iodl & icem 2010

45
Getting the Right Mix: Three generations of Distance Education Pedagogy: Terry Anderson, PhD and Professor IODL & ICEM 2010

Upload: terrya

Post on 06-May-2015

1.375 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Keynote at IODL, ICEM in Eskishir, Turkey - Three Generations of DE Pedagogy revisited

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Iodl & icem 2010

Getting the Right Mix: Three generations of

Distance Education Pedagogy:

Terry Anderson, PhD and Professor

IODL & ICEM 2010

Page 2: Iodl & icem 2010

Overview

• Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy• A Network and Connective future for Flexible

Lifelong and Learning and Education

• Your Comments and Questions!

Page 3: Iodl & icem 2010

Athabasca University, Alberta, Canada

* Athabasca University

Fastest growing university in Canada

34,000 students, 700 courses

100% distance education

Graduate and Undergraduate programs

Master & Doctorate – Distance Education

Only USA Regionally Accredited University in

Canada

*Athabasca University

Page 4: Iodl & icem 2010

• “Canada is a great country, much too cold for common sense, inhabited by compassionate and intelligent people with bad haircuts”. – Yann Martel, Life of Pi, 2002.

Page 5: Iodl & icem 2010
Page 6: Iodl & icem 2010

Values

• We can (and must) continuously improve the quality, effectiveness, appeal, cost and time efficiency of the teaching/learning experience.

• Student control and freedom is integral to 21st Century life-long education, training and learning.

• Current training models do not scale for lifelong learning for all residents of our planet.

Page 7: Iodl & icem 2010

Three Generations of Flexible Learning Pedagogies

1. Behaviourist/Cognitive – Self Paced, Individual Study

2. Constructivist – Groups3. Connectivist – Networks

and Collectives

Page 8: Iodl & icem 2010

1. Behavioural/Cognitive Pedagogies

• “tell ‘em what you’re gonna tell ‘em,

• tell ‘em • then tell ‘em what you

told ‘em”

Direct Instruction

Page 9: Iodl & icem 2010

Gagne’s Events of Instruction (1965)

1. Gain learners' attention2. Inform learner of objectives3. Stimulate recall of previous information4. Present stimulus material5. Provide learner guidance6. Elicit performance7. Provide Feedback8. Assess performance9. Enhance transfer opportunities

Basis of Instructional Systems Design (ISD)

Page 10: Iodl & icem 2010

Enhanced by the “cognitive revolution”

• Chunking • Cognitive Load• Working Memory• Multiple Representations• Split-attention effect• Variability Effect• Multi-media effect

– (Sorden, 2005)“learning as acquiring and using conceptual and cognitive structures” Greeno, Collins and Resnick, 1996

Page 11: Iodl & icem 2010

Behaviourist/Cognitive Knowledge Is:

• Logically coherent, existing independent of perspective

• Largely context free• Capable of being transmitted• Assumes closed systems with discoverable

relationships between inputs and outputs

Page 12: Iodl & icem 2010

Behaviourist/Cognitive Focus is on the Content and the Individual

Learner

Page 13: Iodl & icem 2010

LMS as current primary B/C tool

• Secure – hackers, vandals• Robust• Custom designed for teaching• Simple, consistent and adopted• Supported and Integrated with other institutional

systems• Tracking and recoding• Sophisticated (branching, printing, permissions)

Page 14: Iodl & icem 2010

Focus on Content• Massive global decrease in costs, complexity

and collaboration,• Massive Increase in convenience and access

Page 15: Iodl & icem 2010

A Tale of 3 books

Open Access - First Year

41,245 + downloads &

Individual chapters

1202 hardcopies sold @ $40

Free at www.aupress.ca

Commercial publisher

934 copies sold at $52.00

Buy at Amazon!!

E-Learning for the 21st CenturyCommercial Pub.1200 sold @ $135.002,000 copies in Arabic Translation @ $8.

Page 16: Iodl & icem 2010

New Content Providers - ITune U

• “iTunes is not simply a repository of more than 8 million songs, audio books, videos and 70,000 or so iPhone applications.

• It also has the world's largest, constantly available, free educational resource” — iTunesU.

Page 17: Iodl & icem 2010

New Developments in Behavioural/Cognitive Systems

• Reflection Amplifiers• Social Indicators

– Global feedback– Digital footprints– Archives– Competition and games

• Multiple Representations• Student modeling and adaptation - analytics

Page 18: Iodl & icem 2010

Behavioural/cognitive learning is necessary but not sufficient for

quality education.

Page 19: Iodl & icem 2010

2nd Generation - Constructivist Training Pedagogy

• New knowledge is built upon the foundation of previous learning

• The importance of context• Errors and contradictions are useful• Learning as an active rather than passive process, • The importance of language and other social tools in

constructing knowledge• Focus on negotiation, meta-cognition and evaluation as a means

to develop learners’ capacity to assess their own learning• The importance of multiple perspectives - groups• Need for knowledge to be subject to social discussion, validation

and application in real world contexts – (from Honebein, 1996; Jonassen, 1991; Kanuka & Anderson, 1999)

Page 20: Iodl & icem 2010

Constructivist Knowledge is:

• Socially constructed• Arrived at through dialogic

encounter– (Bakhtin, 1975)

• “education as the discursive construction of shared knowledge”– (Wegerif, R., 2009)

Kathy Sierra http://www.speedofcreativity.org/

Page 21: Iodl & icem 2010

Constructivist learning isGroup Learning

• Motivation• Feedback• Alternate and conflicting viewpoints

Page 22: Iodl & icem 2010

Taxonomy of the ‘Many’ – A Conceptual Model

Dron and Anderson, 2007

GroupConscious membership

Leadership and organizationCohorts and paced

Rules and guidelinesAccess and privacy controls

Focused and often time limitedMay be blended F2F

Metaphor : Virtual classroom

22

Page 23: Iodl & icem 2010

Why Groups?• “Students who learn in small groups

generally demonstrate greater academic achievement, express more favorable attitudes toward learning, and persist …

• small-group learning may have particularly large effects on the academic achievement of members of underrepresented groups and the learning-related attitudes of women…” • Springer; Stanne, & Donovan, (1999) P.42

Page 24: Iodl & icem 2010

Why Groups?

• Athabasca University’s learner-paced undergraduate courses averaged 63.6% completion rates for the 2002-2003 academic year.

• Completion rates for the same courses offered in seminar format (either through synchronous technologies or face-to-face) averaged 86.9% over the same period (Athabasca University, 2003, p.12)

Page 25: Iodl & icem 2010

Constructivist Learning in Groups• Long history of research

and study• Established sets of tools

– Classrooms– Learning Management

Systems – Synchronous (video &

net conferencing)– Email

• Need to develop face to face, mediated and blended group learning skills

Garrison, R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking in text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87-105.

Page 26: Iodl & icem 2010

Advances in Constructivist Learning Tools

• Easier tools for group formation and collaborative production.– LMS advances, – Group editing – wiki, Google docs– Free synchronous tools- Skype– Beyond email – texting, VocieThread,Twitter,

location awareness

Page 27: Iodl & icem 2010

Problems with Groups• Restrictions in time, space, pace, &

relationship - NOT OPEN• Often overly confined by leader

expectation and institutional curriculum control

• Usually Isolated from the authentic world of practice

• “low tolerance of internal difference, sexist and ethicized regulation, high demand for obedience to its norms and exclusionary practices.” Cousin & Deepwell 2005

• “Pathological politeness” and fear of debate

• Group think (Baron, 2005)• Poor preparation for Lifelong Learning

beyond the course

Page 28: Iodl & icem 2010

• Constructivist learning in Groups is necessary, but not sufficient for advanced forms of learning.

Page 29: Iodl & icem 2010

3rd Generation - Networked Learning using Connectivist Pedagogy

• Learning is building networks of information, contacts and resources that are applied to real problems.

Page 30: Iodl & icem 2010

Connectivist Learning PrinciplesGeorge Siemens, 2004

• Learning and knowledge rests in diversity of opinions. • Learning is a process of connecting specialized nodes or

information sources. • Learning may reside in non-human appliances. • Capacity to know is more critical than what is currently

known. • Ability to see connections between fields, ideas, and

concepts is a core skill. • Currency (accurate, up-to-date knowledge) is the intent

of all connectivist learning activities.

Page 31: Iodl & icem 2010

Connectivist Knowledge is

• Emergent• Distributed• Chaotic• Fragmented• Non sequential• Contextualized

Page 32: Iodl & icem 2010

Connectivist Learning designs

Awareness and Receptivity

Connection formingSelectionFiltering

Contribution and Involvement

Reflection and Metacognition

Pettenati, M. (2007).

Page 33: Iodl & icem 2010

Special Issue of IRRODL on Connectivism coming Nov. 2010

Free Subscriptions at www.irrodl.org

Page 34: Iodl & icem 2010

Connectivist focuses on Networks - - not Groups

Group

NetworkShared interest/practice

Fluid membershipFriends of friends

Reputation and altruism drivenEmergent norms, structures

Activity ebbs and flowsRarely F2F

Metaphor: Virtual Community of Practice34

Dron and Anderson, 2007

Page 35: Iodl & icem 2010

Networks add diversity to learning

“People who live in the intersection of social worlds are at higher risk of having good ideas” Burt, 2005, p. 90

Page 36: Iodl & icem 2010

Connectivist Designs build Social Capital

• “The sum of actual and potential resources embedded within, available through, and derived from the network of relationships possessed by an individual or social unit.” Nahapiet and Ghoshal (1998, p.243)

Photo greensoleshoes.com

Page 37: Iodl & icem 2010

How do we Build Networks of Practice ?

• Motivation – learning plans, self and net efficacy, net-presence

• Structural support – Exposure and training– Transparent systems– Wireless access, mobile computing

• Cognitive skills – content + procedural, disclosure control

• Social connections, reciprocity– Creating and sustaining a spiral of social capital building

• Nahapiet & Ghoshal (1998)

Page 38: Iodl & icem 2010

Connectivist Tools - Web 2.0 &Personal Learning Networks

http://www.go2web20.net/

Page 39: Iodl & icem 2010

Network Tool Set (example)

39

TextText

Stepanyan, Mather & Payne, 2007

Page 40: Iodl & icem 2010

Access Controls in Elgg

Page 41: Iodl & icem 2010

Open Net

Athabasca University

Athabasca Landing

E-PortfoliosProfilesNetworksBookmarksBlogs

Media lab

Secondlife campus

AUspace

AlFrescoCMS

Moodle

Library

Course Development

ELGG

MY AULogin

Registry

OERs, YouTUBE

DiscoveryRead & Comment

Single Sign on

CIDER

Research/Community Networks

Sample CC Course units and Branded OERs

PasswordsPasswords

Page 42: Iodl & icem 2010

Challenges of Connectivist Learning Models

• Privacy • Control • Dealing with disruptive change• Institutional Support• Sustaining motivation and

commitment

Page 43: Iodl & icem 2010

3 Generations of DE Pedagogy Summary

Anderson, T. & Dron, J. (in press) Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy. IRRODL

Page 44: Iodl & icem 2010

Conclusion• Behavioural/Cognitive models are useful for

memory and conceptual knowledge acquisition.• Constructivist models develop group skills and

negotiated knowledge.• Connectivist models and tools introduce

networked learning and are foundational for lifelong learning.

• 21st Century Literacy's and skills demand effective use of all three pedagogies

Anderson & Dron (in press) 3 generations of DE Pedagogy. International Review of Research in Distance and Open Learning (IRRODL)

Page 45: Iodl & icem 2010

"He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever.”

Chinese Proverb

Terry Anderson [email protected]

Blog: terrya.edublogs.org

Your comments and questions most welcomed!