island-type smart community demonstration in … › content › 100788811.pdfcommonly-used name:...
TRANSCRIPT
Island-Type Smart Community Demonstration in Miyakojima City
Eco-Island Promotion Division, Planning Department, Miyakojima City
Miyakojima City
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
• Background
Entire-island EMS demonstration project
• Overview of the demonstration project
• Results of the demonstration project
• Perspective of the business model
Kurimajima RE 100% self-support demonstration project
• Overview of the demonstration project
• Results of the demonstration project
• Direction from now on
Table of contents
2
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
Overview of Miyakojima City Miyakojima City
Miyakojima is an island located approximately 2,000km from Tokyo, approximately 300km from Naha, and midway between Japan and Taiwan.
Approx. 300km
Approx. 2,000km
3Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Diagram of the location of Miyakojima City
Location of Miyakojima City
Miyakojima City
Okinawa’s main island
Miyakojima City
Tokyo
Osaka
Ishigakijima
Cross-section of Miyakojima
(overview)
MiyakojimaSpring
Well
Sloped
well
SpringRyuku
limestone
Shimajiri mud stone layers
(clay)
Freshwater
FaultFault
Freshwater
SeawaterSeawater
Sugarcane
field
Ikemajima Ogamijima
Irabujima
Shimojijima
Kurimajima
Population:Approx. 55,000 people
Area:Approx. 205km2 (of that, 80% is Miyakojima)
Climate:Subtropical climate
Temperature:Annual average of 23.3C
Rainfall amount:Annual average of 2,000mm
Humidity: Annual average of 79%
Maehama
Beach
Scenes of Miyakojima City
It is a flat island surrounded by the ocean on all four sides and formed by raised coral reefs. There are no large
rivers, and it has a harsh natural environment that is easily affected by typhoons and draughts.
Spring
water from
a mountain
river
Higashihennazaki
(government-
designated site of
scenic beauty)
Overview of Miyakojima City
4Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
Overview of multiple-well systemFarm pondMain watercourse
Irrigation channel Underground dam
Pump building
Water level
AqueductIntake channel
Intake facilities
Well
PumpCut-off wall
Lim
esto
ne
Sluice gate
Aquifer
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Groundwater watershed boundary
Current direction of groundwater
Spring
Minafuku
underground dam
Fukuzato
underground dam
Nakaharabasin
Sunagawa underground dam
Shirakawa spring
Miyakojima is in a harsh natural environment, and in the past it has suffered heavy damage from things such as droughts. Therefore, we are aiming to break away from waterless agriculture by using its abundant underground water, and we have built water storage dams by using underground water-stopping walls made of Ryukyu limestone, which is very permeable, and we have developed water resources. (Construction began in 1987 and was completed in 2000 and 2002.)
Project to prepare underground dam irrigation
Pinfu Peak FP Milk Crest FP Nakao Crest FP Higashiyama
FPNohara Peak
FP
Kurimajima
FP
・FP = Farm pond
5
Miyakojima City
• Background
Entire-island EMS demonstration project
• Overview of the demonstration project
• Purpose of the demonstration project
• Progress of the demonstration project
Kurimajima RE 100% self-support demonstration project
• Overview of the demonstration project
• Progress of the demonstration project
• Direction from now on
Table of contents
6
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
Overview of the projectFor the purpose of making the most efficient use of the island’s renewable energy such as solar power and wind power, we are aiming to clarify the state of the entire island’s demand for electricity, to build a system that will bring about faceted management of energy by doing things such as making electricity consumption visible and controlling demand for electricity, and at the same time to build a system by which it will be possible for regions to be the main parties conducting operations throughout the future.Project period: Fiscal 2011 – fiscal 2017 * Operation began in October 2013Implementation system: Implementing body: Okinawa Prefecture
Consigned party: Miyakojima City (overall control)Re-consigned party: SMA ECO Co. (promotion of commercialization, system
development, etc.)Promotion committee: Professor Kenji Iba, Meisei University (committee
chairperson)Professor Hitoshi Aida, The University of TokyoAssociate Professor Junpei Baba, The University of TokyoProfessor Tomonobu Senju, University of the Ryukus
(1) overview of the Miyakojima entire-island EMS verification project
~Island-type smart community demonstration project~
7Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
CEMS: Local energy management system
AMI systemadvanced metering infrastructure
・・・200 households
Measurement device
Tablets
MDMS serverMeter Data Management System
BEMS
Places of large-scale demand・・・5 business places
Small and medium-scale monitors・・・20 business places
Information G/W equipment
Integrated BEMS serverBuilding Energy Management System
Agriculture EMS server
Pump buildings: Places holding pumps
Existing water management system
Terminal that makes things visible
Terminal that makes things visible
Entire-island EMS Collection of performance informationPrediction → Planning functions
Overview of the systemHome sector: 200 householdsBusiness place sector: 25 business places(Places of large-scale demand: 5 business places; places
of small and medium-scale demand: 20 business places)Agricultural sector: 19 pump buildings (places containing underground dam water pumps)
Commonly-used name: “SMA ECO Project”: Let’s live on the island in a smart way.
(1) Overview of the Miyakojima City entire-island EMS verification project
~Island-type smart community demonstration project ~
8
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
• Background
Entire-island EMS demonstration project
• Overview of the demonstration project
• Purpose of the demonstration project
• Progress of the demonstration project
Kurimajima RE 100% self-support demonstration project
• Overview of the demonstration project
• Progress of the demonstration project
• Direction from now on
Table of contents
9
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
Purposes of the project① Reduction of the degree of reliance on energy from outside the island
= Security measure
・Reduction of the total amount of energy consumption
・ Maximum use of renewable energy
② Reduction of social costs for energy supply
=Stabilization of citizens’ daily lives
=Reduction of daily life costs
③ Creation of a business model for social implementation
(2) Purposes of the demonstration project(SMA ECO project)~Entire-island EMS demonstration project~
10Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
Structure of supply costs
~Reasons why electricity supply costs are high on remote islands~
Fuel costs(influenced by the consumption amount)
・On Miyakojima, diesel power generation is dominant.
・Heavy oil C, which is more expensive than coal, is the main fuel.
・Transport costs are necessary.・There is a significant influence by the cost of crude oil.
Facility costs (peak times have an influence)・Because it is a small-scale system, reserve power is made comparatively large
・Economy of scale does not work, and it is difficult to recover facility costs.
However, because it is universal service, it is a state in which independent operation by remote island areas is difficult.⇒In comparison, the effects of introducing renewable energy are high. ⇒It is possible to build a cooperative relationship with Okinawa Electric Power Company!?
(2) Purpose of the demonstration project(SMA ECO project)~Entire-island EMS demonstration project~
⇒This will be the first example of a smart community that coordinates supply and demand (the real thing)!!
Energy
conservatio
n
Cutting use
at peak
times
Renewable
energy
11Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
State of demand (fiscal 2011 results) Electricity demand peak: Approx. 52MW (summer) Electricity demand bottom (daytime): Approx. 22MW
(winter)* Application of 30-day rule→25.6MW
Total amount of annual electricity consumption: 262,419MWh
* The peak is around 8 p.m. (civilian demand)
Reference: The state of Miyakojima’s electricity system~Island-type smart community demonstration project ~* Created by using materials made public by Okinawa Electric Power Company as a reference
12
State of power generation facilities (as of March 31, 2015) DEG power generation(heavy oil C): 65MW(7 facilities) GT power generation(heavy oil A):15MW(3 facilities)
● Thermal power generation total: 80MW
Wind power generation:4.8MW Solar power generation: 4MW(mega-solar) Sunlight on the demand side:19.71MW(connectable
amount)● Renewable energy facility total: Approx. 28.5MW
Calculation of RE ratio* Calculation based only on
ordinary use ratiosSunlight 12%
23.7×8760 h×12%=Approx. 25,000MWh
Wind power 25%4.8×8760×25%
= Approx. 10,500MWh
RE total / Total amount of consumption
Approx. 35,500/ Approx. 262,500MWh
RE ratio13.5%
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
• Background
Entire-island EMS demonstration project
• Overview of the demonstration project
• Purpose of the demonstration project
• Progress of the demonstration project
Kurimajima RE 100% self-support demonstration project
• Overview of the demonstration project
• Progress of the demonstration project
• Direction from now on
Table of contents
13
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
(3) Progress of the demonstration project(SMA ECO project)~Entire-island EMS demonstration project~
① Reduction of the degree of reliance on energy from outside the island(expansion of renewable energy)
The problem of connection hold for solar power generationThe need to increase daytime demand in the winter⇒ It is not possible to use it wastefully. = A demand shift is
necessary.14
On the island, there is increasing introduction of large amounts of PV through FIT, and a situation is near at hand in which, in times of clear weather in the winter, the cost of reducing the amount of production of power plants’ diesel generators will be eliminated.
Daytime load: Approx. 25.6MWIn contrast,PV connectable amount:19.71MW
(announced by Okinawa Electric)It is not possible to reduce DEG more than this.
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
System load
Generator output
Solar power generation
Generator output lower limit (supposed)
Image for a time of clear weather in winter.PV introduction amount equivalent to 15MW (Even in winter, PV of 2/3 is output when weather is clear.)
Miyakojima City
Overview of multiple-well
system
Farm pondMain watercourse
Irrigation channel Underground dam
Pump building
AqueductIntake channel
Intake facilities
Well
PumpCut-off wall
Lim
esto
ne
Sluice gate
Aquifer
Reference: Mechanism of water supply from underground dams~Entire-island EMS demonstration project~
15
Doing the following for the timing of drawing up water:
○ Shifting from the peak hours of the entire island’s electricity
demand
○ Shifting to the hours of solar power generation
Summer: There is a lot of use of water, and it is necessary to operate them within the extent that they do not become empty.
Winter: There is little use of water, and it is necessary to operate them within the extent that they do not overflow.
Watering fields through
natural downward flow
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Full water level
Impermeable basement
(shimajiri mud stone layers )
Miyakojima City
(3) Progress of the demonstration project (SMA ECO project)~Entire-island EMS demonstration project~
16
As a result of demonstration, it was found that because there are limits to expansion of the connectable amount, it is necessary to control facilities for which a demand shift (accumulated energy) is possible for equipment on the demand side.
From now on, we will proceed with various types of investigations and reviews in order to bring about energy management that utilizes things such as the following:
○HP-type water heaters○Electric automobiles
① Reduction of the degree of reliance on energy from outside the island (expansion of renewable energy)
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
(3) Progress of the demonstration project (SMA ECO project)~Entire-island EMS demonstration project~
② Reduction of social costs for energy supply
Power generation costs are lowered by realizing load leveling through coordination of timely and appropriate demand and improving system load factors.
17
As a result of simulations, it became clear that, in aiming to reduce social costs for supply, measures for cutting use at peak times are effective and lead to bottom-up power generation cost reduction.
Miyakojima model Conventional EMS business / New electricity business
AVE
Power
generation
capacity
AVE
Power
generation capacity
Inefficient
Load factor improvement
(Reduction of power
generation costs)
Electricity
business
EMS
business
Electricity
business
EMS
business
←Competition→→Cooperation←
Bottom up
Cutting use
at peak hoursOnly cutting use
at peak hours
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
(3) Progress of the demonstration project (SMA ECO project)~Entire-island EMS demonstration project~
18
As a result of demonstrating demand response thus far, it was revealed that because ordinary homes and business places do not have facilities by which large load control is possible, even if we have them respond to requests by e-mail, etc. it is difficult to obtain valid effect size.
From now on, we will proceed with various types of investigations and reviews in order to bring about energy management that utilizes things such as the following:
○HP-type water heaters○Electric automobiles
In the same way as with measures for the connection hold problem, popularization of controllable load and realization of remote control will be important tasks from now on.
② Reduction of social costs for energy supply
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
19
Sustainable social system
(≒ Creation of business)
Energy benefits
(1)Tasks for DR implementation
(Supply and demand cooperation)
(2)Tasks for service
(Energy services)
Non-energy benefits
(3)Tasks for service
(Added-value services)
(3) Progress of the demonstration project(SMA ECO project)~Entire-island EMS demonstration project~
③ Creation of a business model for social implementation
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
Overview of the business modelBy conserving energy and realizing DR by making energy visible through entire-island EMS, we aim to create a business model and form a social system.
Entire-island EMS company
Home sectorBusiness place
sector
Energy conservation services through creation of visibility
(Lower effects)
Electricity charge reduction service through cutting use at peak hours
Agricultural sector
a) Energy conservation services by making electricity consumption visible for parties on the demand side =Lower effects
A service model developed by obtaining counter value for energy conservation services such as making the energy consumption situation visible to the demand side and conducting energy diagnoses
Service charges
20
(3) Progress of the demonstration project(SMA ECO project)~Entire-island EMS demonstration project~
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
Entire-island EMS business
Home sectorBusiness place
sector
D.R. request
Agricultural sector
b) Optimization of supply and demand through demand response (DR) =Upper effectsThrough electricity consumption adjustment requests (demand response = DR) to the demand side, we will realize optimization of supply that includes efficient use of renewable energy, and ensure initiatives for effects (upper effects) for electricity businesses.
D.R. incentives
Electricity company
Improved system operation efficiency through optimization of supply and demand
(Upper effects)
21
(3) Progress of the demonstration project(SMA ECO project)~Entire-island EMS demonstration project~
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
Concluding an MOU with an EMS businessIn the future, concluding an MOU with SMA ECO Co., which is an EMS business that is responsible for business.We will participate in a project promotion system from now on and conduct things such as the following:
System operation and evaluation Overall consideration of business models Scheme for popularizing controllable loads
Addition of functions to control systems
22
(3) Progress of the demonstration project(SMA ECO project)~Entire-island EMS demonstration project~
③ Creation of a business model for social implementation
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
• Background
Entire-island EMS demonstration project
• Overview of the demonstration project
• Purpose of the demonstration project
• Progress of the demonstration project
Kurimajima RE 100% self-support demonstration project
• Overview of the demonstration project
• Progress of the demonstration project
• Direction from now on
Table of contents
23
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
Project overviewWith the purposes of ensuring energy security and contributing to reduction of CO2 emissions by building a “use model” that uses renewable energy in the most efficient ways in local areas, we aim to install solar power generation and local storage cell facilities on the demand side and build a “model of a remote island with 100% renewable energy” that will combine with the wind power generation data of Miyakojima’s existing facilities to cover all consumed power on the island with renewable energy. Project period: Fiscal 2011 – fiscal 2016 * Operation began in January 2014.
Implementation system: Implementing body: Okinawa PrefectureConsigned party: Miyakojima City (promoting party and overall
control)
System (re-consigned party): SMA ECO Co. (evaluation verification, consideration of expansion models)
Overview of Kurimajima RE 100% self-support demonstration project
~Island-type smart community demonstration project ~
24Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
Overview of Kurimajima Population: Less than 200 people(less than 100 households) Electricity demand: More than 200kW at the summer peak, approximately
50kW at the winter bottomSystem overview Power generation facility: Solar power generation system of approx. 380kW Storage cell facilities: 100kW-176kWh × 2 sets Current measurement / Kurima EMS
Kurima EMS Electrical
charge / Electrical
discharge
Command
control
Time of power generation
surplus: Electrical charge command
Time of power generation
insufficiency: Electrical discharge command
PV panels
Measurement
device
Kurimajima
Power
generationConsumption
Automatic calculation
System server
Homes
School
Remote
island center
Group homeRealization of local production and local consumption through cooperative initiatives↓Realization of 100%independence
Local
storage cell
Overview of Kurimajima RE 100% self-support demonstration project
~Island-type smart community demonstration project ~
25Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
• Background
Entire-island EMS demonstration project
• Overview of the demonstration project
• Purpose of the demonstration project
• Progress of the demonstration project
Kurimajima RE 100% self-support demonstration project
• Overview of the demonstration project
• Progress of the demonstration project
• Direction from now on
Table of contents
26
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
(2) Progress of demonstration~Kurimajima RE 100% self-support demonstration project~
27
Renewable energy 100% self-support demonstration
On remote islands that have extremely small-scale independent systems and remote islands that are supplied by ocean floor cables, it is thought that power generation costs will become more expensive, and therefore we are conducting technical verification of systems in which supply is not hindered even if there is no internal-combustion power and, in light of the trend of cost reduction for solar power generation and storage cells, we are continuing to consider expansion to small-scale remote islands.
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
・Solar power generation only Capacity Ratio of f acility use Power generation cost
Power generation f acility PV:2.0MW 4.9%
Storage f acility Lead storage battery :7.5MWh
・Solar power generation + Wind power generation
PV:1.0MW 5.4%
WT:245kW 15.6%
Storage f acility Lead storage battery : 6.0MWh
JPY 107.5
Power generation f acilityJPY 89.1
(2) Progress of demonstration~Kurimajima RE 100% self-support demonstration project~
28
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
Po
wer
(kW
)
Batt
ery
Sta
te o
f C
harg
e (
%)
AC Primary Load
PV Pow er
Excess Electricity
Battery State of Charge
● In the case of aiming for 100% by sunlight alone:PV2000kW(existing 380kW+1620kW)Lead storage battery: 7.5MWh
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
(2) Progress of demonstration~Kurijima RE 100% self-support demonstration project~
29
● In the case of aiming for 100% by sunlight + wind power:PV1000kW(existing 380kW+620kW)245kW One tilting wind millLead storage battery: 6.0MWh
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
Po
wer
(kW
)
Batt
ery
Sta
te o
f C
harg
e (
%)
AC Primary Load
PV Pow er
Vergnet gev-MP275
Excess Electricity
Battery State of Charge
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
Verification of facilities’ optimal capacityRatio of renewable energy・・・Ratio of supply of electricity derived from renewable energy indicated in electricity demand on the island
Using microgrid simulation software (HOMER) that can conduct optimization analysis for 8,760 hours a year, we input the previously mentioned data for demand on the island, solar radiation amount data, and wind speed data, and conducted simulation analyses.
For solar power generation we set ordinary specifications, and for wind power generation we set 245kW tilting wind mill specifications.For storage cells, we used 15% charge and discharge loss by lead storage batteries.
As a result, the facility composition that is necessary for 100% independence are the regions enveloped in red and written in red numbers.
PV
(kW)WT
(kW)Storage cell (MWh)
0 0.75 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5 9.0 12.0
0 0 0.0% 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.5% 0.6% 0.8% 0.9% 1.2%
400 0 31.7% 46.5% 51.1% 51.8% 51.9% 52.1% 52.3% 52.5% 52.8%
800 0 38.8% 62.6% 76.7% 86.9% 91.0% 93.6% 95.3% 96.1% 96.9%
1,000 0 40.4% 66.1% 81.9% 92.4% 96.7% 98.8% 99.6% 99.9% 100.0%
2,000 0 44.1% 74.6% 92.5% 98.9% 99.8% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
3,000 0 45.3% 77.2% 95.6% 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
4,000 0 45.9% 78.2% 96.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
0 245 41.9% 51.5% 54.3% 57.8% 60.0% 61.4% 61.9% 62.2% 62.6%
400 245 56.4% 79.0% 85.8% 89.2% 90.6% 91.4% 92.0% 92.4% 93.0%
800 245 58.9% 84.5% 93.4% 98.0% 99.3% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
1,000 245 59.5% 85.7% 94.8% 98.8% 99.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
2,000 245 61.0% 88.7% 97.8% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
3,000 245 61.5% 89.4% 98.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
4,000 245 61.7% 89.8% 98.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
0 490 55.8% 71.3% 75.1% 79.3% 81.7% 82.8% 83.6% 84.5% 85.6%
400 490 63.8% 86.4% 92.4% 95.5% 96.6% 97.5% 98.1% 98.6% 99.1%
800 490 65.3% 89.4% 96.2% 99.2% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
1,000 490 65.7% 90.2% 97.0% 99.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
2,000 490 66.6% 91.8% 98.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
3,000 490 66.9% 92.2% 99.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
4,000 490 67.1% 92.5% 99.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Kurimajima renewable energy 100% self-support
30Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Verification of facilities’ optimal capacity
Introduction cost
Regarding introduction costs, for the scale of each facility we calculated JPY 400,000/kW for solar power generation, JPY 200,000,000 per mill for 245kW tilting wind mills, and JPY 100,000,000/MWH as system counter value for storage cells.
(JPY 100,000,000)
PV
(kW)WT
(kW)Storage cell (MWh)
0 0.75 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5 9.0 12.0
0 0 0.0 0.8 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5 9.0 12.0
400 0 1.6 2.4 3.1 4.6 6.1 7.6 9.1 10.6 13.6
800 0 3.2 4.0 4.7 6.2 7.7 9.2 10.7 12.2 15.2
1,000 0 4.0 4.8 5.5 7.0 8.5 10.0 11.5 13.0 16.0
2,000 0 8.0 8.8 9.5 11.0 12.5 14.0 15.5 17.0 20.0
3,000 0 12.0 12.8 13.5 15.0 16.5 18.0 19.5 21.0 24.0
4,000 0 16.0 16.8 17.5 19.0 20.5 22.0 23.5 25.0 28.0
0 245 2.0 2.8 3.5 5.0 6.5 8.0 9.5 11.0 14.0
400 245 3.6 4.4 5.1 6.6 8.1 9.6 11.1 12.6 15.6
800 245 5.2 6.0 6.7 8.2 9.7 11.2 12.7 14.2 17.2
1,000 245 6.0 6.8 7.5 9.0 10.5 12.0 13.5 15.0 18.0
2,000 245 10.0 10.8 11.5 13.0 14.5 16.0 17.5 19.0 22.0
3,000 245 14.0 14.8 15.5 17.0 18.5 20.0 21.5 23.0 26.0
4,000 245 18.0 18.8 19.5 21.0 22.5 24.0 25.5 27.0 30.0
0 490 4.0 4.8 5.5 7.0 8.5 10.0 11.5 13.0 16.0
400 490 5.6 6.4 7.1 8.6 10.1 11.6 13.1 14.6 17.6
800 490 7.2 8.0 8.7 10.2 11.7 13.2 14.7 16.2 19.2
1,000 490 8.0 8.8 9.5 11.0 12.5 14.0 15.5 17.0 20.0
2,000 490 12.0 12.8 13.5 15.0 16.5 18.0 19.5 21.0 24.0
3,000 490 16.0 16.8 17.5 19.0 20.5 22.0 23.5 25.0 28.0
4,000 490 20.0 20.8 21.5 23.0 24.5 26.0 27.5 29.0 32.0
Kurimajima renewable energy 100% self-support
31Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Verification of facilities’ optimal capacity
Power generation cost
We set twenty years as the number of operation years for all facilities, and 1% of construction expenses per year for maintenance costs, and then calculated electricity generation costs.
Electricity generation costs =(Construction expenses(no subsidies)+ Operation costs (1% of construction expenses for twenty years))÷((PV scale *PV facility use ratio +WT scale *WT facility use ratio)*8760*20 years)
The things that will become inexpensive within the scope of 100% independence are PV2MW + storage cell 7.5MWh or PV1MW + WT245kW + storage cell 6.0MWh.
If electricity generation costs by ordinary diesel electricity generation are set at JPY 50/kWh, it can be appraised that the regions enveloped in green and written in red numbers have economical efficiency.
(JPY/kWh)
PV
(kW)WT
(kW)Storage cell (MWh)
0 0.75 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5 9.0 12.0
0 0 - - - - - - - - -
400 0 31.4 33.5 40.5 59.6 79.0 98.4 117.8 137.2 176.1
800 0 51.4 42.6 41.8 49.0 58.3 67.8 77.5 87.7 108.4
1,000 0 61.7 48.7 45.9 52.2 60.7 69.9 79.8 90.0 110.6
2,000 0 113.0 80.5 70.8 77.1 86.9 97.1 107.5 117.9 138.7
3,000 0 164.9 113.7 97.6 104.4 114.6 125.0 135.4 145.8 166.7
4,000 0 217.1 147.7 125.3 132.0 142.5 152.9 163.3 173.7 194.6
0 245 33.3 41.1 50.1 67.8 85.1 102.7 121.3 140.1 177.4
400 245 42.9 41.2 44.7 55.7 67.4 79.1 90.9 102.7 126.3
800 245 58.7 52.3 53.3 62.3 72.7 83.4 94.5 105.7 128.0
1,000 245 66.8 58.3 58.6 67.7 78.2 89.1 100.2 111.4 133.6
2,000 245 107.8 89.5 86.7 96.1 107.0 118.1 129.2 140.2 162.4
3,000 245 149.4 121.5 115.8 125.2 136.2 147.3 158.3 169.4 191.4
4,000 245 191.0 153.7 145.2 154.4 165.5 176.5 187.5 198.6 220.6
0 490 50.2 52.6 58.1 70.2 82.9 96.2 109.4 122.4 148.8
400 490 60.7 57.3 60.0 70.4 81.7 92.9 104.4 115.7 138.8
800 490 75.9 69.0 70.1 79.7 90.8 102.3 114.0 125.6 148.9
1,000 490 83.7 75.2 75.7 85.4 96.7 108.3 119.9 131.5 154.7
2,000 490 123.1 107.1 105.2 115.4 126.9 138.5 150.0 161.6 184.6
3,000 490 163.1 139.8 135.6 145.8 157.3 168.8 180.3 191.8 214.9
4,000 490 203.1 172.5 166.2 176.2 187.7 199.2 210.7 222.2 245.2
Kurimajima renewable energy 100% self-support
32Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Verification of facilities’ optimal capacity
PV facility use ratio
PV
(kW)WT
(kW)Storage cell (MWh)
0 0.75 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5 9.0 12.0
0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
400 0 8.7% 12.0% 13.1% 13.2% 13.2% 13.2% 13.2% 13.2% 13.2%
800 0 5.3% 7.9% 9.6% 10.8% 11.3% 11.6% 11.8% 11.9% 12.0%
1,000 0 4.4% 6.7% 8.2% 9.2% 9.6% 9.8% 9.9% 9.9% 9.9%
2,000 0 2.4% 3.7% 4.6% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9%
3,000 0 1.7% 2.6% 3.2% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3%
4,000 0 1.3% 1.9% 2.4% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%
0 245 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
400 245 5.0% 7.4% 8.3% 8.7% 8.9% 9.0% 9.1% 9.2% 9.3%
800 245 3.4% 5.1% 5.9% 6.2% 6.4% 6.4% 6.4% 6.4% 6.4%
1,000 245 2.9% 4.4% 5.0% 5.3% 5.4% 5.4% 5.4% 5.4% 5.4%
2,000 245 1.7% 2.6% 2.9% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
3,000 245 1.2% 1.8% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1%
4,000 245 0.9% 1.4% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6%
0 490 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
400 490 1.5% 2.9% 3.5% 3.8% 3.9% 4.0% 4.1% 4.1% 4.2%
800 490 1.2% 2.3% 2.7% 2.9% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
1,000 490 1.1% 2.0% 2.4% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6%
2,000 490 0.7% 1.3% 1.5% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6%
3,000 490 0.5% 0.9% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1%
4,000 490 0.4% 0.7% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9%
Kurimajima renewable energy 100% self-support
As a result of simulations, for the surplus power that cannot be absorbed even by storage cells we made allocations in accordance with each output scale of solar power generation and wind power generation.That resulted in a reduction of the facility use ratio.
In the case of solar power generation, PCS output control is technically possible, but because special specifications are necessary we think that under current standard technology it is desirable to realize 10kW-PCS unit number control (ON-OFF).
33Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Verification of facilities’ optimal capacity
WT facility use ratio
As a result of simulations, for the surplus power that cannot be absorbed even by storage cells we made allocations in accordance with each output scale of solar power generation and wind power generation.That resulted in a reduction of the facility use ratio.
In the case of wind power generation, it is assumed that output control will be conducted by pitch control.
PV
(kW)WT
(kW)Storage cell (MWh)
0 0.75 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5 9.0 12.0
0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
400 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
800 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
1,000 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2,000 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3,000 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4,000 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0 245 16.8% 18.7% 19.5% 20.6% 21.4% 21.8% 21.9% 21.9% 22.1%
400 245 15.2% 17.5% 18.4% 18.9% 19.1% 19.2% 19.3% 19.3% 19.4%
800 245 13.6% 15.2% 16.0% 16.4% 16.5% 16.6% 16.6% 16.6% 16.6%
1,000 245 13.1% 14.5% 15.2% 15.5% 15.6% 15.6% 15.6% 15.6% 15.6%
2,000 245 11.9% 12.7% 13.1% 13.2% 13.2% 13.2% 13.2% 13.2% 13.2%
3,000 245 11.4% 12.0% 12.2% 12.3% 12.3% 12.3% 12.3% 12.3% 12.3%
4,000 245 11.1% 11.6% 11.8% 11.8% 11.8% 11.8% 11.8% 11.8% 11.8%
0 490 11.1% 12.6% 13.2% 13.9% 14.3% 14.5% 14.7% 14.9% 15.0%
400 490 11.7% 13.1% 13.7% 14.0% 14.1% 14.2% 14.2% 14.3% 14.3%
800 490 11.3% 12.4% 12.9% 13.1% 13.2% 13.2% 13.2% 13.2% 13.2%
1,000 490 11.2% 12.2% 12.6% 12.7% 12.8% 12.8% 12.8% 12.8% 12.8%
2,000 490 10.8% 11.4% 11.7% 11.7% 11.7% 11.7% 11.7% 11.7% 11.7%
3,000 490 10.7% 11.1% 11.3% 11.3% 11.3% 11.3% 11.3% 11.3% 11.3%
4,000 490 10.6% 10.9% 11.0% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1%
Kurimajima renewable energy 100% self-support
34Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
• Background
Entire-island EMS demonstration project
• Overview of the demonstration project
• Purpose of the demonstration project
• Progress of the demonstration project
Kurima RE 100% self-support demonstration project
• Overview of the demonstration project
• Progress of the demonstration project
• Direction from now on
Table of contents
35
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
(3) Direction from now on~Kurimajima RE 100% self-support demonstration project~
36
By demonstrating renewable energy 100% independence, the difficulties and possibilities of efficiently using renewable energy become clear as actual data.
Costs are expensive for 100% renewable energy, but because the supply cost per kWh is extremely high on remote islands that have a smaller scale than Miyakojima and that have independent systems and on small-scale remote islands that conduct supply by ocean floor cables, there is a possibility that future cost reductions for solar power generation systems and storage cell systems will generate competitive edges for expanding this model to such small-scale remote islands.
Because Kurmajima’s system is connected to Miyakojima, there is little risk of things such as power outages due to the effects of demonstration, and because it is possible to measure the interconnected line current, it is an environment in which, after conducting maximum introduction of RE, it is possible to conduct verification based on actual changes of seasons and solar radiation, as well as residents’ actual daily life environments.We think that there is value in utilizing such characteristics as a base for researching and demonstrating the many independent system remote islands that exist in Okinawa Prefecture.
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City
37
Thank you for your attention.
Copyright Miyakojima City 2016
Miyakojima City