This pdf is created to help the students of sampaguita high school or any other schools that are using interactive science notebooks as an instrument of learning. License: You are allowed to copy distribute and modify this document. Revised by: Ralph Jerome m. Batuigas Contact: https://www.facebook.com/ralphbatuigas this pdf consists of pages that are necessary for creating an interactive science notebook -Profile page -Guidelines -Isn instruction -2 pages of Table of contents -2 pages of ISN evaluation sheet -gems of wisdom If you need an editable copy of this document just contact me.

*Name: *Grade and section: *Other info’s - -

-

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

STUDENT EVALUATION

TEACHER EVALUATION

VISUAL APPEARANCE/ORGANIZATION (20)

Table of Contents Work is Neat and Organize

Headings and Dates on all Pages

Effective use of color

QUALITY AND COMPLETENESS (70)

Notes and right-side work to complete and high quality

Left side work is complete and shows processing of the work done on the right side

Evidence of the following instructions

Includes graphic representations of thought

No missing work (even if you were absent)

EXTRAS (10)

Obvious evidence of time invested

Obvious evidence of learning

Effort and quality of work are exceptional

TOTAL (100)

Interactive Science Notebook Evaluation Sheet Score Level Performance 1 2 3 4

6 Excellent

- Notebook contents are complete, dated and labeled - Pages are numbered (odd; right side; even: left side) - Right-side/Left-side topics are correct and contents

organized - Lecture notes go beyond the basic requirements - Uses color and effective diagrams making notebook-

visually appealing - Shows impressive, in-depth self-reflections

5 Well Done

- Notebook contents are complete, dated and labeled - Pages are numbered (odd; right side; even: left side) - Right-side/Left-side topics are correct and contents

organized - Includes most of the traits of a “6”, but lacks

excellence in all areas - Most areas meet requirements but don’t go beyond - Shows in-depth self-reflection

4 Satisfactory

- Notebook contents are complete (at least 90%), dated and labeled

- Pages are numbered (odd: right side; even: left side) - Right-side/Left-side topics are correct and contents

organized - Uses color and some diagrams - Information shows basic understanding of content

topics - Some areas meet requirements, but don’t go beyond - Shows limited but real self-reflection

3 Fair

- Notebook contents are complete (at least 80%), dated and labeled

- Pages are numbered (odd: right side; even: left side) - Right-side/Left-side topics are correct and contents

organized - Uses minimal color and few diagrams - Information shows basic understanding of content

topics - Few areas meet all the requirements - Shows some real self-reflection

2 Revision Needed

- Notebook contents are complete - Some attempt at dating and labeling of entries is

made - Right-side/Left-side is consistent and contents are

unorganized - Notebook is not ready written - Shows little real self-reflection

1 Unacceptable - Notebook turned in but too incomplete to score