issues in second line art failureawacc.org/2014/ppt2017/15.moosa.pdf · 2017. 9. 14. · resistance...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Issues in Second
line ART failure
1
Yunus Moosa
08 September 2017
Dept of Infectious Diseases
UKZN
-
Overview
• Mechanism of drug resistance
• Limitations of ART resistance testing
• Third line ART drugs
• Illustrative clinical case – drug-drug
interactions
• Accessing third line agents in KZN
2
-
Goal of HAARTDurable Viral Suppression
Undetectable Levels
Halt disease progression
Immunological recovery
Reduce OIs
Reduce viraltransmission
Prevent drug resistance
-
Pathogenesis of ARV
Drug Resistance
-
Growth in the absence of inhibitory pressure
HIV multiplies freely taking the most optimum form for rapid growth wt.
As it proliferates, HIV undergoes spontaneous mutations in random genes due to error prone RT enzyme.
-
Growth in the presence of ARV pressure
ARVs kill all of the original wild type (wt) organisms
The mutated virus which is RESISTANT survives.
but
-
Growth in the presence of ARV pressure
• The mutated HIV grows and multiplies, even in the presence of ARVs.
This virus is now RESISTANT and will continue to replicate albeit at a slower rate due to reduced fitness.
-
Growth in the absence of ARVs Treatment Interruption
Wt. - replicative advantage
Wt. -dominant species
-
What viral load threshold is used to
define virologic failure in SA
Guidelines
A. 10000
B. 1000
C. 500
D. 200
-
Virologic failure
2 consecutive viral loads >1000cpm
-
How Does ART Resistance Develop?
Selective Pressure
11
Poor Adherence
Insufficient Drug Level
Viral Replication in the
Presence of Drug
RESISTANT VIRUS
Social/Personal Issues
Regimen Issues
ToxicitiesPoor Potency
Wrong Dose
Host Genetics
Poor Absorption
Rapid Clearance
Poor Activation
Drug Interactions
Transmission
-
When faced with ART failure
need to consider HIV resistance
testing
There are limitations
to interpretation of
this test
-
Facts on ART resistance testing
• Minimum VL required 1000 cpm
• Measures dominant HIV strains (>20%)
• Does not detect virus in sanctuary sites
• Does not detect “archived” viruses
• Important to obtain comprehensive drug
history & outcome of past regimens
13
-
Facts on ART resistance
testing
• Tells you what will not work, not what will work
• Most reliable for indicating Ω to drugs the patient is
currently on or recently discontinued
Resistance testing must be done
when the patient is on the failing
regimen
-
To decide on a new ART regimen
Need to know all ARVs patient has
experienced in the past
Need to know reasons for
discontinuation
Need to know regimen patient is on at
time of resistance testing
15
-
Minimum time on second line
treatment before you consider
treatment failure from resistance?
A. 3 months
B. 6 months
C. 12 months
D. 18 months
E. 24 months
-
Diagnosis of second-line treatment failure
-
Important to Detect Treatment
Failure Early
• Morbidity/mortality from progression
• Further accumulation of mutations »
higher levels of drug resistance »
more difficult to construct new
regimen
• Potential for transmission of drug
resistant virus18
-
Resistance to 2nd Line
PI Based ART
Estimated Prevalence 14%–32%
-
Options for Novel Regimens and
New Drugs
Drug Class Drugs Available
Protease Inhibitors Darunavir/Ritonavir
(DRV/r)
Integrase Inhibitors Raltegravir (RAL)
Dolutegravir
Elvitegravir
Second Generation
NNRTI’s
Etravirine (ETV)
-
Darunavir
• Highly potent Protease Inhibitor
• Dose 600mg bd + Ritonavir 100mg bd
• Retains activity in the presence of resistance to other protease inhibitors (e.g. LPV/r and ATV/r)
• Drug interaction with Rifampicin (↓DRV levels)
• Important adverse effects:
– Diarrhoea, rash, hepatitis
-
Other PI exposure & DRV Ω
Extensive PI exposure - potential to
generate DRV resistance
Therefore persisting with a failing PI can
compromise DRVs.
-
Raltegravir• Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor
• (INSTI) - 400mg bid
• Potential drug interaction with Rifampicin
(↓RAL levels)
• With RIF – dose 800 bid vs. 400 bid (reflate
study)
• Important adverse effects: rash, hepatitis
• New drug class – no resistance at baseline
-
Dolutegravir
• Integrase inhibitor - Dose 50mg daily
• Potential drug interaction with Rifampicin (↓DTG
levels) **
• Needs to be adequately evaluated in patients on
treatment for TB (INSPIRING study)
• Important adverse effects: insomnia and headache
• New drug class – no resistance at baseline
-
RAL vs. DTG
• Raltegravir has low genetic barrier to
resistance - single mutation resistance
• Once vs. twice daily dosing**
• DTG is preferred INSTI
-
Etravirine
• 2nd Generation NNRTI
• Dose 200mg bid
• Can retain activity in the presence of
resistance to EFV/NVP (depends on
mutation profile)
• C/I with Rifampicin (↓ETR levels)
• Important adverse effects: rash
-
Etravirine• More robust than NVP or EFV.
• Works in the presence of single mutations: L100I, K103N, Y188L
or G190A/S
• Mutations associated with Etravirine resistance:
• F227C
• Combination K103N + L101I
• Combination of 3 mutations: V90I, A98G, L100I,
K101E/P, V106I, V179D/F, Y181C/I/V, G190A/S.
-
What contributes to Resistance?
A. Sub-optimal potency of regimen
B. Non adherence
C. Malabsorption
D. Drug interactions
E. All of the above
-
What is the main cause of 2nd line
treatment failure
A. Sub-optimal potency of regimen
B. Non adherence
C. Malabsorption
D. Drug interactions
E. Resistant virus
-
Factors that Contribute to
Resistance
Resistant Virus
Drug interactions
Malabsorption
Non adherence
Sub-optimal potency of regimen
-
Conundrum
31
Deciding between
Resistance vs. non- adherence
-
Which of the following is most
effective means (>90%) of
predicting non-adherence
A. Direct questioning
B. Pill counts
C. Clinic Attendance
D. Script refills
E. All of the above
F. None of the above
32
-
Resistance at second-line failure in SA
Resistance to PIs in adults failing 2nd line ART is not common
Interpret cautiously - short duration of second-line ART
Bias – poorly compliant patients go onto 2nd line ART
Study author N Criteria for
genotype
Duration on
second-line
ART (median)
Drug resistance
Wallis 75 2 x VL >5000 16 months39% no major DR mutations
7% major PI mutations
Levison 33 2 x VL >1000 10 months67% no major DR mutations
No major PI mutations
Sigaloff 15 1 x VL >1000 >12 months40% no major DR mutations
7% major PI mutations
Sources: AIDS Res Treat 2011; 769627. PLoS ONE 2012; 3: e32144. JID 2012; 205: 1739-44
-
Message
• Many treatment failures occur with no significant mutations non-adherence
• Resistance testing is effective but expensive means to determine adherence
• Cost benefit favors resistance testing
-
Factors that Contribute to
Resistance
Resistant Virus
Drug interactions
Malabsorption
Non adherence
Sub-optimal potency of regimen
-
Case 1
• 36 yr. old male- Baseline CD4 = 9
• 09/2009 – started D4T, 3TC, EFV took for 2/12
• 08/2010 started TDF, 3TC, EFV
• 07/2011 failing Regimen 1
• 07/2011 started on AZT, 3TC, LPV/r – 4/52 – An.
-
Case 1
• 08/2011 switched to ABC, 3TC, LPV/r
• 09/2011 TB – on ATT till 04/2012
• 05/2012 VL > 106 CD4
-
Was ATV/r a good choice?
A. Yes
B. No
38
-
ATV/r/TDF/3TC
• VL remained between 105 and 106 cpm
• Repeated adherence counseling still not
suppressed
• Genotyped in Jan 2013
-
ATV/r/TDF/3T
C
Genotyped: Jan 2013
-
Case 1 progress
Based on genotype
TDF/3TC/RAL/DRV/r
-
Clinical chart - UPDATE
August 2014 VL
-
Which TB drug is associated
with PI failure
A. Isoniazid
B. Ethambutol
C. Pyrazinamide
D. Rifampicin
-
Which PI can be used with
Rifampicin based ATT
A. Lopinavir/ritonavir
B. Darunavir/ritonavir
C. Atazanavir/ritonavir
D. Indinavir/ritonavir
-
The only PI that can be used
with rifampicin.
Lopinavir/ritonavir (aluvia)
-
How should dose adjust when
using Rifampicin and Aluvia?
A. Double the dose of aluvia (4 bid)
B. Double dose the Rifafour
C. Dose aluvia three times a day (2 tds)
D. Further increase ritonavir (LPV 400 +
ritonavir 400 bid)
E. None of above
-
Current Strategy
47
-
What alternate to rifampicin?
A. Rifabutin
B. Double dose rifampicin
C. Rifapentine
D. Riftimaxcid
-
How do you dose rifabutin?
A. 600mg daily
B. 450mg daily
C. 300mg daily
D. 150mg daily
E. 150mg three time as week
F. I don’t care!
-
Main toxicities: Rifabutin
• Uveitis
• Hepatotoxicity
• Neutropenia.
-
CASE 2
• Ms NC 40 yr. old
• Diagnosed Jan 2008 during pregnancy –
received stat dose NVP
• April 2008- started d4T/3TC/NVP
• 2013 – d4T replaced with TDF (lipodystrophy)
• March 2013 - VL 65030 -AZT/3TC/LPV/r
• June 2013 – VL 157
-
Case 2
• Sept 2013 –carbamazepine for pain related to
fracture of left tibia following MVA (2007)
Date Viral load
17/09/2014 732
28/05/2014 1752
06/09/2015 2520
09/12/2015 18300
02/03/2016 16200
• 2016 referred to ID- second line failure
-
Be vigilant for concomitant
drugs and ALWAYS check for
drug-drug interactions
-
Guidelines for Second and Third
Line Regimens
• Use at least 2 and preferably 3 active drugs
• Based on ART history & genotype
• Using a new drug not previously experienced
does not mean drug is fully active due to class
resistance and or archived resistance
-
Algorithm for choosing 3rd line agents
• Potential low level resistance: >10 to =15 to =30 to =60
55
Eligible for third line ART?
PI score ≥15
DRV/r
PLUS
3TC/FTC
PLUS
AZT/TDF (lowest score)
Add RAL/DTG
Add ETR
TDF/AZT >29
&
DRV ≥15
&
ETR ≤29
TDF/AZT (30-59)
or
DRV ≥15
-
Process to follow
56Genotyping
Clinic
CentralCoordinator
Local
Pharmaceutical
services
-
• Fill in PDF form on computer and email to
third line coordinator
• Include electronic copy of genotype
mailto:[email protected]
-
Motivation Forms
• Patients details
• Facility details
• Past ART - drugs/duration/ why discontinued
• Adherence details
• Concomitant medication
• Serial recent CD4/VL/ Safety bloods (ALT, Cr, WCC)
• HBV status
• Genotype
59
-
Key Learning Points
• Non adherence is still the main cause of
failure of 2nd line treatment
• Beware of drug-drug interactions when failing
second line treatment
• Beware of complexities of TB treatment when
using 2nd & 3rd line ART
• Unadjusted LPV/r drives 2nd line resistance
• Simple algorithm for deciding on third line Rx
• Follow the national process to access drugs
-
Contact Numbers
• Adult ID Helpline: 0800 111 740
• Department of Virology: 0800 113 000031 240 2599/ 031 240 6000 / 031 240 2794
• The Secretariat: Ruth Lancaster
– [email protected]• Ashwin Bhagwandin
– Wk. 031 4698397
– Cell: 083 465 5107
61
-
Acknowledgements
• Richard Lessells
• Bernadett Gosnell
• Justen Manasa
62