IPv6 Survey:

Taking the Federal Pulse on IPv6

Summary Results

Market Connections, Inc.

June 2006

Outline

Goals and Objectives Methodology Respondent Demographics General Business and IT Issues and Challenges Understanding of IPv6 Respondents Directly Involved with IPv6: Status and

Challenges of Transition and Implementation of IPv6 Vendor Outsourcing Key Findings (to come)

Goals and Objectives

Study undertaken on behalf of Cisco Systems to enhance marketplace understanding and strategic direction. Specifically we looked at:

– Business and IT issues and challenges agency

decision makers face on a daily basis.– Involvement and understanding of IPv6.– Challenges and barriers surrounding IPv6

transition plans and implementation.– Vendor outsourcing and contractors likely to be

considered as a networking solution provider for IPv6 implementation.

Methodology

200 telephone interviews conducted in May 2006 from a Government Computer News subscriber list.

Respondents screened for level of involvement in the implementation of IT and network solutions for their agency.

Mix of civilian and defense agencies, business and IT job functions and involvement with IPv6.

Respondent Demographics

Overall Sample Population: Agency, Job Function and Involvement

Agency Defense or Intelligence

28%

Civilian or Independent

72%

Primary Job Focus

IT related53%Line of

Business47%

You are an employee of which of the following? Are you mainly involved in the daily business operations of your agency or more specifically, IT related functions?

Please indicate the scope of your involvement of IT and network solutions for your agency or organization.

41%

42%

50%

53%

54%

63%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Authorize/approvepurchases

Establish businessplan

Establish tech specsor architects

Determine the need

Recommend/specifybrands

Evaluateproducts/services

Involvement in IT

Overall Sample Population: Involvement in IPv6

41%

26%

59%

75%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Involved

Not involved

Involvement by Line of Business

IT related Business

The survey meant to evaluate attitudes of all IT decision makers toward IPv6.

One-third of respondents were directly involved in the planning or implementation of IPv6.

Significantly more IT related and defense agency respondents were involved in the planning or implementation of IPv6 than business or civilian respondents.

On a scale of one to five, where one is not at all involved and five is very involved, how involved are you in the planning or implementation of IPv6 within your agency organization?

Not directly involved

66%

Involved34%

General Business and IT Issues and Challenges

All IT Decision Makers: Business Issues

58%

64%

69%

74%

83%

85%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

% Rating Important

FISMA compliance

Cost reduction

Regulatorycompliance

Citizen satisfaction

Continuity ofoperations (COOP)

Workforceproductivity

Overall, workforce productivity and continuity of operations (COOP) were the most important business issues to respondents.

Business respondents were more focused on the importance of workforce productivity, citizen satisfaction and cost reduction than IT respondents.

On a scale of one to five where one is not at all important and five is very important, how important are the following business issues right now?

All IT Decision Makers: IT Issues

68%

73%

77%

86%

92%

93%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

% Rating Important

Interoperability

Cost of operations

Networkmanagement

Network performance

Quality of service

Privacy and securityof communications

While most IT issues were important to respondents, privacy and security of communications and quality of service were most important, overall.

Respondents directly involved in IPv6 rated network performance, management and cost of operations significantly more important.

Interoperability was more important to defense agency respondents than civilian respondents.

On a scale of one to five where one is not at all important and five is very important, how important are the following IT issues right now?

Understanding of IPv6

Concern for Availability of IP Addresses by Involvement

Overall, 48% of respondents were concerned with the availability of IP addresses.

Respondents involved with the planning or implementation of IPv6 were significantly more concerned for the availability of IP addresses going forward.

On a scale of one to five, where one is not concerned at all and five is very concerned, how big of a concern for you is the availability of IP addresses going forward?

42%

58%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

% Concerned

Not involved withIPv6

Involved with IPv6

Overall Sample Population: What is Associated with IPv6?

4%

5%

5%

8%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20%

Bettercommunication

More IP addresses

Cost

Security

Top of mind, respondents associated security with IPv6 implementation.

There was no clear, single association with IPv6. Respondents’ answers varied widely.

What do you think of first or associate with IPv6 implementation?

Overall Sample Population: IPv6 Benefits and Challenges

Security and additional IP addresses were the leading top of mind benefits respondents associated with IPv6 implementation.

Cost and security were noted as the top challenges respondents will face implementing IPv6.

What do you believe will be the ONE most significant benefit once the implementation of IPv6 is completed?

What do you believe will be the ONE most significant challenge or barrier you will face implementing IPv6?

4%

9%

10%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Better communication

More IP addresses

Security

IPv6 Benefits

6%

11%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Security

Cost

IPv6 Challenges

Specific Business Issues Impacting Implementing IPv6

49%

56%

58%

64%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

% Stating IPv6 Will Have an Impact

Regulatorycompliance

Citizen satisfaction

Workforceproductivity

Continuity ofoperations (COOP)

Business respondents believed implementing IPv6 would have the most significant impact on COOP, workforce productivity and citizen satisfaction.

On a scale of one to five where one is no effect at all and five is a significant impact, how do you believe implementing IPv6 will affect the following business issues? (Asked only of those primarily involved in agency business activities.)

Specific IT Issues Impacting Implementing IPv6

70%

73%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

% Stating IPv6 Will Have an Impact

Privacy and securityof communications

Expanding networkcapacity/scalability

IT respondents believed implementing IPv6 would have the most significant impact on expanding network capacity/scalability and privacy and security of communications.

On a scale of one to five where one is no effect at all and five is a significant impact, how do you believe implementing IPv6 will affect the following IT issues? (Asked only of those primarily involved in agency IT activities.)

Respondents Directly Involved with IPv6: Status and Challenges of

Transition and Implementation of IPv6

Involvement with IPv6

42%

44%

58%

68%

83%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

% Involved

In-house applicationdevelopers

Outside consultant orvendor

CIO or other C-levelexecutive(s)

Program/project manager

IT/IS/MIS/Network/Systemsmanager

According to respondents, IT/IS/MIS/Network/Systems managers will be the most involved in the planning and implementation of IPv6.

Where one is not at all involved and five is very involved, to what extent are the following involved in the planning and implementation of IPv6 within your agency or organization?

Expected Timeline of IPv6 Planning and Implementation

Less than two percent of respondents have completed their IPv6 planning process.

Only fourteen percent of respondents have begun their IPv6 implementation process.

More than one-third of respondents will not complete their IPv6 planning or implementation process until the 2007 fiscal year.

When do you expect to complete your IPv6 planning process?

When do you expect to begin your IPv6 implementation process?

IPv6 Planning Complete

Don't know27%

Already complete

2%

Within the 2007 fiscal year

37%

Within the next three months

4%Within the 2006 fiscal year

30%

IPv6 Implementation Complete

Within the 2006 fiscal year

18%

Already started14%

Don't know30%

Within the 2007 fiscal year

38%

Not Yet Begun Milestones of IPv6 Conversion

26%

31%

34%

39%

39%

51%

53%

60%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

% Who Have Not Yet Begun

Inventory of existing technology devices

Impact and risk analysis stage

Assigned an officer to coordinate planning

Identified funding for implementation

IPv6 transition plan

All agency infrastructures using IPv6

Monitor benefits of IPv6

Received funding approval

Sixty percent (60%) of respondents had not yet begun to receive funding approval.

Defense agency respondents were more likely to have assigned an officer to coordinate and lead agency planning than civilian agency respondents.

Please tell me if you have not yet begun, are in the process of or have completed working on the following milestones for IPv6 conversion.

Completed Milestones of IPv6 Conversion

3%

8%

9%

17%

20%

22%

28%

31%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

% Who Have Completed

All agency infrastructures using IPv6

IPv6 transition plan

Monitor benefits of IPv6

Received funding approval

Impact and risk analysis stage

Identified funding for implementation

Assigned an officer to coordinate planning

Inventory of existing technology devices

Respondents were most likely to be in the process of or completed inventorying existing technology devices.

Less than ten percent of respondents have completed monitoring the benefits of IPv6, an IPv6 transition plan or all agency infrastructures using IPv6.

Please tell me if you have not yet begun, are in the process of or have completed working on the following milestones for IPv6 conversion.

Challenges Implementing IPv6

45%

51%

52%

62%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

% Considered a Challenge

Lack of experiencedagency staff

Other projects gethigher priority

Developing transitionplan

Funding/budget

Funding/budget was the top challenge respondents were facing completing their IPv6 implementation.

A lack of time and experienced staff also presents a challenge to many respondents.

On a scale of one to five, where one is not at all challenging and five is extremely challenging, how challenging are or were the following in your completion of IPv6 implementation?

Addressing IPv6 Planning and Implementation

Half of respondents plan to develop their transition plan in-house.

Almost half of respondents were planning to collaborate with a vendor to address IPv6 implementation in their agency.

Which of the following best describes how you are planning to or already addressing the transition plan of IPv6 within your agency or organization?

Which of the following best describes how you are planning to or already addressing the implementation of IPv6 within your agency or organization?

14%

36%

50%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Outsource thedevelopment andimplementation

Collaborate with avendor

Develop the solutionplan in-house

Addressing Transition Plan

8%

21%

29%

42%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Outsource the entireimplementation

Off-the-shelfsoftware/solutions

Internal agency staff todevelop a custom

solution

Collaborate with avendor

Addressing Implementation

IPv6 Mandate

More than half of respondents would likely consider IPv6 even if it had not been mandated.

Reasons for not considering implementing IPv6 if it had not been mandated include: cost, no compelling business driver, and hesitancy to implement unproven technologies.

Without a mandate in place, almost forty percent of respondents would not have implemented IPv6 until FY 2008 or later.

How likely would you be to consider IPv6 now if it had not been mandated? What is your reason for not considering IPv6 implementation?

Without the mandate in place, when do you believe your agency would have implemented IPv6?

35%

53%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Somewhat/veryunlikely

Somewhat/very likely

Likelihood to Consider Without a Mandate

30%

2%

29%

39%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Don't know

Within the 2006 fiscal year

Within the 2007 fiscal year

Fiscal year 2008 or later

When Implement Without a Mandate

Vendor Outsourcing

Solution Provider Assistance for IPv6 Implementation

15%

19%

30%

31%

37%

43%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Third party analysis

Developing abusiness case

Ongoing maintenanceand user support

Risk management

Tech assistanceduring planning stage

Tech support duringimplementation

Respondents were most likely to consider using an industry solution provider for technical support during implementation, and for technical assistance during planning stage.

Which of the following could an industry solution provider assist you with to improve or enhance your IPv6 implementation?

Vendors Associated with IPv6

More than half of respondents could not name a top of mind vendor they considered a leader for planning and implementing IPv6 in federal agencies.

When given a list of vendors to choose from, almost three-quarters of respondents selected Cisco as the networking company they most associate with IPv6.

Which ONE company would you consider a leader in helping plan and implement IPv6 in federal agencies?

Which ONE of the following networking companies do you most associate with IPv6?

3%

3%

22%

51%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

AT&T

IBM

Cisco

Don't know

Top of Mind IPv6 Leader

2%

3%

5%

5%

13%

73%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Sprint

AT&T

Lucent

Juniper

Verizon

Cisco

ONE Company Most Associated with IPv6

Important Attributes When Choosing a Vendor

70%

74%

74%

76%

77%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

% Considering Important

Supports ongoingoperations

Training and support

Cost

Provides riskmitigation tools for

transition

Provides a system-wide view

The most important attributes when selecting a vendor for respondents included: providing a system-wide view, risk mitigation tools for transition, cost, and training and support.

Using a scale of one to five, where one is not at all important and five is very important, how important are the following attributes/factors when choosing a vendor to assist you in your efforts?

Contact Information

Market Connections, Inc

13135 Lee Jackson Memorial Hwy, Suite 380

Fairfax, VA 22033

703.378.2025

www.marketconnectionsinc.com