investmentanalysis alc rm ar edits 2019 tip investment analysis page 1 june 18, 2018 introduction...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Draft 2019 TIP June 18, 2018
APPENDIX A 3
2 0 1 9 T I P I n v e s t m e n t A n a l y s i s
-
2019 TIP Investment Analysis
AFOCUSONLOWINCOMEANDMINORITYPOPULATIONS,SENIORS,ANDPERSONSWITHDISABILITIES
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 1 June 18, 2018
INTRODUCTION The2019TIPInvestmentAnalysisisanassessmentofTIPinvestmentsthroughanequitylens,specificallyfocusedontheBayAreasdisadvantagedpopulations.Thepurposeoftheanalysisistounderstandiflowincomeandminoritypopulations,seniors,andpersonswithdisabilitiesaresharingequitablyintheregionsneartermtransportationinvestments.2019TIPTheBayAreas2019TIPcoversthefouryearperiodofFY201819throughFY202122andincludesmorethan500transportationprojectswith$13billionincommittedfundingduringthefouryearperiod.ProjectsintheTIPTheTIPincludesalltransportationprojectsthatarefederallyfunded,requireafederalaction,orareconsideredregionallysignificantforairqualityconformitypurposes.ThemajorityofprojectsintheTIParefederallyfunded,althoughsomelocalorstatefundedprojectsarealsoincluded,particularlythosethatarelargeinscaleorimpacttravelpatternsoverarelativelylargegeographicarea,suchasanewlaneonastatehighway.InreviewingTIPinvestmentsasawhole,itisimportanttokeepinmindthatmosttransportationprojectsarelocal,inbothscaleandfunding,andtheseprojectsaretypicallynotreflectedintheTIP.Theseprojectsincludepavementpreservation,transitoperationsandmaintenance,planningefforts,bicycle/pedestrianimprovements,andminorintersectionimprovements.AllprojectsincludedintheTIPmustbeconsistentwiththeregionslongrangeplan,PlanBayArea2040(thePlan).Assuch,theTIPrepresentsafouryearsnapshotthatisasmallpartofthe24yearsofthePlan.InadditiontothetotalinvestmentscapturedintheTIPversusthePlan,thereisanimportantdifferencebetweenthesetwodocumentsthatcomplicatesanysidebysidecomparison.WhilethePlanincludestheuniverseofrevenuesreasonablyexpectedtobeavailable(federal,state,local,andprivatefunds)toimplementplannedtransportationprojects,program,andstrategies,theTIPismuchmorefocusedonprojectswithfederalfundingorthataffectairqualityconformity.ThismeansthattheTIPismoreheavilyweightedtowardlargecapitalprojects,suchastransitandhighwayexpansions,thataremorelikelytorequirefederalfundsoraction.Thevastmajorityoffundsthatgotooperate,maintain,andmanagetheregionsexistingtransportationsystem,atoppriorityofthelongrangeplan,arenottypicallycapturedinaTIPastheytendtobelocallyfunded.SeeFigure1,onthefollowingpage,foranillustrationofthisdistinction.
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 2 June 18, 2018
Figure1.TIPandPlanInvestmentsbyMode/Type
$303billion
24years$13.2billion
4yearsThenarrowerfocusoftheTIPalsomeansonlyafractionoftotalregionaltransportationexpendituresarecapturedinanygivenyear.Onaverage,oneyearofinvestmentsinthe2019TIPaccountsforonlyaquarterofannualexpendituresintheregionallongrangeplan.AnotherfeatureoftheTIPthatdistinguishesitfromtheregionallongrangeplanisthatittendstobeamoredynamicdocumentmeaningthatitisrevisedfrequentlytoreflectchangingfundingandprojectchanges,andongoingfundingefforts.Forcontext,the2017TIPwasamendedormodifiedmorethan30timesinthetwoyearsfollowingitsfederalapproval.EquityandEnvironmentalJusticeConsiderationsAsthefederallydesignatedMetropolitanPlanningOrganization(MPO)fortheBayArea,MTCisrequiredtoensurethattheregionstransportationplanningprocessescomplywithapplicableequityandenvironmentaljusticerequirements.Thelegal,regulatory,andpolicyframeworkforaddressingthoseissuesisdescribedinAppendixAandincludes: TitleVIoftheCivilRightsAct:statesthatnopersonshallbesubjectto
discriminationbasedonhisorherrace,colorornationaloriginunderanyfederallyfundedprogram.
FederalGuidanceonEnvironmentalJustice:requirementthatfederalprogramsandfundsdonotresultindisproportionatelyhighandadverseimpactsonminorityandlowincomepopulations.
MTCsEnvironmentalJusticePrinciples:adoptedprinciplesthataffirmMTCsongoingcommitmentsto:
Operate+Maintain72%
Modernize16%
Expand10%
DebtService+CostContingency
2%
PlanBayArea2040InvestmentsExpendituresbyInvestmentStrategy
Operate+Maintain34%
Modernize19%
Expand47%
DebtService+CostContingency
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 3 June 18, 2018
Createanopenandtransparentpublicparticipationprocessthatempowersdisadvantagedcommunitiestoparticipateindecisionmakingthataffectsthem,and
Collectaccurateandcurrentdataessentialtodefiningandunderstandingthepresenceandextentofinequities,ifany,intransportationfundingbasedonraceandincome.
MTCsatisfiesitsrequirementsforequityandenvironmentaljusticeprimarilythroughPlanBayAreasEquityAnalysis,MTCsPublicParticipationPlan,andMTCsbroaderTitleVIprogram.TofurtherbuilduponMTCscommitmenttoaddressequityconcerns,theTIPInvestmentAnalysisprovidesthepublicwithanadditionalopportunitytoassesstheregionstransportationinvestments.
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 4 June 18, 2018
BAY AREA COMMUNITY CONTEXT DemographicProfileAnimportantfirststepoftheinvestmentanalysisistounderstandthedemographiccontextandtravelpatternsfortheBayArea.Race/EthnicityTheBayAreaisoneofthemostdiverseregionsinthecountry,with60percentofthepopulationselfidentifyingasmembersofaracialand/orethnicminority.Inthismajorityminorityregion,aquarterofthepopulationidentifiesasAsian(25%),followedcloselybyHispanicorLatino(24%),andthenBlackorAfricanAmerican(6%).Otherracialminorities,includingthoseidentifyingastwoormoreraces,accountfortheremaining5%ofthepopulation.
TABLE1.PopulationDistributionbyRace/Ethnicity Population
(inmillions) %Minority 4.6 60%Asian 2.0 25%HispanicorLatino 1.8 24%BlackorAfricanAmerican 0.4 6%Otherminority 0.4 5%
NonMinority 3.0 40%Total 7.6 100%
Notes:TabulationpreparedbyMTCbasedondatafrom2016AmericanCommunitySurvey,TableC03002.IncomeAlthoughtheBayAreaseconomyhasshownstronggrowthoverthepastfewdecades,regionallevelsofpovertypersist.Nearlyninepercentofthepopulationlivesbelowthefederalpovertylevel($24,300ayearforafamilyoffour).Another12percentoftheregionshouseholdsaretechnicallyabovethefederalpovertylinebutstillqualifyaslowincomeforthepurposesofthisanalysis,definedashouseholdswithincomesthatfallbelow$50,000(approximately200percentofthefederalpovertylineforafamilyoffour).Forreference,the2016medianincomeforafamilyoffourrangesfromjustover$69,000inSolanoCountytomorethan$101,000inSantaClaraCounty.
TABLE2.PopulationDistributionbyHouseholdIncome Population
(inmillions) %LowIncome 1.6 21%$150,000 2.7 36%
Total 7.5 100%
Notes:TabulationpreparedbyMTCbasedondatafrom2016AmericanCommunitySurveyPublicUseMicrodataSamples.Incomeiscalculatedin2016denominateddollars.Notethattheuniverseispersonsinhouseholdsandexcludespersonslivingingroupquarters.
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 5 June 18, 2018
SeniorsandPersonswithDisabilitiesMorethan14%oftheBayAreaspopulationisaged65orolder.PersonsreportingdisabilitiesacrosssixcategoriesdefinedbytheCensusBureautotalnearly10%oftheregionspopulation.
TABLE3.SeniorsandPersonswithDisabilities
Population(inmillions) %
Seniors 1.1 14%PersonswithDisabilities 0.8 10%
Notes:TabulationpreparedbyMTCbasedondatafrom2016AmericanCommunitySurveyTablesC18101andB01001.Notethattheuniverseisciviliannoninstitutionalizedpopulationcountedindisability.
TravelPatternsCommutetripsbyBayArearesidentsareoverwhelminglymadebymotorvehicle(76%)followedbytransit(12%),nonmotorizedtrips(5%),telecommute(6%),andothermodes(1%).
TABLE4.ShareofCommuteTripsbyModebyPopulation Low
Income Minority SeniorsTotal
PopulationRoadway(Motorized) 73% 78% 73% 76%Roadway(Nonmotorized) 8% 4% 4% 5%Transit 11% 12% 8% 12%Telecommute 6% 4% 14% 6%Other 2% 1% 1% 1%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
Notes:TabulationpreparedbyMTCbasedondatafrom2016AmericanCommunitySurveyPublicUseMicrodataSamples.Incomeiscalculatedin2016denominateddollars.Notethattheuniverseispersonsinhouseholdsandexcludespersonslivingingroupquarters.Theshareofalltrips(includingbothcommuteandnoncommutetrips)madebytargetpopulationgroupsisprovidedinTable4below.Whiletherearedifferencesinthetravelpatternsoflowincome,minorityandseniorpopulations,thevastmajorityofalltripsarecategorizedasroadwaytrips,whichincludeshighwayandroadwaytravelaswellastripsmadebywalkingorbiking.
TABLE5.ShareofCommuteandNonCommuteTripsbyModebyPopulation Low
Income Minority SeniorsTotal
PopulationRoadway(Motorized) 74% 80% 82% 80%Roadway(Nonmotorized) 18% 14% 14% 15%Transit 7% 6% 4% 5%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
Notes:Tabulationbasedon2012CaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey.Tabulationdoesnotincludeshareoftripsmadebypersonswithdisabilitiesduetosamplesizelimitations.
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 6 June 18, 2018
METHODOLOGY The2019TIPinvestmentanalysisisbuiltonthreecomponentsthatworktogethertoinformhowlowincomeandminoritycommunities,seniors,andpersonswithdisabilitiesmaybeaffectedbytheproposedinvestmentsinthe2019TIP.
Themethodologiesusedineachanalysisaredescribedinmoredetailbelow.AppendixBincludesdefinitionsanddatasourcesusedinthisanalysis.PopulationUseBasedAnalysisThisportionoftheanalysiscomparestheestimatedpercentofinvestmentsincludedintheTIPthatbenefitlowincomeandminoritypopulations,aswellasseniors,tothepercentofthesepopulationsrelativeusageofthetransportationsystem,forbothroadwaysandtransit.Theanalysismeasurestransitandmotorvehicletripsusingthe20122013CaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey.
1. Forthisanalysis,investmentsintheTIPareseparatedintotwomodes:transitandlocalstreetsandroads/highway(referredtoasroadway).Forsimplicity,pedestrianandbicycleprojectsareassignedtolocalstreetsandroadsandnotevaluatedasaseparatemodeoftravelorinvestmenttype.Forreference,AppendixCincludesmapsforeachcountywithprojectsshownwiththeirroadwayortransitcategorization.
2. Toanalyzewhatshareofeachmode(transitandroadway)lowincome,minority,andseniorpopulationsutilize,thefollowingdefinitionsareusedtoidentifydisadvantagedpopulations: LowIncomeHouseholds:Lowincomehouseholdsweredefinedashouseholds
earning$50,000orless.Thisisroughlyequivalentto200percentofthefederalpovertylevelforafamilyoffour.
MinorityHouseholds:Forthisanalysis,minorityhouseholdsweredefinedusingU.S.CensusBureaudefinitions.RacialandethnicminoritiesexaminedinthisanalysisareHispanic,blackorAfricanAmerican,Asian,andotherortwoormoreraces.
Seniors:Seniorsaredefinedaspersonsaged65andover.
PopulationUseBasedAnalysisPercentofinvestmentsthatwouldlikelybeusedbylowincomeandminoritypopulations,andseniors
DisparateImpactAnalysisPercapitaandperridertransitinvestmentslikelybenefitingracialorethnicminorities
TransportationEquityMeasuresAnalysisMapsandsummarydataonprojectsthatsupportPlanBayArea2040stransportationfocusedequitymeasures
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 7 June 18, 2018
3. Theassignmentofinvestmentsbyusageisthenperformedbymultiplyingthepercentofuseofthemodebytheinvestmentinthatparticularmode.Thisanalysisisconductedatthecountylevelforhighwaysandroadwaysandatthetransitoperatorlevelfortransit.Forthemultimodal,aggregateanalysis,tripdatafromthehouseholdtravelsurveyisused.Asanillustrativeexample,lowincomepopulationsmake32%ofAlamedaCountyroadwaytrips.Fora$50millionstatehighwayprojectinthatcounty,32%or$16million,wouldbeassignedasafinancialbenefittolowincomepopulationsandtheremaining68%,or$34million,totheremainingpopulation.Asimilarapproachisfollowedfortransitinvestmentsbyoperator.Asimilaranalysisisconductedusingroadwayvehiclemilestraveled(VMT)andtransitorigindestinationdistance.Fortheindepthanalysis,transitusagedataisderivedfromthemostrecenttransitsurveydataavailableforeachoperatorthroughMTCsongoingTransitPassengerDemographicSurvey.Forindepthroadwayusage,VMTdataisusedfromthehouseholdtravelsurvey.
4. Theinvestmentsbymode(fromcountyortransitoperatordata)aresummedforlowincome,minority,andseniorpopulationsbasedoneachgroupsusageshareofeachmode.Thepercentofusageofthesystembythetargetandotherpopulationsisthencomparedtothepercentofinvestmentfortripssupportingthatpopulation.
DisparateImpactAnalysisThisportionoftheanalysiscompares2019TIPinvestmentspercapitaforracialorethnicminoritypopulationstopercapitainvestmentsidentifiedfornonminoritypopulations,toinvestigatewhetherdisadvantagedpersonsintheregionarereceivinganequitableshareofthebenefitsfromTIPinvestments.DuetothesimilaritiesintheanalysisrequiredbytheFederalTransitAdministration(FTA)forthelongrangetransportationplan,thisportionoftheanalysisisalsoreferredtoastheTitleVIanalysis.ThedisparateimpactanalysisisnotarequiredcomponentoftheTIP,andisprovidedforinformationalpurposesonly.Thisportionoftheanalysisfocusesonfederalandstatefundedprojectsonly.SomeoftheStateandFederalfundsourcesincludedareFTA5307,FTA5309,FTA5311,FTA5337funds,STP/CMAQ,Proposition1B,andSenateBill1(SB1)funds.Inaddition,allracialorethnicminoritygroups(Asian,BlackorAfricanAmerican,HispanicorLatinoandotherminorities)areevaluatedcollectivelyincomparisontotheinvestmentspercapitafornonminoritypopulations.Thedisparateimpactanalysisincorporatesthequantitativeresultsproducedbythepopulation/usebasedanalysisforstateandfederallyfundedprojects.Investmentsarefirstexpressedintermsofinvestmentspercapitaforbothminorityandnonminoritytransitriders(ortotalpopulation)intheregionasfollows:
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 8 June 18, 2018
Minoritybenefitpercapita= Totaltransitinvestmentsallocatedtominorityriders Totalregionalminoritytransitridership(orpopulation) Nonminoritybenefitpercapita=Totaltransitinvestmentsallocatedtononminorityriders Totalregionalnonminoritytransitridership(orpopulation)Next,theminorityandnonminoritypercapitabenefitresultsarecompared,expressingtheminoritybenefitpercapitaasapercentageofthenonminoritybenefitpercapita:Result(%)=Minoritybenefitpercapita Nonminoritybenefitpercapita
AlthoughFTAdoesnotprovidespecificguidanceorstandardbenchmarksforMPOstouseinthemetropolitanplanningprocesstodeterminewhetheranygivenresultforalongrangeplanrepresentsadisparateimpact,ageneralpracticeistousethepercentageresulttodeterminewhetheranydifferencesbetweenbenefitsforminorityornonminoritypopulationsmaybeconsideredstatisticallysignificant.Ifadisparateimpactinthelongrangeplanisfoundtobestatisticallysignificant,considerationmustthenbegiventowhetherthereisasubstantiallegitimatejustificationforthepolicythatresultedinthedisparateimpacts,andiftherearealternativesthatcouldbeemployedthatwouldhavealessdiscriminatoryimpact.1Asstatedearlier,thedisparateimpactanalysisisnotafederalrequirementfortheTIP,andisincludedinthe2019TIPInvestmentAnalysisforinformationalpurposes.TransportationEquityMeasuresAnalysisThethirdcomponentoftheanalysishighlightsprojectsandinvestmentsthatarelikelytosupportourregionalperformancetargetsinfivetransportationrelatedequitymeasuresfromPlanBayArea2040.PlanBayArea2040GoalArea Goal# PerformanceTargetHealthyandSafeCommunities
3 Reducedadversehealthimpactsassociatedwithairquality,roadsafety,andphysicalinactivityby10%
EconomicVitality 8 Increaseby20%theshareofjobsaccessiblewithin30minutesbyautoorwithin45minutesbytransitincongestedconditions
TransportationSystemEffectiveness
12 Reducevehicleoperatingandmaintenancecostsduetopavementconditionsby100%
13 Reduceperridertransitdelayduetoagedinfrastructureby100%EquitableAccess 5 Decreasetheshareoflowerincomeresidentshouseholdincome
consumedbytransportationandhousingby10%HealthyandSafeCommunitiesProjectsthatareexpectedtocontributetowardsreachingourregionalgoalsforhealthyandsafecommunitiesincludeprojectsthatimproveroadsafety,projectsthatincreasephysicalactivity,andprojectsthatimproveairquality.Theseprojectsareidentifiedby: 1 FTA Circular 4702.1B, page VI-2.
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 9 June 18, 2018
Safety:Projectsidentifiedbytheprojectsponsorsashavingaprimarypurpose
ofaddressingsafety,orasanticipatedtohaveasignificantimpactonreducingfatalitiesandseriousinjuriesforallusers.
PhysicalActivity:Projectsidentifiedbyprojectsponsorsasbeingfocusedprimarilyonbicycleorpedestrians(greaterthan50%oftheprojectsinvestmentsupportsbicyclistsand/orpedestrians),andthetotalinvestmentsincludedintheTIPthatsupportbicycleorpedestrianmoderegardlessoftheprojectsprimarypurpose.
AirQuality:ProjectsfundedwithfederalCongestionMitigationAirQuality
ImprovementProgram(CMAQ),stateCaliforniaAirResourcesBoard(CARB),regionalTransportationforCleanAir(TFCA)grants,orinMTCsClimateInitiativesProgram.
Thenumberandinvestmentleveloftheprojectssupportingthehealthyandsafecommunitiesgoalareaaresummarizedattheregionalandcountylevel.Safetyandactivetransportationprojectsthathavephysicallocations(ex.:acompletestreetsproject,oraninterchangeimprovement)arealsomappedovertheregionsCommunitiesofConcern(COCs).EconomicVitalityTransportationprojectsthatcanbeexpectedtoincreaseaccessibilitytotheshareofjobsbycarandtransitareprojectsthatreducetrafficcongestionorimprovethereliabilityoftheexistingtransportationsystem.Theseprojectsareidentifiedby:
RoadCongestion/Reliability:Roadprojectsidentifiedbytheprojectsponsorsashavingaprimarypurposeofaddressingcongestionorsystemreliability,orprojectsanticipatedashavingasignificantimpactoncongestionreductionorimprovedsystemreliability.
TransitService/Capacity:Transitprojectsidentifiedbytheprojectsponsorsashavingaprimarypurposeofaddressingcongestionorsystemreliability,orprojectsanticipatedashavingasignificantimpactoncongestionreductionorimprovedsystemreliability.
Thenumberandinvestmentlevelofprojectssupportingtheeconomicvitalitygoalareaaresummarizedattheregionalandcountylevel.Additionally,projectsidentifiedasimprovingcongestionorsystemreliabilitythathavephysicallocations(ex.:anewbusrapidtransitproject,oranewHOVorexpresslane)arealsomappedovertheregionsCommunitiesofConcern(COCs).
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 10 June 18, 2018
TransportationSystemEffectivenessThetransportationsystemeffectivenessgoalareaencompassestwoperformancemeasures:pavementconditionandtransitstateofgoodrepair.Theseprojectsareidentifiedby:
PavementCondition:Projectsthatincludeapavementrehabilitationorpreservationcomponent.
TransitStateofGoodRepair:Projectsthatrehabilitateorreplaceexistingtransitassets.
Thenumberandinvestmentlevelofprojectssupportingimprovedpavementconditionsaresummarizedattheregionallevelandcountylevel.Additionally,pavementprojectsarealsomappedovertheregionsCommunitiesofConcern(COCs).Transitstateofgoodrepairinvestmentsaresummarizedattheregionalandtransitoperatorlevel.Astransitassetprojectstendtobesystemwide,ratherthantiedtoastaticlocation,theyarenotincludedintheTransportationSystemEffectivenessmaps.Transitprojectsassociatedwithneworexpandedserviceinspecificlocations,suchasanewlightrailline,arerepresentedintheEconomicVitalitymaps.EquitableAccessTheEquitableAccesscomponentiscalculatedattheprogramlevelforthe2019TIP.ReplicatingPlanBayArea2040smethodology,dataisprovidedfromtheregionaltransportationmodeltoreportthetransportationcostsforlowincomehouseholdsin2022(endofthe2019TIPperiod)ascomparedtothetransportationcostsforthegeneralpopulation.Inthetravelmodel,andthusforpurposesofthiscalculation,lowincomehouseholdsaredefinedasthoseearninglessthan$60,000peryearinyear2000dollars,roughlyreflectingthelowertwoquartilesoftheincomespectrum.GiventhefocusoftheTIPontransportationinvestments,thehousingcostsportionoftheEquitableAccessmeasureisexcludedfromthisanalysis.LimitationsAsaregionalanalysis,themethodsusedintheTIPinvestmentanalysishaveseverallimitations.Themostsignificantlimitationisthattheanalysisdoesnotdirectlyassesstheresultingbenefitandburdenofspecificprojectsorprograms,suchastraveltimesavingsorimprovedaccessibilitytojobsorotherdestinations.Otherlimitationsare:
TIPisasnapshotintime:ItisalsoimportanttoreemphasizethattheTIPdoesnotreflectthefullpictureoftransportationinvestmentsintheBayAreaoverthelongterm.Asdiscussedintheintroduction,theTIPonlyincludesfouryearsofneartermfundprogramming,comparedtothe20+yearsforecastinPlanBayArea2040.Also,fundingshownintheTIPisincludedintheyearthatprojectphasesbeginorareobligatedanddoesnotreflecttheactualflowoffundingandexpenditureswithinthesephases.Whilerehabilitationprogramswilltypicallyhavetheirfundingspread
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 11 June 18, 2018
acrossmanyyears,largecapitalprojectstendtohavetheirfundinglumpedintoasingleyearintheTIP,evenifthefundswillactuallybeexpendedoveranumberofyears,someofwhichmaybeoutsidethe4yearperiodoftheTIP.
Notesonassumptions:Inaddition,theanalysisassumesthatmodechoiceand
systemusageremainsconstantovertime.Systemexpansion,suchasanewtransitlineorhighway,andchangingconditions,suchasimprovementstoreliabilityandtravelcosts,tendtoinfluencetravelbehaviorovertime.However,thisanalysisassumesthattheusagederivedintherecenttravelsurveyandtransitpassengersurveysremainstaticovertime.Theclassificationofinvestmentsintoeitherroadwayortransitinvestmentsalsopresentssomelimitations.Forexample,classifyingapavementrehabilitationprojectasstrictlyroadwaydoesnotaccountforthebenefittotheregionstransitvehiclesthatsharethestreetwithprivateautomobiles.
Mappinglimitations:Mappingprojectsprovidesavisualrepresentationofthe
locationofprojectsinrelationtoCOCs.However,projectmappingalsopresentscertainlimitations.First,notallsignificantregionalinvestmentsaremappable.Forexample,asubstantialshareoftotalfundingintheTIPisdedicatedtotransitoperatorsforongoingmaintenanceoftheirentiresystem,whichcannotberepresentedasasimplepointorlineonamapinrelationtoaspecificcommunity.Second,displayinginvestmentsonamapdoesnottranslateintoadirectbenefitorburdenforthesurroundingcommunities.Giventheselimitations,themappinganalysisprovidesaqualitative,ratherthanquantitative,assessmentofthespatialdistributionofmappableprojectsincludedintheTIP.
Fundingandprojecttypes:Giventhedocumentsfederalfocus,theinvestmentsreflectedintheTIPrepresentonlyaboutaquarterofalltransportationinvestmentsintheBayAreaatanygiventime.Asaresult,theinvestmentanalysisdoesnotcapturetheequityimplicationsofmanylocallyfundedprojects.Localprojectstendtobesmaller,inbothgeographyandscope,butcollectively,theseprojectsareexpectedtohaveasignificantimpactontravelbehaviorsandexperiencesthroughouttheregion.
Demographicdata:Whilethelatestavailabledemographicdatawasusedinthe
investmentanalysis,somedatasetshavebeenupdatedmorerecentlythanothers.Theinformationfromthehouseholdtravelsurveyismorethan5yearsold,withdatacollectedfromhouseholdsbetween2012and2013.Thetransitpassengersurveydataismorerecent.However,theexactyearofdatacollectionvaries,asMTCconductsthesurveysbyoperatoronarollingbasis.Giventhepacewithwhichtravelpatternsandbehaviorshavechangedinrecentyears,theyearinwhichdataiscollectedisexpectedtoinfluencetheresultsoftheanalysis.
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 12 June 18, 2018
The2019TIPinvestmentanalysisincludesananalysisofinvestmentsbenefitingseniors.Unfortunately,asimilaranalysisforpersonswithdisabilitiesisnotincludedduetosamplesizelimitationsofthetravelsurvey,anddataunavailabilityfromthetransitpassengerdemographicsurvey.However,aqualitativediscussionofregionaltransportationinvestmentsthatbenefitseniorsandpersonswithdisabilitiesisincludedinthefollowingsection.
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 13 June 18, 2018
ANALYSIS RESULTS & DISCUSSION PopulationUseBasedResultsThepopulationusebasedanalysisisdividedintothreefocusareas:income,race/ethnicity,andseniors.Additionalinformationisalsoprovidedattheendofthissectiononregionaleffortsandinitiativestosupportandbetterunderstandthetransportationneedsofresidentswithtransportationrelateddisabilities.InvestmentsbyIncomeBayArearesidentslivinginlowincomehouseholds,earninglessthan$50,000peryear,accountfornearlyathirdofalltrips(27%)intheregion.Inthe2019TIP,32%ormorethan$4billionisdirectedtoprojectssupportingtripsmadebyresidentsfromlowincomehouseholds.Theshareoftheseinvestmentssupportinglowincometripsexceedstheshareoftripsmadebypersonsfromlowincomehouseholdsbyapproximately5%.SeeTable6andFigures2and3foradditionaldetail.TABLE6.2019TIPInvestmentsandTripsbyIncome
2019TIPInvestments(in$billions)
%ofInvestment
%ofTrips
LowIncome $4.3 32% 27%$150,000 $2.7 20% 23%
Total $13.2 100% 100%FIGURE2.2019TIPInvestmentsandTripsbyIncomeCategory
16% 16% 15% 15% 18% 20%11% 17% 16% 14% 20% 23%0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
$150K
%ofInvestment%ofTrips
Source:Draft2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 14 June 18, 2018
FIGURE3.2019TIPInvestmentsandLowIncomeTrips
Similarly,theshareofinvestmentsinprojectsthatsupporttravelmadebylowincomepopulations(24%)slightlyexceedstheirusageshareofthetransportationsystemintermsofshareofthetotaldistancetraveled(22%)vehiclemilestraveled(VMT)forautotripsandorigindestinationdistancefortransittrips.SeeTable7andFigure4. TABLE7.2019TIPInvestmentsandTravelDistancebyIncome
2019TIPInvestments
(in$billions)%of
Investment
%ofTotalTravel
DistanceLowIncome $3.1 24% 22%$150,000 $3.2 24% 25%
Total $13.2 100% 100%FIGURE4.2019TIPInvestmentsandTravelDistancebyIncomeCategory
32% 27%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ShareofInvestmentforTripsmadebyLowIncomePopulation
ShareofTripsbyLowIncomePopulation
Source:Draft2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey
10%14% 14% 15% 22% 24%
7%15% 16% 15% 22% 25%0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
$150K
%ofInvestment
%ofTravelDistance
Source:Draft2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 15 June 18, 2018
Theanalysisindicatesthattheshareofinvestmentsinlocalroad,statehighwayandtollbridgesystemsthatbenefitdriverslivinginlowincomehouseholds(21%)isverysimilartotheshareoftotalVMTbydriverslivinginlowincomehouseholds(22%).SeeTable8andFigure5.TABLE8.2019TIPRoadwayInvestmentsandTravelDistancebyIncomeIncludesLocalStreetsandRoads,StateHighway,PublicLands/Trails,Port/FreightRailandTollBridge
2019TIPRoadwayInvestments(in$billions)
%ofInvestment
%ofTotalTravel
Distance*LowIncome $1.3 21% 22%$150,000 $1.7 27% 26%
Total $6.3 100% 100%*Totaltraveldistanceisvehiclemilestraveled(VMT)forallnontransittripsasderivedfromtheCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey.FIGURE5.2019TIPRoadwayInvestmentsandTravelDistancebyIncomeIncludesLocalStreetsandRoads,StateHighway,PublicLands/Trails,Port/FreightRailandTollBridge
Theshareoftransitinvestmentsinthe2019TIPforpassengerslivinginlowincomehouseholds(40%)fallsshortoftheshareoftransittripsbypassengerslivinginlowincomehouseholds(47%).TABLE9.2019TIPTransitInvestmentsandTransitTripsbyIncome
2019TIPTransitInvestments
(in$billions)%ofTransitInvestment
%ofPassengerTransitTrips
LowIncome $2.8 40% 47%NotLowIncome $4.2 60% 53%Total $7.0 100% 100%
6% 15% 16% 15% 21%27%7% 15% 16% 15% 22%
26%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
$150K
%ofRoadwayInvestments%ofVehicleMilesTraveled(VMT)
Source:Draft2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 16 June 18, 2018
FIGURE6.2019TIPTransitInvestmentsandPassengerTripsbyIncome
InvestmentsbyRace/EthnicityMinorityhouseholdsmakeup60%oftheregionspopulationandaccountfor52%ofalltrips.TheshareoftransportationinvestmentsintheBayAreathatsupportminoritypopulationtrips(57%)isgreaterthantheshareoftripstakenbythesepopulations(52%).TABLE10.2019TIPInvestmentsandTripsbyRace/Ethnicity
2019TIPInvestmentsbyTrips(in$billions)
%ofInvestment %ofTrips
NonMinority $5.7 43% 48%Minority $7.5 57% 52%Total $13.2 100% 100%
FIGURE7.2019TIPInvestmentsandTripsbyRace/Ethnicity
Theminorityhouseholdpopulationsaccountforapproximatelyhalf(50%)ofalltravel
40% 47%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ShareofTransitInvestmentforLowIncomePassengers
ShareofTransitTripsbyLowIncomePassengers
Sources:Draft2019TIPandTransitPassengerDemographicSurvey(MTC)andBARTCustomerSatisfactionSurvey
43%57%48% 52%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
NonMinority Minority
%ofInvestmentbyTrips%ofTotalTrips
Source:Draft2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 17 June 18, 2018
distance,asmeasuredbyVMTofroadwaytripsandorigindestinationdistancefortransittrips.Theshareofinvestmentssupportingminoritytravelbydistance(52%)isslightlymorethantheshareoftraveldistancetraversedbytheminoritypopulations(50%).TABLE11.2019TIPInvestmentsandTravelDistancebyRace/Ethnicity
2019TIPInvestmentsbyTravelDistance
(in$billions)%of
Investment%ofTravel
DistanceNonMinority $6.4 48% 50%Minority $6.8 52% 50%Total $13.2 100% 100%
FIGURE8.2019TIPInvestmentsandTravelDistancebyRace/Ethnicity
Personsfromminorityhouseholdsaccountforhalfofallroadwaytraveldistance,asmeasuredbyVMT.Theshareofinvestmentssupportingminorityroadwaytravelbydistance(50%)isroughlyequivalenttotheoverallshareofVMTtraveledbyminoritypopulations(49%).TABLE12.2019TIPRoadwayInvestmentsandTravelDistance(VMT)byRace/EthnicityIncludesLocalStreetsandRoads,StateHighway,PublicLands/Trails,Port/FreightRailandTollBridge
2019TIPInvestmentsbyVMT(in$billions)
%ofInvestment %ofVMT
NonMinority $3.1 50% 51%Minority $3.1 50% 49%Total $6.3 100% 100%
48% 52%50% 50%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
NonMinority Minority
%InvestmentbyTravelDistance%ofTravelDistance
Source:Draft2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 18 June 18, 2018
FIGURE9.2019TIPRoadwayInvestmentsandTravelDistance(VMT)byRace/EthnicityIncludesLocalStreetsandRoads,StateHighway,PublicLands/Trails,Port/FreightRailandTollBridge
Nearlytwothirds(63%)oftransittripsintheBayAreaaretakenbyresidentsidentifyingasaracialorethnicminority.Theshareofinvestmentsinthe2019TIPthatsupportthesetransittrips(67%)isslightlymorethantheshareoftransittripsmadebyminoritypopulations(63%).TABLE13.2019TIPTransitInvestmentsandTransitTripsbyRace/Ethnicity
2019TIPInvestmentsbyTransitTrips
(in$billions)%of
Investment%ofTransit
TripsNonMinority $2.3 33% 37%Minority $4.6 67% 63%Total $7.0 100% 100%
FIGURE10.2019TIPTransitInvestmentsandTransitTripsbyRace/Ethnicity
50% 50%51% 49%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
NonMinority Minority
%ofInvestmentbyVMT
%ofVMT
Source:Draft2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey
33%
67%
37%
63%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
NonMinority Minority
%ofInvestmentbyTrips%ofPassengerTrips
Sources:Draft2019TIPandTransitPassengerDemographicSurvey(MTC)andBARTCustomerSatisfactionSurvey
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 19 June 18, 2018
InvestmentsbySeniorsSeniors,definedforthisanalysisaspersonsovertheageof65,accountfornearly14%oftheregionspopulation.Theshareoftransportationinvestmentsthatsupporttripstakenbyseniors(10%)isslightlylessthan,butroughlyequivalentto,theirshareoftrips(11%).TABLE14.2019TIPInvestmentsandTripsbySeniors
2019TIPInvestmentsbyTrips
(in$billions)%of
Investment %ofTripsSenior $1.3 10% 11%NonSenior $11.9 90% 89%Total $13.2 100% 100%
FIGURE11.2019TIPInvestmentsandTripsbySeniors
Seniorsalsoaccountfor10%ofalltraveldistance,asmeasuredbyVMTofroadwaytripsandorigin/destinationdistancefortransittrips.Thisisroughlyequivalenttotheirshareoftheinvestments(8%)supportingdistancetravelledbyseniorpopulations.TABLE15.2019TIPInvestmentsandTravelDistancebySeniors
2019TIPInvestmentsbyTravelDistance
(in$billions)%of
Investment%ofTravel
DistanceSenior $1.0 8% 10%NonSenior $12.2 92% 90%Total $13.2 100% 100%
10%
90%
11%
89%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Seniors NonSeniors
%ofInvestmentbyTrips%ofTotalTrips
Source:2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 20 June 18, 2018
FIGURE12.2019TIPInvestmentsandTravelDistancebySeniors
Forroadwaytravel,seniorsaccountfor10%ofallVMTandbenefitfromanequivalentshareofinvestments.TABLE16.2019TIPRoadwayInvestmentsandTravelDistance(VMT)bySeniorsIncludesLocalStreetsandRoads,StateHighway,PublicLands/Trails,Port/FreightRailandTollBridge
2019TIPInvestmentsbyVMT
(in$billions)%of
Investment %ofVMTSenior $0.6 10% 10%NonSenior $5.6 90% 90%Total $6.3 100% 100%
FIGURE13.2019TIPRoadwayInvestmentsandTravelDistance(VMT)bySeniorsIncludesLocalStreetsandRoads,StateHighway,PublicLands/Trails,Port/FreightRailandTollBridge
Giventhelimitationsofthedataavailable,adetailedlookatinvestmentsbytransittriplengthbypassengerageisnotincludedinthepopulationusebasedanalysis.
8%
92%
10%
90%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Senior NonSenior
%InvestmentbyTravelDistance%ofTravelDistance
Source:Draft2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey
10%
90%
10%
90%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Senior NonSenior
%ofInvestmentbyVMT%ofVMT
Source:2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 21 June 18, 2018
SupplementalInformationPersonswithTransportationRelatedDisabilitiesLimitationsinthedataavailablemakeitdifficulttoquantifytransportationsystemusageofpersonswithdisabilitiestothedegreenecessaryforthepopulationusebasedanalysis.However,transportationinvestmentsbenefitingthesepopulationsarebeingmadethroughouttheregion.Belowisanoverviewofregionalinvestmentsandplanninginitiativesthatsupporttransportationbypersonswithdisabilities.AlistoftransitprojectscompliantwiththeAmericanswithDisabilitiesAct(ADA)isincludedAppendixA49.
CommunityBasedTransportationPlanning(CBTP)ProvidesplanningfundsfordevelopingprojectrecommendationsineachoftheregionsCommunitiesofConcern(COCs).PersonswithdisabilitiesareoneofeightfactorsthatareusedtodetermineCOCdesignations.Todate,fortyoneCBTPsat$60,000eachhavebeencompletedforthesecommunities.AnewroundoffundingforupdatedCBTPsisexpectedinthefallof2018.
LifelineTransportationProgramProvidesfundstoaddressmobilityneedsoflow
incomeresidents,includingseniorsandindividualswithdisabilities.FundingisusedtosupportprojectsfromCBTPs.Historically,$20millionhasbeenprovidedannually.
FTASection5310EnhancedMobilityofSeniors&IndividualswithDisabilities
Providescapitalandoperatinggrantstoprivatenonprofitandpublicagenciestoimprovemobilityforseniorsandindividualswithdisabilitiesbyremovingbarrierstoandexpandingservices.Inthelastroundoffunding,$13.2millioninawardsweremadeintheregionslargeurbanizedareas.Theregionssmallurbanizedareasreceived$1.4millioninawards.
TransitCapitalPrioritiesProvidesanoptionalADAsetasideof10%oftheFTA
Section5307largeurbanizedareaapportionment.Operatorsmayusethisfundingtodefraytheoperatingcostsoftheirparatransitsystems.Annually,thisamountstoapproximately$20million.
StateTransitAssistanceHistorically,aportionofSTAPopulationBasedfundsweresetasideforoperatorstouseinordertodefraytheoperatingcostsoftheirparatransitsystems.WiththeadoptionofMTCResolutionNo.4321inFebruary2018,70%ofallSTAPopulationBasedfundsnowflowtoeachcountyCongestionManagementAgencythroughtheSTACountyBlockGrantand30%isdirectedtotheRegionalProgrammanagedbyMTC.ParatransitoperationsareaneligibleuseoftheCountyBlockGrantprogram.
MTCsCoordinatedPublicTransitHumanServicesTransportationPlan
Identifiesthetransportationneedsofindividualswithdisabilities,olderadults,andindividualswithlimitedincome,andidentifiesfundingprioritiesandcoordinationstrategiesformeetingtheseneeds.TheCoordinatedPlanisintendedtomeetthefederalplanningrequirementsaswellastoprovideMTCanditsregionalpartners
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 22 June 18, 2018
withablueprintforimplementingarangeofstrategiesintendedtopromoteandadvancelocaleffortstoimprovetransportationforpersonswithdisabilities,olderadults,andpersonswithlowincomes.MTCstaffworkswithstakeholdersthroughouttheregiontogatherinputontransportationgaps,aswellassolutionsthataretheneligibleforfederalfundingthroughtheSection5310program.TheCoordinatedPlanwaslastupdatedin2018.
Caltransrecentlyawardeda$407,000granttoMTCandtheWorldInstituteonDisability(WID)forapilotprojectfocusedonidentifyingandaddressingaccessandmobilityneedsofpeoplewithdisabilitiesintheBayArea.Theprojectwillexplorewaystoexpandinstitutionalcapacityattransitandparatransitserviceproviders,countycongestionmanagementagencies,localjurisdictionsandregionalagenciestobetterunderstandandaddressaccessandmobilityneedsofpeoplewithadisability.MTCwillpartnerwithWIDtoengagecommunitybasedorganizationsandotherstakeholderstodevelopamethodologyandprocessforcollectingdataandupdatingaregionalneedsassessments.Theprojectisanticipatedtostartinfall2018andendbyMarch2020.
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 23 June 18, 2018
DisparateImpactAnalysisThesecondcomponentoftheinvestmentanalysisincludesacloserlookatfederalandstatetransitinvestments.Thefederalandstatefundingsourcesforpublictransportationaccountforonlyasmallportion(13%)offundinginthe2019TIP,asillustratedbelowinFigure11.FIGURE11.2019TIPTransitInvestmentsfromFederal/StateSourcesasaShareofAllInvestments
Although40%oftheTIPismadeupofregionalorlocalinvestmentsinpublictransit,itisimportanttonotethatasubstantialshareoftotalfundingdedicatedtotransitoperatorsforongoingoperationsandmaintenancearenotincludedintheTIP.Thisfundingcomesfromstate,regionalandlocalsourcesandmaynotbecapturedintheTIPastheseprojectsandprogramsdonottypicallyrequireafederalaction.Thedisparateimpactanalysisindicatesthattheshareoffederalandstatetransitinvestmentsdistributedtotransitservicesupportingminoritypopulationsvaryascomparedtorespectivesharesofregionaltransitridershipandregionalpopulation.TABLE17.2019TIPFederal/StateTransitInvestmentsbyMinorityStatus
Federal/StateTransit
Investments($millions)
%ofTotalFederal/State
TransitFunding
%ofRegionalTransit
Ridership
%ofTotalRegional
PopulationMinority $1,025 62% 63% 60%NonMinority $640 38% 37% 40%Total $1,665 100% 100% 100%
LocalStreetsandRoads,StateHighwaysandTollBridgeInvestments47%
Federal/StateTransitInvestments13%
Regional/LocalTransitInvestments40%
Source:Draft2019TIP
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 24 June 18, 2018
Investmentsdistributedonapercapitabasisindicatethatminoritypopulationsintheregionarereceiving$221inbenefitsperperson,morethanthe$210inbenefitsperpersonfornonminoritypopulations(or105%ofthebenefitsreceivedbynonminorityresidents).TABLE18.2019TIPFederal/StateTransitInvestments,DisparateImpactAnalysisbyPopulation
Federal/StateTransit
Investments($millions)
RegionalPopulation
PerCapitaBenefit
MinorityperCapitaBenefitas%ofNonMinorityPerCapitaBenefit
Minority $1,025 4,634,040 $221 105%Nonminority $640 3,049,971 $210 Total $1,665 7,684,011 $217
Investmentsdistributedonapertransitriderbasisindicatethatminoritypopulationsintheregionreceive$1,007inbenefitsperrider,slightlylessthan$1,089inbenefitspertransitriderfornonminoritypopulations(or92%ofthebenefitsreceivedbynonminorityresidents).TABLE19.2019TIPFederal/StateTransitInvestments,DisparateImpactAnalysisbyBoardings
Federal/StateTransit
Investments($millions)
AverageDailyTransit
RidershipPerRiderBenefit
MinorityperRiderBenefitas
%ofNonMinorityPerRiderBenefit
Minority $1,025 1,018,086 $1,007 92%Nonminority $640 587,771 $1,089 Total $1,129 1,605,856 $1,037
TransportationEquityMeasuresHealthyandSafeCommunitiesProjectsthatareexpectedtocontributetowardsreachingourregionalgoalsforhealthyandsafecommunitiesincludeprojectsthatimproveroadsafety,increasephysicalactivity,andimproveairquality.
RoadSafety:Inthe2019TIP,morethan160projectsandnearly$2billioninfundingaredirectedtoprojectsthatareidentifiedbyprojectsponsorsashavingaprimarypurposeofimprovingroadsafetyorthatareotherwiseanticipatedtosignificantlyreducefatalitiesandseriousinjuries
Table20.2019TIPRoadSafetyImprovements
County Projects Investments
Alameda 40 $368ContraCosta 26 $169Marin 10 $28Napa 10 $36SanFrancisco 10 $65SanMateo 25 $38SantaClara 24 $278Solano 11 $37Sonoma 5 $11Multiple 3 $696 164 $1,726
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 25 June 18, 2018
duetotrafficcollisions(Table20).Itisimportanttonotethatmanyotherprojectsinthe2019TIPareanticipatedtohaveamoderateorslightpositiveimpactontransportationsafety.However,thisanalysisfocusesonthoseprojectsthathavesafetyimprovementasaprimarypurposeorthatareotherwiseanticipatedtoleadtosignificantreductionsintransportationfatalitiesandseriousinjuriescausedbytrafficcollisions.Someofthelargestsafetyinvestmentsinthe2019TIPinclude: $545millionforvariousStateHighwayOperationandProtection
Program(SHOPP)CollisionReductionprojects $102millionforvariousSHOPPSafetyImprovementMandatesprojects,
whichareprimarilyfocusedonensuringcompliancewiththeAmericanswithDisabilitiesAct(ADA)
$62millionforI680/SR4InterchangeReconstructionPhase3inContraCostaCounty
$49millionforvariouslocalHighwaySafetyImprovementProgramprojects
$22millionforMcKeeRdandTullyRdSafetyImprovementsinSanJose
Additionalinformationisprovidedonprojectsthatareexpectedtoimprovethesafetyofourroadsforpedestriansandbicyclists.AsshowninTable21,$1.3billionisinvestedin77projectsinthe2019TIPthatareidentifiedbytheprojectsponsorsasanticipatedtohaveasignificantimpactonreducingfatalitiesandseriousinjuriesforpedestriansandbicyclists.Safetyofthetransportationsystemincludesmorethanjustthereductionofcollisions.Projectsunrelatedtoreducingcollisionscanalsohavesignificantimpactsonsafetytothetravelingpublic,includingseismicretrofits,securityimprovements,andresiliencyprojects.The2019TIPalsoincludesasignificantinvestmentintheGoldenGateBridgeSuicideDeterrentSafetyBarrier,whichaimstoimpedetheabilityofindividualstojumpoffthebridgeresultinginasaferenvironmentforthelandmarktransportationfacility.ThisprojectwasnotincludedintheHealthyandSafeCommunitiesmeasureforthisanalysis,butdoeshaveanimportantsafetypurpose.
Table21.2019TIPSafetyImprovementsforPedestrians&Bicyclists
County Projects Investments
Alameda 28 $334ContraCosta 3 $23Marin 6 $22Napa 5 $28SanFrancisco 6 $47SanMateo 11 $23SantaClara 13 $237Solano 1 $1Sonoma 2 $1MultipleCounties 2 $594 77 $1,311
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 26 June 18, 2018
PhysicalActivity:TheTIPincludes136projectsandover$400millioninvestedonprojectsthatareprimarilyfocusedonbicycleandpedestrianimprovementsandprograms,whichenableandencourageactivetransportation.Someofthelargestbicycleandpedestrianinvestmentsinthe2019TIPinclude: $17millionforImprovedBike/PedAccesstoEastSpanoftheSan
FranciscoEastBayBridge $14millionfortheIronHorseTrailBikeandPedestrianOvercrossingin
ContraCostaCounty $13millionforOaklands14thStSafeRoutesintheCityproject $12millionfortheNorthSouthGreenwayCapClosureinMarinCounty
ManyprojectsintheTIPthatarefocusedonothermodesorpurposesalsoincludeimprovementsthatbenefitbicyclistsorpedestrians,suchasapavementrehabilitationprojectthatincludesaddinganewbikelane.Projectsponsorsreporttheshareofeachprojectstotalprojectcostthatcanbeattributedtothevariousmodesthatwillbenefitfromtheproject.Table22displayscountyandregionalinvestmentsinbike/pedestrianprojectsaswellasthetotaldollarsinvestedonallprojectsthatareanticipatedtobenefitbicyclistsandpedestriansoverthefouryearTIPperiod,asreportedbytheprojectsponsors.
Table22.2019TIPBike&PedestrianInvestments
Bicycle&PedestrianProjectsProjectswithBicycle&PedestrianElements
County Projects Investments Projects InvestmentsAlameda 26 $136 50 $137ContraCosta 17 $59 47 $69Marin 10 $26 15 $31Napa 6 $12 12 $18SanFrancisco 10 $26 17 $45SanMateo 20 $28 40 $32SantaClara 32 $97 60 $200Solano 8 $19 15 $24Sonoma 6 $8 16 $12MultipleCounties 1 $3 3 $5 136 $413 276 $573
AirQuality:ProjectsfundedwithfederalCongestionMitigationAirQuality
ImprovementProgram(CMAQ),CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard(CARB),orregionalTransportationforCleanAir(TFCA)fundsareexpectedtoimproveairqualitythroughpromotingcleanertechnologiesoralternativemodesoftransportation.Manyotherprojectsinthe2019TIPmayalsosupportimprovedairquality,butthisanalysisfocusedonprojectsfundedwithairqualityspecificfundsources(Table23).
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 27 June 18, 2018
Afewoftheprojectsfundedthroughairqualityfundingprogramsinthe2019TIPinclude: $50millionforBARTRailcarProcurement $12millionforElectricVehicleInfrastructure/VehicleBuybackprograms $10millionforMTCsClipper2.0FareCollectionSystem $10millionforACEsLocomotiveProcurementproject $7millionforSFMTAsGearyBusRapidTransitproject $5millionforMTCsSparetheAirprogram
Maps:2019TIPHealthy&SafeCommunities
Safetyandactivetransportationprojectsaremapped,wherepossible,bycountyandoverlaidagainstCommunitiesofConcerntodisplaytheoverallspatialdistributionofprojectsthatsupporttheregionsgoalstoimprovethehealthandsafetyofregion.Thesemapscanbeviewedstartingon
pages34.Theseprojectscanalsobeviewedonaninteractivewebmapthatincludeadditionaldataonspatialconcentrationsbyraceandethnicity(https://mtc.ca.gov/ourwork/fundinvest/transportationimprovementprogram).EconomicVitalityProjectsthatreducecongestion,improvereliability,orimprovetransitserviceorcapacityaremostlikelytosupporttheregionalgoaltoincreasetheshareofjobsaccessiblewithin30minutesbycaror45minutesbytransitincongestedconditions.
RoadCongestion/Reliability:Thereare102roadwayprojectsinthe2019TIP,totalingabout$2billion,whichareidentifiedbyprojectsponsorsashavingaprimarypurposeofreducingcongestionorimprovingsystemreliabilityorareotherwiseanticipatedtosignificantlyimprovecongestionorreliability(Table24).
Table23.2019TIPAirQualityFocusedInvestmentsCounty Projects InvestmentsAlameda 12 $51ContraCosta 10 $22Marin 6 $5Napa 3 $4SanFrancisco 2 $10SanMateo 13 $9SantaClara 25 $50Solano 8 $10Sonoma 3 $4Multiple 12 $83 94 $248
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 28 June 18, 2018
Afewoftheseprojectsinthe2019TIPinclude:
$473millionforUS101ManagedLanes:SanMateoCountySouthofGrandAvetoSantaClaraCountyLine
$167millionforvariousSHOPPMobilityProgramprojects
$142millionforUS101/ZankerRoadSkyportDriveN.FourthSt.ImprovementsinSantaClaraCounty
$66millionforI680SBHOVLaneCompletioninContraCostaCounty
$47millionfortheEastWestConnectorinFremontandUnionCity
$22millionfor511NextGenTravelerInformation
TransitService/Capacity:Thereare33transitprojectsinthe2019TIP,totalingnearly$5billion,whichareidentifiedbyprojectsponsorsashavingaprimarypurposeofreducingcongestionorimprovingsystemreliabilityorareotherwiseanticipatedtosignificantlyimprovecongestionorreliability(Table25).Afewoftheseprojectsinthe2019TIPinclude:
$2.6billionfortheBARTBerryessatoSanJoseExtension
$1.1billionfortheBARTTransbayCoreCapacityImprovements
$598millionfortheTransbayTerminal/CaltrainDowntownExtensionPhase2
$268millionforVTAsEastridgetoBARTRegionalConnector
$128millionforCaltrainsPeninsulaCorridorElectrificationExpansion
$54millionforSFMTAsAdditionalLightRailVehiclestoExpandMuniRailService
Table24.2019TIPRoadwayCongestion/ReliabilityInvestmentsCounty Projects InvestmentsAlameda 22 $344ContraCosta 15 $159Marin 2 $20Napa 5 $34SanFrancisco 6 $21SanMateo 15 $550SantaClara 18 $580Solano 2 $28Sonoma 3 $9Multiple 14 $238
102 $1,984
Table25.2019TIPTransitService/CapacityImprovementsCounty Projects InvestmentsAlameda 4 $20ContraCosta 2 $8Marin 2 $2Napa SanFrancisco 12 $678SanMateo 3 $141SantaClara 3 $2,842Solano 1 $2Sonoma Multiple 6 $1,099 33 $4,793
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 29 June 18, 2018
Maps:2019TIPEconomicVitality
Roadcongestionorreliabilityprojectsandtransitserviceorcapacityimprovementprojectsaremapped,wherepossible,bycountyandoverlaidagainstCommunitiesofConcerntodisplaytheoverallspatialdistributionofprojectsthatsupporttheregionsgoalstoimproveeconomicvitality.
Thesemapscanbeviewedstartingonpage34.Theseprojectscanalsobeviewedonaninteractivewebmapthatincludeadditionaldataonspatialconcentrationsbyraceandethnicity(https://mtc.ca.gov/ourwork/fundinvest/transportationimprovementprogram).TransportationSystemEffectivenessThetransportationsystemeffectivenessgoalareaencompassestwoperformancemeasures:improvedpavementconditionandtransitstateofgoodrepair.Projectsthatincludeapavementorbridgerehabilitationorpreservationcomponentorrehabilitateorreplaceexistingtransitassetsarecompiledforthisportionoftheanalysis.
PavementandBridgeCondition:Inthe2019TIP,97projectstotaling$2.5billionisinvestedinrehabilitationandpreservationofexistingroadsandbridges(Table26).Afewofthelargerrehabilitationprojectsinthe2019TIPinclude:
$1billionforvariousSHOPPRoadwayPreservationprojects
$583millionforvariousSHOPPBridgeRehabilitationandReconstructionprojects
$303millionfortheregionalTollBridgeRehabilitationProgram
$207millionforvariousLocalHighwayBridgeProgramprojects
TransitStateofGoodRepair:Thereare81transitstateofgoodrepairprojectsinthe
2019TIP,totaling$1.9billionincommittedinvestments.Thetransitinvestmentsinthe2019TIPinclude:
$737millionfortheBARTRailcarProcurementProgram $210millionfortheCaltrainElectrificationproject $67millionforSFMTAsRailReplacementProgram $62millionfortheClipper2.0FarePaymentSystem $59millionforGGBHTDsDieseltoHybridBusReplacementproject $50millionforVTAsStandardandSmallBusReplacementproject
Table26.2019TIPPavementandBridgeRehabilitationProjects
County Projects Investments
Alameda 14 $36ContraCosta 24 $49Marin 4 $8Napa 3 $6SanFrancisco 2 $200SanMateo 19 $17SantaClara 14 $46Solano 3 $3Sonoma 8 $16Multiple 6 $2,122 97 $2,504
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 30 June 18, 2018
Maps:2019TIPTransportationSystemEffectiveness
Pavementandbridgeconditionprojectsandtransitassetmanagementprojectsaremapped,wherepossible,bycountyandoverlaidagainstCommunitiesofConcerntodisplaytheoverallspatialdistributionofprojectsthatsupporttheregionsgoalstoimproveeconomicvitality.These
mapscanbeviewedstartingonpage34.Theseprojectscanalsobeviewedonaninteractivewebmapthatincludeadditionaldataonspatialconcentrationsbyraceandethnicity(https://mtc.ca.gov/ourwork/fundinvest/transportationimprovementprogram).EquitableAccessTheequitableaccessmeasureestimatestheshareofincomeconsumedbytransportationcostswithagoalofreducingthefinancialburdenontheregionslowestincomeresidents.Thisportionoftheanalysisincorporatesvariousoutputsfromtheregionaltraveldemandmodeltocalculatehouseholdtransportationcostsasashareofhouseholdincome.The2019TIPinvestmentsappeartohaveanegligibleeffectontheshareofincomespentontransportation,acrossallincomelevels,whencomparedtoascenarioinwhichnoneoftheprojectsinthe2019TIPiscompleted(Table28).
Table27.2019TIPTransitRehabilitation/ReplacementProjects
Sponsor Projects Investments Sponsor Projects Investments
ACTransit 5 $56 SamTrans 2 $2ACE 2 $25 SantaRosaBus 3 $5BART 10 $947 SFMTA 14 $326Caltrain 3 $246 SMART CCCTA SolTrans 2 $3ECCTA SonCoTransit 3 $5Fairfield 1 $2 UnionCityTransit 1 $2GGBHTD 12 $135 Vacaville LAVTA VTA 7 $92MCTD 5 $13 WCCTA 6 $9MTCClipper 1 $62 WETA 3 $41NVTA 1
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 31 June 18, 2018
Theseresultsdonotnecessarilyindicatethattheprojectsinthe2019TIPwillhavenoimpactonhouseholdtransportationcosts.Rather,itismorelikelythatthetravelmodelmaynotbeappropriateforassessingchangesintransportationcostsresultingfromTIPinvestments.Acoupleofnotesaboutthelimitationsofthisapproach:1. Althoughthereismorethan$13billionintransportationinvestmentsprogrammedin
the2019TIP,manyoftheseprojectswillnotbecompleteduntilafterthe2019TIPperiod.Forexample,majorprojectswithfundsprogrammedforconstructionin2022maynotbecompleteandopentothepublicforanotherseveralyears.Theimpactsoftheseinvestmentswerenotcapturedinthe2022modelyear,butcanbeassumedtohaveaneffectontripsandcost.
2. Fortheprojectsthatarecompletedby2022,onlyahandfulhaveascopethatisevaluatedinaregionaltravelmodel.Manylocalroadwayandtransitassetprojects,aswellasbicycleandpedestrianprojects,cannotbecapturedintheregionaltravelmodel,butarestillexpectedtohavesignificantcumulativeimpactsontravelintheregion.
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 32 June 18, 2018
2019TIPInvestmentAnalysisKeyFindingsEquitabledistributionofinvestmentsoverallTheresultsofthepopulationusebasedanalysisindicatethatoverall,theinvestmentsinthe2019TIPdirectanequitableproportionofinvestmentstoprojectsthatsupportthetransportationofresidentsoflowincomehouseholds,racialorethnicminorities,andseniors.
Theshareofinvestmentssupportingoveralllowincometrips(32%)andtripsmadebyminoritypopulations(57%)exceedstheshareoftripsmadebyeachgroup(27%and52%,respectively).
Theshareofinvestmentssupportingoveralltraveldistancebylowincomepopulations(24%)andminoritypopulations(52%)alsoslightlyexceedstheshareofoveralldistancetravelledbyeachgroup(22%and50%,respectively).
Theshareofinvestmentssupportingtrips(10%)andtraveldistance(8%)madebyseniorsisslightlyunder,butstillroughlyequivalent,totheirrelativeshareofeachmeasure(11and10%).
Variableresultsfortransit,duetosmallnumberofverylargeinvestmentsThereareafewvariancesworthnotinginthepopulationusedbasedanalysisanddisparateimpactanalysis,specificallyrelatedtotransit.
Theshareoftransitinvestmentsthatsupporttripsmadebypassengersinlow
incomehouseholds(40%)fallssomewhatshortofthesepassengersrelativeshareofthetransittripstaken(47%).
Federalandstatetransitinvestmentsresultinapercapitabenefitforminoritiesthatslightlyexceedsthepercapitabenefitfornonminorities(105%ofnonminoritypercapitabenefit).However,onapertransitriderbasis,federalandstatetransitinvestmentsfallshort,withaminorityperriderbenefitof92%ofthenonminorityperriderbenefit.
Thevariedresultsinthe2019TIPareattributedtoanumberoflargeprojects,including:
BARTsRailcarProcurementProgram; BARTsTransbayCoreCapacityImprovementsProgram; CaltrainElectrification; CaltrainsPeninsulaCorridorElectrificationExpansion;and TransbayJointPowerAuthoritysCaltrainDowntownExtension.
Together,thesefiveprojectsaccountforalmost40%ofalltransitfundinginthe2019TIP.Whenfocusingonlyonstateandfederalfunds,theseprojectsaccountforapproximately35%offundingintheTIPperiod.WhileBARTridershipapproximatelymirrorstheregionalridershipshareforminoritypopulations,theshareofBARTridersfromlowincomehouseholdsislessthantheregionalaverageshare.Caltrainisusedbyalowerproportionoflowincomeandminorityridersthantheregionalaveragefortransitriders.
-
Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 33 June 18, 2018
Thedegreeofthevariancesseeninthe2019TIPdisparateimpacttransitanalysisarenotablyimprovedascomparedtothe2017TIP,withtheminoritypertransitriderinvestmentdisbenefitdecreasingfrom89%inthe2017TIPto92%inthe2019TIP.Inaddition,theminoritypercapitatransitinvestmentincreasesfrom96%ofthenonminoritypercapitainvestment(disbenefit)inthe2017TIPto105%ofthenonminoritypercapitainvestment(benefit)inthe2019TIP.Itisimportanttoreemphasize,thattheTIPdoesnotreflectthefullpictureoftransportationinvestmentsintheBayArea.TheTIPonlyincludesfouryearsofneartermfundprogrammingandtendsnottoincludeoperatingandmaintenancefunds,particularlyfortransit.AdditionoftransportationequitymeasuresprovidesopportunityforbetterunderstandingofpotentialequityimpactsForthe2019TIP,additionalinformationisprovidedonprojectsthatsupportPlanBayArea2040stransportationfocusedequitymeasures:HealthyandSafeCommunities,EconomicVitality,TransportationSystemEffectiveness,andEquitableAccess.Althoughtheanalysisdoesnotidentifydirectbenefitsandburdensresultingfromindividualinvestments,itbuildsuponthepopulationusebasedanddisparateimpactanalysestobetterunderstandthenatureoftheprojectsincludedinthe2019TIPandtheiranticipatedeffectsonlongtermregionalgoals.Dataforthetransportationequitymeasuresisselfreportedbyprojectsponsors,thereforetheresultinginformationislimitedbythequalityandconsistencyofthedataprovided.Wherepossible,projectssupportingthetransportationfocusedequitymeasureswerealsomappedtoillustratethelocationof2019investmentsinrelationtoadoptedCOCsaswellascensustractswithconcentrationsofminoritypopulationsthatareaboveregionalaverages.Thegeographicdisplayofprojectsallowsforexaminationandidentificationofanyapparentsystematicexclusionofcommunitiesinthespatialdistributionofbenefits,oranyapparentsystematicimbalancesbetweenthedistributionofprojectsbetweencommunitiesofconcernandtheremainderoftheregion,orbetweenminorityandnonminoritycommunities.Asnotedabove,manyprojectsandadditionaldatacanbeviewedonaninteractivewebmapavailableonhttps://mtc.ca.gov/ourwork/fundinvest/transportationimprovementprogram.
-
2019 TIP Investment AnalysisAlameda County Project List
1 AC Transit: East Bay Bus Rapid Transit 39 BART: Traction Power System Renovation2 AC Transit: San Pablo and Telegraph Ave Rapid Bus Upgrades 40 BART:ADA Paratransit Capital Accessibility Improve3 ACE: Platform Extensions 41 BATA: Toll Bridge Maintenance4 ACTC: 7th Street Grade Separation East 42 BATA: Toll Bridge Rehabilitation Program5 ACTC: 7th Street Grade Separation West 43 Berkeley: John Muir Safe Routes to School6 ACTC: East-West Connector in Fremont & Union City 44 Berkeley: Sacramento Street Complete Streets Improvements7 ACTC: Freight Intelligent Transportation System (FITS) 45 Berkeley: Southside Complete Streets & Transit Improvement8 ACTC: I-580/680 Interchange HOV/HOT Widening 46 Caltrans: Oakland to San Jose Double Track (Segment 2A)9 ACTC: I-680 NB HOV/HOT Lane 47 Dublin: Dublin Blvd-North Canyons Pkwy Extension10 ACTC: I-80 Gilman Interchange Reconfiguration 48 Dublin: Dublin Blvd Rehabilitation11 ACTC: I-80/Ashby Avenue Interchange Improvements 49 Dublin: Dublin Boulevard widening12 ACTC: I-880 NB HOV/HOT: North of Hacienda to Hegenberger 50 Dublin: I-580 Interchange Imps at Hacienda/Fallon Rd, Ph 213 ACTC: I-880/Industrial Parkway West Interchange 51 EBRPD: Doolittle Drive Bay Trail 14 ACTC: I-880/West Winton Avenue Interchange 52 Emeryville: Frontage Rd, 65th St and Powell St Pavement Maint15 ACTC: I-880/Whipple Road Interchange Improvements 53 Emeryville: Greenway Crossing Improvements 16 ACTC: Oakland/Alameda Freeway Access Project 54 Fremont: Complete Streets Upgrade of Relinquished SR-8417 ACTC: SR-262 (Mission Blvd) Improvements 55 Fremont: Pavement Rehabilitation18 ACTC: SR-84 widening, South of Ruby Hills Dr to I-680 56 Fremont: Widen Kato Rd from Warren Ave to Milmont Dr19 ACTC: Widen I-680 NB and SB for EL from SR-84 to Alcosta 57 Hayward: I-880 Auxiliary lanes at Industrial Parkway20 Alameda County: Cherryland/Ashland/CastroValley/Fairview BikePed 58 Hayward: I-880/A Street Interchange Reconstruction21 Alameda County: Crow Canyon Safety Improvements 59 Hayward: Main Street Complete Street22 Alameda County: Estuary Bridges Seismic Retrofit and Repairs 60 Hayward: Rt 92/Clawiter/Whitesell Interchange Improvements23 Alameda County: Fruitvale Ave Roadway Bridge Retrofit 61 Hayward: Winton Ave Complete Street 24 Alameda County: Niles Canyon Rd (SR-84)/Pleas-Sunol Rd I/C Imps 62 Livermore: Pavement Rehabilitation - MTS Routes25 Alameda County: Various Streets and Roads Preservation 63 MTC: Bay Bridge Forward-Commuter Parking Initiative26 Alameda County: Vasco Road Safety Improvements 64 MTC: Bay Bridge Forward-West Grand HOV/Bus Only Lane27 Alameda: Central Avenue Safety Improvements 65 MTC: Bay Bridge Forward-West Grand TSP28 Alameda: City-Wide Pavement Rehabilitation 66 MTC: Bay Bridge Park29 Alameda: Clement Avenue Complete Streets 67 MTC: Bike Share Capital Program (Fremont)30 Albany: San Pablo Ave & Buchanan St Pedestrian Improvements 68 MTC: Freeway Performance Program-I-880 Corridor31 BART Car Exchange (Preventive Maintenance) 69 MTC: Freeway Performance Program-SR-8432 BART Train Control Renovation 70 MTC: I-880 Integrated Corridor Management-Central 33 BART Transbay Core Capacity Improvements 71 MTC: Improved Bike/Ped Access to East Span of SFOBB34 BART: 19th Street BART Station Modernization-GO Uptown 72 Newark: Thornton Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation35 BART: Bay Fair Connection 73 Oakland: 14th St Safe Routes in the City36 BART: Fare Collection Equipment 74 Oakland: 19th St BART to Lake Merritt Urban Greenway37 BART: Rail, Way and Structures Program 75 Oakland: 35th Ave Bike/Ped Improvements 38 BART: Railcar Procurement Program 76 Oakland: 42nd Ave. & High St I-880 Access Improvements
Draft 2019 TIP Page 34
-
2019 TIP Investment AnalysisAlameda County Project List (Continued)
77 Oakland: Army Base Infrastructure Improvements78 Oakland: Crossing to Safety79 Oakland: Fruitvale Alive Gap Closure Project80 Oakland: Fruitvale Ave Bike/Ped Improvements81 Oakland: Lake Merritt to Bay Trail Bike/Ped Bridge82 Oakland: Lakeside Family Streets83 Oakland: Shattuck and Claremont Bike/Ped Improvements84 Oakland: Telegraph Ave Bike/Ped Improvements and Road Diet85 Oakland: Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets86 Oakland: Waterfront Bay Trail87 Piedmont: Oakland Avenue Improvements88 Pleasanton: Pavement Rehabilitation Hacienda Business Park89 San Leandro: SR 185-E. 14th St/ Hesperian Blvd/150th Ave90 San Leandro: Washington Avenue Rehabilitation91 Union City: Dyer Street Pavement Rehabilitation92 WETA: Ferry Service-Berkeley
NOT MAPPEDAC Transit: ADA Paratransit Assistance Union City Transit: Replace Heavy-Duty Transit Vehicles
AC Transit: Paratransit Van Replacement Union City Transit: Travel Time Improvements
AC Transit: Purchase (10) 24ft Cut-aways
AC Transit: Purchase (24) 60ft Artic Hybrid Buses
AC Transit: Replace (27) 40ft Urban Buses - Hybrid
AC Transit: Replace (6) 24ft Cut-Away Vans
ACE: Fixed Guideway (Capital Lease)
ACE: Locomotive Procurement
ACE: Railcar Midlife Overhaul
ACTC: Alameda Safe Routes to School
Alameda County: Active Oakland Safe Routes to School
Caltrans: Alameda County - TOS-Mobility
LAVTA: ADA Paratransit Operating Subsidy
LAVTA: Livermore Transit Center Rehabilitation and Improvement
MTC: Bay Bridge Forward - Casual Carpool
MTC: Bay Bridge Forward - Integrated Bridge Corridor
MTC: Bay Bridge Forward - Commuter Parking Initiative O&M
MTC: Regional Planning Activities and PPM - Alameda County
Oakland: Local Streets and Roads Paving
Union City Transit: ADA Paratransit Operating Subsidy
Draft 2019 TIP Page 35
-
680
61
80
804
262
84
84
84
680
92
238
238
185
61
880
238
880
24
13
13
123
80
580
580
580
580
84
24
680
101
101
880
1281011011011041041288121521523333140555331321082199955801323333120991204129954889958510112810111111612812125051215223729580168068061801132208412293725156152152101101130680880878217859280358435353511182380280353511280101221121128128128292912126808080131371211161210110110111444424278080262848484680929223823818561880238880241313123808058058058058084241934529880236160881401085261018024680101101165080659999705113113516165329175101128132280171018801717992361115216016084599205
Oakland
Hayward
Berkeley
San Mateo
Pleasanton
Alameda
Union City
Redwood City
Livermore
San Leandro
Albany
Hillsborough
Dublin
Moraga
Foster City
Orinda
Tracy
San Ramon
Lafayette
East Palo Alto
Burlingame
Belmont
Emeryville
San Carlos
Piedmont
Danville
Newark
Fremont
13
11
43
7
3030
30
1616
6671
15
53
4410
60
24
58
17
14
78
67
21
9
19
79
75
48
26
18
83
83
74
12
27 29
5454
4
86
86 86
8686
86
8686
86
86
8485
73
8082
45
51
5
20
57
56
81
49
8 8
6
MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)
Active Transportation Project
Safety Project
Safety and Active Transportation Project
Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.
Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq
2019 TIP Investment AnalysisAlameda County: Healthly and Safe Communities Projects
Draft 2019 TIP Page 36
-
680
61
80
804
262
84
84
84
680
92
238
238
185
61
880
238
880
24
13
13
123
80
580
580
580
580
84
24
680
101
101
880
1281011011011041041288121521523333140555331321082199955801323333120991204129954889958510112810111111612812125051215223729580168068061801132208412293725156152152101101130680880878217859280358435353511182380280353511280101221121128128128292912126808080131371211161210110110111444424278080262848484680929223823818561880238880241313123808058058058058084241934529880236160881401085261018024680101101165080659999705113113516165329175101128132280171018801717992361115216016084599205
Oakland
Walnut Creek
Hayward
Berkeley
San Mateo
Pleasanton
Alameda
Union City
Redwood City
Livermore
San Leandro
Albany
Hillsborough
Dublin
Moraga
Foster City
Orinda
Tracy
San Ramon
Lafayette
East Palo Alto
Burlingame
Belmont
Emeryville
San Carlos
Piedmont
Danville
Newark
Fremont
89
13
11
716
16
15
5050
10
60
3
358
17
14
35
6363
63
67
9
19
92 38
38
38
38
38
18
12
70
654
64
5
57
49
1
8
8
2
2
6
46
33
33
33
33
33
68
69
MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)
Roadway Congestion and/or ReliabilityTransit Congestion and/or Reliability
Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.
Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq
2019 TIP Investment AnalysisAlameda County: Economic Vitality Projects
Draft 2019 TIP Page 37
-
680
61
80
804
262
84
84
84
680
92
238
238
185
61
880
238
880
24
13
13
123
80
580
580
580
580
84
24
24
680
101
101
880
1281011011011041041288121521523333140555331321082199955801323333120991204129954889958510112810111111612812125051215223729580168068061801132208412293725156152152101101130680880878217859280358435353511182380280353511280101221121128128128292912126808080131371211161210110110111444424278080262848484680929223823818561880238880241313123808058058058058084241934529880236160881401085261018024680101101165080659999705113113516165329175101128132280171018801717992361115216016084599205
Oakland
Walnut Creek
Hayward
Berkeley
San Mateo
Pleasanton
Alameda
Union City
Redwood City
Livermore
San Leandro
Albany
Hillsborough
Dublin
Moraga
Foster City
Orinda
Tracy
San Ramon
Lafayette
East Palo Alto
Burlingame
Belmont
Emeryville
San Carlos
Piedmont
Danville
Newark
Fremont
25
25
25
25
2548
61
5555
55
55 5555
5555 55
55
5555
52
5252
8742
42
42
72
45
88
28
28
90
6262
91
MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)
Rehabilitation Project
Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.
Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq
2019 TIP Investment AnalysisAlameda County: Transportation System Effectiveness-Pavement and Bridge Condition Projects
Draft 2019 TIP Page 38
-
2019 TIP Investment AnalysisContra Costa County Project List
1 AC Transit: San Pablo and Telegraph Ave Rapid Bus Upgrades 39 Contra Costa County: Kirker Pass Road NB Truck Climbing Lanes 2 Antioch: L Street Pathway to Transit 40 Contra Costa County: Kirker Pass Road Open Grade Overlay3 Antioch: Laurel Road Extension 41 Contra Costa County: Local Streets and Roads Preservation4 Antioch: Pavement Rehabilitation 42 Contra Costa County: Pacheco Blvd Sidewalk Gap Closure Phase 35 Antioch: Slatten Ranch Road Extension 43 Contra Costa County: Vasco Road Safety Improvements6 BART Car Exchange (Preventive Maintenance) 44 Danville: Camino Ramon Improvements7 BART Train Control Renovation 45 Danville: Diablo Road Imps. - Green Valley to Avenida Neuva8 BART Transbay Core Capacity Improvements 46 Danville: San Ramon Valley Blvd Lane Addition and Overlay 9 BART: Concord BART Station Modernization 47 El Cerrito Blvd: Carlson Blvd and Central Ave Pavement Rehab10 BART: Fare Collection Equipment 48 El Cerrito: El Cerrito del Norte Area TOD Complete Street Imps11 BART: Rail, Way and Structures Program 49 El Cerrito: Ohlone Greenway Station Area Bike/Ped Improvements12 BART: Railcar Procurement Program 50 Hercules: Sycamore/Willow Pavement Rehabilitation13 BART: Traction Power System Renovation 51 Lafayette: Pleasant Hill Rd Pavement Rehab & Maintenance14 BART:ADA Paratransit Capital Accessibility Improve 52 Martinez: Downtown Streets Rehabilitation 15 BATA: Toll Bridge Maintenance 53 Moraga: Moraga Way and Canyon/Camino Pablo Improvements16 BATA: Toll Bridge Rehabilitation Program 54 MTC: ALA/CC-80 and Bay Bridge Approach Express Lanes17 Brentwood: Brentwood Blvd Widening-(Phase I) North 55 MTC: Bike Share Capital Program (Richmond)18 Brentwood: Brentwood Blvd Widening Phase II 56 MTC: Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Access Improvements19 Brentwood: John Muir Parkway Extension: Phase II 57 Oakley: Civic Center Railroad Platform Park & Ride Complex20 Brentwood: Various Streets and Roads Preservation 58 Oakley: Street Repair and Resurfacing21 CCTA: I-680 Advanced Techologies 59 Orinda: Orinda Way Pavement Rehabilitation22 CCTA: I-680 Bus On Shoulder 60 Pinole: San Pablo Avenue Rehabilitation23 CCTA: I-680 SB HOV Lane Completion 61 Pittsburg: BART Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity24 CCTA: I-680/SR 4 Interchange Reconstruction-Phase 3 62 Pittsburg: Pavement Improvements25 CCTA: I-680/SR 4 Interchange Reconstruction-Phases I & II 63 Pleasant Hill: Road Improvements26 CCTA: Mokelumne Trail Bike/Ped Overcrossing 64 Richmond: Citywide Pavement Rehab ADA Improvement27 CCTA: Reconstruct I-80/San Pablo Dam Rd Interchange 65 Richmond: I-80/Central Avenue Interchange Modification28 CCTA: SR-4 Operational Improvements-Initial Phases 66 Richmond: Lincoln Elementary SRTS Pedestrian Enhancements29 Clayton: Neighborhood Street Rehab 67 San Pablo: Market Street Pavement Rehabilitation30 Concord: Commerce Ave Complete Streets 68 San Pablo: Rumrill Blvd Complete Streets Improvements31 Concord: Downtown Corridors Bike/Pedestrian Improvements 69 San Ramon: Alcosta Boulevard Pavement Rehab32 Concord: Monument Boulevard Class I Path 70 San Ramon: Crow Canyon Rd Widening (Alcosta to Indian Rice)33 Concord: Willow Pass Road Repaving and 6th St SRTS 71 San Ramon: Iron Horse Trail Bike and Pedestrian Overcrossing34 Concord: Ygnacio Valley Road Widening 72 Walnut Creek: BART TOD Access Improvements35 Contra Costa County: Bailey Road-SR-4 Interchange 73 Walnut Creek: N. Main St Rehab-I-680 to California36 Contra Costa County: Bailey Road Bike and Pedestrian Improvements 74 Walnut Creek: Ygancio Valley & Oak Grove Road Rehabilitation37 Contra Costa County: Camino Tassajara Realignment 75 WETA: Richmond Ferry Service38 Contra Costa County: Fred Jackson Way First/Last Mile Connection
Draft 2019 TIP Page 39
-
2019 TIP Investment AnalysisContra Costa County Project List
NOT MAPPEDAC Transit: ADA Paratransit Assistance
AC Transit: Paratransit Van Replacement
AC Transit: Purchase (10) 24ft Cut-aways
AC Transit: Purchase (24) 60ft Artic Hybrid Buses
AC Transit: Replace (27) 40ft Urban Buses - Hybrid
AC Transit: Replace (6) 24ft Cut-Away Vans
CCCTA: County Connection ADA Paratransit Assistance
CCTA: SR 239 - New State Highway Study
Contra Costa County: West County Walk and Bike Leaders
EBRPD: Conta Costa Parks Bike/Ped Trail Improvements
ECCTA: Tri-Delta ADA Operating Assistance
MTC: Regional Planning Activities and PPM - Contra Costa County
San Ramon: San Ramon Valley Street Smarts
Walnut Creek: Parking Guidance System Pilot
WCCTA: WestCAT ADA Paratransit Operating Subsidy
WCCTA: WestCAT Purchase (6) Electronic Fareboxes
WCCTA: WestCAT Purchase (9) Electronic Fareboxes
WCCTA: WestCAT Purchase of (2) Radio Systems
WCCTA: WestCAT Replace (2) DAR MiniVans
WCCTA: WestCAT Replace (6) 2008 35ft Revenue Vehicles
WCCTA: WestCAT Replace (5) 35ft and (4) 40ft Vehicles
Draft 2019 TIP Page 40
-
680
61
80
29
280
4
4
4
4
242
78080
185
61
24
13
13
123
80
80
580
580
580
24
24
680
Discovery Bay
Orinda
San Ramon
Port Costa
Dublin
Rodeo
PleasantHill
Brentwood
Danville
Alamo
San Pablo
OakleyMartinez
Moraga
Clayton
Pinole
EmeryvillePiedmont
Bay Point
Hercules
Blackhawk
Crockett
Bethel Island
Byron
Lafayette
El Sobrante
Albany
Kensington
El Cerrito
Benicia
Richmond
Vallejo
San Leandro
Antioch
Berkeley
Concord
Alameda
Pittsburg
Walnut Creek
Castro Valley
Oakland
San Francisco
48
26
71
27
42 35
24
6655
4353
53
31
2
36
49
68
38
61
6337
30
33 33
32
49
MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)
Active Transportation Project
Safety Project
Safety and Active Transportation Project
Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.
Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq
2019 TIP Investment AnalysisContra Costa County: Healthy and Safe Communities Projects
Draft 2019 TIP Page 41
-
680
61
80
29
280
4
4
4
4
242
78080
185
61
24
13
13
123
80
80
580
580
580
24
24
680
Discovery Bay
Orinda
San Ramon
Port Costa
Dublin
Rodeo
PleasantHill
Brentwood
Danville
Alamo
San Pablo
OakleyMartinez
Moraga
Clayton
Pinole
EmeryvillePiedmont
Bay Point
Hercules
Blackhawk
Crockett
Bethel Island
Byron
Lafayette
El Sobrante
Albany
Kensington
El Cerrito
Benicia
Richmond
Vallejo
San Leandro
Antioch
Berkeley
Concord
Alameda
Pittsburg
Walnut Creek
Castro Valley
Oakland
San Francisco
48
65
27
25
55
34
18
21
12
12
22
3
5
17
28
70
1
23
75
56
8
8
54
MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)
Roadway Congestion and/or ReliabilityTransit Congestion and/or Reliability
Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.
Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq
2019 TIP Investment AnalysisContra Costa County: Economic Vitality Projects
Draft 2019 TIP Page 42
-
680
61
80
29
280
4
4
4
4
242
78080
185
61
24
13
13
123
80
80
580
580
580
24
24
680
Discovery Bay
Orinda
San Ramon
Port Costa
Dublin
Rodeo
PleasantHill
Brentwood
Danville
Alamo
San Pablo
OakleyMartinez
Moraga
Clayton
Pinole
EmeryvillePiedmont
Bay Point
Hercules
Blackhawk
Crockett
Bethel Island
Byron
Lafayette
El Sobrante
Albany
Kensington
El Cerrito
Benicia
Richmond
Vallejo
San Leandro
Antioch
Berkeley
Concord
Alameda
Pittsburg
Walnut Creek
Castro Valley
Oakland
San Francisco
40
4
4
4
4
74
5860
45
51
64
64
64
64 64
64
5252
16
16
16
16
46
73
47
59
2020
2020
50
5 0
63
69
44
30
4141
41
67
33 33
62
62
29
29
29
29
29
29
MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)
Rehabilitation Project
Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.
Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq
2019 TIP Investment AnalysisContra Costa County: Transportation System Effectiveness-Pavement and Bridge Condition Projects
Draft 2019 TIP Page 43
-
2019 TIP Investment AnalysisMarin County Project List
1 BATA: Toll Bridge Maintenance NOT MAPPED2 BATA: Toll Bridge Rehabilitation Program Caltrans: Marin County - TOS-Mobility3 Corte Madera: Central Marin Regional Pathway Gap Closure GGBHTD: Facilities Rehabilitation4 Corte Madera: Paradise Drive Multiuse Path GGBHTD: Ferry Propulsion Systems Replacement5 GGBHTD: Ferry Channel & Berth Dredging GGBHTD: Fixed Guideway Connectors6 GGBHTD: Golden Gate Bridge-Suicide Deterrent Safety Barrier GGBHTD: Purchase (7) Hybrid Buses7 GGBHTD: Golden Gate Bridge Seismic Retrofit, Phase 1-3A GGBHTD: Replace (14) 22' Gas Body-on-Chassis Vehicles8 GGBHTD: Golden Gate Bridge Seismic Retrofit, Phase 3B GGBHTD: Replace (2) Paratransit Vehicles 9 GGBHTD: Larkspur Ferry Terminal Parking Garage GGBHTD: Replace (67) Diesel Buses with Hybrid Buses10 GGBHTD: San Rafael Transit Center Relocation GGBHTD: Replace (7) 40' Diesel Buses11 Marin County: Hicks Valley/Marshall Petaluma/Wilson Hill Rd Rehab GGBHTD: Replace Paratransit Vehicles12 Marin County: Mountain View Rd Bridge Replacement GGBHTD: Transit Systems Enhancements13 MTC: Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Access Improvements MCTD: ADA Paratransit Assistance14 Novato: Carmel Open Space Acquisition MCTD: Preventive Maintenance15 Novato: Downtown SMART Station Commuter Lot MCTD: Relocate Transit Maintenance Facility16 Novato: Hill Recreation Area Improvements MCTD: Replace Articulated Vehicles17 Novato: Measure A Group 10 Pavement Rehabilitation MCTD: Replace Diesel Vehicles18 Novato: Novato Boulevard Widening, Diablo to Grant MCTD: Replace Shuttle Vehicles19 Novato: Vineyard Road Improvements MTC: Regional Planning Activities and PPM - Marin County20 NPS: Fort Baker's Vista Point Trail Novato: Downtown SMART Station Commuter Lot21 San Anselmo: Bike Spine TAM/SCTA: Bike Share Capital Program (SMART Corridor in Marin and
Sonoma Counties)
22 San Anselmo: Center Blvd Bridge Replace 23 San Anselmo: Sir Francis Drake Blvd Pavement Rehabilitation24 San Rafael: Francisco Blvd East Sidewalk Widening25 San Rafael: Francisco Blvd West Multi-Use Pathway26 San Rafael: Grand Avenue Bicycle Pedestrian Improvements27 Sausalito: Bridgeway/US 101 Off Ramp Bicycle Imps28 SMART: Larkspur Extension29 TAM: North-South Greenway Gap Closure30 TAM: US 101 HOV Lanes-Marin-Sonoma Narrows (Marin)
Draft 2019 TIP Page 44
-
1
580
1
680
80
29
37
221
29 12
12
680
80
131
37
121116
12
101
101
101
1
1
4
4
242
78080
24
13
13
123
80
80
580
24
24
Pleasant Hill
TiburonLafayette
San Anselmo
Emeryville
Albany
FairfaxMartinez
El Cerrito
Larkspur
Petaluma
Cotati
San Pablo
CorteMadera
Benicia
Moraga
Mill Valley
American Canyon
Piedmont
Orinda
Hercules
Sausalito
Novato
Ross
Pinole
Sonoma
Bolinas
Inverness
Port Costa
Stinson Beach
Dillon Beach
Boyes Hot Springs
Muir Beach
Crockett
Bodega Bay
Belvedere
El Sobrante
Santa Venetia
Kensington
Green Valley
Pacheco
Kentfield
Point Reyes Station
El Sobrante
Tomales
Rodeo
Berkeley
Napa
San Rafael
Fairfield
Richmond
Vallejo
Walnut Creek
27
2226
30
4
18
29 29
2425
21
20
19
23
3
16
MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)
Active Transportation Project
Safety Project
Safety and Active Transportation Project
Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.
Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq
2019 TIP Investment AnalysisMarin County: Healthy and Safe Communities Projects
Draft 2019 TIP Page 45
-
1
580
1
680
80
29
37
221
29 12
12
680
80
131
37
121116
12
101
101
101
1
1
4
4
242
78080
24
13
13
123
80
80
580
24
24
Pleasant Hill
TiburonLafayette
San Anselmo
Emeryville
Albany
FairfaxMartinez
El Cerrito
Larkspur
Petaluma
Cotati
San Pablo
CorteMadera
Benicia
Moraga
Mill Valley
American Canyon
Piedmont
Orinda
Hercules
Sausalito
Novato
Ross
Pinole
Sonoma
Bolinas
Inverness
Port Costa
Stinson Beach
Dillon Beach
Boyes Hot Springs
Muir Beach
Crockett
Bodega Bay
Belvedere
El Sobrante
Santa Venetia
Kensington
Green Valley
Pacheco
Kentfield
Point Reyes Station
El Sobrante
Tomales
Rodeo
Berkeley
Napa
San Rafael
Fairfield
Richmond
Vallejo
Walnut Creek
30
78
2813
MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)
Roadway Congestion and/or ReliabilityTransit Congestion and/or Reliability
Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.
Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq
2019 TIP Investment AnalysisMarin County: Economic Vitality Projects
Draft 2019 TIP Page 46
-
1
580
1
680
80
29
37
221
29 12
12
680
80
131
37
121116
12
101
101
101
1
1
4
4
242
78080
24
13
13
123
80
80
580
24
24
Pleasant Hill
TiburonLafayette
San Anselmo
Emeryville
Albany
FairfaxMartinez
El Cerrito
Larkspur
Petaluma
Cotati
San Pablo
CorteMadera
Benicia
Moraga
Mill Valley
American Canyon
Piedmont
Orinda
Hercules
Sausalito
Novato
Ross
Pinole
Sonoma
Bolinas
Inverness
Port Costa
Stinson Beach
Dillon Beach
Boyes Hot Springs
Muir Beach
Crockett
Bodega Bay
Belvedere
El Sobrante
Santa Venetia
Kensington
Green Valley
Pacheco
Kentfield
Point Reyes Station
El Sobrante
Tomales
Rodeo
Berkeley
Napa
San Rafael
Fairfield
Richmond
Vallejo
Walnut Creek
2
11 11
19
23
17
MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)
Rehabilitation Project
Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.
Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq
2019 TIP Investment AnalysisMarin County: Transportation System Effectiveness-Pavement and Bridge Condition Projects
Draft 2019 TIP Page 47
-
2019 TIP Investment AnalysisNapa County Project List
1 American Canyon: Devlin Road and Vine Trail Extension NOT MAPPED2 American Canyon: Eucalyptus Drive Realignment Complete Streets MTC: Regional Planning Activities and PPM - Napa County3 American Canyon: Green Island Road Class I Napa County: 2014 Earthquake Pavement Repair4 Calistoga: SR-128 and Petrified Forest Intersection Improvements NVTA: Napa Vine ADA Operating Assistance5 Napa County: Airport Boulevard Rehabilitation NVTA: Napa Vine Equipment Replacement and Upgrades6 Napa County: Hardin Rd Bridge Replacement VVTA: Napa Vine Operating Assistance7 Napa County: Loma Vista Dr Bridge Replacement 8 Napa County: Silverado Trail Phase L Rehab9 Napa: California Boulevard Roundabouts10 Napa: Silverado Trail Five-Way Intersection Improvements11 Napa: SR 29 Bicycle & Pedestrian Undercrossing12 Napa: Vine Trail Gap Closure-Soscol Avenue Corridor13 NVTA: Napa Valley Vine Trail Calistoga-St. Helena Segment14 NVTA: SR 12/29/221 Soscol Junction Interchange Improvements15 NVTA: Vine Transit Bus Maintenance Facility16 St. Helena: Main Street Pedestrian Improvements17 Yountville: Hopper Creek Pedestrian Bridge and Path Project
Draft 2019 TIP Page 48
-
12
29
68037
221
121
128128
128
29
29
12
12
68080
121116
12
101
16
29
Yountville
Green Valley
Calistoga
Petaluma
Sonoma
American Canyon
Angwin
Rohnert Park
St. Helena
Glen Ellen
Deer Park
Santa Rosa
Fairfield
Napa9
10
14
11
4
17
3
16
13
128
MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)
Active Transportation Project
Safety Project
Safety and Active Transportation Project
Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.
Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq
2019 TIP Investment AnalysisNapa County: Healthy and Safe Communities Projects
Draft 2019 TIP Page 49
-
12
29
68037
221
121
128128
128
29
29
12
12
68080
121116
12
101
16
29
Yountville
Green Valley
Calistoga
Petaluma
Sonoma
American Canyon
Angwin
Rohnert Park
St. Helena
Glen Ellen
Deer Park
Santa Rosa
Fairfield
Napa 9 10
14
1
2
MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)