iso 13485:2016 the next revision · pdf fileiso 13485:2003 vs iso 13485:2016 2016 •when a...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 –
The Next Revision
Richard (Rick) Burgess
Medical Program Manager
30 March 2016
© DQS Group 1 March 31, 2016
![Page 2: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 – The Next Revision
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 2
Agenda and Scope
Relationship to ISO 9001
New requirements
Transition Timing
Questions
![Page 3: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 - Putting the pieces together
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 3
Structure
![Page 4: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 - Putting the pieces together
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 4
Structure
Based on ISO 9001:2008
![Page 5: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 - Putting the pieces together
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 5
Structure
Based on ISO 9001:2008
Does not follow the new high level
structure of ISO 9001:2015
![Page 6: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 - Putting the pieces together
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 6
Structure
Based on ISO 9001:2008
Does not follow the new high level
structure of ISO 9001:2015
Annex B shows the corresponding sections
of ISO 9001:2015
![Page 7: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 - Putting the pieces together
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 7
Considerations for the changes:
Regulatory requirements
![Page 8: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 - Putting the pieces together
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 8
Considerations for the changes:
Regulatory requirements
Risk Management
![Page 9: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 - Putting the pieces together
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 9
Considerations for the changes:
Regulatory requirements
Risk Management
Supplier controls
![Page 10: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 - Putting the pieces together
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 10
Considerations for the changes:
Regulatory requirements
Risk Management
Supplier controls
Feedback
![Page 11: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 - Putting the pieces together
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 11
Considerations for the changes:
Regulatory requirements
Risk Management
Supplier controls
Feedback
Verification, Validation and Design Transfer
![Page 12: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 - Putting the pieces together
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 12
Considerations for the changes:
Regulatory requirements
Risk Management
Supplier controls
Feedback
Verification, Validation and Design Transfer
Clarifications
![Page 13: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
2003
• Requirements for QMS that can be used by an organization for:
• design and development
• production
• installation and servicing of medical devices
• design, development, and provision of related services.
• Can also be used by internal and external parties, including certification bodies, to assess the organization’s ability to meet customer and regulatory requirements.
2016
• Requirements for QMS that can be used by an organization involved in one or more stages of the life-cycle of a medical device:
• design and development
• production
• storage and distribution
• installation
• servicing
• final decommissioning and disposal of medical devices
• and design and development, or provision of associated activities (e.g. technical support).
• Can also be used by suppliers or other external parties providing product (e.g. raw materials, components, subassemblies, medical devices, sterilization services, calibration services, distribution services, maintenance services) to such organizations. The supplier or external party can voluntarily choose to conform to the requirements of this International Standard or can be required by contract to conform.
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 13
0.1 General
![Page 14: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
2016
• When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate unless the organization can justify otherwise. A requirement is considered appropriate if it is necessary for:
• product to meet requirements;
• compliance with applicable regulatory requirements;
• the organization to carry out corrective action;
• the organization to manage risks.
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 14
0.2 Clarification of concepts
![Page 15: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
2016
• When the term “risk” is used, the application of the term within the scope of this International
• Standard pertains to safety or performance requirements of the medical device or meeting applicable regulatory requirements.
• — When a requirement is required to be “documented”, it is also required to be established, implemented and maintained.
• — When the term “product” is used, it can also mean “service”. Product applies to output that is intended for, or required by, a customer, or any intended output resulting from a product realization process.
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 15
0.2 Clarification of concepts
![Page 16: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
2016
• In this International Standard, the following verbal forms are used:
• “shall” indicates a requirement;
• “should” indicates a recommendation;
• “may” indicates a permission;
• “can” indicates a possibility or a capability.
• “Regulatory requirements” encompasses requirements contained laws applicable to the user of this standard. The application of “regulatory requirements” is limited to requirements for the QMS and the safety or performance of the medical device.
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 16
0.2 Clarification of concepts
![Page 17: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
2016
• a) understanding and meeting requirements;
• b) considering processes in terms of added value;
• c) obtaining results of process performance and effectiveness;
• d) improving processes based on objective measurement.
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 17
0.3 Process Approach
![Page 18: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
2016
• Applicability to organizations that are involved in one or more stages of the life-cycle of a medical device.
• Use by suppliers or external parties that provide product, including quality management system-related services to medical device organizations.
• Identifies responsibilities for monitoring, maintaining, and controlling outsourced processes.
• Allows for clauses 6, 7 and 8 to be not applicable.
• Clarifies that the term “regulatory requirements”
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 18
1 Scope
![Page 19: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
Several new definitions added and some existing definitions refined
• Customer complaint - complaint
• Distributor
• Importer
• Labeling – redefined
• Life-cycle
• Manufacturer
• Medical Device Family
• Performance Evaluation
• Post-market surveillance
• Product
• Purchased Product
• Risk
• Risk management
• Sterile Barrier System
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 19
3 Terms and Definitions
![Page 20: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• Requirements to document the role(s) of the organization based on applicable regulatory requirements
• Determine the processes needed and application of those processes – taking into account the roles of the organization
• Apply risk based approach to control of appropriate processes needed for QMS
• Processes changes to be evaluated for impact on QMS and products produced
• Validation of computer software utilized in the QMS
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 20
4.1 General Requirements
![Page 21: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• Defines contents of medical device file
• Description, purpose, labeling, IFU
• Product specifications
• Manufacturing procedures
• Monitoring and measuring procedures
• Requirements/Procedures for installation and servicing as applicable
• Requirements for the protection of confidential health information
• Prevention of deterioration or loss of documents
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 21
4.2 Documentation Requirements
![Page 22: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• No significant changes to sections:
• 5.1 Management Commitment
• 5.2 Customer Focus
• applicable regulatory requirements
• 5.3 Quality Policy
• 5.4.1 Quality Objectives
• applicable regulatory requirements
• 5.4.2 Quality Management System Planning
• 5.5.1 Responsibility and authority
• 5.5.2 Management Representative
• applicable regulatory requirements
• 5.5.3 Internal Communication
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 22
5 Management Responsibility
![Page 23: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• Documented procedure required
• Inputs expanded • Complaint Handling
• Reporting to regulatory authorities
• Monitoring and measurement of processes
• Monitoring and measurement of product
• Corrective action
• Preventive action
• Applicable new or revised regulatory requirements
• Outputs to be recorded and include the input reviewed and decisions/actions related to:
• Improvement needed for QMS and processes
• Improvement of product related to customr reqs
• Changes needed to response to regulatory requirements
• Resource needs
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 23
5.6 Management Review
![Page 24: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• Requirements for documented processes for establishing competence, providing needed training and ensuring awareness of personnel
• Application of risk based approach for determining the methodology used to check effectiveness of training
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 24
6.2 Human Resources
![Page 25: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• Documented requirements for infrastructure needs to achieve:
• Product conformity
• Prevent product mix-up
• Ensure orderly handling of product
• Maintenance activities to apply (as appropriate) to equipment used in:
• Production
• Control of work environment
• Monitoring and measurement
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 25
6.3 Infrastucture
![Page 26: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 6.4.1 Work Environment
• Must document requirements for work environments needed to meet product conformity
• 6.4.2 Contamination Control
• Sterile medical devices -
• Documented requirements for control of microorganisms or particulate matter
• Maintain cleanliness during assembly or packaging process
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 26
6.4 Work Environment and contamination control
![Page 27: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• Added to requirements to product realization list:
• Inclusion of infrastructure and work environment considerations
• required verification, validation, monitoring, measurement, inspection and test, handling, storage, distribution and traceability activities specific to the product together with the criteria for product acceptance;
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 27
7.1 Planning of Product Realization
![Page 28: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 7.2.1 Determination of requirements related to product
• Determining if any user training is needed to ensure performance and safe use of medical device
• 7.2.2 Review of requirements related to product
• Applicable regulatory requirements are met
• any user training identified is available or planned
• 7.2.3 Communication
• Communication with customers shall be planned and documented
• Shall communicate with regulatory agencies
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 28
7.2 Customer Related Processes
![Page 29: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 7.3.1 General – new/unchanged
• 7.3.2 Design and Development Planning
• D&D planning documents shall be maintained and updated
• Shall document:
• Reviews needed at each D&D stage
• Methods to ensure traceability of outputs to inputs
• Resources needed
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 29
7.3 Design and Development
![Page 30: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 7.3.3 Design and Development Inputs
• Addition of “usability and safety requirements”
• 7.3.4 Design and Development Outputs
• No significant changes
• 7.3.5 Design and Development Review
• No significant changes
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 30
7.3 Design and Development
![Page 31: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 7.3.6 Design and Development Verification
• Documented verification plans
• Methods
• acceptance criteria
• As appropriate
• Statistical techniques
• Sample size rationale
• Connection or interface to other medical devices
• Confirm Outputs meet inputs when connected
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 31
7.3 Design and Development
![Page 32: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 7.3.7 Design and Development Validation
• Documented validation plans
• Methods
• Acceptance criteria
• As appropriate
• Statistical techniques
• Sample size rationale
• Conducted with representative product
• Rationale for choice documented
• Connection or interface to other medical devices
• Confirm requirements met when connected
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 32
7.3 Design and Development
![Page 33: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 7.3.8 Design and Development Transfer
• New section
• Documented procedures for transfer to manufacturing
• Verify:
• Outputs suitable for manufacturing
• Production capability can meet requirements
• Record of results of conclusions of transfer
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 33
7.3 Design and Development
![Page 34: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 7.3.9 Control Design and Development Changes
• Determine significance of change to:
• Function
• Performance
• Usability
• Safety
• Applicable regulatory requirements
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 34
7.3 Design and Development
![Page 35: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 7.3.10 Design and Development Files
• New section
• File shall be maintained for each device or device family
• Shall include:
• Records of conformity to D&D requirements
• Records for D&D changes
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 35
7.3 Design and Development
![Page 36: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 7.4.1 Purchasing Process
• Establishment of criteria for evaluation and selection of suppliers
• Supplier’s ability to provide product that meets reqs
• Performance
• Effect of purchased product on quality of device
• Risk associated with device
• Monitoring and re-evaluation of suppliers
• Non-fulfillment addressed based on:
• Risk associated with purchased product
• Compliance with applicable regulatory requirements
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 36
7.4 Purchasing
![Page 37: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 7.4.2 Purchasing Information
• Shall describe or reference product to be purchased
• Product specifications
• Written agreements (as applicable)
• Notification of changes prior to implementation
• Changes that affect ability to meet specified requirements
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 37
7.4 Purchasing
![Page 38: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 7.4.3 Verification of Purchased Product
• Based on:
• Supplier evaluation results
• Risks associated with purchased product
• Notification of changes:
• Determine if changes affect product realization or device
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 38
7.4 Purchasing
![Page 39: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 7.5.1 Control of Production and Service provision
• Minor changes
• Production and service provision shall be planned, carried out, monitored and controlled to ensure that product conforms to specification.
• Production controls to also include:
• Qualification of infrastructure
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 39
7.5 Production and Service Provision
![Page 40: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 7.5.2 Cleanliness of Product
• Minor changes
• Additional requirement for cleanliness/contamination control:
• c) product cannot be cleaned prior to sterilization or its use, and its cleanliness is of significance in use
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 40
7.5 Production and Service Provision
![Page 41: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 7.5.3 Installation Activities
• No changes
• 7.5.4 Servicing Activities
• Service records to be analyzed by organization or supplier:
• a) To determine if the information is to be handled as a complaint
• b) As appropriate, for input to the improvement process
• 7.5.5 Particular Requirements for sterile medical devices
• No change
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 41
7.5 Production and Service Provision
![Page 42: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 7.5.6 Validation of processes for production and service
• Documented procedure to include:
• Approval of changes to the processes
• Software validations
• Approach proportionate to risk in use of software
• Effect on product conformity to specifications
• Validation records to include:
• Results
• Conclusions of validation
• Necessary actions
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 42
7.5 Production and Service Provision
![Page 43: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 7.5.7 Particular Requirements for validation of processes for sterilization and sterile barrier systems
• Addition of sterile barrier system validations
• Validation records to include:
• Results
• Conclusions of validation
• Necessary actions
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 43
7.5 Production and Service Provision
![Page 44: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 7.5.8 Identification
• Requires documented procedure
• Requirement that was in 7.5.3.3 of 2003 version
• Unique Device Identification (UDI)
• As applicable by regulatory requirements
• Shall be a documented system
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 44
7.5 Production and Service Provision
![Page 45: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 7.5.9 Traceability
• No changes
• 7.5.10 Customer Property
• No changes
• 7.5.11 Preservation of product
• Additional requirements on protection from expected conditions and hazards:
• Design and construct of packaging and shipping containers
• Documentation of special conditions if packaging is not enough
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 45
7.5 Production and Service Provision
![Page 46: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 7.6 Control of monitoring and measuring equipment
• No changes
• 8 Measurement, analysis and improvement
• 8.1 General
• No changes
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 46
![Page 47: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 8.2 Monitoring and Measurement
• 8.2.1 Feedback
• Emphasis on feedback coming from both production and post-production activities
• Utilization of feedback as input to risk management for monitoring and maintaining product requirements
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 47
8 Measurement, analysis and improvement
![Page 48: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 8.2.2 Complaint Handling
• New section
• Requirements for procedure and timely handling of complaints
• Procedure to include:
• Receiving and recording information
• Evaluating information to determine if the feedback constitutes a complaint;
• Investigating complaints;
• Determining the need to report the information to the appropriate regulatory authorities;
• Handling of complaint-related product;
• Determining the need to initiate corrections or corrective actions
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 48
8 Measurement, analysis and improvement
![Page 49: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 8.2.3 Reporting to Regulatory Authorities
• New section
• Procedure required if applicable by regulatory requirements
• Complaints that result in need for:
• Adverse event reporting
• Advisory Notices
• Records of reporting required
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 49
8 Measurement, analysis and improvement
![Page 50: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 8.2.4 Internal Audit
• No changes
• 8.2.5 Monitoring and measurement of processes
• No changes
• 8.2.6 Monitoring and measurement of product
• Minor change
• Records to identify test equipment used
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 50
8 Measurement, analysis and improvement
![Page 51: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 8.3 Control of Nonconforming Product
• 8.3.1 General
• New section
• Clarification of procedure requirements to define controls and related responsibilities and authorities
• Identification
• Documentation
• Segregation
• Evaluation
• Disposition
• Inclusion of determination for investigation and notification of any external party
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 51
8 Measurement, analysis and improvement
![Page 52: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 8.3 Control of Nonconforming Product
• 8.3.2 Actions in Response to nonconforming product detected before delivery
• Acceptance by concession only if:
• Justification provided
• Approval is obtained
• Applicable regulatory requirements met
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 52
8 Measurement, analysis and improvement
![Page 53: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 8.3 Control of Nonconforming Product
• 8.3.3 Actions in Response to nonconforming product detected after delivery
• Minor change
• Expanded section on 2003 requirements
• Addition of records requirement for Advisory Notices
• 8.3.4 Rework
• No changes
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 53
8 Measurement, analysis and improvement
![Page 54: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 8.4 Analysis of Data
• New requirements for:
• Determination of appropriate methods
• To include statistical techniques and use
• Data to now include:
• Audits
• Service reports (as applicable)
• If analysis shows QMS is not sutiable, adequate or effective, analysis is to be used as input for improvements.
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 54
8 Measurement, analysis and improvement
![Page 55: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
ISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016
• 8.5 Improvement
• 8.5.1 General
• No changes
• 8.5.2 Corrective Action
• Minor change
• CA’s to be taken without undue delay
• Verify CA has no adverse affect
• 8.5.3 Preventive Action
• Minor change
• Verify PA has no adverse affect
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 55
8 Measurement, analysis and improvement
![Page 56: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 Transition
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 56
When do we have to make the change?
![Page 57: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 Transition
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 57
When do we have to make the change?
Depends on your organization.
![Page 58: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 Transition
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 58
When do we have to make the change?
Depends on your organization.
Depends on other standards that your
organization is registered to.
![Page 59: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 Transition
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 59
TC Recommendation
ISO TC 210 has recommended a co-
existence period of 3 years
![Page 60: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 Transition
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 60
TC Recommendation
ISO TC 210 has recommended a co-
existence period of 3 years
Recommending that:
2 years after publication (1 March 2018), all
accredited certificates be to ISO 13485:2016
![Page 61: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 Transition
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 61
TC Recommendation
ISO TC 210 has recommended a co-
existence period of 3 years
Recommending that:
2 years after publication (1 March 2018), all
accredited certificates be to ISO 13485:2016
3 years after publication (1 March 2019), all
ISO 13485:2003 certificates will not be valid
![Page 62: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 Transition
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 62
What if I have ISO 9001 as well?
![Page 63: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 Transition
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 63
What if I have ISO 9001 as well?
All ISO 9001:2008 certificates will expire September 2018
![Page 64: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 Transition
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 64
What if I have ISO 9001 as well?
All ISO 9001:2008 certificates will expire September 2018
Upgrade audits for ISO 9001:2015 must occur by 1 July
2018
![Page 65: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
ISO 13485:2016 – The Next Revision
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 65
![Page 66: ISO 13485:2016 The Next Revision · PDF fileISO 13485:2003 vs ISO 13485:2016 2016 •When a requirement is qualified by the phrase “as appropriate”, it is deemed to be appropriate](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030508/5ab6ede77f8b9adc638e9974/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
DQS Inc Contact Information
March 31, 2016 © DQS Group 66
DQS Inc
1-800-285-4476
www.dqsus.com
Medical Program
Rick Burgess
Medical Program Manager
763-229-9833