is the 19 f problem in agb c-stars solved ?

21
he 19 F problem in AGB C-stars solve Abia (UGR) Cristallo (UGR-INAF) Cunha (ORJ) de Laverny (OCA) Domínguez (UGR) Eriksson (Upssala) Gialanella (Napples) Hinkle (NOAO) Imbriani (Napples) Recio-Blanco (OCA) Smith (NOAO) Straniero (OACT-INAF)

Upload: abril

Post on 28-Jan-2016

22 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Is the 19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?. C. Abia (UGR) S. Cristallo (UGR-INAF ) K. Cunha (ORJ) P. de Laverny (OCA) I. Domínguez (UGR) K. Eriksson (Upssala) L. Gia l a n ella (Napples) K. Hinkle (NOAO) G. Imbriani (Napples) A. Recio-Blanco (OCA) V. Smith (NOAO) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

Is the 19F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

C. Abia (UGR)S. Cristallo (UGR-INAF)K. Cunha (ORJ)P. de Laverny (OCA)I. Domínguez (UGR)K. Eriksson (Upssala)L. Gialanella (Napples)K. Hinkle (NOAO)G. Imbriani (Napples)A. Recio-Blanco (OCA)V. Smith (NOAO)O. Straniero (OACT-INAF)

Page 2: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

19F is a fragile element easily destroyed by p & captures and difficult to observe in astrophysical objects.

Its origin is not very well known...

-induced spallation in SN II (Woosley et al. 1990)

TP-AGB stars (Forestini et al. 1992)

Hydrostatic He-burning in heavy mass-losing WR (Meynet & Arnould 2000)

Chemical evolution models suggest the contribution of all the three sources (Renda et al. 2004)

Page 3: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

...Only AGB stars show observational evidence of 19F production, (Jorissen et al. 1992) confirmed by observations in post-AGB stars and planetary nebulae (Werner et al. 2005; Zhang & Liu 2005; Otsuka et al. 2008)

Renda et al. (2004)

Page 4: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

Jorissen et al. (1992)

- 19F abundances up to 30-50 solar - [F/O] vs. C/O correlation production in TP-AGB stars

C-richO-rich

MMSSSCC(N)

Page 5: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

19F nuclear chain in He-burning conditions in TP-AGB stars:

, 15N, 18O are needed: p & n from 14N(n,p)14C and 13C(,n)16O

19F has primary & secondary origins (13C): at low metallicity primary source dominates large [F/Fe] are expected

Simultaneous 19F & s-element production (?)

Page 6: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

3 M TP-AGB, Z = 0.02 Lugaro et al. (2004)

Models and observations mainly disagree in AGB C-stars

1.5 M TP-AGB, Z = 0.018 Goriely & Mowlavi (2000)

Page 7: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

1.5, 2 M, Z=0.006 TP-AGB FRANEC code

...After up-dated s-element abundances in AGB C-stars (Abia et al. 2002)

C-rich AGBs O-rich AGBs

Page 8: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

19F abundance determinations from rotational HF lines @ 2.3 m in intrinsic AGB C-stars

- Extragalactic C-stars as main targets (Magellanic Clouds, Draco, Carina, Ursa Minor, Sagittarius...)- Galactic field AGB C-stars as calibration objects- VLT & GEMINI, R ~ 50000

- Only one proposal accepted (after 4 trials !!!)- Only 3 galactic objects observed

We decided to re-analyse the Jorissen et al. (1992) FTS spectra

Page 9: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

Teff= 3100 K, [Fe/H]= -0.4

C/O = 1.12, 12C/13C = 4216O/17O =1240, 16O/18O =1450

[F/Fe] = 0.5 ± 0.1 [F/O] = 0.2

TX Psc

- Spec. synthesis with the state-of-the-art C-rich atmosphere models- Up-dated atomic and molecular (C2, CN, CO, CH) line lists- HF R9 line as the main F indicator (Gustafsson et al. 2008; Plez et al. 2008)

Page 10: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

Teff= 2800 K, [Fe/H] = 0.0 C/O = 1.17, 12C/13C = 52 16O/17O = 1200

[F/Fe] = 0.10 ± 0.05 [F/O] = 0.22

AQ Sgr

Page 11: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

Teff= 2825 K, log g = 0.0, [Fe/H]= +0.06

C/O = 1.06, 12C/13C = 50, 16O/17O = 1125, 16O/18O = 1150

[F/Fe] = 0.26 0.04[F/O] = 0.2

UU Aur

Page 12: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

Main Results

• Mean difference in 32 stars re-analysed [F/Fe]= +0.6

• In some stars differences up to 1 dex !

• Unable to derive 19F abundances for Mira variables (JSL did !)

• J-type stars show no 19F enhancements

• SC-type stars show the largests 19F enhancements (but no so large)

Page 13: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

Why ..? • Stellar atmosphere parameters....±0.2 dex, no!• Atomic line parameters...no!• Atmosphere models.... +0.1 dex• Molecular blends C2, CN, CH.....very probably !

log (19F) = 4.88 ± 0.04 log (19F) = 5.65 (JSL)

Wavelength (Å)

UU Aur

Page 14: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

Teff= 2800 K, [Fe/H] = 0.0 C/O = 1.01, 12C/13C = 4.516O/17O = 450, 16O/18O = 1600 log (Li) = 4.8

[F/Fe] = 1.15 0.18[F/O] = +0.80

WZ Cas

Evidence: SC-type stars have C/O 1

HF R9

19F abundance in agreement with the JSL analysis

Page 15: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

C(N)-stars SC-stars J stars

1.5, 2, 3 M TP-AGB Z=0.006

FRANEC code

19F vs. s-elements

Page 16: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

JSL

Page 17: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

JSL

Page 18: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

C(N)-stars SC-stars J stars M, MS, S stars

1.5, 2, 3 M TP-AGB Z=0.006

FRANEC code

11th

Page 19: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

C(N)-stars SC-stars M,MS,S stars

1.5, 2, 3 M TP-AGB Z=0.006

FRANEC code

Intrinsic AGB stars

C/O> 1

C/O> 1

Page 20: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

The [F/Fe] vs. C/O correlation dissapears...for C/O > 1!!

2 M, Z=0.008 FRANEC code

Page 21: Is the  19 F problem in AGB C-stars solved ?

Summary

• Extra-mixing and/or changes in reaction rates seems not necessary to explain 19F abundances in AGB C-stars.

• 19F and s-element enhancements are correlated in intri. AGB stars.

• Yet there is a problem in explaining 19F, s-element abundances and the C/O ratios simultaneously in AGB C-stars.

• SC-stars... are they in the sequence MMSSSCC ?

• 19F & s-element determinations in low [Fe/H] AGB C-stars needed to evaluate the yield from AGBs and test nucleosynthesis models!!!