iogp data series

IOGP Data Series

SEPTEMBER2019

Data can play a vital role in improving performance. Every year, we collect data covering a range of topics on worldwide upstream operations, onshore and offshore, from participating member companies.

Safety performance indicatorsWe started collecting upstream safety data in 1985, and now have the industry’s largest database of safety performance, covering participating member company employees and their contractors onshore and offshore.

Our annual reports analyse results for key indicators by region, function and company:

• Number of fatalities, fatal accident rate, fatal incident rate• Total recordable injury rate, lost time injury frequency• Number of lost work day cases and the number of

days lost• Number of restricted work day cases and the number

of restricted work days• Number of medical treatment cases

The latest report (2018 IOGP Safety Performance Indicators) shows that the Fatal Accident Rate for reporting companies has fallen by 8% compared with 2017. The number of fatalities has decreased from 33 in 2017 to 31 in 2018.

The number of fatal incidents has also decreased from 30 in 2017 to 27 in 2018. This is against the background of a 2% increase in work hours reported.

Safety performance indicators – Process safety eventsWe started a pilot project collecting Process Safety Event data in 2010 and have published an annual report since 2011.

The process safety events (PSE) data are based on the numbers of Tier 1 and Tier 2 process safety events reported by participating IOGP member companies, separately for:

• Onshore and offshore

• Drilling and production

• Activities

• Consequences

• Material released

The data are normalised against work hours associated with drilling and production work hours to provide PSE rates.

PSE Rate – Tier 1 and Tier 2

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

20182017201620152014201320122011

PSE

per m

illio

n w

ork

hour

s

Tier 1

0.29

0.19 0.190.14 0.14 0.13

0.52 0.50

0.61

0.50

Tier 2

0.44

0.16

0.440.39

0.16

0.39

Number of fatalities and fatal accident rate (2009–2018)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

20182017201620152014201320122011201020090.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

Num

ber o

f fat

aliti

es

FAR

fata

litie

s pe

r 100

mill

ion

hour

s w

orke

d

67

94

58

99

Fatal accident rate (FAR)Fatalities Fatal Incidents

65

50

88

52

80

43 45 42

54

4050

29 30332731

IOGP Data Series www.iogp.org/bookstore/product-category/data-series


Well control incidents and safety alertsIOGP Members also report well control incidents and safety alerts, you can find these – as well as narratives for all fatal events – on the IOGP Safety Zone at http://safetyzone.iogp.org

Safety performance indicators – Aviation accidentsThis report presents the safety performance of the aviation industry involved in both upstream and downstream operations reported by participating IOGP member companies for 2013-2018.

The key indicators for analysis of aviation operations and safety performance are:

• numbers of fatalities• accidents recorded• hours flown• passengers carried• flights performed

Safety performance indicators – Motor Vehicle CrashesThis report presents contributing IOGP Members’ global results for:

• Number of motor vehicle crash (MVC) fatalities

• Number of MVC for each reporting group and category

• MVC rate (motor vehicle crashes per million kilometres) for each reporting group and category.

Reporting companies will typically report their own data as well as that of their associated contractors. The indicators are analysed by region for both company and contractor data.

Work-related land transport fatalities reported to IOGP

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40 Land transport fatalities due to assault/violent acts

Land transport fatalities excluding assault/violent acts

Land transport fatal incidents

2018201720162015201420132012201120102009200820072006200520042003200220012000

Report 365 first published

April 2005

Fata

litie

s an

d fa

tal i

ncid

ents

Level of reporting by participating companies for helicopter operations

0

100000

200000

300000

400000

500000

600000

700000

800000

900000

2018201720162015201420130

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Num

ber o

f hou

rs fl

own

or n

umbe

r of f

light

s

Num

ber of helicopters

Hours flown Number of flights Total helicopter fleet


Health leading performance indicatorsIOGP and IPIECA have developed two tools to assess health leading performance indicators within individual companies. These enable performance comparison between different parts of a company and between participating companies.

Percentage tool – 2018 HPI average values

1

2

3

4Public health interface and promotion of good health

(3.42)

Health reporting andrecord management

(3.57)

Health impact assessment(2.78)

Fitness for task assessment and health surveillance

(3.40)

Management of ill-health in the workplace(3.73)

Medical emergency management(3.61)

Industrial hygiene and control of workplace exposures(3.37)

Health risk assessment and planning

(3.31)

Environmental performance indicatorsWe have collected and published environmental data from our member companies on an annual basis since 2001. The database now represents about one third of known hydrocarbon production.

Information is aggregated at both global and regional levels and is expressed within the following environmental indicator categories:

• gaseous emissions• energy consumption• flaring• produced water• non-aqueous drilling fluids retained on cuttings

discharged to sea• spills• fresh water

Hydrocarbon flared per unit of hydrocarbon production (by region)

Tonn

es h

ydro

carb

on fl

ared

pe

r tho

usan

d to

nnes

pro

duct

ion

62%33%

95%

10%20%

34%0

10

20

30

40

50

South &CentralAmerica

Russia &Central

Asia

NorthAmerica

MiddleEast

EuropeAsia/Australasia

Africa

6.07.8

Overall 12.1

6.55.0

2.9

19.6

35.6

2017

2016

2015

2017 overall

Table 13: Gap analysis tool 2018 results for Element 4 – Management of ill-health in the workplace

Company Code

Results by statement score Average by company

G B E C A F D

NN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.3

SC 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0

BP 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.1

MC 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.4

OQ 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 3.4

DP 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.6

IJ 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7

IN 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.7

YF 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7

AR 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.9

BH 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.9

EF 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.9

WD 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.9

AI 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

AP 4.0 4.0 n/a 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

BW 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

CF 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

CT 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

GJ 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

HC 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

HG 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

ID 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

IV 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

KN 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

MB 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

PB 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

RA 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

RD 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

TD 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

VC 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

VG 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

YT 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

YU 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

Average by statement 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.9

Sorted by statement score, lowest to highest (33 companies took part)Note: assigned company codes change every year

Health leading performance indicators – 2018 data / Gap analysis tool results

33

Gap analysis tool 2018 results for Element 4 – Management of ill-health in the workplace

Registered Office: City Tower, Level 14, 40 Basinghall Street, London EC2V 5DE, United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 3763 9700 [email protected] Office: Avenue de Tervuren 188A, B-1150 Brussels, Belgium T +32 (0)2 790 7762 [email protected] Houston Office: 19219 Katy Freeway, Suite 175, Houston, TX 77094, USA T +1 (713) 261 0411 [email protected]

www.iogp.org

iogp data series

Documents