is it moral or not? animal testing by: hannah holleran
TRANSCRIPT
Is it moral or not?
Animal Testing
By: Hannah Holleran
Thesis
Animal Testing is morally wrong and violates basic
animal rights.
Arguments
• Animal testing is morally wrong.• It violates basic animal rights.• Not 100 percent accurate.• Extremely expensive.
Animals used in Experimentation
Counterarguments
• Scientific and Medical advances• The campaign ad below explains the
supporters arguments.
Conclusion
• It is inhumane to continue to conduct experiments on animals. It has been proven that the animals are put through extreme torturous pain. It is ultimately wrong to continue this. Arguments will continue to arise from both sides, but it is overall your choice whether you are for or against animal testing.
References
• Animal rights. (2012, September 3). Retrieved April 21, 2015, from http://icof.infobaselearning.com
• Animal testing. (2015, April 16). Retrieved April 21, 2015, from http://icof.infobaselearning.com
• By the numbers: Animal testing. (2015, April 16). Retrieved April 21, 2015, from http://icof.infobaselearning.com
• Chronology: Animal rights. (2015, April 16). Retrieved April 21, 2015, from http://icof.infobaselearning.com
• Fellenz,, M. R. (2005). Animal experimentation (C. Mitcham, Ed.). Retrieved from http://ic.galegroup.com
• Goering, S. (n.d.). Cosmetics (C. Mitcham, Ed.). Retrieved April 21, 2015, from http://ic.galegroup.com
• Masters Evans, K. (Ed.). (2009). Research animals. Retrieved from http://ic.galegroup.com • PETA makes its case against animal testing. (2015, April 16). Retrieved April 21, 2015,
from http://icof.infobaselearning.com • Vivisection. (2007). Retrieved April 21, 2015, from http://ic.galegroup.com