iot community - masstlc - harvard business school joint open forum
TRANSCRIPT
Smart, Connected Products: Which locations will deliver the production
technology of the 21st century?
WorkshopHarvard Business School
September 24, 2015
Dr. Christian Ketels, Principal AssociateRich Bryden, Director of Information ProductsDanny Bressler, Research AssociateInstitute for Strategy and CompetitivenessHarvard Business School
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter22015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Establishing Boston as the leading hotspot for IoT-enabling technologies
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter32015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
? • What are ‘IoT enabling technologies’?• What is a cluster in ‘IoT enabling technologies’?
• What is Boston’s position relative to rival locations in ‘IoT enabling technologies’?
• What are Boston’s specific strengths and weaknesses?
• What is the position in this market that Boston should/could aspire for?
• What are the actions that Boston should take to achieve this position?
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter42015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Sources: Fortune, Forbes, Financial Times, Economic Times of India, Wall Street Journal, Pulse, Harvard Business Review Network World, Manfucaturing.net
Internet of Things: Dominating News Headlines
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter52015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Internet of Things: Huge Economic Impact Forecasted
• Gartner: IoT product and service suppliers will generate incremental revenue exceeding $300 billion in 2020
• IDC: Estimates that the “IoT solutions” market will grow from $1.9 trillion in 2013 to $7.1 trillion by 2020
• McKinsey: Published a Report “The Internet of Things: Mapping the Value Beyond the Hype”, in which they estimate that the IoT could have an economic impact of up to $11.1 Trillion by 2025
• GE: The “Industrial Internet” has the potential to add $10 to $15 trillion to global GDP over the next 20 years
• Cisco: $19 trillion forecast for the economic value created by the “Internet of Everything” over the course of the next decade
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter62015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Internet of Things: Selected Challenges
• Standards - Without agreement on key standards for communication between the different elements of the SCP system market growth will be limited
• Skills – The skills needed to design, sell, and service smart, connected products are in high demand but short supply
• Security – Without credible security solutions markets will be held back by worried consumers and firms facing liability risks
• Infrastructure – Without sufficient capacity in the internet/ communication networks increasingly higher bandwidth SCP solutions might not be feasible
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter72015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
From Internet of Things to Smart Connected ProductsDifferent Perspectives
How Smart, Connected Products are Transforming Companies
Where are the Emerging Hotspots in Smart, Connected Products Technology?
Markets Companies Locations
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter82015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
? • What are ‘IoT enabling technologies’?• What is a cluster in ‘IoT enabling
technologies’?
• What is Boston’s position relative to rival locations in ‘IoT enabling technologies’?
• What are Boston’s specific strengths and weaknesses?
• What is the position in this market that Boston should/could aspire?
• What are the actions that Boston should take to achieve this position?
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter92015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Towards A Cluster-View of IoT-Enabled Technologies
1. What is the core of the cluster that we are interested in, i.e. the central product or service it provides?
2. What are the relevant economic activities that together drive IoT-enabled products and services?
3. What are the linkages between them; where are there significant benefits of geographic proximity between them?
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter102015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Products vs Production Technology
Smart, Connected Products
Smart, Connected Products
Production Technology
Many end-product (and service) industries…
…served by one new production technology for the digital age
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter112015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
What Smart, Connected Products (SCPs) Need:The Technology Stack
Identity & SecurityTools that manage user authentication and system access, as well as secure the product, connectivity, and the product cloud
External Information SourcesA gateway for information from external sources –such as weather, traffic, commodity and energy prices, social media, and geo-mapping – that inform product capabilities
Network Communication
Product Data Database
Smart ProductApplications
Rules/Analytics Engine
Application Platform
The protocols that enable communications between the product and the cloud (cellular, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, others)
Big data database system that enables aggregation, normalization, and management of real-time and historical product data
Application development and execution environment enabling rapid creation of smart, connected business applications using data access, visualization, and run-time tools
The rules, business logic, and big data analytical capabilities that populate the algorithms involved in product operation and reveal new product insights
Software applications running on remote servers that manage the monitoring, control, optimization, and autonomous operation functions
PRODUCT
Product Hardware
Embedded sensors, processors, and connectivity port/antennas supplementing traditional mechanical and electrical components
Product Software
An embedded operating system, onboard software applications, enhanced user interface, and product control components
Integration with Business SystemsTools that integrate data from smart, connected products with core enterprise business systems such as ERP, CRM, and PLM
COMMUNICATIONS
PRODUCT CLOUD
Source: Porter/Heppelmann, 2014
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter122015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Product
Smart Connected Products Technology
Product Cloud
Application Platforms
Smart Product Applications
Rules/Analytics Engines
Smart Connected Product Hardware (e.g sensors, chipsets)
Smart Connected Product Software
Physical Product
Communications
Network Hardware (e.g commsboards, product base stations)
Middleware/ Service Delivery Platform
Technical Services
Business Systems IntegrationIdentity and
Security
Big Data Analytics
Business ServicesSelected Product Verticals
Agriculture
Automotive
Medical Devices
Heavy Machinery
Tourism
Apparel
Aerospace & Defense
Distribution
Electric Power
Lighting
Recreational and Small Electric Goods
Research and Educational Institutions
Institutions for Collaboration
Insurance
Transportation and Logistics
Communications Equipment / Services
Universities
Research Institutions
Technology Organizations
Standards Organizations
Who is Delivering the Technology for SCPs? The Technology Stack Ecosystem
Supporting Infrastructure Financing – Banks
and VC/PEBusiness
Consultants
Lawyers
Data Centers/ Computing
Network Service Providers
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter132015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Local Linkages Within the Technology StackCore Activities
Product
Smart Connected Products Technology
Product Cloud
Application Platforms
Smart Product Applications
Rules/Analytics Engines
Smart Connected Product Hardware (e.g sensors, chipsets)
Smart Connected Product Software
Physical Product
Communications
Network Hardware (e.g commsboards, product base stations)
Middleware/ Service Delivery Platform
Drivers of local linkages:General categories• Use of similar specialized skills and
other local business environment conditions
• Existence of deep and complex input/output relationships
• Meaningful knowledge spillovers
Linkages in the Technology Stack: Initial hypotheses• Strong linkages across most
elements of the technology stack, with the possible exception of communication network hardware
• All types of linkages relevant
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter142015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Local Linkages Within the Technology StackRelated and Supporting Activities
Drivers of local linkages:General categories• Use of similar specialized skills and
other local business environment conditions
• Existence of deep and complex input/output relationships
• Meaningful knowledge spillovers
Linkages in the Technology Stack Ecosystem: Initial hypotheses• Strong local linkages of core activities
to technical services• Medium local linkages to specialized
business services and productverticals
• Weak to medium local linkages to supporting infrastructure providers
ProductProduct Cloud Communications
Technical Services
Business Systems IntegrationIdentity and
Security
Big Data Analytics
Business ServicesSupporting Infrastructure Financing – Banks
and VC/PEBusiness
Consultants
Lawyers
Data Centers/ Computing
Network Service Providers
Product Verticals
Smart Connected Products Technology
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter152015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
The Nature of Smart, Connected Products ClustersOperationalizing the Idea
Information Technology and Analytical Instruments• Semiconductor Machinery Manufacturing • Photographic and Photocopying Equipment Manufacturing • Electronic Computer Manufacturing• Computer Storage Device Manufacturing• Computer Terminals and Other Computer Peripheral Manufacturing • Bare Printed Circuit Board Manufacturing• Semiconductor and Related Device Manufacturing• Electronic Coil, Transformer, and Other Inductor Manufacturing• Electronic Connector Manufacturing• Printed Circuit Assembly (Electronic Assembly) Manufacturing• Other Electronic Component Manufacturing• Software Publishers
Business Services
• Scientific and Technical Consulting Services• Lessors of Nonfinancial Intangible Assets (except Copyrighted Works)• Data Processing, Hosting, and Related Services• Custom Computer Programming Services• Computer Systems Design Services• Computer Facilities Management Services• Other Computer Related Services
Education and Knowledge Creation• Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life
Sciences (except Biotechnology)
The SCP Technology Cluster – Core Industries
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter162015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Questions For You
• Does this conceptualization of the cluster as ‘Production Technology for IoT” make sense to you?
• Are we capturing the relevant industries/activities? What’s missing?
• Where do local linkages (tight collaboration) and spill-overs (including tapping into the same pool of skilled labor, intense local competition driving innovation, etc.) matter the most?
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter172015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
? • What are ‘IoT enabling technologies’?• What is a cluster in ‘IoT enabling technologies’?
• What is Boston’s position relative to rival locations in ‘IoT enabling technologies’?
• What are Boston’s specific strengths and weaknesses?
• What is the position in this market that Boston should/could aspire?
• What are the actions that Boston should take to achieve this position?
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter182015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Smart Connected Products: Boston Area Companies
PLATFORM
NETWORK AND COMMUNICATIONS
PRODUCT COMPONENTS
APPLICATIONS, ANALYTICS, DATABASE
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter192015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Benchmarking by IoT Company HQs
But how many of them are focused on
production technology vs products?
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter202015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
0K
50K
100K
150K
200K
250K
300K
Employment in SCP Related Clusters, Selected IndustriesTop Regions
Business Services: #5Education and Knowledge Creation: #4Information Technology and Analytical Instruments: #3
The Boston Economic Area has a strong position in the set of industries broadly related to the SCP technology stack.Boston’s ranks across the 179 U.S. Economic Areas:
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter212015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Information Technology and Analytical Instruments
Educationand
KnowledgeCreation
Business Services
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
33,2232.45
2,9016.09
3,8314.81
5,2723.36
1,4302.17
5,0981.81
1,1001.46
2,7651.42
3752.20
9121.52 595
1.36
4770.59
34,6492.26
24,2631.57
34,3641.53
23,0521.17
2,1801.88
4,3961.25 3,663
1.10
3,0710.62
Boston Area Specialization in SCP Related Industries
EmploymentLocation Quotient
BusinessServices
Education and Knowledge
Creation
Information Technology and Analytical Instruments
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter222015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Employment and Specialization in SCP Related ClustersTop Regions
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8Location Quotient
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
150,000
175,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
Boston, MA
Boston, MA
Washington, DC
San Jose, CA
San Jose, CA
San Jose, CA
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
Boston, MA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Business Services
Education and Knowledge Creation
Information Technology and Analytical Instruments
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter232015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
SCP-Related Skill Base by Economic AreasMay 2014, Economic Areas with >100K SCP Jobs
2.6% 5.6% 6.6% 2.1% 4.6% 3.4% 6.2% 2.5% 2.7%Percent of Total Employment
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Boston has the 5th
highest total number of key SCP jobs and the 4th
highest concentration of key SCP jobs
471K
399K
342K
268K245K
216K 203K 202K
135K
New York WashingtonDC
SF andSiliconValley
Los Angeles Boston Dallas Seattle Chicago Philadelphia
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter242015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Patenting in SCP Related IndustriesTop Economic Areas
Patents in SCP Related Industries*(1998-2013, Metros with more than 10K SCP Patents)
Source: US Cluster Mapping Project DataNotes: *SCP Related Industries include Information Technology and Analytical Instruments, Education and Knowledge Creation, and Business Services;
>99% of the patents were in IT and Analytical Instruments in all 5 Economic Areas
88K
30K21K 20K 20K 17K
13K 11K
SF and SiliconValley
New York Boston Seattle Los Angeles Austin Minneapolis Portland
SCP Patents Per 10K Employees 235 33 56 111 29 229 51 96
Boston has the 3rd highest total number of patents in SCP related industries, but
less concentration per employee than other key areas
including SF and Silicon Valley, Seattle, and Austin
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter252015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Boston Smart, Connected Products ClusterSummary Assesment
Demand Conditions
Factor(Input)
Conditions
Context for Firm Strategy and
Rivalry
Related and Supporting Industries
• A strong culture of innovation wherecompanies compete using cutting-edge technologies (reflected by the large number of patents in SCP related industries), though lagging behind Silicon Valley in terms of scale, and Seattle and Austin in terms of concentration
• Companies both compete and cooperateintensely
• A mix of large companies with scale and resources and small companies andstartups with dynamism and new ideas
• A sophisticated, young, tech-savvy populace that is a rigorous testing-groundfor SCP applications
• Boston has a world-leading life-sciences cluster, which has a number of potential SCP applications
• Strong presence of supporting industries thatfacilitate growth of the SCP cluster:
• Business services - financing, consulting, law
• Technical Services - identity and security, big data analytics, business systems integration
• Supporting Infrastructure – Data centers/ computing, enterprise-scale network
• Lack of HQs from the “heaviest hitters” in technology with the largest R&D budgets (e.g. Google, Amazon)
+ Access to the right talent to produce SCP technology, including talent in computer and mathematical occupations, electronic and computer engineering, and computer and information systems management
+ Leading educational and researchinstitutions in IT, robotics, engineering, etc.
+ Research institutions that have a strong focus on applied science and industry partnerships (e.g. Auto-ID lab, Lincoln lab)
-
+
+/-
++
+
+
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter262015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Boston’s Position as a SCP Technology Cluster:Our View so Far
• Boston has strong companies active in the industry, a solid to leading position in many of the relevant industries and clusters, and strong cluster-specific business environment conditions
• Overall, Boston is positioned among the leading locations vying to be the hotspots for SCP technology; it is, however, not better positioned than key rivals like Silicon Valley
• Success is not a foregone conclusion; rivalry is intense
• Boston has an opportunity to take the lead if it focuses its efforts more strongly than others on this specific part of the broader market opportunity offered by digitalization – Need a strategy, not just a few good policies
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter272015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Questions for You
• Does this characterization of Boston’s positioning in this space broadly match your perceptions?
• Who are the key rival locations Boston is competing with?
• What do you see as Boston’s key strengths, key weaknesses?
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter282015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
? • What are ‘IoT enabling technologies’?• What is a cluster in ‘IoT enabling technologies’?
• What is Boston’s position relative to rival locations in ‘IoT enabling technologies’?
• What are Boston’s specific strengths and weaknesses?
• What is the position in this market that Boston should/could aspire for?
• What are the actions that Boston should take to achieve this position?
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter292015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Internet of Things: A Global Race for the TopIoT Week ‘15
Lisbon, PortugalPromotes international dialogue
and cooperation on the IoTbetween diverse actors from
industry, research and government and across sectors
Internet of Things Tech Forum ‘15
Frankfurt, GermanyBrings in players in
Industry from across the industry to discuss IoTbusiness opportunities
IoT World ‘15San Francisco, CA
“The World’s largest and most comprehensive IoT event”
aimed at creating partnerships and developing ecosystems to monetize the IoT Revolution
IoT European Summit ‘15Brussels, Belgium
Bringing together European decision makers and leading
industry stakeholders to foster IoT’srole in building a “more inclusive, smarter and competitive Europe”
IoT Evolution Experience ‘15Miami, FL
Bringing together a worldwide community of IoT technologists to
share how IoT can transform business
IoT Connect ‘14Sydney, Australia
Brings together key innovators, platforms and telecoms to examine synergies between IoT ecosystems such as smart cities, home, health,
wearables, car and agriculture
IoT Korea ‘14Seoul, Korea
Showcases products from the
Industrial Products Industry
Internet of Things Global Summit ‘14
Washington, DCBringing together key
stakeholders to discuss critical policy dimensions and
numerous commercial opportunities surrounding IoT
Sources: Event Websites
International Conference on Cloud Computing and IoT ‘14
Changchun, ChinaPromotes Bringing together business
and academic leaders to discuss recent advances in cloud computing,
big data, and IoT
LiveWorx ‘15Boston, MA
“Bringing together industry leaders to share real-world successes with IoT and, together, shape the future of this technology and business as
we know it.”
LiveWorx Europe ’15Stuttgart, Germany
“The fastest-growing network of pan-European product
development, service and IoT leaders who are transforming their businesses to gain a competitive advantage in the marketplace.”
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter302015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Mobilizing the SCP Technology Cluster
• Most existing Internet of Things-initiatives focus on– Helping start-ups that produce SCPs– Helping established industries and firms to turn their products into SCPs
• This will drive, but not by itself serve, the demand for SCP technology to produce these new SCPs
• Boston has an opportunity to target this SCP technology market
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter312015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Thinking About Positioning
• Successful positioning is about finding (attractive) market segments where rivals either can not or do not want to compete; it builds on finding or creating trade-offs across serving different market segments
Focus on IoT-enabled products and services for the end consumer
marketFocus on IoT-solutions in a specific set of existing
industries
Focus on launching and growing start-ups in the
emerging IoT space
Focus on the enabling technology that
companies providing IoT-enabled products and
services need
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter322015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Ideas for Boston’s SCP Technology Cluster
• Harvard SCP Technology Science Park
• Skill development programs
• Global standards initiative
• Test beds, living labs, competitions …
• ‘Product vertical’-specific collaboration projects
• …
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter332015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Questions for You
• What are relevant segments in this market?
• Where do you see opportunities for creating ‘trade-offs’ by choosing a specific market segment to serve?
• What should be done to make Boston a more attractive location for the SCP Technology cluster? By whom?
• How does a stronger Boston SCP cluster matter to you and your company?
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter342015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Back-Up
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter352015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
967K699K
523K 481K 411K182K 145K 103K 35K 25K
166K 87K
447K
4.27M
SoftwareDevelopers,Applications
ComputerSystemsAnalysts
SoftwareDevelopers,
SystemsSoftware
Network andComputerSystems
Administrators
ComputerProgrammers
ComputerNetwork
Architects
DatabaseAdministrators
InformationSecurityAnalysts
Statisticians Computer andInformationResearchScientists
ElectronicsEngineers
ComputerHardwareEngineers
Computer andInformation
SystemsManagers
Total
Skill Base of an SCP Technology Cluster SCP-related Occupations, May 2014
Jobs in Computer and Mathematical Occupations(3.57M Jobs; 2.1% of National Labor Force)
Jobs in Engineering Occupations(253K Jobs; 0.2% of National Labor Force)
Jobs in Management Occupations(447K Jobs; 0.3% of National Labor Force)
In total, jobs in key occupations for an SCP technology cluster make up 4.27M jobs or 2.5%
of the labor force
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Note: Key occupations were determined by going through the BLS list of occupations and determining which occupations are likely very important in producing SCP technology
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter362015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Jobs in Key Occupations for an SCP Technology ClusterTop 25 Economic Areas
Economic Area # of SCP Jobs Percentage of Jobs that are SCP JobsNew York‐Newark‐Bridgeport, NY‐NJ‐CT‐PA 470,530 2.6%Washington‐Baltimore‐Northern Virginia, DC‐MD‐VA‐WV 398,680 5.6%San Jose‐San Francisco‐Oakland, CA 342,090 6.6%Los Angeles‐Long Beach‐Riverside, CA 268,020 2.1%Boston‐Worcester‐Manchester, MA‐NH 245,120 4.6%Dallas‐Fort Worth, TX 215,500 3.4%Seattle‐Tacoma‐Olympia, WA 202,760 6.2%Chicago‐Naperville‐Michigan City, IL‐IN‐WI 202,470 2.5%Philadelphia‐Camden‐Vineland, PA‐NJ‐DE‐MD 134,540 2.7%Detroit‐Warren‐Flint, MI 95,080 2.6%Atlanta‐Sandy Springs‐Gainesville, GA‐AL 82,550 3.5%Houston‐Baytown‐Huntsville, TX 66,680 2.3%Denver‐Aurora‐Boulder, CO 61,020 4.1%Minneapolis‐St. Paul‐St. Cloud, MN‐WI 60,670 3.3%Phoenix‐Mesa‐Scottsdale, AZ 54,580 3.0%Miami‐Fort Lauderdale‐Miami Beach, FL 48,070 1.4%San Diego‐Carlsbad‐San Marcos, CA 45,220 3.4%Austin‐Round Rock, TX 43,320 4.9%St. Louis‐St. Charles‐Farmington, MO‐IL 34,050 2.6%Portland‐Vancouver‐Beaverton, OR‐WA 32,780 2.6%Columbus‐Marion‐Chillicothe, OH 32,460 3.4%Charlotte‐Gastonia‐Salisbury, NC‐SC 31,220 3.4%Kansas City‐Overland Park‐Kansas City, MO‐KS 30,250 3.0%Tampa‐St. Petersburg‐Clearwater, FL 27,560 2.3%Sacramento‐‐Arden‐Arcade‐‐Truckee, CA‐NV 27,200 3.2%
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Copyright 2015 © Professor Michael E. Porter372015 SCP Boston – HBS Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness
Patenting in SCP Related Industries*Top 25 Economic Areas
Economic Area # of SCP Patents # of SCP Patents Per 10K EmployeesSan Jose‐San Francisco‐Oakland, CA 88,071 235New York‐Newark‐Bridgeport, NY‐NJ‐CT‐PA 30,304 33Boston‐Worcester‐Manchester, MA‐NH 21,144 56Seattle‐Tacoma‐Olympia, WA 20,413 111Los Angeles‐Long Beach‐Riverside, CA 19,960 29Austin‐Round Rock, TX 16,960 229Minneapolis‐St. Paul‐St. Cloud, MN‐WI 12,721 51Portland‐Vancouver‐Beaverton, OR‐WA 11,086 96Denver‐Aurora‐Boulder, CO 9,626 56Dallas‐Fort Worth, TX 9,590 30San Diego‐Carlsbad‐San Marcos, CA 8,539 72Boise City‐Nampa, ID 8,446 343Chicago‐Naperville‐Michigan City, IL‐IN‐WI 7,656 18Washington‐Baltimore‐Northern Virginia, DC‐MD‐VA‐WV 7,395 19Raleigh‐Durham‐Cary, NC 7,096 64Rochester‐Batavia‐Seneca Falls, NY 6,472 115Detroit‐Warren‐Flint, MI 5,895 25Phoenix‐Mesa‐Scottsdale, AZ 5,768 35Houston‐Baytown‐Huntsville, TX 5,040 19Atlanta‐Sandy Springs‐Gainesville, GA‐AL 4,964 18Philadelphia‐Camden‐Vineland, PA‐NJ‐DE‐MD 4,927 17Sacramento‐‐Arden‐Arcade‐‐Truckee, CA‐NV 4,251 53Miami‐Fort Lauderdale‐Miami Beach, FL 3,077 14Burlington‐South Burlington, VT 2,821 168Cleveland‐Akron‐Elyria, OH 2,813 16
Source: US Cluster Mapping Project DataNotes: *SCP Related Industries include Information Technology and Analytical Instruments, Education and Knowledge Creation, and Business Services;
>99% of the patents were in IT and Analytical Instruments in all 5 Economic Areas