is the east asian economic model still relevant? manu bhaskaran centennial group inc july 2002
TRANSCRIPT
IS THE EAST ASIAN ECONOMIC MODEL STILL RELEVANT?
Manu BhaskaranCentennial Group Inc
July 2002
KEY POINTS
East Asian Model Definition / Was there such a model?
New arguments Shift to domestic-driven growth?
The real story: Major re-thinking of growth models
THE EAST ASIAN THE EAST ASIAN MODELMODEL
Common features1. High savings rate2. Emphasis on education3. Export-friendly policy regimes4. Pragmatic, non-ideological5. Egalitarian approach
Agriculture in Korea,Taiwan Public housing in HK/Singapore
THE EAST ASIAN MODEL (2)
Were these features unique to Asia? Good economic housekeeping rules Other success stories shared these
Botswana: fastest growing economy
NOT UNIQUE TO EAST ASIA ALONE
EAST ASIANS PURSUED DIFFERENT MODELS
1. Government role Hong Kong: laissez-faire Taiwan: focused in some sectors Korea: allocated capital,… Singapore: hyper-active govt
Each had different starting points Each evolved own responses
DIFFERENT MODELS
2. Foreign capital inflows Korea: xenophobic Taiwan: wary Singapore: open Hong Kong: ultra open
Portfolio capital: earlier opening Direct investment: liberalised later
DIFFERENT MODELS (2)
3. Capital markets Korea: heavily distorted Taiwan: some political influence Singapore: Relatively free, ex-CPF HK: Free, main allocator of capital
Banks under tight govt control ex-HK
DIFFERENT MODELS (3)
4. Size of companies
Korea: chaebol-driven Taiwan: Mainly small companies,
govt-backed ones in crucial sectors Singapore: MNCs and GLCs HK: Vibrant, early globalisers
DIFFERENT MODELS (4)
5. Other degrees of openness Labour market
HK/Singapore: Highly open Korea: closed
Protectionism Korea/Taiwan: High HK/Singapore: Very low
DIFFERENT MODELS (5)
6. Domestic competition policy
HK: Some cartels, otherwise free Taiwan: Generally free Singapore: GLCs dominated Korea: SMEs/consumers squeezed
RE-THINKING MODELS
SHIFT TO DOMESTIC DEMAND?
Slowdown in global demand More competitive export markets
Means better depend on domestic
DOMESTIC DEMAND AS DRIVER?
Is this possible? Domestic linked to external demand
Trade sector generates incomes Freer trade increases incomes
Can policy discriminate? Favouring domestic demand distorts
NEW THINKING
1. Economic philosophy HK: Shift away from laissez-faire S’pore: Allowing more laissez-faire Korea: Substantial opening Taiwan: Opening up as well Malaysia: Reviewing NEP Thailand: Moderating growth targets
NEW THINKING (2)
2. Resource allocation
Bond markets: less bank financing Banks liberalised Prices less distorted
Interest rates freed Product prices closer to world prices
NEW THINKING (3)
3. Savings and consumption
Freer banks: easy consumer credit
Trade liberalisation: prices fell
Consumption/GDP rose post-crisis
NEW THINKING (4)
4. Corporate sector
Restructuring: more efficient More policy emphasis on
Local companies vs MNCs Consumer protection, competition
policy
CONCLUSION
No single model Pragmatism prevailed Substantial re-thinking going on
BEWARE APPLYING SIMPLISTIC MODELS TO ECONOMIES