ipmvp update m&v summit, new orleans may 6th, 2003 satish kumar

23
IPMVP Update M&V Summit, New Orleans May 6th, 2003 Satish Kumar

Upload: jayson-little

Post on 29-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

IPMVP Update

M&V Summit, New OrleansMay 6th, 2003

Satish Kumar

Outline

IPMVP Inc. – Organizational Issues Recent Efforts

New Construction Renewable Energy Technologies Baseline Development in DR Programs Quantifying emissions reductions from

EE projects

The Organization

IPMVP Inc. is a non-profit organization responsible for maintaining existing and developing new protocols under the IPMVP umbrella

Supported by US Department of Energy, LBNL, and Charter Members

Charter Members

Bonneville Power Administration Energy Foundation Federal Energy Management Program General Services Administration NYSERDA Sacramento Municipal Utility District Southern California Gas

Mission Statement

“To develop and maintain an international, consensus framework for creating measurement and verification (M&V) protocols to quantify such metrics that determine the financial value of any energy efficiency projects.”

IPMVP Sphere of Influence

IPMVPInc.

RenewableEnergyTech.

Energy/Water EfficiencyRetrofits

PerformanceBenchmarkingof New Const.

IndoorEnvironmental

Quality

QuantifyingEmissionsFrom EE Projects

BaselineDetermination

in DRPrograms

Objectives - I

Maintain a stable and financially self-sustaining organization, while remaining faithful to the organization’s mission.

Establish and maintain internationally accepted M&V standards for energy and water efficiency and demand reduction projects. 

Reach out and effectively involve the finest international talents and expertise in developing protocols and in avoiding duplicate efforts.

Objectives - II Maintain contact with practitioners and market

place to ensure relevance of the protocol. Effectively disseminate the IPMVP guidelines

around the world, work with our international partners to encourage the translation of the Protocol for faster and more effective adoption and application of the IPMVP concepts.

Develop training and certification material to educate and train professionals in the field of measurement and verification of energy savings.

M&V of New Construction

Baseline Development Basics Appropriateness of Benchmark

Energy codes/standards, design standards Rigor

Use appropriate M&V methods and defensible assumptions

Reasonableness/Repeatability Come up with a reasonable baseline

estimate with a provision to adjust based on post-construction findings

M&V of New Construction

Approaches to Performance Verification Component Verification Whole Building Benchmarking Calibrated Simulation

M&V Options in New Const.

M&V Options Typical Applications A. Partially Measured ECM IsolationPartial measurement of system energy use. Some operating parameters are stipulated.

Lighting system or constant speed motors - power draw periodically measured, operating hours stipulated.

B. ECM IsolationFull measurement of energy use and operating parameters of system.

Variable speed control of a fan motor – Continuous measurement of energy use throughout M&V period.

C. Whole Building ComparisonSavings determined at whole-building level by measuring energy use at main meters or with aggregated sub-meters.

Government agency wishes to determine order-of-magnitude savings level associated with a building design incentive program.

D. Calibrated SimulationSavings are determined at whole-building or system level by calibrating simulated energy use to measured energy use

Savings determination for the purposes of a new building performance contract, with the local energy code defining the baseline.

M&V of NC - Process MapDetermine the appropriate baseline

High Rigor: Building CodesLow Rigor: Existing Market Standards

Select Analysis Type:Whole Building or Component

Select Component Verification:Performance & Usage Performance

Use Option ABaseline is relevant codes or design

standards for components with usage stipulations

Use Option BBaseline is relevant codes or design

standards for components

Use Option DBaseline is relevant codes or design

standards for whole buildings

Use Option CBaseline is normalized average

energy performance of the control group

Use Option CBaseline is published or reported normalized energy performance of buildings with similar

functions, operational characteristics and climate

Are Similar Buildings Available

for Compariso

n

Yes

No

Performance& Usage

Performance

Component

Whole buildingor major system

M&V of Renewable Energy Technology (RET) Status

In Final Draft Form Before the Technical Committee

What’s New Consistent With the Latest IPMVP

Concepts and 2001 IPMVP Volume I Format

More Examples

M&V of RET

Key Issues Renewables supply energy rather than reduce

the amount of energy used. M&V strategy for renewables must be able to

differentiate between an energy supply and a reduction in the load.

The performance of renewable energy systems is a function of environmental conditions (solar radiation and wind speed), which are outside the control of the project developers and should be accounted for.

M&V of RET

Baseline Applications Control Group Before and After – Before and After On and Off Calculated Reference

M&V of RET

Key Issues Renewables supply energy rather than reduce

the amount of energy used. M&V strategy for renewables must be able to

differentiate between an energy supply and a reduction in the load.

The performance of renewable energy systems is a function of environmental conditions (solar radiation and wind speed), which are outside the control of the project developers and should be accounted for.

M&V of RET Option A: Partially Measured Retrofit Isolation - It

measures the ability of the system to deliver energy, capacity, and other claimed benefits and applies the measured result to an assumed set of operating conditions.

Option B: Retrofit Isolation - It involves long-term measurement of energy delivery directly by metering the plant’s output or indirectly by determining savings based on analysis of end-use meters.

Option C: Whole Building Analysis - It involves inferring savings by the statistical analysis of whole-facility energy consumption without end-use metering of the renewable energy system.

Option D: Calibrated Simulation Models – It involves predicting the long-term performance of a system or whole building by calibrating a computer model based on data from a short-term test.

M&V protocol for Calculating Demand Reductions

Sponsor California Energy Commission

Jointly developed by Xenergy and IPMVP Analysis performed by Xenergy Review conducted by IPMVP Inc.

Goal Calculation of the baseline against which reductions

are calculated. Help increase participation in DR programs of small-

and medium-sized customers by reducing the barriers related to inconsistency and confusion about baseline methods.

M&V protocol for Calculating Demand Reductions Criteria for a Good Baseline Method

Simplicity Accuracy Minimize gaming Predictability Consistency (with other ISOs)

M&V protocol for Calculating Demand Reductions Recommendations

A method that generally works well for a range of load types is the simple average of the last 10 days, by hour of the day, with additive adjustment to the 2 hours prior to the curtailment period. This method can be recommended for both weather-sensitive and non-weather-sensitive accounts, with both low and high variability, for summer and nonsummer curtailments.

Emissions Initiative In developmental stages Motivation

Guarding EE community’s interests Key Issues

Site Vs. Source Program Vs. Project Where IPMVP Can Make a Difference Build on the Strength of IPMVP Need for aggregation

Emissions Initiative – Proposed Strategy Illustrate candidate approaches to convert energy savings into

emission credits based on the uncertainties inherent in the M&V option selected to quantify energy savings;

Develop simple, practical, repeatable, and cost-effective monitoring, evaluation, and verification approaches

Role of IPMVP in different trading program such as Cap and Trade, Offsets, and Set-asides.

Emission factors for typical fuel burning appliances or reference to a range of resources;

Link to national or state registry of emissions factors at least at an aggregate level;

Better guidance for the EE community on the difficulties of off site emissions for electricity and district heat/cool;

Current list of relevant environmental authorities/rule makers and their web sites;

Related bibliography;

For More Information

Satish KumarEmail: [email protected]: 202-646-7953