ip engine inc v aol inc et 899

Upload: jpweinstein

Post on 04-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 IP Engine Inc v AOL Inc Et 899

    1/4

    1

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

    NORFOLK DIVISION

    )

    I/P ENGINE, INC., ))Plaintiff, )

    v. ) Civ. Action No. 2:11-cv-512)

    AOL, INC. et al., ))

    Defendants. ))

    PLAINTIFF I/P ENGINE, INC.S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY

    Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc. respectfully submits this Notice of Supplemental Authority.

    Attached is a highlighted copy of a recent ruling in VirnetX Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 6:10-

    cv-417, D.I. 732 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2013).1 TheVirnetX decision (at 23-25) further supports I/P

    Engines Opposition to Defendants JMOL on Damages (D.I. 871 at 22-28).

    Respectfully submitted,

    Dated: February 28, 2013 By: /s/ Jeffrey K. SherwoodDonald C. Schultz (Virginia Bar No. 30531)W. Ryan Snow (Virginia Bar No. 47423)CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN PLC150 West Main StreetNorfolk, VA 23510Telephone: (757) 623-3000Facsimile: (757) 623-5735

    Jeffrey K. Sherwood (Virginia Bar No. 19222)

    1 The attached ruling is captionedVirnetX Inc. v. Apple Inc. But the docketed caption of the caseisVirnetX Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. Apple is a co-defendant.

    Case 2:11-cv-00512-RAJ-TEM Document 899 Filed 02/28/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID# 22667

  • 7/29/2019 IP Engine Inc v AOL Inc Et 899

    2/4

    2

    Frank C. Cimino, Jr.Kenneth W. BrothersCharles J. Monterio, Jr.DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP1825 Eye Street, NW

    Washington, DC 20006Telephone: (202) 420-2200Facsimile: (202) 420-2201

    Dawn Rudenko AlbertDICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP1633 BroadwayNew York, New York 10019Telephone: (212) 277-6500Facsimile: (212) 277-6501

    Counsel for Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.

    Case 2:11-cv-00512-RAJ-TEM Document 899 Filed 02/28/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID# 22668

  • 7/29/2019 IP Engine Inc v AOL Inc Et 899

    3/4

    3

    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    I hereby certify that on February 28, 2013, the foregoing, was served via the Courts

    CM/ECF system on the following:

    Stephen Edward NoonaKaufman & Canoles, P.C.150 W Main StSuite 2100Norfolk, VA [email protected]

    David BilskerDavid Perlson

    Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP50 California Street, 22nd FloorSan Francisco, CA [email protected]@quinnemanuel.com

    Robert L. BurnsFinnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLPTwo Freedom Square11955 Freedom DriveReston, VA [email protected]

    Cortney S. AlexanderFinnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP3500 SunTrust Plaza303 Peachtree Street, NEAtlanta, GA [email protected]

    /s/ Jeffrey K. Sherwood

    Case 2:11-cv-00512-RAJ-TEM Document 899 Filed 02/28/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID# 22669

  • 7/29/2019 IP Engine Inc v AOL Inc Et 899

    4/4

    I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al, Docket No. 2:11-cv-00512 (E.D. Va. Sept 15, 2011), Court Docket

    2013 Bloomberg Finance L.P. All rights reserved. For terms of service see bloomberglaw.com// PAGE 1

    Document Link: http://www.bloomberglaw.com/ms/document/X1Q6MK5FSE82?imagename=953-1.pd

    General Information

    Case Name I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

    Docket Number 2:11-cv-00512

    Court United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

    Nature of Suit Property Rights: Patent

    Related Opinion(s) 283 F.R.D. 322 874 F. Supp. 2d 510 2012 BL 329705

    http://www.bloomberglaw.com/ms/document/X1Q6MK5FSE82?imagename=953-1.pdfhttp://www.bloomberglaw.com/ms/