james w. marshall elementary school - scusd
TRANSCRIPT
cluster with security fencing and play area. The kitchen is adequate but with some barrier free circulation and restroom issues. The multi-purpose room is also adequate but without stage and storage for tables and chairs. The administration office and nurse's room are small for the needs and without sufficient storage.
Paving within the campus common area is concrete with some minor path of travel issues. The paved outdoor activity area is adequate and in fairly good condition. The play fields are also in fairly good condition although flat withsome drainage problems. The site is well lighted, allowing for some evening use.
Based on the opportunities, facility conditions and code issues identified in this report, James Marshall Elementary School appears to be in generally good condition. The school should be suitable for further modernization especially for the fields and Multi-Purpose Building.
Narrative SummaryThe site is approximately 8 acres in an area of fully developed suburban neighborhoods and is adequate for an elementary school serving 405 students. James Marshall was redeveloped in 2000 with recently modernized portable classrooms and significant site upgrades. The administration and multi-purpose building, originally built in 1976 was substantially modernized at that time.
There is ample parking for staff and visitors with good access to and from Goethe Road. Both bus and parent drop off however, is along the school entry walk in the main parking lot with circulation through the lot. There is no designated barrier free drop off space and the lack of properly constructed curb ramps at the drives to and from the parking lots and within the lots create path of travel issues that need correcting. Upgrades are also needed to separate parking and drop off.
26 of the 33 classrooms plus the library and teacher's lounge are clustered around a looped core. 7 classrooms including pre-school and kindergarten are in a separate
Campus Entry
Goethe Road
James W. Marshall Elementary School
James W. Marshall Elementary School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
School Mission Statement
‘Student Centered Education’
Site Plan of Campus
School Location Legend
JMES-I
•Ensuring that teaching is effective and engaging to all students.•Ensuring the delivery of standards based instruction is differentiated to meet the needs of every student.•Empowering students to make good decisions and create a safe environment through clear, consistent, school-wide expectations.•Engaging the community in a variety of activities to reinforce a better understanding of our shared responsibility.
Sustainable Sites Outdoor ActivityPoor surface condition and drainage poses safetyrisk and limits use of facilities.
Sustainable Sites Campus CoreNon-compliant barrier free surfaces exist. This space does not promote educational and informal gathering opportunities.
Sustainable Sites School Entry/Drop Off Parking conflicts with drop off. Barrier free drop ff space is needed.
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
Utility (Water) Efficiency Exterior Aged and inefficient irrigation system and controls need replacement.
Energy & AtmosphereOld and inefficient equipment and managementSystems are at the end of their useful life.
Materials & Resources ExteriorInadequate roof slopes and drains create roof problems.
Indoor Environmental Quality Insufficient and inadequate storage impairs barrierFree access.
James W. Marshall Elementary School
Water Efficiency InteriorLeaking and inefficient fixtures need replacement.
Materials & Resources InteriorNon-compliant code issues need correcting.
JMES-II
High Performance Transformation
Encourage innovation in high performance school design creating safe, motivating and sustainable learning environments that reduce dependence on non-sustainable resources.
Create safe, barrier free outdoor learning environments incorporating efficient and effective storm water management, landscaping, lighting and surfaces.
Improve the efficiency of fixtures, appliances and irrigation systems to reduce domestic water usage.
Optimize energy efficiency and performance to minimize environmental impacts and reduce operating costs associated with fossil fuels.
Improve the learning environment and extend the life-cycle of facilities while encouraging the use of efficient sustainable materials and reducing waste.
Enhance air quality, thermal comfort, natural light, acoustic performance and physical environments while reducing pollutants. Provide a safe, healthy, functional environment to help motivate students and encourage attendance.
James W. Marshall Elementary School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012Site Plan – Concept Study
JMES-III
‘Student Centered Education’The following is a site organizational concept of James W. Marshall Elementary School to implement the Strategic Plan 2010-2014: Putting Children First and the Common Core Standards.
SAFE & WELCOMING SCHOOLDedicated Drop-Off
Visitor/Staff Parking
Garden/Quad/Outdoor Learning
CAREER & COLLEGE READYCore Academic Pathway Transformation
Kindergarten (K)Elementary; Lower 1-3, Upper 4-6
Project Lab Transformation (2,880 sf)Project Labs (PL) Art/Science
Support Support Spaces – distributed
FAMILY & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENTTechnology Center (TC) Transformation (4,279 sf)
Media Center & Computer LabParent Center & Conference RoomTeacher Planning CenterNote: Transformation of (E) MP
Multi-Purpose (MP) Expansion (7,536 sf)Dining / Gym / Assembly / Stage Restrooms / Kitchen / Storage
ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATIONClassroom Conversion / Expansion (0 sf)
Portable to Permanent and CR Expansion to meet optimized Campus Capacity Goals of 522 – 672 students. No additional classrooms required
PL
TC
MP
MP
TC
Admin
PL
Goethe Road
James W. Marshall Elementary School
JMES-IV
James W. Marshall Elementary School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master PlanJune 2012
School Site Facility(s) Needs The following list was provided by the school’s principal which was generated from school site council and community meetings:
CHPS SummaryCollaborative for High Performance Schools
Supports the idea that “a well-designed facility can truly enhance performance and make education more enjoyable and rewarding…and a productive learning experience.”
In accordance with the Green and Grid Neutral Model Schools Policy Initiative-BP 3511and Resolution No. 2583; Adopting the Collaborative for High Performing Schools (CHPS) Criteria, the following summary characterizes how the Schools align with the Best Practices Criteria.
SUMMARY by Eligible ActualCHPS Categories Points Points
Leadership, Education & Innovation 13 1
Sustainable Sites 14 4 Water Efficiency 9 0 Energy & Atmosphere 29 1 Climate 10 0 Materials & Resources 18 2 Indoor Environmental
Quality 23/25 2
TOTAL 118 10
Under CHPS CHPS HighPerforming Minimum Performing
0 10 25 118 PointsJMES
- Size of the classrooms are too small to hold 30+ students
- Multipurpose Room needs to be bigger to accommodate all students and more activities
- Lack of shade/cover for rain
- Front office area (for parents) is too small, often not enough room to get in the door
- More restrooms needed by the playground
- Additional Play Structure
- Need watering options for garden
- Repair sinkholes in the playground
- Library/Computer Lab
Indoor Environmental Quality
- Electrical Systems- Lighting Systems- Technology Systems- Low Voltage Systems
Energy & Atmosphere- Central Plant- HVAC Systems- Specialty Systems- Alternative Energy Systems
Sustainable Sites- School Entry & Drop-off
- Parking & Drives- Service Access- Outdoor Activity- Campus Core - Utilities & Infrastructure
Water Efficiency- Site Utilities &Infrastructure
- Plumbing Systems- Specialty Systems- Fire Protection Systems
Campus Assessment SummaryMaterials & Resources- Signage - Door Hardware- Interior Space- Exterior Finish
Leadership, Education & Innovation
- Career & College Ready- Family & Community Engagement- Organizational Transformation
Assessment TotalCost Summary reflects Total Project Cost Estimate, inclusive of Construction Cost and Soft Cost
Cod
e, L
ife S
afet
y &
Acc
ess
Mai
nten
ance
&
Ope
ratio
ns
High
Per
form
ance
Tr
ansf
orm
atio
n
Project Cost Summary Matrix
Schools as Teaching Tools
$ 154,960
$ 24,440
$ 0
$ 102,570
$ 32,890
$ 0
$ 314,860
$ 60,190
$ 7,020
$ 12,740
$ 367,250
$ 499,460
$ 0
$ 946,660
$ 811,200
$ 109,850
$ 100,360
$ 1,432,340
$ 462,150
$6,399,640
$9,315,540
$ 1,026,350
$ 141,310
$ 113,100
$ 1,902,160
$ 994,500
$6,399,640
$10,577,060
Sust
aina
ble
Cat
egor
y To
tal