isl david stuart, uc santa barbara may 11, 2006 david stuart, uc santa barbara may 11, 2006

34
ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

Post on 19-Dec-2015

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

ISLISL

David Stuart,UC Santa Barbara

May 11, 2006

David Stuart,UC Santa Barbara

May 11, 2006

Page 2: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

ISLISL

David Stuart,UC Santa Barbara

May 11, 2006

David Stuart,UC Santa Barbara

May 11, 2006

Formerly known as Intermediate Radius Silicon

Formerly known as Intermediate Radius Silicon

Page 3: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

I’ll review the motivation for the detector

and give a tour of its design and construction

I’ll review the motivation for the detector

and give a tour of its design and construction

Page 4: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

The motivation is best shown by looking at an event display from Run 1.

Page 5: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

The motivation is best shown by looking at an event display from Run 1.

Page 6: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

The motivation is best shown by looking at an event display from Run 1.

Tracks are obviously missed and obviously easy to find.

Page 7: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

Actual size

Page 8: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

Unused hits from:

1. Low pT

2. > 1

Page 9: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

Using forward silicon hits in Run 1

1. Stand-alone silicon pattern recognition• Fit for 0, d0, pT (curvature) with 4 hits, <=1 dof.• It worked, but was limited by

• lever arm (L2)• Too few hits• Poor curvature resolution degraded impact parameter resolution• 4% relative increase in b-tagging for

top

Page 10: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

Using forward silicon hits in Run 1

2. Calorimeter-seeded tracking for electronsi.e., Phoenix

eeET event

Page 11: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

eeET event

Page 12: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

ISL designed to extend lever arm

SVX’ (Run 1)L00SVXII

ISL

Page 13: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

Design goalsFine granularity at large radius for

Low occupancytypical jet has ~10 tracks in a <0.2 cone, covers 1000 channels

Resolution and lever arm (BL2)

100 m pitch = 30 m resolution sufficient forNegligible effect on d0 resolutionPointing into COT

< hit resolution at high pT

< hit width at low pT

2trk

COTres

Page 14: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

Portcard scattering is a real complication

Page 15: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

Design requirements

Big (5 m2)

Cheap

Fast

Page 16: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

Design requirements

Big (5 m2) simple

Cheap simple

Fast simple

Piggybacking on SVX-II infrastructure important

Page 17: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

Sensor Design

Big- used max possible sensor size per wafer.

HPK only had 4” wafersMicron had 6”, and they were cheaper (in both senses of the word).

Layer 6 built with HPK at FermilabLayer 7 built with Micron at Pisa Different geometries, mechanics, & quality

Page 18: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006
Page 19: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006
Page 20: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

Readout Hybrid

Double sided and spaciousPitch adapterTransceiver

Page 21: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

Half ladder

Page 22: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

Full ladder

Page 23: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

Ganging

Not in trigger, but don’t preclude, so r-phi read first.16 chips total--max FIB can handle.Note up-down reverses hall effect and readout direction.

Page 24: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

Joel dropped them in place

Page 25: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

Supported by carbon fiber spaceframeContaining cable and cooling

and gang card mounts

Page 26: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006
Page 27: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006
Page 28: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006
Page 29: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006
Page 30: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006
Page 31: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006
Page 32: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

Notable differences from SVXII• Because rad damage is less of a concern, and no direct silicon heating

– ISL operates ~10 deg warmer than SVXII

• Layer 6 has the implant on the z-side

• IB0,1,4,5 (forward region)– L0,L2,L4 are layer seven (Micron sensors)– L1,L3 are layer six (Hamamatsu sensors)

• IB2,3 (central region)– Everything is layer six

• Within a given layer, IBxWyLz, y and z denote phi position of ganged readout pair

Page 33: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

• Forward tracking

Recall Design goals

Page 34: ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

• Forward tracking ?

Recall Design goals