell 2000 Value TR USD. The index measures the performance of small-cap value segment of the US equity universe. It includes thoseRussell 2000 companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values. It is market-capitalization weighted. RussellInvestment Group is the source and owner of the trademarks, service marks and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes. Russell® is atrademark of Russell Investment Group.

Russell Mid Cap TR USD. The index measures the performance of the mid-cap segment of the US equity universe. It is a subset of Russell1000 index and includes approximately 800 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current indexmembership. The index represents approximately 31% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 1000 companies.

Russell Mid Cap Value TR USD. The index measures the performance of the mid-cap value segment of the US equity universe. It includesRussell midcap index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values. It is market-capitalization weighted.

S&P. © 2019 Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. Reproduction of the S&P Dow Jones Indices in any form is prohibited except with the priorwritten permission of S&P. S&P does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, completeness or availability of any information and is not responsible forany errors or omissions, regardless of the cause or for the results obtained from the use of such information. S&P DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALLEXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR APARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. In no event shall S&P be liable for any direct, indirect, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legalfees, or losses (including lost income or lost profit and opportunity costs) in connection with subscriber's or others' use of S&P Dow Jones Indices.

This following indices are part of this family:

S&P 1500 Health Care TR. The index measures the performance of health care(sector) segment of US equity securities. It comprises thosecompanies included in the S&P Composite 1500 that are classified as members of the Global Industry Classification Standard(GICS) HealthCare (sector).

S&P Global REIT TR USD. The index measures the performance of publicly traded equity REITs listed in both developed and emergingmarkets. It is a member of the S&P Global Property Index Series.

Page 31: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES: PEER GROUP DESCRIPTIONS

PAGE 31 OF 34

Allocation--50% to 70% Equity (MA). Funds in allocation categories seek to provide both income and capital appreciation by investing inmultiple asset classes, including stocks, bonds, and cash. These portfolios are dominated by domestic holdings and have equity exposuresbetween 50% and 70%.

Diversified Emerging Mkts (EM). Diversified emerging-markets portfolios tend to divide their assets among 20 or more nations, althoughthey tend to focus on the emerging markets of Asia and Latin America rather than on those of the Middle East, Africa, or Europe. Theseportfolios invest predominantly in emerging market equities, but some funds also invest in both equities and fixed income investments fromemerging markets.

Emerging Markets Bond (EB). Emerging-markets bond portfolios invest more than 65% of their assets in foreign bonds from developingcountries. The largest portion of the emerging-markets bond market comes from Latin America, followed by Eastern Europe. Africa, the MiddleEast, and Asia make up the rest.

Equity Precious Metals (SP). Precious-metals portfolios focus on mining stocks, though some do own small amounts of gold bullion. Mostportfolios concentrate on gold-mining stocks, but some have significant exposure to silver-, platinum-, and base-metal-mining stocks as well.Precious-metals companies are typically based in North America, Australia, or South Africa.

Foreign Large Blend (FB). Foreign large-blend portfolios invest in a variety of big international stocks. Most of these portfolios divide theirassets among a dozen or more developed markets, including Japan, Britain, France, and Germany. These portfolios primarily invest in stocksthat have market caps in the top 70% of each economically integrated market (such as Europe or Asia ex-Japan). The blend style is assigned toportfolios where neither growth nor value characteristics predominate. These portfolios typically will have less than 20% of assets invested inU.S. stocks.

Foreign Large Growth (FG). Foreign large-growth portfolios focus on high-priced growth stocks, mainly outside of the United States. Most ofthese portfolios divide their assets among a dozen or more developed markets, including Japan, Britain, France, and Germany. These portfoliosprimarily invest in stocks that have market caps in the top 70% of each economically integrated market (such as Europe or Asia ex-Japan).Growth is defined based on fast growth (high growth rates for earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow) and high valuations (high price ratiosand low dividend yields). These portfolios typically will have less than 20% of assets invested in U.S. stocks.

Global Real Estate (GR). Global real estate portfolios invest primarily in non-U.S. real estate securities but may also invest in U.S. real estatesecurities. Securities that these portfolios purchase include: debt securities, equity securities, convertible securities, and securities issued by realestate investment trusts and REIT-like entities. Portfolios in this category also invest in real estate operating companies.

Health (SH). Health portfolios focus on the medical and health-care industries. Most invest in a range of companies, buying everything frompharmaceutical and medical-device makers to HMOs, hospitals, and nursing homes. A few portfolios concentrate on just one industry segment,such as service providers or biotechnology firms.

Intermediate Core Bond (CI). Intermediate-term core bond portfolios invest primarily in investment-grade U.S. fixed-income issues includinggovernment, corporate, and securitized debt, and hold less than 5% in below-investment-grade exposures. Their durations (a measure ofinterest-rate sensitivity) typically range between 75% and 125% of the three-year average of the effective duration of the Morningstar CoreBond Index.

Intermediate Core-Plus Bond (PI). Intermediate-term core-plus bond portfolios invest primarily in investment-grade U.S. fixed-income issuesincluding government, corporate, and securitized debt, but generally have greater flexibility than core offerings to hold non-core sectors such ascorporate high yield, bank loan, emerging-markets debt, and non-U.S. currency exposures. Their durations (a measure of interest-ratesensitivity) typically range between 75% and 125% of the three-year average of the effective duration of the Morningstar Core Bond Index.

Large Growth (LG). Large-growth portfolios invest primarily in big U.S. companies that are projected to grow faster than other large-capstocks. Stocks in the top 70% of the capitalization of the U.S. equity market are defined as large cap. Growth is defined based on fast growth(high growth rates for earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow) and high valuations (high price ratios and low dividend yields). Most of theseportfolios focus on companies in rapidly expanding industries.

Large Value (LV). Large-value portfolios invest primarily in big U.S. companies that are less expensive or growing more slowly than otherlarge-cap stocks. Stocks in the top 70% of the capitalization of the U.S. equity market are defined as large cap. Value is defined based on lowvaluations (low price ratios and high dividend yields) and slow growth (low growth rates for earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow).

group@@@IlN0YXRlbWVudCBvZiBBZGRpdGlvbmFsIERpc2Nsb3N1cmVzOiBQZWVyIEdyb3VwIERlc2NyaXB0aW9ucyI=@@@

Page 32: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES: PEER GROUP DESCRIPTIONS

PAGE 32 OF 34

Mid-Cap Blend (MB). The typical mid-cap blend portfolio invests in U.S. stocks of various sizes and styles, giving it a middle-of-the-roadprofile. Most shy away from high-priced growth stocks but aren't so priceconscious that they land in value territory. The U.S. mid-cap range formarket capitalization typically falls between $1 billion and $8 billion and represents 20% of the total capitalization of the U.S. equity market.The blend style is assigned to portfolios where neither growth nor value characteristics predominate.

Mid-Cap Value (MV). Some mid-cap value portfolios focus on medium-size companies while others land here because they own a mix ofsmall-, mid-, and large-cap stocks. All look for U.S. stocks that are less expensive or growing more slowly than the market. The U.S. mid-caprange for market capitalization typically falls between $1 billion and $8 billion and represents 20% of the total capitalization of the U.S. equitymarket. Value is defined based on low valuations (low price ratios and high dividend yields) and slow growth (low growth rates for earnings,sales, book value, and cash flow).

Miscellaneous Sector (MR). Miscellaneous-sector portfolios invest in specific sectors that do not fit into any of Morningstar’s existing sectorcategories and for which not enough funds exist to merit the creation of a separate category.

Short-Term Bond (CS). Short-term bond portfolios invest primarily in corporate and other investment-grade U.S. fixedincome issues andtypically have durations of 1.0 to 3.5 years. These portfolios are attractive to fairly conservative investors, because they are less sensitive tointerest rates than portfolios with longer durations. Morningstar calculates monthly breakpoints using the effective duration of the MorningstarCore Bond Index in determining duration assignment. Short-term is defined as 25% to 75% of the three-year average effective duration of theMCBI.

Small Growth (SG). Small-growth portfolios focus on faster-growing companies whose shares are at the lower end of the market-capitalization range. These portfolios tend to favor companies in up-and-coming industries or young firms in their early growth stages. Becausethese businesses are fastgrowing and often richly valued, their stocks tend to be volatile. Stocks in the bottom 10% of the capitalization of theU.S. equity market are defined as small cap. Growth is defined based on fast growth (high growth rates for earnings, sales, book value, and cashflow) and high valuations (high price ratios and low dividend yields).

Small Value (SV). Small-value portfolios invest in small U.S. companies with valuations and growth rates below other small-cap peers. Stocksin the bottom 10% of the capitalization of the U.S. equity market are defined as small cap. Value is defined based on low valuations (low priceratios and high dividend yields) and slow growth (low growth rates for earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow).

Page 33: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES: RISKS

PAGE 33 OF 34

Investing involves risk. Loss of principal is possible. An investment in a fund is not a bank deposit, and it is not insured or guaranteed by the FederalDeposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency. Each fund carries its own specific risks which depend on the types ofinvestments in the fund. Investors should review the fund’s prospectus carefully to understand the risks before investing.

In general, some of the risks associated with the Morningstar Categories shown in this report are as follows:

Allocation. Different methods of asset allocation are associated with varying degrees of risks. Conservative portfolios contain low riskinvestments but may not earn any value over time. Moderate portfolios have a higher level of risk than conservative portfolios. Aggressiveportfolios mainly consist of equities, so their value tends to fluctuate widely.

Bonds. Bonds are subject to interest rate risk. As the prevailing level of bond interest rates rise, the value of bonds already held in a portfoliodecline. Portfolios that hold bonds are subject to declines and increases in value due to general changes in interest rates. Bonds are also subjectto prepayment risk, which is the chance that an issuer may exercise its right to prepay its security, if falling interest rates prompt the issuer to doso. Forced to reinvest the unanticipated proceeds at lower interest rates, the fund would experience a decline in income and lose the opportunityfor additional price appreciation.

Emerging Markets. Investments in emerging markets securities may be subject to greater market, credit, currency, liquidity, legal, political, andother risks compared with assets invested in developed foreign countries.

Foreign. Investments in foreign securities may be more volatile than investing solely in U.S. markets due to interest-rate, currency, exchangerate, economic, and political risks. The value of these securities can change more rapidly and extremely than can the value of U.S. securities.Foreign securities are subject to increased issuer risk because foreign issuers may not experience the same degree of regulation as U.S. issuersdo and are held to different reporting, accounting, and auditing standards. In addition, foreign securities are subject to increased costs becausethere are generally higher commission rates on transactions, transfer taxes, higher custodial costs, and the potential for foreign tax charges ondividend and interest payments. Many foreign markets are relatively small, and securities issued in less-developed countries face the risks ofnationalization, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, and adverse changes in investment or exchange control regulations, including suspensionof the ability to transfer currency from a country. Economic, political, social, or diplomatic developments can also negatively impactperformance.

Foreign Currencies. Foreign currencies are subject to the risks associated with such currencies and the changes in their values relative to the U.S.dollar. Such risks include volatility in the price relationship between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies. The value of foreign currencies relativeto the U.S. dollar can be affected by many factors, including national debt levels, trade deficits, international trade and foreign policies, changesin trade and balance of payments, governmental fiscal and monetary policies, currency exchange rates and changes in supply and demand thataffect those rates, investment and trading activity of mutual funds, hedge funds and currency funds, exchange rate controls and governmentintervention in currency markets, inflation rates, interest and deposit rates, market expectations about future inflation rates and interest rates,and global and national economic, financial, political, regulatory, judicial, military and geographical events or developments. Prices of currenciesof less developed or emerging market nations tend to be more volatile than those of developed countries, given the greater political, regulatory,economic, financial, military and social instability and uncertainty in less developed or emerging market nations.

Large Cap Equities. Concentrating assets in large-capitalization stocks may subject the portfolio to the risk that those stocks underperformother capitalizations or the market as a whole. Large-cap companies may be unable to respond as quickly as small- and mid-cap companies canto new competitive pressures and may lack the growth potential of those securities. Historically, large-cap companies do not recover as quicklyas smaller companies do from market declines.

Real Estate. Real estate investments are subject to various risks that affect their values and the income they generate. Real estate investmentsare affected by changes in the general economy, prevailing interest rates, local economic and market conditions, competition for tenants,declining occupancy rates, oversupply or reduced demand for space where the properties are located, tenant defaults, increased operating,insurance, maintenance and improvement costs. Many costs associated with owning and operating real estate are fixed even when revenuesfrom the properties are declining. Additionally, real estate development activities are subject to various risks, such as excess construction costs,unfavorable financing terms, construction delays and other challenges, issues with the developer, and changing market conditions. Owners andoperators of real estate are also exposed to potential liability under environmental, zoning, tax and other laws.

Sector. Concentrating assets in a particular industry, sector of the economy, or markets may increase volatility because the investment will bemore susceptible to the impact of factors such as the market, the economy, regulations, and other dynamics affecting that industry or sector

group@@@IlN0YXRlbWVudCBvZiBBZGRpdGlvbmFsIERpc2Nsb3N1cmVzOiBSaXNrcyI=@@@

Page 34: Investment Evaluation grou p@ @IkN vd mV yIF Bh Z2 UgK GN ......Jul 03, 2019  · This report is designed to provide performance data and other information regarding a portfolio of

Please see important disclosures in the Statement of Additional Disclosures. © 2018, Fi360, Inc. All rights reserved. The analysis and opinionsgenerated by Fi360, Inc. do not constitute professional investment advice and are provided solely for information purposes.

Investment EvaluationInvestment Data as of 05/31/2019.

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES: RISKS

PAGE 34 OF 34

compared with a more broadly diversified asset allocation.

Small/Mid Cap Equities. Portfolios that invest in stocks of small- to mid-cap companies involve additional risks. Smaller companies typicallyhave a higher risk of failure and are not as well established as larger blue-chip companies. Historically, smaller company stocks have experienceda greater degree of market volatility that the overall market average.

Taxable Bond. Investments in taxable bonds such as government bonds, long-term and short-term bonds, bank loans, corporate bonds,preferred stock, high-yield bonds, etc. are subject to numerous risks including those relating to reinvestment, inflation, market, selection, timing,and duration.