iso 5001 article -eric woodroof
DESCRIPTION
spread sheetTRANSCRIPT
-
Eric A. Woodroof,
Ph.D., is the Chairman of the Board for the
Certified Carbon Reduction Manager
12/06/2011
Should You Implement ISO 50001?
By Eric Woodroof
I recently attended a three-day seminar about ISO 50001 and
I am also serving on committees of some organizations that
plan to train people/companies on how to apply this new
standard. This article explains the new standard as well as
implementation/application barriers that I can see at this
time.
For the record, I do think that it is important for companies to
have a written energy management policy, and for the US
government to establish a more robust energy/environmental
plan. However, the state of the economy is a big influence on
the implementation of any new programs, requiring
management commitment, money and a long-term focus.
Unfortunately, many companies are constrained by a very
short-term planning horizon, which retards the
implementation of long-term strategic policies/programs.
What is ISO 50001?
50001 is a blueprint for an energy management policy within an organization. Basically, it is a universal process that
can be applied to many facilities to ensure that they are following the fundamental principles of an energy
management policy. It is very similar to other standards that ISO has developed regarding Quality (ISO 9001) and
Environmental Management Systems (ISO 14001).
Barriers and Concerns about ISO 50001 Application
Will ISO 50001 be widely adopted? I am not sure. 50001 is not a results-oriented program, which means that
implementing it does not mean that a company has saved any energy although savings would be likely. There are at
least two consequences of not being results-oriented:
1. Companies that implement 50001 will want a return on their investment (either in savings or marketing
advantage via improved image);
2. Consumers/Clients want simple evidence that a company is doing the right thing with respect to the
environment/energy/sustainability, etc.
Everyone understands the benefits when a company says that it is carbon neutral or net energy zero or
contributes zero waste to landfills. These benefits can be measured and validated as results toward a sustainability
goal (as opposed to efforts). Even the ENERGY STAR program allows companies to earn a label if their buildings
achieve performance in the top 25% against a group of similar buildings.
I am not sure consumers will care if a company is following an efforts-based standard, as consumers are already
overwhelmed with information. Consumers/clients know that companies will naturally respond to market forces and
(with or without a standard) will attempt to reduce energy costs to remain cost-competitive. So the question
becomes whether the marketing value of being ISO 50001 certified is important to an organizations clients.
Additional influence to implement 50001 can come from a variety of sources. For example, if Wal-Mart or a similar
big company demands that all suppliers have ISO 50001, then suppliers will follow. Alternatively, if a utility offers
funding to help companies implement the 50001 standard, then more companies will do it. Some utilities are
considering this approach as it is similar to the investments they make in demand side management programs.
Companies that have already implemented ISO 14001 may find it relatively easy to incrementally add the processes
needed to satisfy 50001 requirements. Also, companies that have implemented Six Sigma, Kaizen or other formal
quality-improvement processes will find 50001 relatively easy.
Implementing ISO 50001
Beyond publishing an official energy policy and committing personnel to implement it, 50001 is mostly about
determining which of a companys processes are the largest contributors to energy consumption, and then
documenting a process to optimize those variables. Specific implementation steps are summarized below:
1. Documenting an energy management policy with responsibilities delegated to individuals.
2. Finding the Significant Energy Users (SEUs) within
your company, and what variables (organized by
process/product or by equipment) your company
wants to manage with respect to energy
consumption.
Page 1 of 2
21/12/2011http://www.buildings.com/DesktopModules/BB_ArticleMax/ArticleDetail/BBArticle...
-
(CRM) program and he has been a board
member of the
Certified EnergyManager (CEM)
Program since 1999. His clients include government agencies,
airports, utilities, cities, universities and foreign governments. Private clients include IBM, Pepsi,
GM, Verizon, Hertz, Visteon, JP Morgan-Chase, and Lockheed Martin.
3. Establishing a baseline of the energy consumption
for specific variables as well as how inputs affect the
performance.
4. Developing an optimization plan and put it into
action.
5. Periodically measuring progress on your
optimization plan, and document any
changes/improvements to the plan.
6. Validating or certifying the application of ISO 50001
Standard within your facility. This can be done via
self-certification or accreditation via a 3rd
party
certification. Obviously, the 3rd
party accreditation will be more respected, but will also cost more to achieve.
Cost-Effective Implementation
Implementing ISO 50001 involves far more steps than are mentioned above. However if I were to advise clients on
how to achieve the standard, it seems clear that the key is to identify a few SEUs (what contributes most to energy
consumption) and then develop an action plan/documentation plan for those specific SEUs. Many companies may
already be doing this due to common sense or because it is already part of another management program/process
(14001 for example).
As mentioned previously, I do think that having a written energy policy is a good idea. ISO 50001 has a great
blueprint that requires that specific actions must be measured periodically and reported. In other words, the company
must actually follow through on the plan it develops and walk the talk. I think that principle of the program is good
because it means at least the policy is being developed and action is occurring.
Page 2 of 2
21/12/2011http://www.buildings.com/DesktopModules/BB_ArticleMax/ArticleDetail/BBArticle...