i.s.a.f.e. (increasing safety and family engagement) - florida's center for child welfare |...
TRANSCRIPT
I.S.A.F.E.
(Increasing Safety and Family Engagement)
DCF Child Protection Summit
September 8, 2016
Shawn Salamida
President
FamiliesFirst Network of Lakeview
Joye Clayton
Regional Director, CLS
Northwest Region
Walter Sachs
Regional Managing Director
Northwest Region
Overview of “ISAFE,” a collaborative system evaluation and re-design
Review of initial and ongoing impact on outcomes
Recent development and response
Open discussion of other responses to similar system trends across the state
Pensacola (Escambia County) is largest city
Mix of rural and coastal communities
FamiliesFirst Network (FFN) of Lakeview is the CBC Lead Agency
Historically high Hotline Call volume and removal rates
Historical use of global “Family Support Team” services for diversion
6
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Total Out of Home Care Population in Circuit 1 45% increase in 15 months
I.S.A.F.E.= Increasing Safety and Family Engagement
FFN, DCF, Children’s Legal Services primary partners
Assessment and planning phase launched in January 2015◦ Project Manager conducted research, interviews and
focus groups
◦ Project charter adopted
Countermeasures implemented June 2015
8
• Decision Support Teams - Implemented June 22, 2015• Provide support and guidance to Child Protective Investigators and their supervisors
• Conducted when Present Danger is identified or when children are determined to be Unsafe and the Safety Analysis determines an out of home plan is needed to manage the Impending Danger
• Focused on accurate assessment, decision making and safety planning
• Conditions for Return Staffings - Implemented June 24, 2015• Review all cases where a child has been removed from their home and is approaching 60
days.
• Later integrated into 90-day Permanency Staffing
• If conditions for return criteria are met, a consultant from within their organization is immediately assigned to follow up and assist the caseworker with developing an in-home safety plan
• Focused on accurate assessment, decision making and safety planning
• Real-time Reunification Process – Implemented August 1, 2015• Process for reunification anytime conditions for return are met
• The process encourages staff to think real time about whether reunification should be considered, rather than waiting until the next judicial review hearing
• The procedure includes a thorough review by the case worker with a practice consultant to determine if an in-home safety plan is warranted, and if so, CLS is engaged to petition the court for reunification
• Front-End Service Array Re-design- Initiated October 1, 2015• “One size fits all” approach re-considered
• Tailored new service array to meet specific family needs based on safety and risk levels as determined by Child Protective Investigators
• Designed to better align with Safety Methodology practice model
Focused on a more targeted, research-based services
Interventions based on Safe/Unsafe determination and risk level
Family engagement a priority◦ Improve safety and permanency outcomes
◦ Reduce re-entry
Relied upon strong partnership with contracted service providers
New Service Continuum◦ Safe, Low /Moderate Risk = Community referral
◦ Safe, High / Very High Risk = Wraparound Family Support (voluntary)
◦ Unsafe (Present Danger)- = Safety Management Services
◦ Unsafe (Present or Impending Danger) = Intensive Family Preservation and Reunification Services
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
1/1
/2
01
4
2/1
/2
01
4
3/1
/2
01
4
4/1
/2
01
4
5/1
/2
01
4
6/1
/2
01
4
7/1
/2
01
4
8/1
/2
01
4
9/1
/2
01
4
10/1
/20
14
11/1
/20
14
12/1
/20
14
1/1
/2
01
5
2/1
/2
01
5
3/1
/2
01
5
4/1
/2
01
5
5/1
/2
01
5
6/1
/2
01
5
7/1
/2
01
5
8/1
/2
01
5
9/1
/2
01
5
10/1
/20
15
11/1
/20
15
12/1
/20
15
State Ave.
First Circuit
Removals per 1,000 in child population
I.S.A.F.E. Strategies Implemented
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
1/1
/2
01
4
2/1
/2
01
4
3/1
/2
01
4
4/1
/2
01
4
5/1
/2
01
4
6/1
/2
01
4
7/1
/2
01
4
8/1
/2
01
4
9/1
/2
01
4
10/1
/20
14
11/1
/20
14
12/1
/20
14
1/1
/2
01
5
2/1
/2
01
5
3/1
/2
01
5
4/1
/2
01
5
5/1
/2
01
5
6/1
/2
01
5
7/1
/2
01
5
8/1
/2
01
5
9/1
/2
01
5
10/1
/20
15
11/1
/20
15
12/1
/20
15
State
First Circuit
Discharges per 1,000 in child population
I.S.A.F.E. Strategies Implemented
922962
10371076 1106
11751206
1340 13361305
1247 1219
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Children in Out of Home Care
Children in Out of Home Care
I.S.A.F.E. Strategies Implemented
77.30%72.70%
96.30%
76.50%81.00%
68.20%
78.70%75.00%
80.30% 82.36%84.62%
86.96%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Oct 14 Nov 14 Dec 14 Jan 15 Feb 15 Mar 15 Apr 15 May 15 Jun 15 Jul 15 Aug 15 Sept 15
Timeliness to Reunification
% of children who were reunified within 12 months of latest removal
Circuit One
good
goal= 75.20%
I.S.A.F.E. Strategies Implemented
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2/1
/2
01
4
3/1
/2
01
4
4/1
/2
01
4
5/1
/2
01
4
6/1
/2
01
4
7/1
/2
01
4
8/1
/2
01
4
9/1
/2
01
4
10/1
/20
14
11/1
/20
14
12/1
/20
14
1/1
/2
01
5
2/1
/2
01
5
3/1
/2
01
5
4/1
/2
01
5
5/1
/2
01
5
6/1
/2
01
5
7/1
/2
01
5
8/1
/2
01
5
9/1
/2
01
5
10/1
/20
15
11/1
/20
15
12/1
/20
15
Out of Home Care
In Home Services
Out of Home and In Home Population
I.S.A.F.E. Strategies Implemented
All is well. The End.
(?????????)
The End
(?????????)
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
1/1
/201
4
2/1
/201
4
3/1
/201
4
4/1
/201
4
5/1
/201
4
6/1
/201
4
7/1
/201
4
8/1
/201
4
9/1
/201
4
10
/1/2
01
4
11
/1/2
01
4
12
/1/2
01
4
1/1
/201
5
2/1
/201
5
3/1
/201
5
4/1
/201
5
5/1
/201
5
6/1
/201
5
7/1
/201
5
8/1
/201
5
9/1
/201
5
10
/1/2
01
5
11
/1/2
01
5
12
/1/2
01
5
1/1
/201
6
2/1
/201
6
3/1
/201
6
4/1
/201
6
5/1
/201
6
6/1
/201
6
7/1
/201
6
State
First Circuit
I.S.A.F.E. Strategies Implemented
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Sep-03 Sep-04 Sep-05 Sep-06 Sep-07 Sep-08 Sep-09 Sep-10 Sep-11 Sep-12 Sep-13 Sep-14 Sep-15
Total Out of Home Care Population in Circuit One
FFN, DCF, CLS re-convened for collaborative planning
Identified 5 initial focus areas:◦ Removals
◦ Relative & Non-relative Placement
◦ Reunifications / Discharges
◦ Foster Home Capacity
◦ “Lockouts”
Plan created, leaders assigned, meetings continue
Partnership never stops
Transparency, ownership and shared accountability are essential
Circuit and Region-level leadership must be engaged
Feedback from frontline team members and system stakeholders will guide direction
The journey continues. Stay tuned…
Questions?
What is Your Community’s Story?
For Circuit 1 system data trends, search “Families First Network data reports”
FFN: [email protected]
DCF: [email protected]
CLS: [email protected]
FFN Contracts Mgr: [email protected]