issues in second line art failureawacc.org/2014/ppt2017/15.moosa.pdf · 2017. 9. 14. · resistance...

62
Issues in Second line ART failure 1 Yunus Moosa 08 September 2017 Dept of Infectious Diseases UKZN

Upload: others

Post on 22-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Issues in Second

    line ART failure

    1

    Yunus Moosa

    08 September 2017

    Dept of Infectious Diseases

    UKZN

  • Overview

    • Mechanism of drug resistance

    • Limitations of ART resistance testing

    • Third line ART drugs

    • Illustrative clinical case – drug-drug

    interactions

    • Accessing third line agents in KZN

    2

  • Goal of HAARTDurable Viral Suppression

    Undetectable Levels

    Halt disease progression

    Immunological recovery

    Reduce OIs

    Reduce viraltransmission

    Prevent drug resistance

  • Pathogenesis of ARV

    Drug Resistance

  • Growth in the absence of inhibitory pressure

    HIV multiplies freely taking the most optimum form for rapid growth wt.

    As it proliferates, HIV undergoes spontaneous mutations in random genes due to error prone RT enzyme.

  • Growth in the presence of ARV pressure

    ARVs kill all of the original wild type (wt) organisms

    The mutated virus which is RESISTANT survives.

    but

  • Growth in the presence of ARV pressure

    • The mutated HIV grows and multiplies, even in the presence of ARVs.

    This virus is now RESISTANT and will continue to replicate albeit at a slower rate due to reduced fitness.

  • Growth in the absence of ARVs Treatment Interruption

    Wt. - replicative advantage

    Wt. -dominant species

  • What viral load threshold is used to

    define virologic failure in SA

    Guidelines

    A. 10000

    B. 1000

    C. 500

    D. 200

  • Virologic failure

    2 consecutive viral loads >1000cpm

  • How Does ART Resistance Develop?

    Selective Pressure

    11

    Poor Adherence

    Insufficient Drug Level

    Viral Replication in the

    Presence of Drug

    RESISTANT VIRUS

    Social/Personal Issues

    Regimen Issues

    ToxicitiesPoor Potency

    Wrong Dose

    Host Genetics

    Poor Absorption

    Rapid Clearance

    Poor Activation

    Drug Interactions

    Transmission

  • When faced with ART failure

    need to consider HIV resistance

    testing

    There are limitations

    to interpretation of

    this test

  • Facts on ART resistance testing

    • Minimum VL required 1000 cpm

    • Measures dominant HIV strains (>20%)

    • Does not detect virus in sanctuary sites

    • Does not detect “archived” viruses

    • Important to obtain comprehensive drug

    history & outcome of past regimens

    13

  • Facts on ART resistance

    testing

    • Tells you what will not work, not what will work

    • Most reliable for indicating Ω to drugs the patient is

    currently on or recently discontinued

    Resistance testing must be done

    when the patient is on the failing

    regimen

  • To decide on a new ART regimen

    Need to know all ARVs patient has

    experienced in the past

    Need to know reasons for

    discontinuation

    Need to know regimen patient is on at

    time of resistance testing

    15

  • Minimum time on second line

    treatment before you consider

    treatment failure from resistance?

    A. 3 months

    B. 6 months

    C. 12 months

    D. 18 months

    E. 24 months

  • Diagnosis of second-line treatment failure

  • Important to Detect Treatment

    Failure Early

    • Morbidity/mortality from progression

    • Further accumulation of mutations »

    higher levels of drug resistance »

    more difficult to construct new

    regimen

    • Potential for transmission of drug

    resistant virus18

  • Resistance to 2nd Line

    PI Based ART

    Estimated Prevalence 14%–32%

  • Options for Novel Regimens and

    New Drugs

    Drug Class Drugs Available

    Protease Inhibitors Darunavir/Ritonavir

    (DRV/r)

    Integrase Inhibitors Raltegravir (RAL)

    Dolutegravir

    Elvitegravir

    Second Generation

    NNRTI’s

    Etravirine (ETV)

  • Darunavir

    • Highly potent Protease Inhibitor

    • Dose 600mg bd + Ritonavir 100mg bd

    • Retains activity in the presence of resistance to other protease inhibitors (e.g. LPV/r and ATV/r)

    • Drug interaction with Rifampicin (↓DRV levels)

    • Important adverse effects:

    – Diarrhoea, rash, hepatitis

  • Other PI exposure & DRV Ω

    Extensive PI exposure - potential to

    generate DRV resistance

    Therefore persisting with a failing PI can

    compromise DRVs.

  • Raltegravir• Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor

    • (INSTI) - 400mg bid

    • Potential drug interaction with Rifampicin

    (↓RAL levels)

    • With RIF – dose 800 bid vs. 400 bid (reflate

    study)

    • Important adverse effects: rash, hepatitis

    • New drug class – no resistance at baseline

  • Dolutegravir

    • Integrase inhibitor - Dose 50mg daily

    • Potential drug interaction with Rifampicin (↓DTG

    levels) **

    • Needs to be adequately evaluated in patients on

    treatment for TB (INSPIRING study)

    • Important adverse effects: insomnia and headache

    • New drug class – no resistance at baseline

  • RAL vs. DTG

    • Raltegravir has low genetic barrier to

    resistance - single mutation resistance

    • Once vs. twice daily dosing**

    • DTG is preferred INSTI

  • Etravirine

    • 2nd Generation NNRTI

    • Dose 200mg bid

    • Can retain activity in the presence of

    resistance to EFV/NVP (depends on

    mutation profile)

    • C/I with Rifampicin (↓ETR levels)

    • Important adverse effects: rash

  • Etravirine• More robust than NVP or EFV.

    • Works in the presence of single mutations: L100I, K103N, Y188L

    or G190A/S

    • Mutations associated with Etravirine resistance:

    • F227C

    • Combination K103N + L101I

    • Combination of 3 mutations: V90I, A98G, L100I,

    K101E/P, V106I, V179D/F, Y181C/I/V, G190A/S.

  • What contributes to Resistance?

    A. Sub-optimal potency of regimen

    B. Non adherence

    C. Malabsorption

    D. Drug interactions

    E. All of the above

  • What is the main cause of 2nd line

    treatment failure

    A. Sub-optimal potency of regimen

    B. Non adherence

    C. Malabsorption

    D. Drug interactions

    E. Resistant virus

  • Factors that Contribute to

    Resistance

    Resistant Virus

    Drug interactions

    Malabsorption

    Non adherence

    Sub-optimal potency of regimen

  • Conundrum

    31

    Deciding between

    Resistance vs. non- adherence

  • Which of the following is most

    effective means (>90%) of

    predicting non-adherence

    A. Direct questioning

    B. Pill counts

    C. Clinic Attendance

    D. Script refills

    E. All of the above

    F. None of the above

    32

  • Resistance at second-line failure in SA

    Resistance to PIs in adults failing 2nd line ART is not common

    Interpret cautiously - short duration of second-line ART

    Bias – poorly compliant patients go onto 2nd line ART

    Study author N Criteria for

    genotype

    Duration on

    second-line

    ART (median)

    Drug resistance

    Wallis 75 2 x VL >5000 16 months39% no major DR mutations

    7% major PI mutations

    Levison 33 2 x VL >1000 10 months67% no major DR mutations

    No major PI mutations

    Sigaloff 15 1 x VL >1000 >12 months40% no major DR mutations

    7% major PI mutations

    Sources: AIDS Res Treat 2011; 769627. PLoS ONE 2012; 3: e32144. JID 2012; 205: 1739-44

  • Message

    • Many treatment failures occur with no significant mutations non-adherence

    • Resistance testing is effective but expensive means to determine adherence

    • Cost benefit favors resistance testing

  • Factors that Contribute to

    Resistance

    Resistant Virus

    Drug interactions

    Malabsorption

    Non adherence

    Sub-optimal potency of regimen

  • Case 1

    • 36 yr. old male- Baseline CD4 = 9

    • 09/2009 – started D4T, 3TC, EFV took for 2/12

    • 08/2010 started TDF, 3TC, EFV

    • 07/2011 failing Regimen 1

    • 07/2011 started on AZT, 3TC, LPV/r – 4/52 – An.

  • Case 1

    • 08/2011 switched to ABC, 3TC, LPV/r

    • 09/2011 TB – on ATT till 04/2012

    • 05/2012 VL > 106 CD4

  • Was ATV/r a good choice?

    A. Yes

    B. No

    38

  • ATV/r/TDF/3TC

    • VL remained between 105 and 106 cpm

    • Repeated adherence counseling still not

    suppressed

    • Genotyped in Jan 2013

  • ATV/r/TDF/3T

    C

    Genotyped: Jan 2013

  • Case 1 progress

    Based on genotype

    TDF/3TC/RAL/DRV/r

  • Clinical chart - UPDATE

    August 2014 VL

  • Which TB drug is associated

    with PI failure

    A. Isoniazid

    B. Ethambutol

    C. Pyrazinamide

    D. Rifampicin

  • Which PI can be used with

    Rifampicin based ATT

    A. Lopinavir/ritonavir

    B. Darunavir/ritonavir

    C. Atazanavir/ritonavir

    D. Indinavir/ritonavir

  • The only PI that can be used

    with rifampicin.

    Lopinavir/ritonavir (aluvia)

  • How should dose adjust when

    using Rifampicin and Aluvia?

    A. Double the dose of aluvia (4 bid)

    B. Double dose the Rifafour

    C. Dose aluvia three times a day (2 tds)

    D. Further increase ritonavir (LPV 400 +

    ritonavir 400 bid)

    E. None of above

  • Current Strategy

    47

  • What alternate to rifampicin?

    A. Rifabutin

    B. Double dose rifampicin

    C. Rifapentine

    D. Riftimaxcid

  • How do you dose rifabutin?

    A. 600mg daily

    B. 450mg daily

    C. 300mg daily

    D. 150mg daily

    E. 150mg three time as week

    F. I don’t care!

  • Main toxicities: Rifabutin

    • Uveitis

    • Hepatotoxicity

    • Neutropenia.

  • CASE 2

    • Ms NC 40 yr. old

    • Diagnosed Jan 2008 during pregnancy –

    received stat dose NVP

    • April 2008- started d4T/3TC/NVP

    • 2013 – d4T replaced with TDF (lipodystrophy)

    • March 2013 - VL 65030 -AZT/3TC/LPV/r

    • June 2013 – VL 157

  • Case 2

    • Sept 2013 –carbamazepine for pain related to

    fracture of left tibia following MVA (2007)

    Date Viral load

    17/09/2014 732

    28/05/2014 1752

    06/09/2015 2520

    09/12/2015 18300

    02/03/2016 16200

    • 2016 referred to ID- second line failure

  • Be vigilant for concomitant

    drugs and ALWAYS check for

    drug-drug interactions

  • Guidelines for Second and Third

    Line Regimens

    • Use at least 2 and preferably 3 active drugs

    • Based on ART history & genotype

    • Using a new drug not previously experienced

    does not mean drug is fully active due to class

    resistance and or archived resistance

  • Algorithm for choosing 3rd line agents

    • Potential low level resistance: >10 to =15 to =30 to =60

    55

    Eligible for third line ART?

    PI score ≥15

    DRV/r

    PLUS

    3TC/FTC

    PLUS

    AZT/TDF (lowest score)

    Add RAL/DTG

    Add ETR

    TDF/AZT >29

    &

    DRV ≥15

    &

    ETR ≤29

    TDF/AZT (30-59)

    or

    DRV ≥15

  • Process to follow

    56Genotyping

    Clinic

    CentralCoordinator

    Local

    Pharmaceutical

    services

  • • Fill in PDF form on computer and email to

    third line coordinator

    [email protected]

    • Include electronic copy of genotype

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Motivation Forms

    • Patients details

    • Facility details

    • Past ART - drugs/duration/ why discontinued

    • Adherence details

    • Concomitant medication

    • Serial recent CD4/VL/ Safety bloods (ALT, Cr, WCC)

    • HBV status

    • Genotype

    59

  • Key Learning Points

    • Non adherence is still the main cause of

    failure of 2nd line treatment

    • Beware of drug-drug interactions when failing

    second line treatment

    • Beware of complexities of TB treatment when

    using 2nd & 3rd line ART

    • Unadjusted LPV/r drives 2nd line resistance

    • Simple algorithm for deciding on third line Rx

    • Follow the national process to access drugs

  • Contact Numbers

    • Adult ID Helpline: 0800 111 740

    • Department of Virology: 0800 113 000031 240 2599/ 031 240 6000 / 031 240 2794

    • The Secretariat: Ruth Lancaster

    [email protected]• Ashwin Bhagwandin

    [email protected]

    – Wk. 031 4698397

    – Cell: 083 465 5107

    61

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • Acknowledgements

    • Richard Lessells

    • Bernadett Gosnell

    • Justen Manasa

    62