Upload File

is floridas school grading system biased?. fy2007 relationship (r) between sar results and % federal...

  • Home
  • Documents
  • Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*
32
Is Florida’s School Grading System Biased?

Upload: anna-weaver

Post on 27-Mar-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

Report

Tags:

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

Is Florida’s School Grading System Biased?

Page 2: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch

HSR

HSM

HSW

HSS

RG MG LRG

LMG

PTS

ES -0.85* -0.79* -0.32* -0.80* -0.60* -0.34* -0.36* -0.07* -0.76*

MS -0.89* -0.87* -0.51* -0.88* -0.69* -0.75* -0.17* -0.39* -0.87*

HS -0.80* -0.82* -0.54* -0.74* -0.66* -0.61* 0.03 -0.10 -0.76*

* Indicates statistical significance.

Page 3: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 High Standards Reading by % Federal Lunch

Elementary Schools r = -0.85

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 4: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 High Standards Reading by % Federal Lunch

Middle Schools r = -0.89

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 5: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 High Standards Reading by % Federal Lunch

High Schools r = -0.80

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 6: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 High Standards Mathby % Federal Lunch

Elementary Schools r = -0.79

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 7: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 High Standards Mathby % Federal Lunch

Middle Schools r = -0.87

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 8: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 High Standards Mathby % Federal Lunch

High Schools r = -0.82

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 9: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 High Standard Writingby % Federal Lunch

Elementary Schools r = -0.32

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 10: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 High Standard Writingby % Federal Lunch

Middle Schools r = -0.51

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 11: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 High Standard Writingby % Federal Lunch

High Schools r = -0.54

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 12: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 High Standards Scienceby % Federal Lunch

Elementary Schools r = -0.80

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 13: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 High Standards Scienceby % Federal Lunch

Middle Schools r = -0.88

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 14: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 High Standards Scienceby % Federal Lunch

High Schools r = -0.74

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 15: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 Reading Gainsby % Federal Lunch

Elementary Schools r = -0.60

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 16: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 Reading Gainsby % Federal Lunch

Middle Schools r = -0.69

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 17: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 Reading Gainsby % Federal Lunch

High Schools r = -0.66

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 18: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 Math Gainsby % Federal Lunch

Elementary Schools r = -0.34

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 19: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 Math Gainsby % Federal Lunch

Middle Schools r = -0.75

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 20: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 Math Gainsby % Federal Lunch

High Schools r = -0.61

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 21: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 Low 25% Reading Gains by % Federal Lunch

Elementary Schools r = -0.36

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 22: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 Low 25% Reading Gains by % Federal Lunch

Middle Schools r = -0.17

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 23: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 Low 25% Reading Gains by % Federal Lunch

High Schools r = 0.03

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Page 24: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 Low 25% Math Gains by % Federal Lunch

Elementary Schools r = -0.07

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 25: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 Low 25% Math Gains by % Federal Lunch

Middle Schools r = -0.39

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 26: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 Low 25% Math Gains by % Federal Lunch

High Schools r = -0.10

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Page 27: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 Points by % Federal Lunch

Elementary Schools r = -0.76

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 28: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 Points by % Federal Lunch

Middle Schools r = -0.87

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 29: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

FY2007 Points by % Federal Lunch

High Schools r = -0.76

Percent Federal Lunch

PERCENT

Significant

Page 30: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

2007 Elementary School Grades by Federal Lunch

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1%-25% 26%-50% 51%-75% 76%-100%

A

B

C

D

F

Page 31: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

2007 Middle School Grades by Federal Lunch

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1%-25% 26%-50% 51%-75% 76%-100%

A

B

C

D

F

Page 32: Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

2007 High School Grades by Federal Lunch

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1%-25% 26%-50% 51%-75% 76%-100%

A

B

C

D

F


RESEARCH PROJECTS LISTS for FY2007

Financial Results inancial Results Presentation Meeting ... · Financial Results inancial Results Presentation Meeting Presentation Meeting Interim Interim results for FY2007 FY2007

FY2007 TIP.pdf

Fy2007 Briefing Slides

UPDATING FLORIDAS STATE AID PROGRAM Analysis and Recommendations 2005

Marion, Lake, Putnam, Volusia Counties. Where are Floridas Scenic Byways?

JARC & New Freedom Draft Project List FY2007

FY2007 Final Addenda

Financial Results for FY2006 and Forecast for FY2007 · FY2007 Forecast FY2007 FY2007 Forecast Forecast (In billion yen, accumulated amount) Orders received:Up ¥106.8 billion YoY

990PF-FY2007 - Cisco · Title: 990PF-FY2007 Created Date: 5/23/2008 3:00:15 PM

geared for growth - HUP SOON GLOBAL CORPORATION LIMITED · FY2006 FY2007 FY2009 FY2010 FY2008 FY2006 FY2009 FY2007 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 Revenue and Operating Profits

Inspired by. Floridas First Green Town Inspired by

JARC NF Application Presentation Fy2007

Floridas Caribbean Sun December 2010

Floridas Fossil Mammals

FY2003 FY2007 FY2011 C F D

arvinmeritor FY2007

Whitepaper Drivers vs Cyclists Floridas Struggle to Share the Road

FY2007 Federal Performance for Managers1June 2006 FY2007 Federal Performance for Managers Overview and Discussion of Performance Measures for FY07

johnson controls FY2007 Proxy Statement

Analyst Presentation - FY2007

3CDC Form 990 FY2007

Institutional Decision-Making Tactics (FY2007)

Defense: FY2007 Authorization and AppropriationsDefense: FY2007 Authorization and Appropriations Most Recent Developments The Senate began floor action on its version of the FY2007

FY2007 - fgacleanup.infofgacleanup.info/Content/Files/AR/AR151_FY2007FortGreelyArmyDefens… · FY2007 FORT GREELY Installation Action Plan Printed 07 November 2007 Army Defense Environmental

Scotia Applause FY2007 Q4 Web Metrics Report

MassDevelopment FY2007 Annual Report

FY2007 Interim Financial Results · FY2007 projection FY2007 projection (Unit: Billion yen) (as of Oct. 31) (as of Jul. 31) Total 281.5 603.5 282.0 Fuel expenses, etc. 120.0 440.0

University of South Carolina FY2007-2008 Budget

All Nippon Airways Financial Results for FY2007 · 2013. 3. 29. · FY2006 FY2007 FY2006 FY2007 Change Ⅰ．Financial Results for FY07 Topics for segments other than air transportation

Agriculture Floridas Opportunity · 2017-12-13 · Floridas Commissioner Conducted Vetwiler Honorary Pabor John Southeastern I Experimentation Fish November experimenting nsationsimply

Complete fy2007 2008adoptedkra_strategicplan

(DlA), FY2006 and FY2007

Career and Service Floridas Dan Jones, Distinguished ...archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/flgre/article/1999win8a.pdf · Floridas Dan Jones, To Receive GCSAA Distinguished TService Award he

FY2007 Annual Report