it alignment : what have we learned

6
IT ALIGNMENT : WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED Yolande E Chan, Blaize Horner Reich ,2007 Journal of Information Technology

Upload: riri-kusumarani

Post on 11-Apr-2017

82 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: It alignment : what have we learned

IT ALIGNMENT : WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED

Yolande E Chan, Blaize Horner Reich ,2007Journal of Information Technology

Page 2: It alignment : what have we learned

4. Challenge

s

5. Dimensio

ns6. Levels

7.Measurements

8.Models

9. Antecedents

10.Outcomes

11.Process Models

IT Alignme

nt

1. Definition

2. Why Alignment

3. Pros & Cons

12. Alignment Changes

Page 3: It alignment : what have we learned

IT Alignme

nt

1. Definition

• IT as reflection of business• Fitness & integration• Harmony• Common goals

2. Why Alignment

• Strategic Business Planning & Long-range IT Planning

3. Pros & Cons

• Outperform• Increased Performance

• Theoretical , not Real Life • Difficult to implement• IT as challenger• Not as an End

VS

4. Challenge

s Knowledge• Unknown Corporate Strategy• Lack of Awareness in the

importance of alignment• Lack of Industry & Business

Knowledge

Organizational

• Dynamic Business & Organization Environment

Locus of Control & IT Status • Understanding & Decision

Authority• IT was not a benign force

5. Dimensio

ns

Structural

• Fitness between IT & Business

Social

• Understanding between Executives

• Committed

Cultural

• Culturally supported• Alignment is about cultural

change & Behavior change

6. Levels

1. Organizational,System2. Project3. Individual

Strategic &

Intellectual

• Strategic :Complementary

• Intellectual : Inter-relation

• How to link high-level strategies to lower level

• Different focus on alignment can appear

• How projects response to change triggers

• IT projects’ deliverables are congruent with IT strategy & projects’ objectives

• Shared cognition between business and IT executives• The higher the level of cognition between both, the higher the IT-

business alignment level will be.• The greater diversity in both, the lower the expected levels of

alignment

Page 4: It alignment : what have we learned

IT Alignme

nt

• Background Corporate culture, shared knowledge, prior experience with IT, existence of clear business plan, organizational size, environmental uncertainty, corporate vision, strategic IT role, technology usage satisfaction, locus control of system approval.

• Foreground leadership approaches, planning processes , communication styles.

9. Anteceden

ts

7.Measureme

nts1. Typologies & Taxonomies2. Fit Models3. Questionnaire items4. Mathematical Calculations &

Models5. Qualitative & Quantitative

Measures

11.Process Models

• Classic Vs processual schools of thought

10.Outcom

es

• Organizational Performance

• Industry PerformanceContingency Perspective- Industry- Organizational

Size- Strategic

Orientation- Turbulence

12. Alignment Changes

• Stages of Growth• The Lead-Lag

Model• Punctuate

Equilibrium

• Organizations change IT Planning styles as they progress through states of growth in using IT (Burn 1993).

• Four phases of alignment : punctuation, change, settling-in and stability (Street 2006).• Organizations will change between IT leading change and IT catching up on change.• Too long lead or lag time will have bad effect to organization.

• IT alignment consisted of long period of evolutionary change and short period of revolutionary change.

Classical School (rational)• Organizations are market

driven• Organizations constantly

adapts to changing environment

• IT to be deployed according to needs & pressures of environment

• Strategy & IT is linked through contingencies of the technologies & its potential

Processual School(Internal & Power)• Rejects formal plans and

methodologies• Exposes hidden social value,

political interests and structural inertia.

• IT as resource & instrument for power gain.

• Kearns & Lederer , 2003 : 12 Items . 6 From Business plan, 6 from Alignment of Business with IT Plan.

• Bergeron et.al 2004 : 29 Items. Includes dimension such as IT environment scanning, planning & control, acquisition & implementation.

• Organizational Culture Audit (OCA) : 6 Relationship are examined such as External Strategy and IT Strategy, Internal Infrastructure model for business & IT , planning models for internal & external cross alignment.

1. MIT Model2. Strategic Alignment Model

(SAM)

8.Models

MIT Model• Revolutionary change related

with IT Investment can bring rewards if all factor are in align,

• These factors are Strategy, technology, structure, management processes and individuals

SAM Model• 4 key domains in strategic

choice.• These key domains are

business strategy, organizational infrastructure and processes, IT strategy and IT infrastructure and processes

Page 5: It alignment : what have we learned

4. Challenge

s

5. Dimensio

ns6. Levels

7.Measurements

8.Models

9. Antecedents

10.Outcomes

11.Process Models

IT Alignme

nt

1. Definition

2. Why Alignment

3. Pros & Cons

12. Alignment Changes

Page 6: It alignment : what have we learned

DISCUSSION ITEMS

A process or an end-state? Does IT Alignment needed in every organizations? How does the Level of IT readiness can affect IT Alignment? How do we know the right time to do IT Alignment with Business? How can we measure organization success in implementing IT Alignment?