is the european parliament an environmental champion? ies march 2010 dr charlotte burns (university...
DESCRIPTION
Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York) Dr Nick Worsfold (University of York) http://www.polis.leeds.ac.uk/research/projects/eu-environmental- champion.php. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion?
IES March 2010
Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds)Professor Neil Carter (University of York)
Dr Nick Worsfold (University of York)
http://www.polis.leeds.ac.uk/research/projects/eu-environmental-champion.php
![Page 2: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Championing Europe’s Environment?
• The European Parliament often sees itself, and is seen
by others, as the defender of environmental interests
(Weale et al. 2000: 91)
• But portrayal based upon partial evidence and
potentially outdated assumptions about EP behaviour.
![Page 3: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Research Questions
• Is EP really an environmental champion?
• How environmentally stringent are its amendments?
• How successful are they?
• Is there a relationship between the strength of an amendment and its chance of adoption?
• Has the EP’s behaviour changed over time? If so, how?
![Page 4: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Methodology• Mixed approach employing qualitative and quantitative
methods
• Coded 7,094 amendments made to 113 proposals adopted under codecision by the EP plenary between 1999 and 2009
• Coding relies on qualitative judgements and data analysis
• Also gained practitioner feedback at seminar in EP and used elite interviews
• Case study analysis
![Page 5: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Methodology
• Legislative proposal classified according to the stage at which it was concluded and the policy area that it addressed.
• Each amendment was classified according to
– the reading at which it was proposed;– its environmental ambition; – its importance; – and the degree to which it was adopted by the
Council of Ministers.
![Page 6: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Environmental Ambition Typology
• Negative (-1) – overall negative impact
• Neutral (0) – no environmental impact
• Marginal (1) – rhetorical commitment to environment, vague, limited impacts and costs
• Weak (2) – tightens limits and standards, some costs and new policy instruments
• Strong (3) – stronger, binding, sanctions, costs
![Page 7: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Importance and Adoption Typologies
Importance 1-5 from insignificant to highly important
Multiplied with environmental ambition to give a score for overall environmental importance
Adoption• 0 = not adopted• 1 = <50% adopted• 2 = >50% adopted• 3= fully adopted• M = text changed so amendment no longer relevant
![Page 8: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Is the EP’s plenary adopting environmentally important amendments?
-1 0 1 2 30
10
20
30
40
50
60
%
![Page 9: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Distribution of strong and negative amendments
1996/02001998/02471999/00682000/01692001/01072002/00262002/03042003/02052004/02182006/00182007/02952008/01650
5
10
15
20
25
negativestrong
![Page 10: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Distribution of strong and negative amendments
• Air quality proposals attract 26% of the amendments
• But 47% of strong and 42% of negatives
![Page 11: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Importance of EP amendments by session
-1 0 1 2 30
10
20
30
40
50
60
EP5EP6
![Page 12: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Is the EP Successful?
OVERALL• 35% rejected• 8% partially adopted
BUT
• 48% fully adopted• 8% largely adopted
![Page 13: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Success by Session
0 1 2 30%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
EP5EP6
Adoption
![Page 14: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Is the EP Successful?
Hypothesis: Adoption of EP amendments by the Council of
Ministers is affected by the amendment’s environmental importance, the reading at which the amendment was introduced and the session of the EP.
![Page 15: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Testing the Hypothesis• Generalized linear model, fit by maximum likelihood,
binomial error structure and logit link function
• Response variable: adopted/not adopted
• Explanatory variables: envimp, session, and reading
• Tested for interaction
![Page 16: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Findings
• More environmentally important = less likely to be adopted
• Second Reading amendments were more likely to be adopted
• Amendments introduced in EP6 more likely to be adopted
![Page 17: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Interactions
• Effect of reading on likelihood of adoption strongly dependent on session in which amendments were introduced
![Page 18: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Summary• EP is trying to strengthen legislation
• Adopts disproportionately more strong and negatives in some policy fields
• Success depends on strength of amendment, reading and session
• Differences between EP5 and EP6 – latter less ambitious but more successful
![Page 19: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Explanations• Nature and costs of regulation
• Shifting norms of decision-making
• Enlargement
![Page 20: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Co-Decision• Commission proposes
• EP 3 readings, conciliation and veto
• EP and Council = co-legislators
• Increasing pressure to agree at first reading or second reading
• Informal meetings used to reach agreement
![Page 21: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Evolving Procedures
Stage at which legislation was concluded• EP5 (1999-2004)
– 47% cases concluded after conciliation
• EP6 (2004-2009) – 16% cases concluded after conciliation, – 56% concluded via fast track 1st reading
![Page 22: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
What is fast track 1st reading?
• Commission proposes legislation• Legislative proposal goes to Environment
Committee• Committee adopts its opinion, which becomes the
mandate for rapporteur to open informal negotiations with Council
• If agreement is reached the plenary endorses the joint text
![Page 23: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Success by Session
0 1 2 30%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
EP5EP6
Adoption
![Page 24: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Explanations• Nature and costs of regulation
• Shifting norms of decision-making
• Enlargement
![Page 25: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Enlargement
• New states less developed. Focus on economic prosperity.
• Weak environmental movement. No green MEPs 2004-09.
• EU saw political centre of gravity shift ‘to the Right and to the East’
![Page 26: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Enlargement
• EPP position consolidated and EPP regards environment as less salient
• Increasingly heterogeneous political groups affect distribution of positions of power.
• EP Groups still cohesive but some evidence of national blocks amongst new states.
![Page 27: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Conclusions
• EP is an environmentally benign actor, but it is no longer championing the environmental cause.
• Unlikely to become more radical
![Page 28: Is the European Parliament an Environmental Champion? IES March 2010 Dr Charlotte Burns (University of Leeds) Professor Neil Carter (University of York)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062815/56816943550346895de0ca03/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Future Directions
• Rapporteur – longevity/group
• Committee amendments
• New EP – patterns persisting or shifting?
• Commission – nature of environmental legislation