its program advisory committee meeting march 13, 2008
DESCRIPTION
ITS Program Advisory Committee Meeting March 13, 2008. Opening. Opening / Introductions Agenda Review / Committee Purpose. 2. Opening. Opening / Introductions Agenda Review / Committee Purpose. 3. Agenda Review. Opening / Introductions Agenda Review / Committee Purpose - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ITS Program Advisory Committee MeetingMarch 13, 2008
22
Opening
• Opening / Introductions• Agenda Review / Committee Purpose
33
Opening
• Opening / Introductions• Agenda Review / Committee Purpose
44
Agenda Review
• Opening / Introductions• Agenda Review / Committee Purpose• Remarks by Paul Brubaker, RITA Administrator• Review and Discussion of Advisory Committee Input From November 2007
Meeting• DOT-Wide Strategic Planning: Context and Details• Safe-Trip 21 • ITS JPO Strategic Planning Results• ITS JPO Proposed Mission, Goals, and Objectives• ITS JPO Proposed Objectives, Metrics, and Programmatic Possibilities• Small Group Report-out• Programmatic Roles: ITS JPO, Private Sector, Public Sector• Consolidation of Views and Recommendations• Adjourn
55
Committee Purpose
• Established pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), October 6, 1972; and the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), August 10, 2005– Provides advise to the Secretary on all matters relating to
the study, development, and implementation of ITS
– Through the ITS JPO, makes recommendations to the Secretary regarding ITS program needs, objectives, plans, approaches, contents, and progress
66
Committee Charter
• Scope and Objectives:– Function of advisory committee is advisory only– Committee is expected to:
• Provide input into development of ITS aspects of Surface Transportation Research and Technology Development Strategic Plan, and, specifically, into Five-Year ITS Program Plan updates
• Review, at least annually, areas of ITS research being considered for U.S. DOT funding to determine:
– Whether the activities are likely to advance either ITS state-of-the-practice or state-of-the-art
– Whether ITS technologies are likely to be deployed, and if not, to determine the barriers to deployment
– The appropriate roles for government and the private sector in investing in the research and technologies being considered
7
Committee Charter (cont)
• Duties: Will be responsive to specific assignments and may conduct studies, inquiries, and workshops as the Secretary may authorize or direct
• Duration: Will remain in existence 2 years from charter effective date. Secretary renewed charter in January 2008
• To Whom Committee Reports: To Secretary, through ITS JPO
• Sponsor and Support Agency:– ITS JPO is sponsor agency– ITS JPO designates Designated Federal Official (DFO) to
direct committee affairs and provide administrative support– DFO is Shelley Row, ITS JPO Director
88
Committee Charter (cont)
• Availability of Records: Records, reports, minutes, agenda, and other documents made available to or by the committee will be made available for public inspection and duplication in the ITS JPO Website, www.its.dot.gov
• Working Groups:– Chairman may establish working groups to perform specific
assignments with DFO approval– Chairman may designate members from either the committee or
the public to serve on working groups– Working group chairs will be committee members– Recording or videotaping of committee and working group
meetings may be performed only by DFO or designee– Committee recommendations to the Department must be
approved by committee as a whole
99
Agenda
• Opening / Introductions• Agenda Review / Committee Purpose• Remarks by Paul Brubaker, RITA Administrator• Review and Discussion of Advisory Committee Input From November 2007
Meeting• DOT-Wide Strategic Planning: Context and Details• Safe-Trip 21 • ITS JPO Strategic Planning Results• ITS JPO Proposed Mission, Goals, and Objectives• ITS JPO Proposed Objectives, Metrics, and Programmatic Possibilities• Small Group Report-out• Programmatic Roles: ITS JPO, Private Sector, Public Sector• Consolidation of Views and Recommendations• Adjourn
1010
Agenda
• Opening / Introductions• Agenda Review / Committee Purpose• Remarks by Paul Brubaker, RITA Administrator• Review and Discussion of Advisory Committee Input From November
2007 Meeting• DOT-Wide Strategic Planning: Context and Details• Safe-Trip 21 • ITS JPO Strategic Planning Results• ITS JPO Proposed Mission, Goals, and Objectives• ITS JPO Proposed Objectives, Metrics, and Programmatic Possibilities• Small Group Report-out• Programmatic Roles: ITS JPO, Private Sector, Public Sector• Consolidation of Views and Recommendations• Adjourn
1111
Agenda
• Opening / Introductions• Agenda Review / Committee Purpose• Remarks by Paul Brubaker, RITA Administrator• Review and Discussion of Advisory Committee Input From November 2007 Meeting• DOT-Wide Strategic Planning: Context and Details
– DOT Secretarial Goals– Commission Report– UTC Program– RD&T RPIC Efforts– Discussion plus Q&A
• Safe-Trip 21 • ITS JPO Strategic Planning Results• ITS JPO Proposed Mission, Goals, and Objectives• ITS JPO Proposed Objectives, Metrics, and Programmatic Possibilities• Small Group Report-out• Programmatic Roles: ITS JPO, Private Sector, Public Sector• Consolidation of Views and Recommendations• Adjourn
1212
Agenda
• Opening / Introductions• Agenda Review / Committee Purpose• Remarks by Paul Brubaker, RITA Administrator• Review and Discussion of Advisory Committee Input From November 2007 Meeting• DOT-Wide Strategic Planning: Context and Details
– DOT Secretarial Goals– Commission Report– UTC Program– RD&T RPIC Efforts– Discussion plus Q&A
• Safe-Trip 21 • ITS JPO Strategic Planning Results• ITS JPO Proposed Mission, Goals, and Objectives• ITS JPO Proposed Objectives, Metrics, and Programmatic Possibilities• Small Group Report-out• Programmatic Roles: ITS JPO, Private Sector, Public Sector• Consolidation of Views and Recommendations• Adjourn
13
DOT Secretarial Goals
• Improve Safety– Current rate: 1.47 fatalities / 100M vehicle-miles-traveled (VMT)– DOT Goal: Achieve 1.0 fatalities per 100M VMT
• Improve System Performance and Reliability– Congestion on highways, railways, airports and seaports is
reducing our nation’s productivity– Goal: Increase capacity and efficiency of transportation network
• Implement 21st Century Solutions– Traditional funding approaches no longer effective– Need to assess feasibility of innovative public-private partnerships
1414
Agenda
• Opening / Introductions• Agenda Review / Committee Purpose• Remarks by Paul Brubaker, RITA Administrator• Review and Discussion of Advisory Committee Input From November 2007 Meeting• DOT-Wide Strategic Planning: Context and Details
– DOT Secretarial Goals– Commission Report– UTC Program– RD&T RPIC Efforts– Discussion plus Q&A
• Safe-Trip 21 • ITS JPO Strategic Planning Results• ITS JPO Proposed Mission, Goals, and Objectives• ITS JPO Proposed Objectives, Metrics, and Programmatic Possibilities• Small Group Report-out• Programmatic Roles: ITS JPO, Private Sector, Public Sector• Consolidation of Views and Recommendations• Adjourn
1515
Agenda
• Opening / Introductions• Agenda Review / Committee Purpose• Remarks by Paul Brubaker, RITA Administrator• Review and Discussion of Advisory Committee Input From November 2007 Meeting• DOT-Wide Strategic Planning: Context and Details
– DOT Secretarial Goals– Commission Report– UTC Program– RD&T RPIC Efforts– Discussion plus Q&A
• Safe-Trip 21 • ITS JPO Strategic Planning Results• ITS JPO Proposed Mission, Goals, and Objectives• ITS JPO Proposed Objectives, Metrics, and Programmatic Possibilities• Small Group Report-out• Programmatic Roles: ITS JPO, Private Sector, Public Sector• Consolidation of Views and Recommendations• Adjourn
16
University Transportation Centers Program
ITS Advisory CommitteeMarch 13, 2008
Curtis J. Tompkins, PhDDirector, UTC Program
17
Advance U.S. technology and expertise in the many disciplines comprising transportation
through the mechanisms of education, research and technology transfer at
university-based centers of excellence.
Mission of the University Transportation Centers Program
18
Current University Transportation Centers
a. As provided for in SAFETEA-LUb. 60 Centers involving 120 universities
i. 20 chosen by merit-based competitive selection
1. 10 Regional UTCs2. 10 Tier I UTCs
ii. 40 named in legislation1. 10 National UTCs2. 22 Tier II UTCs3. 8 Title III UTCs
c. Title III UTCs do not have a matching fund requirement;
all others must have a 1-for-1 match
19
Opportunities for the ITS JPO to Be Involved with the UTC Program
1. Facilitate, collaboratively with the UTC Program, an ongoing ITS “community of interest” of UTCs doing (or potentially interested in doing) ITS work
2. Participate in the UTC Directors Summer meeting (June 25, in San Jose this year) and Winter meeting (at TRB in January)
3. Share information regularly with UTC directors about ITS JPO priorities, directions, etc
Use the UTC Program as a communication channel to inform UTC directors about ITS research opportunities outside of the UTC grant-sponsored work.
20
4. Have someone serve as liaison to the UTC Program, as FHWA and FTA currently do
5. Serve on UTC advisory committees and project selection committees
6. Review UTC strategic plans
7. Have UTC students serve as ITS interns
8. Have UTC faculty work with the ITS JPO during Sabbatical leaves
Opportunities for the ITS JPO to Be Involved with the UTC Program cont’d.
2121
Agenda
• Opening / Introductions• Agenda Review / Committee Purpose• Remarks by Paul Brubaker, RITA Administrator• Review and Discussion of Advisory Committee Input From November 2007 Meeting• DOT-Wide Strategic Planning: Context and Details
– DOT Secretarial Goals– Commission Report– UTC Program– RD&T RPIC Efforts– Discussion plus Q&A
• Safe-Trip 21 • ITS JPO Strategic Planning Results• ITS JPO Proposed Mission, Goals, and Objectives• ITS JPO Proposed Objectives, Metrics, and Programmatic Possibilities• Small Group Report-out• Programmatic Roles: ITS JPO, Private Sector, Public Sector• Consolidation of Views and Recommendations• Adjourn
Research Development & TechnologyStrategic Plan Update
Presented to the ITS-JPO Advisory CouncilMarch 13, 2008
Dr. Jan Brecht-Clark, RITA Associate Administrator for RD&T
23
Overview
RD&T Purpose is to Coordinate and Leverage DOT’s Research, Development & Technology Investments – roughly $1B per year.
To Accomplish This Mission, RD&T has Undertaken Three Major Activities Update DOT’s RD&T Strategic Plan to Set Long Term
Investment Direction Across Modes Develop & Implement the Research Planning, Investment &
Control (RPIC) Process for these Activities Develop & Deploy IT System to Support RPIC (R2NS)
24
At RITA’s Inception, RD&T and RITA Planning Team created a RD&T Strategic Plan for the Department.
The 2006 Plan Presents Cross-Cutting Views of Current DOT Activities Areas for Intermodal Cooperation
RD&T & Planning Team are Updating Plan to Outline & Identify A Road Map to Address the Long Term, Strategic Goals & Objectives of DOT-Funded Research. Release Date: Summer 2008
Strategic Plan Chronology
25
2008 Plan Vision & Strategies
Safe, Less Congested
Economically Competitive
Energy Independent
Environmentally Sustainable
Secure
Resilient
Transportation Vision 2030 Sets Direction for RD&T Activities so the Next Generation Will Have A System That Is:
Using these 6 Strategies, RDT & the Planning Team have identified the challenges & activities needed to produce Vision 2030 outcomes.
26
Strategic Collaboration
Congestion Mitigation
Human Factors
System Resilience/Global Logistics
Position, Navigation & Timing
Nanotechnology
Enhanced Safety Data
Transportation in an Aging Society
Energy Efficiency/Alternative Fuels
To promote collaboration, RD&T and the Planning Team created the Intermodal Research Working Groups identified in 2006 Plan
27
Strategic Collaboration
RDT is working with the University Transportation Centers and FAA Centers of Excellence to foster collaboration among these DOT-funded researchers and with Intermodal Working Groups.
RDT & National Transportation Libraries Will Be Working With Key External Stakeholders To Create Public Collaboration Sites Later This Year.
28
Strategic Plan Update
QUESTIONS?
29
RPIC Integrated Investment Management
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Pas
t Y
ear
(FY
200
7)
What activities are taking place during the current year with regard to last year's Plan, Budget, and R&D Portfolio?
Cur
rent
Yea
r(F
Y 2
008)
What activities are taking place during the current year with regard to current year's Plan, Budget, and R&D Portfolio?
Bud
get
Yea
r(F
Y 2
009)
What activities are taking place during the current year with regard to next year's Plan, Budget, and R&D Portfolio?
Bud
get
Yea
r +
1(F
Y 2
010)
What activities are taking place during the current year with regard to two year's out Plan, Budget, and R&D Portfolio?
Integrated Strategic Planning, Budgeting, and R&D Investment ManagementCurrent Fiscal Yr (FY 2008)
PostImplement.
Review
InvestmentPerformance
Oversight PortfolioPerformance
Evaluation
PortfolioDevelopment
ProposalSelection
InvestmentAnalysis
PortfolioDevelopment
PortfolioSelectionCriteriaDefined
Develop Annual Report to Congress
Reprogram to Adjust to Appropriations Revise and Reprogram Internal
President's Budget
Assess BudgetVariances; Closeout Report on Annual Performance
PortfolioDevelopment
Revise Annual Plan & Budgetbased on OMB Passback
CongressionalAppropriations
Develop Annual Plan
Formulate R&D Budget
SubmitPlan andBudget to
OMB
Screen/Score Select Control Evaluate Apply Lessons Learned
STAKEHOLDER REVIEW
ProposalSelection
InvestmentAnalysis
PortfolioDevelopment
PostImplement.
Review
InvestmentPerformance
Oversight PortfolioPerformance
Evaluation
PortfolioDevelopment
PostImplement.
Review
InvestmentPerformance
Oversight PortfolioPerformance
Evaluation
PortfolioDevelopment
30
DOT R&D Portfolio Mix
Operating Administration
Enacted FY2007 RD&T Budget
($000)
FAA $319,702
FHWA $512,657
FMCSA $12,098
FRA $58,344
FTA $75,536
NHTSA $91,698
OST $14,850
PHMSA $11,751
RITA $2,470
Total $1,099,106
Safety 44%
Congestion 49% Security 1%
Global Con 1%
Env Steward 4%Org Excell 1%
R&D 70%
Technology 28%
Facilities 2%
R&D Sub-Portfolios• Intermodal Policy & System Research• Safety Systems Management• Environmental Stewardship &
Energy Independence• Logistics & Transportation
• Physical Infrastructure• Comm, Navigation, and Surveillance• Human Factors Research & Applications• Intelligent Transportation Systems• Nanotechnology
3131
Agenda
• Opening / Introductions• Agenda Review / Committee Purpose• Remarks by Paul Brubaker, RITA Administrator• Review and Discussion of Advisory Committee Input From November 2007 Meeting• DOT-Wide Strategic Planning: Context and Details
– DOT Secretarial Goals– Commission Report– UTC Program– RD&T RPIC Efforts– Discussion plus Q&A
• Safe-Trip 21 • ITS JPO Strategic Planning Results• ITS JPO Proposed Mission, Goals, and Objectives• ITS JPO Proposed Objectives, Metrics, and Programmatic Possibilities• Small Group Report-out• Programmatic Roles: ITS JPO, Private Sector, Public Sector• Consolidation of Views and Recommendations• Adjourn
3232
Agenda
• Opening / Introductions• Agenda Review / Committee Purpose• Remarks by Paul Brubaker, RITA Administrator• Review and Discussion of Advisory Committee Input From November 2007
Meeting• DOT-Wide Strategic Planning: Context and Details• Safe-Trip 21 • ITS JPO Strategic Planning Results• ITS JPO Proposed Mission, Goals, and Objectives• ITS JPO Proposed Objectives, Metrics, and Programmatic Possibilities• Small Group Report-out• Programmatic Roles: ITS JPO, Private Sector, Public Sector• Consolidation of Views and Recommendations• Adjourn
SAFE TRIP-21
ITS Advisory Committee Overview
March 13, 2008
SAFE TRIP-21ITS Advisory Committee OverviewMarch 13, 2008
34
The Critical Need
United States in 2006:
2.6 million traffic crashes
42,000 fatalities
2.6 million injuries
$80 billion cost of urban traffic congestion*
4.2 billion hours of delay
2.9 billion gallons of wasted fuel
• *Texas Transportation Institute, 2007
35
SAFE TRIP-21 is a Vehicle Infrastructure Integration (VII) Program Initiative
36
SAFE TRIP-21 Fills the Gap While DSRC Deployment Challenges are Addressed
Infrastructure installation cost and responsibility
Operational authority, capability and maintenance responsibilities
Governance and privacy issues
Sustainable financing and business model
Active crash avoidance applications require extensive DSRC coverage to warrant vehicle equipage
37
SAFE TRIP Inspiration: SmartWay 2007
• SmartWay: Exhibition and operational test of second generation ITS in Japan
– 1,650 Exhibition attendees; 35 media outlets– Ongoing Tokyo field test; 60 vehicles
• Adds DSRC-enabled capabilities to existing ITS infrastructure:
– 163 TMCs; 2,800 cameras; 180,000 traffic sensors;
– Vehicle Information Communications System (VICS) with 33,000+ communications beacons; FM radio
• Builds upon installed base of ITS users:
– 21.6 Million ETC units; 71% of transactions overall– 28.3 Million navigation units; 19.6 Million VICS
• Motivated by distinctive Japanese conditions– Complex street addressing and navigation– Expressways built to lesser “parkway” standards– Serious motor vehicle crash rate 5X U.S– Vehicle density 10X U.S.; congestion / limited parking– $5.60 / gallon fuel; ~$0.40 / mile expressway tolls– Decreased interest in automobile ownership / use
among younger Japanese
38
SAFE TRIP-21: Purpose and Objectives
• Draw upon VII research and transition it into real-world use
• Assess near-term possibilities that don’t require extensive infrastructure
– Accelerate ITS benefits through “aftermarket” nomadic devices (quickly, cheaply)
– Exploit existing communications technologies as pathways to DSRC
• Validate public acceptance and benefits of integrated multi-modal deployment :
– Safety– Mobility (Road / Transit Travel Information) – Commercial vehicle operations– Electronic Payment
• Identify environmental / energy impacts
• Provide feedback to VII program plans and basis for deployment decisions
39
Near Term Trends and Opportunities
Navigation Devices• Strong growth in GPS consumer electronics• ~ 10% of vehicles now equipped, growing• Emerging 2-way communication capabilities
(cellular, WiFi) capabilities
Mobile Phones• Nearly ubiquitous; data / messaging services• GPS / location based services:
• Route planning• Parking location / availability• Real-time traffic and travel information
• Bluetooth / Wi-Fi / E-payment capabilities
Mobile Wi-Fi / WiMax on the horizon
40
SAFE TRIP-21 – Safety Applications
In-Vehicle Alerts / Static Information:
Advisories for sharp curves, railroad crossings, school zones, low clearance etc.
In-Vehicle Alerts / Dynamic Hazard Information:
Fixed Locations (icy bridge, wet curves, temporary speed reductions);
Transient Conditions (Work zones, Emergency vehicles, Congestion ahead; obstacles ahead, etc.)
Crash Avoidance:
Stop sign Violation Alert, Traffic / Pedestrian Alert, Incident Ahead Alert, etc.
41
SAFE TRIP-21– Mobility Applications
Information:
Real-time probe-based traffic / travel / weather conditions, Transit Connections and Schedules, Parking Information (Car Park, Transit Park and Ride, and Commercial Vehicle Parking)
Navigation: Congestion Information, Event-driven Routing, Route and Modal Diversion
Signal Interface: Transit Signal Priority
42
SAFE TRIP-21 – CVO / E-Payment
Commercial Vehicle ApplicationsReal time traffic information, Dynamic routing, Parking, Weather, Electronic safety inspection clearance systems, HAZMAT shipment monitoring.
E-Payment ApplicationsUnified Transit, Tolling, and Parking; and, possibly commercial services payment and/or congestion pricing.
43
SAFE TRIP Components
Information Gathering ITS America / industry representatives
Transportation and transit agencies
University Transportation Centers
VII research groups / sites
Request for Information
Field Test and Evaluation ITS World Congress Launch
Year-long test and evaluation
Interim findings throughout 2009
Summary Results - January 2010
Business Model Assessment
44
SAFE TRIP Activities / Milestones
2007-08 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008-10 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
Information Gathering Sharing
RFI
ITS World Congress
BAA Evaluation / Award
Test Bed Development
Integrate WC Exhibits
Test WC Exhibits
Develop Evaluation Protocol / Collect “Baseline” Data
Field Test and Evaluation
Field Test and Evaluation
Data Collection and Interim Findings Reports + Outreach and CommunicationsFinal Report
Outreach / Communications PlanOutreach / Communications Activities
Public Roads Article
Business Model AssessmentRFI Alternatives Analysis
4545
Agenda
• Opening / Introductions• Agenda Review / Committee Purpose• Remarks by Paul Brubaker, RITA Administrator• Review and Discussion of Advisory Committee Input From November 2007
Meeting• DOT-Wide Strategic Planning: Context and Details• Safe-Trip 21 • ITS JPO Strategic Planning Results• ITS JPO Proposed Mission, Goals, and Objectives• ITS JPO Proposed Objectives, Metrics, and Programmatic Possibilities• Small Group Report-out• Programmatic Roles: ITS JPO, Private Sector, Public Sector• Consolidation of Views and Recommendations• Adjourn
46
Briefing Outline
• Follow up from last meeting– ITS JPO Management and organization
• Strategic Planning Activity– Draft Mission
– Draft Goals and Focus Areas
– Other Activities
• Screening criteria
47
ITS Joint Program Office
• Programmatic oversight – RITA• HR, Legal, IT, Contracts, Budget - FHWA• Responsible for Strategic Leadership, Coordination, and
Oversight• 17 Person Staff – Very Senior and with Diverse Expertise
48
Current JPO Organization
Traveler Information (14)Traveler Information (14)
Communication &Communication &Outreach (15)Outreach (15)
Architecture/Architecture/Standards (14)Standards (14)
Evaluation (15)Evaluation (15)
Program Program ManagerManager
(SES)(SES)
Emergency Management (14)Emergency Management (14)
SecretarySecretary(9)(9)
Highway Safety (15)Highway Safety (15)
ManagingManagingDir.(15)Dir.(15)
Freight/CVO (14)Freight/CVO (14)
Transit (15)Transit (15)
Traffic Management (14/15)Traffic Management (14/15)
InitiativeInitiativeCoordinatorsCoordinators
Vehicle Safety (14/15)Vehicle Safety (14/15)
Vehicle-Infrastructure Tech.(15)Vehicle-Infrastructure Tech.(15)
Professional Professional Capacity Capacity
Building(15)Building(15)
Deployment Support Deployment Support CoordinatorsCoordinators
Program Program SupportSupport
Program Mgt.Program Mgt.Specialist (14)Specialist (14)
Fiscal Mgt. Fiscal Mgt. Specialist (14)Specialist (14)
49
Modal Administration Program Offices
• With JPO Leadership - Provides National Emphasis for the ITS Program
• Responsible for – Execution of ITS R&D Program
– Leadership for ITS Program
• Provide Technical Assistance to State and Local Governments
50
Management Structure
Advisory Advisory CommitteeCommittee
ITS JPOITS JPO
Strategic Strategic Planning Planning
GroupGroup
Modal Modal AdministrationAdministration
Program OfficesProgram Offices
Management Management CouncilCouncil
51
Internal Coordination
• ITS Management Council– Internal “Board of Directors”
– Chaired by RITA Administrator
– Includes all Modal Administrators
• ITS Strategic Planning Group– Internal Management Coordination
– Chaired by JPO Director
– Includes senior managers for all modes
52
• ITS Research Program
–R&D Initiatives
–Technology Transfer
Overview of Current ITS Program
5353
Overview of Current ITS Program (cont)
• ITS major research initiatives are centerpiece of ITS Program
• Focus on innovative combinations of technologies to solve critical transportation problems related to safety, mobility, and global connectivity
• Consistent with Congressional goals, purposes, and research objectives outlined in SAFETEA-LU and also with U.S. DOT goals of:– Safety– Congestion reduction– Productivity/global connectivity
5454
Overview of Current ITS Program (cont)
• Each initiative is: – Partnership that includes:
• U.S. DOT Modal Administrations
• Private-sector organizations
• State and local transportation agencies
• Professional associations
• Other public-sector interests
– Oriented to focus on fewer, larger, higher-risk, high-payoff “major initiatives”
• Nine major initiatives were approved by the Management Council• Congestion Initiative & Rural Safety were added this year
55
Major Initiatives
Rural SafetyRural Safety
Integrated Vehicle-Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety SystemsBased Safety Systems
Cooperative Cooperative Intersection Intersection
Collision Avoidance Collision Avoidance Systems Systems
Next Generation 911Next Generation 911
SafetySafety
Congestion InitiativeCongestion Initiative
Integrated CorridorIntegrated CorridorManagement SystemsManagement Systems
Mobility Services for Mobility Services for All AmericansAll Americans
Clarus Clarus
Emergency Emergency TransportationTransportation
OperationsOperations
MobilityMobility
Universal ElectronicUniversal ElectronicFreight ManifestFreight Manifest
Global ConnectivityGlobal Connectivity
Crosscutting:Crosscutting:
Vehicle InfrastructureVehicle InfrastructureIntegrationIntegration
56
Technology Transfer
• Information Dissemination
• Professional Capacity Building
• Architecture & Standards – National ITS Architecture Version 6.0– 105 ITS standards
• 88 published• 13 in final process • 4 in development
• Benefits & Costs, Lessons Learned, Deployment Statistics
57
ITS Strategic Planning Process
• Trends– Interview ITS Advisory Committee members– Interview USDOT modal staff– JPO staff input
• End state visioning• Opportunities• Barriers• Draft mission, goals and focus areas• Gathering input
58
Mission & Goal Areas
• JPO’s mission is to lead the creation & demonstration of intelligent technology solutions to achieve the safest & best performing surface transportation system in the world.
• Goal Areas– Safety– Mobility– Environment– 21st Century Institutions, Innovations, and
Partnerships
59
Goal: Safety
Focus:• Networked/Intelligent Vehicle – Create capability for all
vehicles to have 360 degree awareness of hazards, and communicate appropriately with drivers to prevent crashes
Achieve measurable reduction in crashes, injuries, fatalities, and
the associated economic costs
Challenge: Reduce 90% of all crashes, injuries, and fatalities by
2029
60
Goal: Mobility
Focus:
• Realize complete transportation system visibility– Real time data on all roads, all modes, all the time
• To enable performance measurement across the transportation system
• To catalyze the development of applications to optimize network performance
• To enable delivery of end-to-end transportation information for trip planning (personal & business)
Achieve measurable improvements in mobility, system performance, and
economic productivity through research & demonstration of ITS technology
61
Goal: Mobility
Focus:
• Integrated electronic payment systems• Enable seamless payment processing
• Provide complete trip payment
• Integrate parking, transit, congestion pricing, tolling
Achieve measurable improvements in mobility, system performance, and
economic productivity through research & demonstration of ITS
technology
62
Goal: Environment/Energy
Focus:• Conduct research to understand relationship between
technology-enabled congestion reduction & safety improvement with environmental impacts (carbon footprint & fuel efficiency)
Achieve improvement in air quality and reductions in fuel consumption
Challenge: Reduce fuel consumption and carbon emissions by 40% by 2029
63
Goal: 21st Century Institutions, Innovations, and Partnerships
Focus:• Research new public-private partnerships to improve
the deployment and use of ITS technologies in transportation
• Examine innovative financing models to foster use of ITS technologies in transportation
• Identify and research solutions to address institutional barriers in the use of ITS technologies in transportation
Foster new institutional relationships to accelerate use of technologies in
transportation
64
ITS Joint Program Office Roles
Federal roles can range from:• Science• Basic R&D• Applied R&D• Technology Transfer to commercialization• Operational Demonstration• Deployment
Appropriate roles will vary based on focus area
Roles are under discussion & development
65
Other Activities:• Look to the next generation technology solutions• Leverage worldwide research• Support the basics
– Architecture
– Standards
– Professional Capacity Building
– Information Clearinghouse
ITS Strategic Plan
66
Criteria – (Handout)
• Criteria developed by JPO staff• Used to assess relevance of goals & focus areas• Provided for your consideration & use
6767
Agenda
• Opening / Introductions• Agenda Review / Committee Purpose• Remarks by Paul Brubaker, RITA Administrator• Review and Discussion of Advisory Committee Input From November 2007
Meeting• DOT-Wide Strategic Planning: Context and Details• Safe-Trip 21 • ITS JPO Strategic Planning Results• ITS JPO Proposed Mission, Goals, and Objectives• ITS JPO Proposed Objectives, Metrics, and Programmatic Possibilities• Small Group Report-out• Programmatic Roles: ITS JPO, Private Sector, Public Sector• Consolidation of Views and Recommendations• Adjourn
6868
Agenda
• Opening / Introductions• Agenda Review / Committee Purpose• Remarks by Paul Brubaker, RITA Administrator• Review and Discussion of Advisory Committee Input From November 2007
Meeting• DOT-Wide Strategic Planning: Context and Details• Safe-Trip 21 • ITS JPO Strategic Planning Results• ITS JPO Proposed Mission, Goals, and Objectives• ITS JPO Proposed Objectives, Metrics, and Programmatic Possibilities• Small Group Report-out• Programmatic Roles: ITS JPO, Private Sector, Public Sector• Consolidation of Views and Recommendations• Adjourn
6969
Agenda
• Opening / Introductions• Agenda Review / Committee Purpose• Remarks by Paul Brubaker, RITA Administrator• Review and Discussion of Advisory Committee Input From November 2007
Meeting• DOT-Wide Strategic Planning: Context and Details• Safe-Trip 21 • ITS JPO Strategic Planning Results• ITS JPO Proposed Mission, Goals, and Objectives• ITS JPO Proposed Objectives, Metrics, and Programmatic Possibilities• Small Group Report-out• Programmatic Roles: ITS JPO, Private Sector, Public Sector• Consolidation of Views and Recommendations• Adjourn
7070
Agenda
• Opening / Introductions• Agenda Review / Committee Purpose• Remarks by Paul Brubaker, RITA Administrator• Review and Discussion of Advisory Committee Input From November 2007
Meeting• DOT-Wide Strategic Planning: Context and Details• Safe-Trip 21 • ITS JPO Strategic Planning Results• ITS JPO Proposed Mission, Goals, and Objectives• ITS JPO Proposed Objectives, Metrics, and Programmatic Possibilities• Small Group Report-out• Programmatic Roles: ITS JPO, Private Sector, Public Sector• Consolidation of Views and Recommendations• Adjourn
7171
Agenda
• Opening / Introductions• Agenda Review / Committee Purpose• Remarks by Paul Brubaker, RITA Administrator• Review and Discussion of Advisory Committee Input From November 2007
Meeting• DOT-Wide Strategic Planning: Context and Details• Safe-Trip 21 • ITS JPO Strategic Planning Results• ITS JPO Proposed Mission, Goals, and Objectives• ITS JPO Proposed Objectives, Metrics, and Programmatic Possibilities• Small Group Report-out• Programmatic Roles: ITS JPO, Private Sector, Public Sector• Consolidation of Views and Recommendations• Adjourn
7272
Agenda
• Opening / Introductions• Agenda Review / Committee Purpose• Remarks by Paul Brubaker, RITA Administrator• Review and Discussion of Advisory Committee Input From November 2007
Meeting• DOT-Wide Strategic Planning: Context and Details• Safe-Trip 21 • ITS JPO Strategic Planning Results• ITS JPO Proposed Mission, Goals, and Objectives• ITS JPO Proposed Objectives, Metrics, and Programmatic Possibilities• Small Group Report-out• Programmatic Roles: ITS JPO, Private Sector, Public Sector• Consolidation of Views and Recommendations• Adjourn