isis-mice tgt alignment m. apollonio ic

9
ISIS-MICE TGT alignment m. apollonio IC urpose: understand sources of reduced rate omment: probably a 2 nd order effect AVEAT: result still preliminary, need a thorough check lease DON’T use them in your simulations !!! 1 MICE Beam Line PC - 031008

Upload: alva

Post on 29-Jan-2016

34 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

ISIS-MICE TGT alignment m. apollonio IC. p urpose: understand sources of reduced rate comment: probably a 2 nd order effect CAVEAT: result still preliminary, need a thorough check Please DON’T use them in your simulations !!!. CAVEAT: used old drawings Author: MJK CLRC 2006 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ISIS-MICE TGT alignment m.  apollonio  IC

MICE Beam Line PC - 031008 1

ISIS-MICE TGT alignmentm. apollonio IC

purpose: understand sources of reduced ratecomment: probably a 2nd order effect

CAVEAT: result still preliminary, need a thorough checkPlease DON’T use them in your simulations !!!

Page 2: ISIS-MICE TGT alignment m.  apollonio  IC

MICE Beam Line PC - 031008 2

486.05

CAVEAT: used old drawings Author: MJKCLRC 2006 Plus some info from Note 216

Page 3: ISIS-MICE TGT alignment m.  apollonio  IC

MICE Beam Line PC - 031008 3

1.76o

Q4-point-1

Q4-point-6

Inclined_Frame_2

Inclined_Frame_1

Inclined_Frame_3

Page 4: ISIS-MICE TGT alignment m.  apollonio  IC

MICE Beam Line PC - 031008 4

“nominal” target bottom tip

ISIS CLUsed 67.1-42.6=24.5

Where is the actual intersection of Q-pole axis with tgt plane?

Page 5: ISIS-MICE TGT alignment m.  apollonio  IC

MICE Beam Line PC - 031008 5

-16000 -15500 -15000 -14500 -14000 -13500 -13000 -12500 -12000

-22700

-22500

-22300

-22100

-21900

-21700

projected trajectory [x-y]

target tip nominal point

x

y

NB coordinates represented in the ISIS frame

Q1

Page 6: ISIS-MICE TGT alignment m.  apollonio  IC

MICE Beam Line PC - 031008 6

-16000 -15500 -15000 -14500 -14000 -13500 -13000 -12500 -12000

-600

-580

-560

-540

-520

-500

-480

-460

-440

-420

-400

projected trajectory [x-z]

traget tip nominal point

x

z

-578.5

35.42.6

~15.

Page 7: ISIS-MICE TGT alignment m.  apollonio  IC

MICE Beam Line PC - 031008 7

-22700 -22600 -22500 -22400 -22300 -22200 -22100 -22000 -21900 -21800 -21700

-600

-580

-560

-540

-520

-500

-480

-460

-440

-420

-400

projected trajectory [y-z]

target tip nominal point

y

z

Page 8: ISIS-MICE TGT alignment m.  apollonio  IC

MICE Beam Line PC - 031008 8

“nominal” target bottom tip

ISIS CL 24.5

... here

3.046o

3.332o

256. ~15.

... a visual answer

Page 9: ISIS-MICE TGT alignment m.  apollonio  IC

MICE Beam Line PC - 031008 9

CONCLUSIONS with a caveat

- from this preliminary study a misalignment is noticed which correspond to an angle of 0.286o : it is the angle by which the bottom tip of the target (at its lowest point) sees the entrance of Q1

- how important is this to pion collection at the 1st Q-pole? - my gut feeling says: not relevant- the real answer should rely on a MC simulation

- I used an old reference (1st survey by CCLRC) because I think I understand the drawings. Also partly used info from note 216, but I found it a bit more difficult to understand. So I want to have the latest figures and re-calculate the axis of the q-poles towards the target plane

- before launching yourself into simulations let me be convinced of the numbers