iter in-vessel coils (ivc) interim design review thermal structural fea of feeders a brooks july 27,...
TRANSCRIPT
ITER In-Vessel Coils (IVC)Interim Design Review
Thermal Structural FEA of Feeders
A Brooks
July 27, 2010
July 26-28, 2010 1ITER_D_353BL2
Middle and Lower ELM FeedersAnalysis Status Overview
• Geometry
• Modeling & Meshing– Feeders
– Background Field Coils
• Material Properties
• Boundary Conditions– Temperature
– Implied Structural Supports
• Loading– Ohmic Heating
– Nuclear Heating
– Lorentz Forces
– Water Pressure
• Preliminary Results
• Stress Allowables and Acceptance Criteria (TBD)
• Ongoing Analyses
• Issues and Resolution Plan
2ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010
Feeder Geometry
Modeling Interface is up to but not including Couplings
CATIA Model Exported as Step File and Imported into ProE3ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010
Modeling• Modeling used section data and sweeping curves from
CAD Model to create mesh using FORTRAN Codes
4ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010
PF and TF Field Drivers
• PF Coils Modeled Explicitly in ANSYS• TF Coil uses 1/R from Center Filament to Provide
5.3T at 6.2m
OH/PF Coil Geometry and CurrentsCoil Rc Zc Dr Dz MA-TurnsOH1 1.688 5.071 0.749 1.979 4.03OH2 1.688 3.043 0.749 1.979 -10.98OH3 1.688 1.014 0.749 1.979 -18.11OH4 1.688 -1.014 0.749 1.979 -18.24OH5 1.688 -3.043 0.749 1.979 -8.99OH6 1.688 -5.071 0.749 1.979 5.94PF1 3.954 7.557 0.968 0.976 5.07PF2 8.309 6.53 0.649 0.595 -2.22PF3 11.935 3.265 0.708 1.125 -6.23PF4 11.905 -2.243 0.649 1.125 -5.05PF5 8.395 -6.73 0.82 0.945 -7.39PF6 4.287 -7.557 1.633 0.976 17.67
Initial Scenario Data UsedOther Scenarios need to be considered
5ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010
Material Properties
• Preliminary Analysis – Using Linear Properties
Material Properties (at 100C for linear checkout) CuCRZr MgO SS
Electrical Resitivity rsvx 1 2.71E-08 2.71E+01 7.70E-07 Ohm-mRelative Permeablity murx 1 1 1 1Elastic Modulus ex 1 1.25E+11 3.00E+11 1.93E+11 MpaPoisson's Ratio nuxy 1 0.3 0.3 0.3Thermal Expansion Coef alpx 1 1.71E-05 1.28E-05 1.65E-05 m/m-CDensity dens 1 8854 2200 7899 kg/m3Thermal Conductivity kxx 1 333 2.36 15.48 w/m-CHeat Capacitance c 1 383 940 513 J/kg-C
6ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010
Boundary Conditions• Preminary Analyses Assumed MgO bonded to Cu Tube and
SS Sheath– Impact of debonding to be addressed using low shear modulus
• Supports not modeled explicidly, constraints added at support locations– Initial runs assumed tee fully bonded to VV structurally but isolated
thermally (conservative?)
– Tube Ends Fully Constrained at Couplings (assumes support will exist)
• Only Cooling from Water Tubes– ID held at fixed temperature: 100C at inlet, 130 at outlet
– Radiation from outer surfaces to VV and surroundings not included
– Conduction cooling to VV ignored
7ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010
Loading
• Ohmic Heating 15 kA DC Current in Cu– Directions chosen to induce worse moments of Tee
Section – Top Turns in one direction, bottom opposite
– Note: Since Temperature is constrained at ID (perfect cooling) Ohmic heating has only small effect on Cu transverse temperature gradients.
• Nuclear Heating assumes 1.4 MW/m2 at Plasma facing surface and decays as e-x/where cm
• Lorentz Forces from 15kA crossed with local field from OH/PF and TF (see plots)
• 4.4 MPa (638psi) Water Pressure in Tubes
8ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010
Applied Nuclear Heating Heat Generation Rates
9ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010
Resulting Steady State Temperatures
10ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010
Mid Section of Feeders
Resulting Steady State Temperaturesat ends of Feeder Tees
ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010 11
With Cold Inlet Water in Bottom Turn, Hot Spot is on TopWith Cold Inlet Water in Top Turn, Hot Spot is on Bottom
Water Pressure in Tubes
12ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010
Toroidal Field
13ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010
1/R Field plusself field fromfeeders
Vertical Field
14ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010
Without Plasma With Plasma
Initial Results ignoredplasma field, but for outboard componentsvertical field is increased
Radial Field
15ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010
Without Plasma With Plasma
As is radial field
Global Von Mises Stresses
16ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010
Global Displacements
ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010 17
ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010 18
EM Thermal
EM vs Thermal Loads Impact onVon Mises Stress
View from Back
ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010 19
EM Thermal
EM vs Thermal Loads Impact onDisplacements
Von Mises Stress at Mid Section
20ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010
Temperature GradientBetween base and VVAnd assumption of fixedSupport causes large stress
Von Mises Stress at Lower End Section
21ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010
Local stress concentrationat weld
Von Mises Stress in Tubes at Mid ELM
22ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010
High Outer fiber stressFrom bending of Unsupported tube
Von Mises Stress at Mid Section with Perfect Thermal Contact to VV
ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010 23
Stress in SS base drops significantly278=>150 MPa
ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010 24
Von Mises Stress at Lower Section with Perfect Thermal Contact to VV
Local stress concentrationat weld stillpersists
Von Mises Stress at Lower Section with Perfect Thermal Contact to VV
ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010 25
Only minor change inOuter fiber stressFrom bending of Unsupported tube
Stress Allowables and Acceptance Criteria
• Need to ensure compliance with Appendix D of the In-Vessel Component Criteria specifies the Stress Acceptance Criteria. Not there yet for
unsupported tubes and welds. MgO TBD
ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010 26
Calculated Stress in Fully SupportedSection (left)
Sm Endurance Limit (No Defects)
Conductor, Intermediate Strength CuCrZr
74 MPa 133 MPa 96 MPa
Conduit, 316LN 131 MPa 147 MPa 196 MPa
Support, 316LN 150 MPa 147 MPa 196 Mpa
MgO 163 MPa ?? ??
Ongoing Analyses
• Alternate Support Concepts need to be evaluated to reduce stresses– For Tee
– For Tubes
• Additional Load Cases need to be identified and run– Normal Operating Scenarios
– Disruption Scenarios
– Transient Response
• Characterization of MgO, which is in progress, needs to be folded into analyses– Material Properties
– Interface behavior with Cu Tube and SS Casing
ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010 27
Issues and Resolution Plan
Issue Resolution Pre/Post October
High Stresses in unsupported region of tubes
Design will need to provide additional supports while not over constraining and restrict thermal expansion
Pre
High Stresses in Welds Refine modeling and/or increase weld section. Solving above support of tubes may also relieve local stress
Pre
High Stresses in Base Support if poor thermal connection to VV while rigidly held
Need to ensure supports to VV provide adequate heat sinking.
Pre
Uncertainty in MgO properties and behavior
Characterization of MgO from testing underway needs to be folded into analysis
Pre?
28ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010