issues concerning the aging population presented by jan figart, associate director, community...
TRANSCRIPT
Issues Concerning the Aging Population
Presented by Jan Figart, Associate Director, Community Service Council
To the Tulsa Regional Chamber of CommerceApril 11, 2013
Population Trends and Projections by Age GroupTulsa County, 1970 - 2030
Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 & 2010 Censuses; US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division, Population Projections, 2000 - 2030.
6.3
6.6
7.4
7.4
7.7
7.7
8.5
16.6
17.1
18.2
18.9
18.4
19.8
25.9
9.2
9.7
9.7
10
10.1
13.5
10.7
47.8
50.5
52.6
51.9
52.2
49.1
46.2
17.5
14.1
10.4
10.4
10.4
9
8.1
2030
2020
2010
2000
1990
1980
1970
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percent of population
0-4 5-17 18-24 25-64 65-84 85+
1.9
1.4
1.2
.9
.6
Pro
ject
ions 2.5
2.1
Apache
96th
66th
121st
91st
Admiral
31st
61st
Peor
ia
Min
go
49t h
W
151st
145t
h E
Garn
ett
Mem
oria
l
Yale
181st
Pine
36th
65th
W
193r
d E
Sher
idan
Harv
ard
Lew
is
129 t
h E
177t
h E
161s
t E
33rd
W
Uni
on
Elw
o od
97t h
W
81st
W
113t
h W
126th
95
55
59
78.02
56
77.02
58.08
66
54.0254.01
111
78.01
93
2
75.16
58.07
67.07
67.08
1
73.08
67.05
92
49
94.01
91.04
75.13
94.0290.03
65.07
29
77.01
91.01
34
76.24
76.38
65.06
75.15
90.07
62
90.09
67.03
27
57
88
79
67.01
25
58.05 58.06
75.0675.08
48
5
47
12 821614 6015
6
58.01
84
87
38
52
53
37
40
86
70
42 39
7
30
51
9
75.1176.35
17
85.02
76.37
74.09
76.36
90.08
8372
75.24
75.20
8
89
74.07
73.11
13
80.01
76.34
4546
80.02
76.25
44
31
10
71.0232 3635
3334
76.11
21
73.05
23.01
75.03
76.14 76.19
69.07
76.39
71.01
76.30
18
75.22
76.32
76.09
69.06
76.33
76.15
69.05
74.1574.1274.11 74.08
76.16
75.12
73.10
76.13
19
69.02
73.06
69.03
90.06
74.14
69.01
75.10
73.12
41.01
75.07
75.19
76.17
76.31
76.18
75.18
75.23
76.29
76.20 74.13 74.02
43.02
50.02
90.04
74.10
43.01
76.12
85.01
73.0920
73.04
68.01
50.01
76.4176.42
68.0368.04
76.08
9400.05
9400.06
Population Age 65 and Over, 2010Tulsa County and part Osage County by Census Tract
City of Tulsa
Population age 65 & over
Less than 250
250 to 349
350 to 449
450 to 599
600 or more
Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census.Prepared by the Community Service Council,
with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (11/21/2011)
1,039
1,033
1,031
1,005
985
892
941 918
862
853
25% of persons age 65 and over live in just 12% (22) of the area census tracts.
830789
782
775
761
755
748
728
724
723
715
674
The aging population in Tulsa County is predominantly female, many live alone and
over a third have a disability
Female Live Alone Live in Group
Quarters
Veteran In Labor Force
Have a Disability
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%58.4%
28.7%
3.8%
23.5%20.7%
36.6%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2011 American Community Survey.
9400.05
9400.06
95
55
78.02
59
77.02
56
58.08
66
54.0254.01
111
78.01
93
75.16
58.07
67.07
67.08
73.08
67.05
2
94.01
91.04
75.13
92
49
1
94.0290.03
65.07
77.01
91.01
29
76.24
76.38
65.06
75.15
90.07
90.09
67.03
62
27
57
67.01
34
88
58.05 58.06
75.0675.08
79
25
4847
12
58.01
821614 6015
5
75.1176.35
85.02
76.37
74.09
76.36
90.08
75.24
84
87
38
52
53
37
40
86
70
42 39
75.20
73.11
74.07
30
51
17
80.01
76.34
8372 89
6
13
7
45
9
80.02
76.25
8
71.02
44
10
76.11
73.05
23.01
75.03
76.14 76.19 74.11
69.07
76.39
71.01
76.30
75.22
76.32
76.09
69.06
76.33
76.15
69.05
74.1574.12 74.08
76.16
75.12
73.10
76.13
69.02
73.06
69.03
90.06
74.14
69.01
75.10
73.12
41.01
75.07
75.19
76.17
76.31
76.18
75.18
75.23
76.29
76.20 74.13 74.02
43.02
50.02
90.04
74.10
43.01
18 73.0919
4631 32 36
35
76.12
3334
85.01
2120
68.01
50.01
76.4176.42
68.03
76.08
Percent 65+ below 185% PovertyLess than 10%
10 to 24%
25 to 39%
40 to 49%
50% or greater
City of Tulsa
Apache
96th
66th
121st
91st
Admiral
31st
61st
49th
W
151st
Mem
oria
l
181st
Pine
36th
65th
W
193r
d E
177t
h E
161s
t E
97t h
W
81st
W
113t
h W
126th
Source: US Census Bureau, 2007-11 American Community Survey.Prepared by the Community Service Council with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (4/9/13)
Estimated Percentage of Persons Age 65 and Over Living Below 185% of Poverty, 2007-11
Tulsa County and Part Osage County by Census Tract
Note: Data estimates used for this map are based on a sample survey, and due to the small geographicarea, margins of error are very high.
Peo r
i a
Min
go
145 t
h E
Garn
ettYale
Sher
idan
Harv
ard
Lew
is
129 t
h E
33rd
W
Uni
on
Elw
o od
2013 poverty guidelinesfor family of 3:
100% = $19,530130% = $25,389185% = $36,131
Inadequate assisted living and other housing services available to meet growing needs of elderly
AND
Inadequate health care workforce available to serve growing needs of the elderly
Selected Health Indicators for Persons 65+ in Tulsa County, 2007-2009
Heart At-tack Di-agnosis
Stroke Diagnosis
Diabetes Diagnosis
Use Special Equipment
Activities Limited
(disability)
Fair or Poor Health
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
14.5%
10.3%
20.5%18.6%
34.4%
25.0%
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, OK2SHARE, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey Data.
Cancer Diabetes Heart Disease Stroke Chronic Lower Resp.
Disease
Accidents0
50
100
150
200
250
180.7
18.6
223.3
57.5 60.5 60.1
Mortality Rates by Cause for Persons 65+, Tulsa County, 2009
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, OK2SHARE, Mortality Data.