jacklyn conley- thermobaric weapons: they will blow your mind
TRANSCRIPT
8092 C8
University of Pittsburgh April 5, 2008
EIGHTH ANNUAL FRESHMAN CONFERENCE 1
THERMOBARIC WEAPONS: THEY WILL BLOW YOUR MIND Jacklyn Conley ([email protected]) and Evan McMillin ([email protected])
Abstract - Since the 1960’s, thermobaric bombs have been
constantly evolving to be specially designed in cave warfare,
air-to-ground missiles, and are alternatives to nuclear
warheads. Thermobaric bombs work by spreading out
certain materials in the air and igniting them to create a
high-energy explosion. Explosions caused by thermobaric
bombs are most effective in enclosed areas such as buildings
and caves because they have a unique ability to wind around
corners and through tunnels. Thermobaric usage has
drastically increased over the last two decades due to the
current locations of United States military conflict in the
Middle East. This paper discusses the chemical structure
and reactions involved in the creation and detonation of
thermobaric bombs and also the use of different materials
and their effects on the explosion. Also a comparison to
other explosives will be made to show how thermobaric
weapons are more effective than conventional weapons.
Chemical engineers are at the forefront of modifying
thermobaric weapons to be more sustainable and to
encompass a larger range of uses. This will make them a
mainstay for military use in the future. Current development
includes shoulder launch rockets and 40-mm grenades that
are suitable for hand-held launches. These significant
developments allow this technology to be used on a much
smaller scale but still be extremely effective.
Key Words-Thermobaric, Fuel-Air, Explosives, Pressure
wave
HISTORY
Since the beginning of time, war has been an inevitable part
of human behavior, and unfortunately “...there are roughly
50 wars being fought somewhere on the planet at any given
time…” [1]. Since war is inevitable, it is then imperative that
the most effective and destructive weapons are created to
eliminate the enemy and protect our soldiers. Thermobaric
weapons developed out of vapor cloud explosions that are
naturally occurring in industries and grain silos. On average,
100 grain explosions occur every 10 years, half of which
involve corn. Nearly every organic material can ignite in the
form of a dust cloud below 500°C. One lit match in the
workplace is sufficient to cause a vapor cloud explosion.
The explosion due to these vapor clouds is nearly identical
to the third part of the detonation in thermobaric weapons.
Many systems have been designed to eliminate this
phenomenon from the workspace as it results in losses of
production and injuries. However, the United States took
these concepts and designed a new type of explosive from it.
Thermobaric weapons have been used by the United
States since the 1960‟s [2]. They were first used in the
Vietnam War to destroy tunnels, clear forest areas for
helicopters, and to clear minefields. Also during this time,
the Soviet Union developed a branch of the thermobaric
weapon called FAE (Fuel Air Explosives) which was used
against the Chinese in 1969. The development of these
weapons has drastically increased over the past two decades
and has become specially designed to have significant
effects compared to conventional weapons. In 2002,
thermobaric weapons have found a new place in the United
States military. The BLU-118/B, an air dropped
thermobaric bomb, was used against Al Qaida and Taliban
forces in Afghanistan. In 2003, a shoulder mounted launch,
called the SMAW-NE, was used in the invasion of Iraq.
One team of marines reported that from 100 yards away the
SMAW-NE was able to effectively destroy a large masonry
type building with only one round [3].
WHAT ARE THERMOBARIC WEAPONS?
Thermobarics are weapons that, at detonation, produce
extremely high heats and pressures from their detonation.
They differ from many conventional weapons because they
do not carry an oxidizer, a compound that supplies oxygen
atoms to a reaction. The thermobaric instead uses the oxygen
in the air to create an explosion which ignites a fuel, usually
a metallic fuel like aluminum, which is spread out in the air
by the bomb. The burning of this metallic fuel is slow
compared to other explosives but produces a high heat
reaction, which in turn creates a destructive pressure wave.
This pressure wave has the ability to collapse walls, wind
around corners and cause internal injuries to its human
victims. To cause these devastating effects, however, the
correct detonation needs to take place [3].
Structures
In order to work effectively there are three parts to the
detonation of a thermobaric weapon. An initial detonation
of CH-6, a small booster charge, provides the heat needed to
start the anaerobic detonation which is a reduction/oxidation
reaction. A reduction/oxidation reaction is the transfer of
electrons between reactants in a reaction. An anaerobic
reaction does not require oxygen and only takes
microseconds to create extremely high pressure within a
small area that has the ability to penetrate armor [4]. During
this reaction, aluminum particles are heated; when they
reach their ignition temperature (950 K or 677°C) the
particles start a chemical reaction with the surrounding water
vapor, carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide. Different sizes
of aluminum particles are ideal because it allows for
multiple reactions to occur. If all the aluminum particles
used are the same size there are two possible outcomes. The
temperature of the gas drops and never ignites the particles
8092 C8
University of Pittsburgh April 5, 2008
EIGHTH ANNUAL FRESHMAN CONFERENCE 2
leaving a nonproductive explosion, or all pieces are ignited
at the same time and the reaction happens too quickly. If it
happens too quickly, the detonation process would stop at
this stage and not have maximum destructive effects. Initial
encasement of the reactants decreases the speed at which the
products expand and will also convert the energy generated
into the thrusting of case fragments. The decreased
expansion rate helps to heat the aluminum particles. The
kinetic energy used to move the reactants is instead used to
displace the casing around the explosive. Without the casing
the reaction would spread out and eventually dissipate and
never reach its full explosive potential [5]. The case must
also be thin enough to maximize the amount of energy
devoted to the next stage of the detonation.
The second stage, the post anaerobic detonation, takes
hundreds of microseconds and is the combustion of the fuel
particles that were too large to be ignited in the first reaction.
The hydrogen generated during the water vapor and
aluminum reaction, carbon generated during the carbon
dioxide, carbon monoxide and aluminum reaction, and the
remaining aluminum particles fuel the progress of this
second reaction [5]. As the products expand a fireball is
created and an intermediate pressure wave erupts which has
the ability to breach walls and bunkers.
The final part of the detonation is the combustion of fuel-
rich species and usually only occurs in enclosed areas and is
considered to be an aerobic reaction. Equation (1) shows the
combustion reaction of aluminum, a common reactant used
in the third part of the detonation.
4Al+3O2 2Al2O3 (1)
ΔH= -1669.8 kJ
The shock wave produced from this reaction bounces off
the surrounding structures and mixes the fuel-rich species
with the surrounding air. The reflected shock wave keeps
the temperature of the air and fireball constant and can even
increase it in certain areas. The shock wave also causes a
change in the flow of the fireball, allowing for more air to be
mixed with the aluminum and therefore causing more
reactions. The increase in the number of reactions creates a
greater impulse, a higher heat, and a larger explosion. When
the fuel rich species mix with the shock-heated air they
undergo “after-burning.” “The energy released through after-
burning and combustion lengthens the duration of blast
overpressure and increases the fireball” [6].
For the aluminum to completely combust, three to six
pounds of air are required for every one pound of aluminum
present. The volume must also expand to 4000 times its
initial volume. The pressure wave is measured to be ten
atm, enough to collapse lungs, blow out eardrums and cause
other internal injuries. The heat and impulse from the
reaction gives the weapon the ability to destroy personnel
and equipment [6].
Optimal Materials
Optimal materials are necessary for the detonation of a
thermobaric weapon to have the greatest destructive effects.
Aluminum is one of the most commonly used materials in
thermobaric weapons. Compared to a conventional
explosive made out of expensive materials created in labs,
aluminum is used in the thermobaric weapon because it is
cost effective and therefore more sustainable. However
other metals may be used in the third stage of the detonation,
including boron, silicon, titanium, magnesium, zirconium,
carbon, and hydrocarbons. Each produces a different
quantity of heat per volume. Aluminum is not only cost
effective but comes second to boron in the amount of heat it
produces per volume of material (Heat Combustion) as seen
in Table I.
TABLE 1 HEAT COMBUSTION FOR FUEL ADDITIVES [4]
Fuel Additive Heat Combustion (cal/cc)
Boron 33,100
Aluminum 20,410
Titanium 19,130
Zirconium 18,390
Silicon 17,720
Carbon 13,820
Magnesium 10,530
Hydrocarbons 9,000
There are many advantages for using these materials. They
have low sensitivity, which means they will not react in their
natural state, and are ideal for explosives that must only
explode when desired. Another advantage is that the output
of the explosion can be modified. The materials can be
tailored to produce a high blast or a high heat explosion.
Effects of Pressure Wave
The most significant characteristic of a thermobaric weapon
is its pressure wave. There are many qualities that make the
pressure waves both significant and unique. Humans and
mechanical devices cannot withstand a pressure wave
exceeding ten atm. The pressure wave interacts with the
tissues in a human body which includes skin, bone, and
muscle, which differ in density and elasticity. When a
pressure wave makes contact with these tissues, they are
“compressed, stretched, sheared or disintegrated by
overload” [6]. This pressure wave also dramatically affects
hollow internal organs such as the lungs, intestines, and ears
by collapsing and rupturing them. In addition to tissue and
organ damage, the body is prone to fractures by being
thrown from the blast. [R]esearch has shown that there are
neurological, biochemical and blood chemistry changes
caused by blast effects” [6].
As mentioned earlier, not only will the pressure wave
cause many internal organ injuries within a human but they
8092 C8
University of Pittsburgh April 5, 2008
EIGHTH ANNUAL FRESHMAN CONFERENCE 3
also will result in major devastation of mechanical devices.
When equipment and systems are destroyed, the facility they
are located in can also be destroyed or down graded. This
results in what is called a functional kill. “Depending on the
purpose of the facility and the level of damage, a functional
kill can be as permanent as a structural kill,” which means
the fortification and its equipment are no longer useable [7].
The ability to wind around corners, and blow out specific
floors in a building is another characteristic of the pressure
wave. A study showed that a thermobaric weapon has the
ability to blow out only one floor of a building with multiple
floors [7]. As mentioned earlier, the thermobaric pressure
wave bounces off the surrounding structures to remix in air
with the reactions products to prolong the blast effects.
Since it deflects off of the surrounding structures; it does not
destroy them and leaves the building still standing but
everything inside destroyed. With increasing conflict in the
Middle East, these weapons have been used more often in
tunnels and multi-room buildings in urban locations. The
destructive effects can be calculated using (2).
D= (1/3) (CnE) (2)
In (2), D is the distance in meters to a 1 psi overpressure. C
is a constant for the damages inflicted by a 1 psi
overpressure and is approximately equal to 0.15. The
variable n is the yield factor for the thermobaric explosion
and is derived from the mechanical yield of combustion.
This value is approximated to be 0.1. Lastly, E is the
energy, in joules, given off by the explosive part of a
thermobaric weapon. This equation is only an estimate of the
thermobaric weapons destructive abilities and is usually an
underestimate.
USES IN THE MILITARY
The United States military began using thermobaric weapons
in the mid 1960‟s in the conflict against Vietnam. These
early versions were called fuel-air explosives and were used
to clear obstacles such as trees, mines, and beach defenses.
After the Vietnam War, the Navy and Army developed
smaller and smaller bombs which saw use in Operation
Desert Storm. The Army was finally able to get the warhead
of their thermobaric weapons down to one explosive part.
Before this development, thermobaric bombs were released
in subsections that each had their own ignition system. This
breakthrough, along with America‟s new theatres of war in
Afghanistan and Iraq led to the production of small arms and
missile variants such as the xm1060 and AGM114-N. These
two theaters are different from any major conflict that
America has been in since World War II because a fair
amount of the fighting involved is indoors. In Afghanistan,
the main warfare is against forces operating from caves in
the northern mountain regions and from militants in the
cities patrolled by the U.N. Coalition. The fighting in Iraq
sees the use of thermobarics in clearing houses converted
into bunkers by insurgents. Another potential use of
thermobaric weapons is to defeat biological and chemical
weapons. American intelligence before the war in Iraq
indicated that chemical weapons were present, thus leading
to the development of weapons to safely remove these
threats.
The future is bright for thermobaric weapons in the
American arsenal. Currently, there are projects focusing on
making hand grenades and flash-bang grenades. The hand
grenades have the potential to be more deadly in enclosed
spaces than traditional hand grenades. Flash-bang grenades
are designed to temporarily blind and impair hearing ability.
The thermobaric flash-bang is designed to be safer to both
the user and the target. Due to the thermobaric explosive
contained inside of it, the grenade can be tailored to produce
a lower but effective blast. Since the reaction lasts longer,
the blinding effects have a longer duration. The lighting
effect is approximately 100 times brighter than the sun
viewed from the earth for 0.06 seconds. Due to the lower
blast, the overpressure wave is also lower, causing less
permanent damage to the surroundings.
The xm1060
The xm1060 is a 40mm grenade designed to be fired from
either an M203 or the new M32 grenade launcher. The
M203 is a single shot grenade launcher mounted on the
bottom of an infantryman‟s rifle. The M32 is a support
weapon that holds six rounds and is used to pin down the
enemy by providing accurate shelling. This round is
designed to be a replacement for the High Explosive (HE)
rounds [9].
The thermobaric rounds are more effective at injuring and
incapacitating infantry than the high explosive rounds.
Thermobaric rounds cover the entire blast radius equally
causing damage that decreases radially from the center of the
blast.
The rounds were designed, tested, and manufactured in
only five months. They are being used in Afghanistan and
Iraq mainly for clearing out buildings and caves because of
the increased blast damage due to afterburning in enclosed
areas. This is the smallest thermobaric weapon in use today
and before testing, it was not certain how effective a small
thermobaric weapon would be [9].
A new round called Direct Air Consuming Ordnance
(DRACO) is being tested. DRACO will replace the xm1060
as the 40mm thermobaric grenade used by the Army. The
xm1060 was manufactured in only five months because the
HE and xm1060 grenade and similar, differing only in the
explosive. DRACO will contain a new fuse and a smaller
casing designed to maximize the effects of the weapon [9].
SMAW-NE
The SMAW-NE, which stands for Shoulder Mounted
Assault Weapon-Novel Explosive, is a weapon designed for
Marine Corps use in Afghanistan and Iraq. The weapon fires
8092 C8
University of Pittsburgh April 5, 2008
EIGHTH ANNUAL FRESHMAN CONFERENCE 4
an unguided rocket containing a thermobaric warhead.
There are a multitude of rounds used in the SMAW for
different purposes. Novel Explosive is the term used for the
thermobaric warhead in this case. The other two rounds used
in the SMAW are High Explosive Dual Mode (HEDM) and
High Explosive Anti Armor (HEAA). The HEDM is used to
penetrate soft targets such as concrete walls or light armor.
The HEAA is designed to penetrate hard targets such as
tanks or reinforce infantry fighting vehicles. The NE is not
designed for penetration like the other types, but is instead
designed to destroy targets using the pressure wave created
by the thermobarics.
The round‟s first use is the demolition of one and two
story buildings that have been turned into enemy pillboxes,
which are bunkers above the ground. One report from Iraq
says "one unit disintegrated a large one-story masonry type
building with one round from 100 meters” [3]. Since the
weapon was introduced in early 2003, it has become a
mainstay for clearing out houses believed to contain hostile
forces of both the Marine Corps and the Army, who has to
borrow the weapon from the Marines. The only downside
found to this weapon is that it must be fired through a hole
due to its lack of penetrating power. The Marine Corps
Gazette says:
"Due to the lack of penetrating power of the NE round, we
found that our assault men had to first fire a dual-purpose
rocket in order to create a hole in the wall or building. This
blast was immediately followed by an NE round that would
incinerate the target or literally level the structure"[3].
The second use of the Novel Explosive round is to clear out
caves in the mountainous regions of Afghanistan. The
thermobaric round is ideal for the clearing of caves due to
both the pressure wave it creates and the fact that it uses the
oxygen in the atmosphere as fuel. The pressure wave
bounces off the walls in the cave and bounces around
corners to injure or kill all of the cave‟s occupants. The lack
of oxygen created after the explosion suffocates any
survivors of the pressure wave. This weapon has the
potential to save American soldiers lives by keeping them
outside of a cave because they effectively clear it out [3].
AGM-114N
“Early in 2002, Headquarters U.S. Marine Corps (HQMC)
identified the need for an enhanced Hellfire missile warhead
to attack multi-room structure targets” [9]. An experienced
team of scientists, engineers and military experts at the
Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division developed this
new type of hellfire missile called the AGM-114N. The
AGM-114N is an air-to-ground missile (AGM) and
considered a Metal Augmented Charge (MAC) Thermobaric
warhead. The MAC is a main component of this weapon
that has increased the effectiveness against enclosed targets
drastically. This weapon has roots in earlier AGM‟s. The
AGM-114N has “same electronic safe, arms/fire device used
in the AGM-114M,” which is a fragmentation missile, and
has the “same guidance and control section and propulsion
section used in the AGM-114K,” which is an anti-armor
missile [10]. The new addition in the AGM-114N is a
warhead section that is designed for an enhanced blast
performance by containing a new warhead casing.
As previously discussed, one of the most effective
components of all thermobaric weapons is the pressure
wave. In the AGM-114N, the pressure wave is more
sustained and destructive compared to conventional weapons
whose waves have a sharp pressure spike followed by a
rapid decay. The blast created is very effective against non-
traditional targets such as tunnels, bunkers and multi-room
structures expected in urban locations. This hellfire missile
is specially designed to only destroy the first floor of a
building leaving the others completely intact [11]. Its ability
to wind around corners allows the blast to propagate
throughout buildings and tunnels to extend its lethal effects.
FIGURE 1 HELICOPTER FIRING THE AGM-114M [11].
BLU-118/B
The BLU-118/B (Bomb Live Unit) is yet another type of
thermobaric weapon that has unique and destructive
abilities. The BLU-118/B is composed of an “advanced
thermobaric explosive that, when detonated, generates
higher sustained blast pressure in confined spaces such as
tunnels and underground facilities” [12].
Soon after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, a
team of military and industry experts was organized to
identify, test, and field an enhanced weapon to counter
underground targets. A group of explosive experts, led by
Nguyet Anh Duong a chemical engineer, at the Naval
Surface Weapons Center created a device that provided
superior blast effects. The group then performed static
testing on the fuse to show that the initiation of this new
explosive was reliable. The weapon was finished in only
three short months when the GBU-24 (which is a laser
guided weapon) containing the BLU-118/B warhead was
launched by a ground-attack aircraft called the F-15E. The
explosion created showed improvements in overpressure and
pressure-impulse in tunnels compared to an earlier model
(BLU-109). The significant difference is the use of a FMU
(Fuel Munitions Unit) to initiate the explosion. When
detonated in enclosed spaces the result is lethal. This
weapon can be dropped from an airplane with the guidance
of a laser. When dropped vertically it can detonate at or just
8092 C8
University of Pittsburgh April 5, 2008
EIGHTH ANNUAL FRESHMAN CONFERENCE 5
outside of an entrance way. A vertical drop is used to
penetrate, overburden, and detonate inside the opening. This
approach penetrates doorways at a maximum distance. It is
ideal to penetrate an opening into a tunnel because the result
is the detonation occurring within the tunnel system. These
detonations within a tunnel are known to increase the
propagation in a facility significantly. The more the blast
propagates, the easier it becomes to travel through
intersections, rooms, and multiple levels. In areas where the
United States is now in conflict the ability for the BLU-
118/B to penetrate deep into the ground, through concrete
barriers and then igniting everything inside is imperative.
The BLU-118/B, after being created and tested within six
months, was used by the United States on Taliban and Al
Qaeda forces that had fled to the caves 90 miles south of
Kabul in Operation Enduring Freedom in 2002 [12].
GBU-43/B
The GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB) is
currently the largest nonnuclear weapon in the United States
arsenal. The weapon was nicknamed the Mother of All
Bombs by soldiers and the press. The MOAB contains
18,700 pounds of warhead consisting of Cyclotrimethylene
trinitramine (RDX), aluminum particles, and trinitrotoluene
(TNT). It can currently only be dropped by the C-130
aircraft as it is too large to fit in a bomber‟s bay. This
weapon was designed to replace the BLU-82, a Vietnam era
bomb. The GBU-43/B has more power using less explosives
and its destructive radius is 150 meters from the center of the
explosion. The MOAB is used to destroy bunkers, soft
armored vehicles and personnel. The detonation of this
explosive device is massive enough to level an apartment
building. Other uses of the weapon include clearing landing
zones for helicopters, clearing mine fields, and clearing
beach fortifications and obstacles. The weapon is guided via
GPS on the aircraft and has pinpoint accuracy. More
importantly than the physiological damage the weapon can
cause to the enemy, its psychological damage to the morale
of the enemy is essential. It can keep the enemy pinned
inside of trenches and bunkers for fear of being hit by this
massive thermobaric weapon [13].
Agent Defeat Weapons
Agent Defeat Weapons (ADW) has been upgraded since the
attacks on September 11, 2001. These weapons are specially
designed to eliminate chemical and biological agents.
Conventional weapons would not be effective against the
facilities that house these harmful agents because it could
result in these agents spreading to nearby areas that civilians
occupy. This would also cause significant damage to the
surrounding environment. Both the AGM-114N and the
BLU-118/B have been integrated into the agent defeat
weapons. The thermobaric component is vital because the
blast effects can be tailored to have higher heats and longer
durations. The thermobaric uses high-temperature
incendiaries against the chemicals in a facility without
letting any escape. The ADW‟s “effectiveness is measured
by how many people it doesn‟t kill-while it destroys
stockpiles of horror weapons” [14].
Multiple programs have been set up and are designed to
neutralize enemy chemical and biological assets. HTI (High
temperature incendiary) is used to ignite the chemical
agents, and munitions in place. Research is currently
developing an Inter-Halogen Oxidizer weapon that will use
incineration techniques to defeat and destroy chemical and
biological agents within the blast radius. Fragmentation
explosives may be used to penetrate chemical containers
without creating a large explosion. The large explosion
could potentially cause the agents to be blown outside of the
facility. Even air-delivered weapons have been considered.
These weapons are still currently being developed and air-
delivered weapons are at the forefront of this new
technology [14].
COMPARISONS AND SUSTAINABILITY
Thermobaric weapons are very unique compared to
conventional weapons because they not only produce an
effective blast and pressure wave but also are considered to
be more sustainable. For a weapon to be considered
sustainable it must have lower costs, lower environmental
impact or decrease the mortality rate of United States
soldiers. Thermobaric weapons encompass all of these
aspects when compared to conventional weapons.
When compared to conventional explosives, thermobaric
weapons contain cost effective materials such as aluminum
where conventional weapon materials are created in labs and
are made up of expensive compounds. Having cost effective
materials allows more weapons to be created for the same
amount of money.
Conventional high explosives are sensitive to mechanical
or thermal energy. Insensitive high explosives, like the
thermobaric, require significant stimuli before any reaction
can occur. A unique quality of insensitive explosives is that
detonation will not occur if they are incinerated, or struck by
a bullet or fragment. This is significant because the weapon
will not detonate unless the correct stimulus is applied and
will fulfill their performance and operational requirements
only on demand. This also decreases the amount of deaths
due to “friendly fire” or accidental explosions. Even though
the time it takes for the reactions to occur are longer in
thermobarics than in conventional weapons, they are able to
potentially produce significant damage because of the
quantity of energy released. As seen in Figure 2, a
comparison between thermobaric explosives and high
explosives is made. Even though the peak pressure is higher
for the High Explosive (HE), compared to the Thermobaric
Explosive (TBE), the pressure dissipates more quickly.
8092 C8
University of Pittsburgh April 5, 2008
EIGHTH ANNUAL FRESHMAN CONFERENCE 6
FIGURE 2 PRESSURE HISTORY OF HIGH EXPLOSIVE (HE) AND
THERMOBARIC EXPLOSIVE (TBE) DETONATIONS [6]
“Thermobaric weapons are explosives optimized to produce
heat and pressure effects instead of armor-penetrating or
fragmentation damage effects” [6]. However, thermobarics
are able to outperform conventional weapons that are
effective against armored vehicles but lack effectiveness
against buildings, bunkers, and fortifications. A shaped
charge is one of these conventional weapons. Its blast has a
narrow damage radius and travels linearly, compared to the
Thermobaric waves that can wind through tunnels.
Fragments from conventional weapons are stopped by tunnel
and cave walls and do not propagate throughout the facility.
“Conventional countermeasures such as barriers (sandbags)
and personnel armor are not effective against thermobaric
weaponry” [6].
When compared to nuclear weapons, the interval at
which overpressure takes place gives the thermobaric
weapon an advantage and allows the explosives to be useful
against bunkers, minefields, and armored vehicles. In
addition, persons outside of the blast radius but deep in a
tunnel will experience internal damage and suffocation due
to the pressure wave and high heats that are produced.
Being better for the environment is a surprising, positive
aspect of the thermobaric. “As they do not radiate any
radioactive material and do not contaminate the
environment, they therefore, have an edge over nuclear and
conventional bombs” [15]. Thermobarics also have a higher
energy density compared to conventional weapons. “For
example, whereas TNT yields 4.2 MJ/kg, hydrogen produces
120 MJ/kg” [16].
When compared to fragmentation grenades, thermobaric
grenades have a better chance of destroying their intended
target. Thermobaric grenades, like the xm1060, cause a
pressure wave that has equal potential at all points, meaning
that everything in its blast radius will be affected from the
blast. The fragmentation grenades are not as efficient
because the shrapnel produced does not strike everything in
its blast radius. High energy rounds used in conventional
fragmentation grenades use their explosion to create
shrapnel from the shell casing and the environment that
travels slightly below the speed of sound and has the same
effects on the body as a bullet would. The spread of shrapnel
in the explosion is inconsistent, which means there are gaps
where no damage is done to the target.
SUMMARY
Without the expertise of chemical engineers like Nguyet
Anh Duong, thermobaric weapons would not be as
successful as they are today. Nguyet has led the
development of ten high performing explosives since 2001
and has left her mark in the future of modern day weapons.
The thermobaric weapon has many significant abilities that
make them superior to other conventional weapons. The
effects of the thermobaric pressure wave and its ability to
wind through tunnels is perhaps one of the most important
aspects of a thermobaric weapon. The high heats created
from the detonation have the ability to incinerate chemical
and biological agents, which is imperative when facing
weapons of mass destruction and ensure that innocent
civilians are not affected. Being a non-sensitive material,
thermobaric weapons are therefore, more safe to transport
and will not detonate randomly. Thermobaric weapons
have raised the bar for modern weapons to become safer for
the environment and also become more effective.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to first thank our Co-Chair Mike for our fun
meetings and for ripping our paper apart and giving us good
feedback. Thank you to Rob for giving up your time to be
the chair of our conference, we greatly appreciate it! Also,
we would like to thank John, the EMT, for helping us to
procrastinate on writing this. And of course we would like to
thank our moms and dads for birthing us and persuading us
to pursue a career in engineering. And finally to the writing
center for reading and editing this paper.
REFERENCES
[1] “Thermobaric weapons under fire again.” 22, November
2005. Gizmag.com
http://www.gizmag.com/go/4856/ Accessed: 2008,
February 10.
[2] “Fuel/Air Explosives (FAE).” FAS Military Analysis
Network. 15 February 1998. Fas.org
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/dumb/fae.htm
Accessed: 2008, February 25.
[3] Hambling, David. Marines Quiet about Brutal New
Weapon. 14 November 2005. Military.com
8092 C8
University of Pittsburgh April 5, 2008
EIGHTH ANNUAL FRESHMAN CONFERENCE 7
http://www.defensetech.org/archives/001944.html
Accessed: 2008, February 10.
[4] Ludwig, Chris. 2003. “Verifying Performance of
Thermobaric Materials” Defense Technical
Information Center
http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2003gun/lud.pdf
Accessed: 12, January 2008.
[5] Kim, Kibong. “Effects of Particle Damage during
Detonation of Thermobarics on Subsequent
Reactions.” 21st ICDERS. 23-27 July 2007.
Poitiers, France.
[6] Wildegger-Geissmaier, Anna E. April 2003. “Aspects
of Thermobaric Weaponry” ADF Health. Vol. 4
(3-6).
[7] Pike, John. “Thermobaric Explosives” 2005.
GlobalSecurity.org
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/mu
nitions/thermobaric.htm Accessed: 12, January
2008.
[8] Hambling, David. “Defense Tech: Kinder, Gentler
Thermobarics” DefenseTech.org August 2006.
http://www.defensetech.org/archives/002621.html
Accessed: 29 February, 2008.
[9] Mistry, Percy. “Multipurpose Cartridges Developed and
Fielded in Record Time.” August 2003. RDECOM
Magazine. Vol. 1
[10] “AGM-114N Metal Augmented Charge (MAC) Hellfire
Missile” DTRA Fact Sheets. July 2007.
http://www.dtra.mil/newsservices/fact_sheets/displ
ay.cfm?fs=agm114n Accessed: February 29, 2008.
[11] Pike, John. “AGM-114N Metal Augmented Charge
(MAC) Thermobaric Hellfire” 2005.
GlobalSecurity.org
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/mu
nitions/agm-114n.htm Accessed: 12, January 2008.
[12] Pike, John. “BLU-118/B Thermobaric Weapon” 2005.
GlobalSecurity.org
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/mu
nitions/blu-118.htmAccessed: 12, January 2008.
[13] Pike, John. “BLU GBU-43/B „Mother Of All Bombs‟
MOAB - Massive Ordnance Air Blast Bomb”
2005. GlobalSecurity.org
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/mu
nitions/moab.htm Accessed: 12, January 2008.
[14] Schneider, Barry R. “VIII. Solving the challenge of
targeting WMD assets: Thermobaric (TB) and
Agent Defense Mechanisms (AWDs)” In the
Counterproliferation Papers Future Warfare Series
No. 22. Counterforce Targeting Capabilities and
Challenges, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama:
USAF Counterproliferation Center Air University.
pp.24-25.
[15] Singh, Dr. Paul. “Saying goodbye to nuclear bombs.”
The Tribune. 23 November 2007. Chandigarh,
India.
[16] Elert, Glenn. “Chemical Potential Energy”. The Physics
Hypertextbook. 2008.
http://hypertextbook.com/physics/ Accessed: 2008,
March 29.