irwin/mcgraw-hill the mcgraw-hill companies, inc. © 1999 slide 3-1 chapter 3 contingency theories...

12
Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999 Slide 3- 1 Chapter 3 Contingency Theories of Leadership

Upload: jasmin-cannon

Post on 17-Jan-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999 Slide 3-3 Normative Decision Model  The Normative Decision Model, developed by Vroom and Yetton, is solely directed at determining how much input subordinates should have in the decisions making process.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999 Slide 3-1 Chapter 3 Contingency Theories of Leadership

Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999

Slide 3-1

Chapter 3

Contingency Theories of Leadership

Page 2: Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999 Slide 3-1 Chapter 3 Contingency Theories of Leadership

Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999

Slide 3-2

Chapter Goals

The goal of this chapter is to review the four better known contingency theories of leadership, as well as show their similarities.

Page 3: Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999 Slide 3-1 Chapter 3 Contingency Theories of Leadership

Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999

Slide 3-3

Normative Decision Model

The Normative Decision Model, developed by Vroom and Yetton, is solely directed at determining how much input subordinates should have in the decisions making process.

Page 4: Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999 Slide 3-1 Chapter 3 Contingency Theories of Leadership

Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999

Slide 3-4

Decision-making processes

To determine which situational and follower factors affect the level of participation and group performance, Vroom and Yetton investigated the decision-making processes leaders use in group settings. They discovered a continuum of decision-as seen in the next slide.

Page 5: Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999 Slide 3-1 Chapter 3 Contingency Theories of Leadership

Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999

Slide 3-5

Continuum of decision-making processes

Leader

FollowersSituation

Decision process

B. Does leader have sufficient information?

A. Quality requirement?C. Is problem structured?

D. Acceptance important for implementation?E. If decision made is solely by leader, will it be accepted by subordinates?F. Do subordinates share organizational goals?G. Is conflict over preferred solution likely?

Outcomes:Decision qualityDecision acceptanceSubordinate development

Page 6: Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999 Slide 3-1 Chapter 3 Contingency Theories of Leadership

Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999

Slide 3-6

The Situational Leadership Theory, developed by Hersey and Blanchard, answers the

following questions:

Is there an optimum way for leaders to adjust their behavior with different followers and thereby increase their likelihood of success?

If so, then what factors should the leader base his behavior on?

Page 7: Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999 Slide 3-1 Chapter 3 Contingency Theories of Leadership

Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999

Slide 3-7

Situational Leadership Theory and the Interactional

Framework

What is the task to be accomplished?

What is the followers job maturity?

Followers

Situation

Psychological maturity?

Leader Outcomes:Task accomplishmentIncreased follower maturity

Telling: high task, low relationishipSelling: high task, high relationshipParticipating: low task, low relationshipDelegating: low task, low relationshipDecision to use developmental intervention

Page 8: Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999 Slide 3-1 Chapter 3 Contingency Theories of Leadership

Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999

Slide 3-8

The Contingency Model

The Contingency Model, developed by Fiedler, recognizes that leaders have general behavioral tendencies and thereby specifies situations where certain leaders (or behavioral dispositions) may be more effective than others.

Page 9: Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999 Slide 3-1 Chapter 3 Contingency Theories of Leadership

Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999

Slide 3-9

Fiedler’s Contingency Theory and the Interactional

Framework

FollowersSituation

Leader

Task structurePosition Power

Leader-member relations

Motivation hierarchy(as determined by LPC score)

Outcomes:Effective or ineffective group performance based upon match or mismatch between leader and overall favorability of the leadership situation

Page 10: Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999 Slide 3-1 Chapter 3 Contingency Theories of Leadership

Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999

Slide 3-10

The Path-Goal Theory

The Path-Goal Theory, the most sophisticated of the four contingency models, deals with expectancy, performance-to-outcome probabilities, and assigned valences or values to outcome.

Page 11: Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999 Slide 3-1 Chapter 3 Contingency Theories of Leadership

Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999

Slide 3-11

The Path-Goal Theory

Expectancy - If I study for 12 hours, what is the probability I will get an A on the exam?

Performance-to-outcome probabilities - If I get an A on the final, what is the probability of getting an A in the course?

Assigned valences or values to outcome - How much do I value a higher GPA

Cont.

Page 12: Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999 Slide 3-1 Chapter 3 Contingency Theories of Leadership

Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999

Slide 3-12

Path-Goal Theory and Interactional Framework

Outcomes:Acceptance of leaderFollower motivationFollower satisfaction

Leader

FollowersSituation

TraitsSkills and abilitiesexpectations and work perceptions of own group abilities

Leader behavior: Directive, Supportive, Participative, Achievement-oriented