is your application tracking system helping with eeoc and ofccp...

40
IS YOUR APPLICATION TRACKING SYSTEM HELPING WITH EEOC AND OFCCP COMPLIANCE ? SMILG Detroit, MI MARCH 20, 2014

Upload: trinhtuyen

Post on 08-Jun-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

IS YOUR APPLICATION

TRACKING SYSTEM HELPING

WITH EEOC AND OFCCP

COMPLIANCE ?

SMILG Detroit, MI

MARCH 20, 2014

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

The materials presented today in both written and oral

forms are for information only and were prepared for this meeting. Attendees should consult with their own legal counsel before taking any actions and should not consider these materials or discussions to be legal or otherwise advice. Professional advice should be obtained before attempting to address any legal situation or problem.

AGENDA

OFCCP and EEOC focus

Why applicant tracking focus

Translating compliance requirements into ATS

Common pitfalls to avoid

Top 5 to review

Analyzing ATS data

THE PERFECT STORM IS BREWING

EEOC and OFCCP are both becoming more

focused on failure to hire

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC) released their strategic plan

for fiscal years 2012-2016, which “establishes

priorities and combines the components of

EEOC’s private, public, and federal sector

enforcement.”

The six priorities included:

Eliminating barriers in recruitment and hiring

THE PERFECT STORM IS BREWING

Recruitment and hiring are high risk areas for

employers

The OFCCP has become increasingly more

aggressive during audits

Failure to hire accounts for vast majority of

conciliation agreements containing fines

Applicant data is used in your defense during:

EEOC investigation

Lawsuit

OFCCP audit

REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

Executive Order 11246

Title VII UGESP

ADAAA

NON-COMPLIANCE COSTS

What is at stake?

Systemic discrimination findings

“Back pay” awards / settlements in the

hundreds of thousand or even millions of

dollars

Forced offers

Bad publicity

Increased agency scrutiny

WHY FOCUS ON APPLICANT TRACKING?

WHY APPLICANT TRACKING FOCUS?

The Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection

Procedures (UGESP) are used by the courts to

determine if unlawful hiring practices were the

basis of discrimination claims

Applicant tracking is recommended by these

guidelines for all employers obligated under

Title VII and can be done pre-hire when part of

an employer’s decision to follow the guidelines

WHY APPLICANT TRACKING FOCUS ?

Employers may need applicant data to measure

the validity of a selection procedures

Tests

Background checks

Etc.

Can help prevent / defend in lawsuits

Collecting selection information

Providing data for defense

Documentation of job qualifications

All with proper use

WHY APPLICANT TRACKING FOCUS ? If your company has to be compliant with EEOC

and/or OFCCP; you are required to keep applicant

flow data and additional records

This is made simpler with an applicant tracking

systems to track the required data and generate

reports

Next week’s regulations (Section 503 & VEVRAA)

increase recordkeeping and other data collection

requirements for federal contractors

ATS: FRIEND OR FOE

During an EEOC investigation or OFCCP

compliance review; your ATS can be an ally or

adversary to your case

Let’s discuss how to make your ATS work to aid

in your compliance

TRANSLATING AA/EEOC REGULATIONS

INTO RECRUITMENT REQUIREMENTS

DEFINITION OF AN APPLICANT

The EEOC and OFCCP use different definitions

of an applicant

The OFCCP definition allows you to “weed out”

based on basic qualifications

ATS should be able to report on all individuals

who apply in order to comply with both agencies

INTERNET APPLICANT - EEOC

Employer Acts to Fill a Particular Position

Job Seeker Follows Standard Application Process

Job Seeker Has Expressed Interest in a Specific Position

INTERNET APPLICANT RULE - OFCCP

The four prongs to the Internet Applicant Ruling:

Must meet all 4 to be an applicant

Expresses

Interest

Considered

Meets Basic Qualifications

Does Not Withdraw

RECORD KEEPING & ATS

Track the following:

Expressions of interest (applications, resumes, etc.)

Each stage of the recruitment process for applicants

Reason for non-selections at each stage (disposition codes)

Selection decisions at every stage

All tests and the results (hot area)

Background checks & results

Accommodation requests/results

Job posting information

Job descriptions & qualifications

Interview notes/forms

RECORD KEEPING & ATS

EEOC regulations require that private employers keep

all personnel and employment records for one year

If an employee is involuntarily terminated,

personnel records must be retained for one year

from the date of termination.

If a charge or civil action is filed under Title VII, ADA,

GINA, or by the Commission

Keep all related records until final disposition of charge or

action

RECORD KEEPING & ATS

The OFCCP has different recordkeeping obligations

depending on the data element

There are many data points under the new OFCCP

regulations that require 3 years record retention,

instead of 2 years

Configure ATS and recordkeeping procedures to keep

data for the appropriate period of time

RECRUITER TRAINING

Train recruiters on the process changes as well

as the technology changes

Make sure compliance is part of the training

Do they understand why these requirements are

necessary?

Recruitment Compliance

Technology Recruitment

Efficiency

COMMON PITFALLS TO AVOID

Accepting ATS vendor defaults

Disposition codes

Stages

Statuses

Many times companies don’t even know what half the

values would ever be used for

Saving money now, can cost later….

SKIMPING ON IMPLEMENTATION

NOT REEVALUATING PROCESS

Not mapping recruitment process prior to implementing

new technology

Taking an existing process designed to work without an

ATS and recreate it inside the ATS

Missing large gaps of the recruitment process because it

was too difficult to capture manually or with the

previous system

Apply Review Interview 1

Interview 2

Offer References

Hire

RANKING & SCORING

Proceed with Caution

Using screening tools to rank and/or score

Basic qualifications vs. preferred

Hiring managers preferences

When is it a test?

If they can pass or fail; it is a “test” in the eyes of

the UGESP

Applies to both EEOC and OFCCP

ACCESSIBILITY & EQUAL OPPORTUNITY

Not testing site and application for universal design

No accommodation process for applicants

Accommodation statement for applicant

Tracking requests and results

EEO rights not shared with applicants via online

application

INADEQUATE TRAINING

Not training recruitment team on changes in

process- just the technology

Not clearly outlining what must be tracked

Not considering the requirements and how the

technology addresses them

No Data = No Defense

EMPLOYEE REFERRAL BLACK HOLE

No referral process:

Referrals considered before applying

Improper tracking on referrals

Pre-selection = Word of mouth recruitment

All lead to a diminished defense

RESUME SEARCHES

Ranking on preferred

Not tracking: internal & external

No Data Management Technique (DMT)

THE HIRING MANAGER (“HM”) & THE ATS

Unrestricted HM access to ATS can cause issues

Creating applicants by reviewing resumes

No disposition reasons applied to decisions

Pre-selection of applicants

Giving applicants to the recruiters to process hire

THE TOP 5

#1: DISPOSITION CODES

Too many

Too few for defense

Not used to limit applicant pool

Inconsistently applied

Recruiters have their “favorite” codes

System processes the hire vs. applicants

Missing steps in the process

Manually added candidates may be input at later

stages only

Cannot tell the story of recruitment process

#2: RECRUITMENT STAGES

#3: APPLICANT HISTORY

Does your ATS vendor provide as standard report

Home grown systems may not be logging the

history

Moving candidates straight from applied to hired

Missing interviews (1st, 2nd, 3rd)

Only tracking an offer for hires

#4: REPORTING

Can you report out on the data you may need in

an investigation or audit

Resumes and applications

Job descriptions including minimum qualifications

All posting info: what and where

All who apply: advertisements, referrals, etc.

Applicant flow history

Race, gender, ethnicity of applicants

Reports set up for AAP plan development

#5: JOB POSTINGS

Many systems only track the external and

internal postings (maybe a few of the big ones)

Major and niche job boards not tracked

Not tracking what was posted

Post and pray outreach

VEVRAA requirements

HOW TO ANALYZE THE DATA

Review previous year’s data

Stage tracking, search logs, job postings

Look for trends

Focus your analysis on the hires

If you don’t track it on your hires you won’t on the

others !

WHERE TO START ?

REVIEW SAMPLE REPORTS

Do you reports give you the information you

would need during an investigation or compliance

review?

Information needed for affirmative action plan

generation

Recruitment metrics

CONTACT

David Scheffler Vice President of Compliance

Pinnacle HR Consulting Services

(770) 693-7288

[email protected]

Jeff Baker Vice President

Pinnacle HR Consulting Services

(404) 549-9373

[email protected]